The cost of being: A full-time student, part-time nanny flatting in Wellington
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a 20-year-old second-year university student explains her approach to spending and saving.
Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.
Gender: Female.
Age: 20.
Ethnicity: NZ European.
Role: I'm a full-time second year student at Vic uni, also working part time as a nanny.
Salary/income/assets: I earn around $320 per week from work and also receive the student allowance of $200ish per week.
My living location is: Suburban.
Rent/mortgage per week: I live in a five-bed flat, $1,200 per week – I'm in the smallest room so I pay $204.
Student loan or other debt payments per week: Not currently paying anything off my student loan or other loans .
Typical weekly food costs
Groceries: We all cook our own meals due to dietary requirements, but I'm lucky enough to eat at work four nights a week. Food is the thing I splurge on most as I value healthy, often organic food. It costs a bit, but the markets are great for fresh produce. It can range from $80-$100 per week including toiletries and any extras.
Eating out: Around $25, I get takeaways once a week and the odd dinner out with friends or my boyfriend. 1154 is one of our favourites – a great pasta place on Cuba Street. We like the $12 weeknight meals.
Takeaways: Included in eating out.
Workday lunches: I buy lunch at uni a few days a week, $30.
Cafe coffees/snacks: I do love a good coffee or matcha but have been making them at home recently. On a splurge week I'll spend around $30… sounds a lot when you write it down! I love a vanilla shot which is usually an extra 60 to 90 cents.
Other food costs: Iron supplements, which is around $40 a month.
Savings: I have a $1,000 emergency fund and recently had a $1,000 car fund which just got spent on my yearly insurance and mechanic. I have around $10,000 in Kiwisaver and investments on Sharesies and Invest Now.
I worry about money: Sometimes.
Three words to describe my financial situation: Grateful, blessed, stressed.
My biggest edible indulgence would be: Big on the drinks! Supreme coffee grinds for my at-home machine, matcha powder or Pukka tea.
In a typical week my alcohol expenditure would be: $6 – usually buy some drinks or a wine once a month.
In a typical week my transport expenditure would be: I drive into uni as I head straight to pick the kids up after my lectures, I spend around $70 on petrol per week.
I estimate in the past year the ballpark amount I spent on my personal clothing (including sleepwear and underwear) was: $800.
My most expensive clothing in the past year was: Bought a 21st dress recently for $120 I got on sale from Ownley (down from $200) and also a quilted jacket for the Welly winters which was around $160.
My last pair of shoes cost: New Balance 480s, which were around $160.
My grooming/beauty expenditure in a year is about: Found this amazing skincare made on Great Barrier Island called Aotea which hits the wallet, and I buy a couple makeup items per year, but apart from that I get at-home haircuts.
My exercise expenditure in a year is about: I love to surf so mostly the free outdoor gym, I pay a $7 weekly membership to City Fitness (that I don't use, but locked in for a year). I love the climbing gym which I spend around $20-$60 per week on depending how much I go.
My last Friday night cost: $55, paid for a gig for a friend and me.
Most regrettable purchase in the last 12 months was: Gym membership.
Most indulgent purchase (that I don't regret) in the last 12 months was: $120 skincare.
One area where I'm a bit of a tightwad is: Clothes and shoes I put off buying.
Five words to describe my financial personality would be: Saver, quality spender, investor.
I grew up in a house where money was: Tight. Just my mum and me, who struggled to keep up with the bills. I always had what I needed but the stress of going into our family debt seeped in.
The last time my Eftpos card was declined was: Taking my two cats to the vet!
In five years, in financial terms, I see myself: I would love to save up a deposit for a tiny house by then, have an emergency fund of $5,000 and continue my investments. Having a small travel fund started in preparation for a world trip is also a goal.
Describe your financial low: Ran out of leave, off work for two weeks sick with a rent increase coming up was stressful. I've found having an emergency fund a lifesaver, if you can even contribute a few dollars a week – when you need it, it can take a load off.
I would love to have more money for: More than two-ply toilet paper.
I give money away to: I'm grateful to be in a position to sponsor two beautiful kids through Tearfund, I also donate to Hagar International – an organisation working with women survivors of trafficking and modern slavery.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
30 minutes ago
- Scoop
Manawatū Tararua Highway Should Open As A Toll Road
The opening of Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway is a significant milestone for the lower North Island, with safety and travel times both set to improve. However, the decision not to toll the route is disappointing, says Infrastructure New Zealand. 'Not tolling the Manawatū Tararua Highway is a missed opportunity to help fund the ongoing maintenance and future resilience of this critical transport route through a 'user pays' approach,' says Chief Executive Nick Leggett. 'Tolling a new highway isn't about penalising the users of that road or the communities in the area. It's about being honest about the ongoing costs required to ensure the responsible management of the asset and ensuring that those who benefit from the road are making a direct contribution to its delivery and maintenance.' 'New Zealand's problem is that nobody thinks about maintaining a new road when it's nice and new, other than those who are responsible for building it. Those people don't control the money, though.' 'New infrastructure such as the Manawatū Tararua Highway comes with significant ongoing costs. Choosing not to use tolling doesn't make those costs disappear, it simply shifts the burden onto all New Zealand road users, including those who will never use the road,' Leggett says. 'If we want high-quality, modern infrastructure that is well maintained and resilient, we need to be smarter in how we manage and fund it. Having an annual amount of money generated from the road, means that New Zealanders can transparently follow that the money goes back into maintaining the road which generates it.' 'Tolling is one of the few tools we have that can directly link use with funding. It also helps protect the sustainability of the National Land Transport Fund so further investments can be made in critical transport projects into the future.' 'We need to be more inventive with how we fund and maintain infrastructure. Nothing should get off the ground without pricing road usage properly,' Leggett says. 'If New Zealand wants better infrastructure, it's going to need to do things differently at every stage of design, build and operations. That includes funding through tolls.'
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Should I contribute to KiwiSaver or pay mortgage faster? Ask Susan
The short answer is it depends. Photo: RNZ I was wondering, is it better to invest more in your KiwiSaver or into your mortgage? We are lucky and have a little bit of extra cash every pay, so we have been making additional mortgage repayments. With the upcoming changes to KiwiSaver, we won't be able to continue to do this if we don't opt out. What is the better option? My thinking is the lower the mortgage, the less interest we pay, which would see us better off in the long term. Fisher Funds Kiwisaver general manager David Boyle says he has received questions like this over the years and the answer is: "it depends". "It's hard to know, without knowing the total financial position and how long they've got until they retire," he said. "Paying more off your mortgage and contributing to KiwiSaver are both smart choices, if you find yourself with a bit of money leftover before payday. "To help with this here are some things they should consider if they keep paying a bit more off the mortgage." It's probably worth talking to a financial adviser about this. If you opt to focus on paying your mortgage faster, you might need a plan to get you on track for retirement, once that loan is gone. The increase to contributions of 4 percent is stepped over the next couple of years. Are you likely to receive a pay rise over that period that will help you continue paying a bit off your mortgage, as well as contribute a bit more? You also have the option to temporarily lower your contribution rate back to 3 percent if you want. I am the epitome of being a victim of the government's totally unfair direct deduction policy. I should have started receiving my richly deserved superannuation when I qualified for it 9.5 years ago and the Winter Energy Payments seven years ago when they began. Consequently, over $300,000 has been stolen from me and I live in abject poverty as a result. I am a dual citizen from America. I have lived here 19.5 years, so on what legal basis has the government for denying the WEPs? Its written explanation is that it would be difficult to administer to NZ seniors not currently receiving a government benefit such as superannuation. That is mind boggling and I hope you see fit to write about this outrageous treatment of nearly 100,000 Kiwi seniors. Sorry, yes, I've checked with the ministry and it confirms that people who are not getting NZ Super because of an overseas pension cannot get the Winter Energy Payment. Generally, if your NZ Super entitlement has been eliminated by your overseas pension, it's because what you receive from overseas is more than the NZ Super payment. Send your questions to Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
17 hours ago
- 1News
Call to rethink tax on KiwiSaver
KiwiSaver members could be significantly better off if New Zealand adopted a taxation model similar to Australia's, an economist says. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub ran some numbers modelling a system similar to Australia's, where contributions and returns are taxed at 15%. In New Zealand, full tax is paid on income contributed to KiwiSaver, and returns in PIE schemes taxed at an investor's prescribed investor rate up to 28%. Eaqub said an "average" KiwiSaver investor starting now could end up $60,000 better off in nominal terms at retirement on a model similar to Australia's. If tax was not paid on contributions or returns, they could be about $1 million better off - and if only taxes on returns were removed the gain would be about $300,000. "In Australia, the context is there's some conversation about whether the tax breaks are too generous for richer people. It's not that it's perfect but the point is in other countries it's heavily incentivised for people to save in their private pension." ADVERTISEMENT But it was not in New Zealand. Kirk Hope, chief executive of the Financial Services Council, which represents KiwiSaver providers, said the Australian model was different because that country has a means-tested pension. "The tax break that occurs in New Zealand occurs when you retire, when you get national super... that is the equivalent of about $500,000. So I think it's hard to do a comparative analysis without acknowledging that there are significant differences between the schemes and what they are trying to achieve." Winter's here, supermarket spying, and TikTok's new feature. (Source: 1News) But he said if the tax on savings for New Zealanders was reduced it would give future governments more "fiscal options" in relation to superannuation. He said New Zealand previously had a system that was EET — or exempt, exempt, taxed, where contributions were tax-exempt, exempt from tax within the scheme and then fully taxed when withdrawn. The Tax Working Group in 2018 acknowledged that the change from that system had potentially created incentives for New Zealanders to direct savings into investments like houses instead. ADVERTISEMENT Hope said it would be expensive to adjust back to EET but there could be other changes that would be more affordable. The tax working group estimated that ignoring behavioural changes, it would cost $200m to $300m a year to move to a system where returns and withdrawals were not taxed, and $2.5b a year to move to an EET system. "The higher initial cost for an EET regime arises from the fact that there will be a substantial deferral period before significant amounts are withdrawn from the scheme, and thus taxed under the third 't'. Although these are very different initial costs, the costs will be the same in the long run on a net present value basis." Hope said providing different forms of tax incentives would be beneficial for savers. He said removing or reducing the employer contribution tax would be particularly useful for low-income people. Kernel Wealth founder Dean Anderson said New Zealand was one of the few countries operating a TTE — taxed contributions, taxed returns and exempt withdrawal — model. "Our future savings would be much better off under an EET approach, where we don't pay tax on the way in but on the way out. ADVERTISEMENT "With low savings rates in NZ, the government should be exploring everything in its powers to grow savings rates, which benefits NZ and Kiwis over the long term. "But it's not a surprise. The recent meek KiwiSaver policy announcement did all the hard work to announce a positive gradual increase to KiwiSaver contributions, yet they fell short by announcing a three-year policy rather than outlining a decade plus long policy of incremental KiwiSaver increases." Ana-Marie Lockyer, chief executive at Pie Funds, said KiwiSaver members were at a disadvantage compared to Australians because there was no upfront tax incentive or concession as in Australia to encourage them to contribute more. "Maybe consideration of a mid-tier flat tax rate on savings up to a certain amount would encourage savings." She said employer contributions were also taxed so investors lost the benefits of compounding, and investors paid tax on bonds and deemed dividends on global equities so they were effectively paying a capital gains tax. "So contrary to the government's stated goal of helping New Zealanders' grow their KiwiSaver balances, these factors mean New Zealanders have less incentives to make voluntary contributions and pay more tax on investment earnings, resulting in smaller balances at retirement relative to our Australian friends."
