Court allows govt appeal in Armed Forces pension adjustment case
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has allowed the appeal by the government and three others to overturn a High Court ruling that favoured 50 retired Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) personnel in a pension adjustment dispute.
In a unanimous decision on Wednesday (June 4), the three-member panel chaired by Justice Datuk Hashim Hamzah ruled that the military personnel failed to prove that the government, prime minister, defence minister and MAF Council had breached provisions under the Federal Constitution.
"We find there is merit in the defendants' appeal that warranted appellate intervention,' said Justice Hashim, who sat with Justices Datuk Wong Kian Kheong and Datuk Ismail Brahim.
ALSO READ: May 6 decision on govt's appeal against Armed Forces pension adjustment
The judge said the defendants cannot be said to have breached Article 147 of the Federal Constitution as they had not placed the plaintiffs in a less favourable position.
The court allowed the appeal with no orders as to legal costs.
Justice Wong, who wrote a supporting judgment, said two documents namely "Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Pindaan Syarat-Syarat Perkhidmatan ATM" dated Jan 17, 2013, and "Surat Pelaksanaan Kesetaraan Pangkat dan Penambahbaikan Jadual Gaji Minimum Maksimum bagi Perkhidmatan ATM di bawah SSM" dated March 14, 2013, were not on salary adjustment but amendments to the terms of service for serving members of the MAF.
He said that the objective was to improve the salary scheme for serving members and not to discriminate against retirees who left service before Jan 1, 2013.
Wong also said there was no unequal treatment between pensioners who retired before and those who retired after Jan 1, 2013, as pension adjustments were not made for retirees after that date that year.
ALSO READ: Khaled: We will wait for court's decision on pension
On Feb 5 last year, the High Court ruled that all military personnel who retired before Jan 1, 2013, are entitled to have their pensions adjusted to the rates and methods applied to the retirees who retired after that date.
The 50 personnel of various ranks filed an originating summons in the High Court on Nov 17, 2022, seeking a declaration that the government had violated provisions in the Constitution read together with Section 187 of the MAF Act 1972 for their respective failures to implement new pension adjustments for those who retired before Jan 1, 2013.
They claimed that the government's failures to implement the pension adjustments had caused a significant pension gap between the MAF retirees who retired before Jan 1 and those who retired after Jan 1, 2013.
In Wednesday's proceedings, Federal Counsel M. Kogilambigai appeared for the government while lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla represented the retired personnel.
After the court proceeding, Haniff Khatri told reporters that he would study the court's grounds of judgment before deciding whether or not to bring the matter to the Federal Court. – Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Wrongly deported Salvadoran migrant arrested on return to US
WASHINGTON: The Salvadoran migrant at the heart of a row over President Donald Trump's hardline deportation policies was returned to the United States on Friday and arrested on human smuggling charges, officials said. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was brought back to the United States from El Salvador and immediately arrested on charges of trafficking undocumented migrants into the country, Attorney General Pam Bondi said. 'Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice,' Bondi said at a press conference. The US Supreme Court had ordered the Trump administration to 'facilitate' the return of Abrego Garcia after he was mistakenly deported in March to a notorious maximum security prison in El Salvador. But Bondi insisted to reporters that his return to the United States resulted from an arrest warrant presented to the Salvadoran authorities. 'We're grateful to (Salvadoran) President (Nayib) Bukele for agreeing to return him to our country to face these very serious charges,' she said. In a post on X, Bukele said 'we work with the Trump administration, and if they request the return of a gang member to face charges, of course we wouldn't refuse.' White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson said Abrego Garcia's return 'has nothing to do with his original deportation.' 'There was no mistake,' Jackson said on X. 'He's returning because a new investigation has revealed crimes SO HEINOUS, committed in the US, that only the American Justice System could hold him fully accountable.' Abrego Garcia, 29, was living in the eastern state of Maryland until he became one of more than 200 people sent to a prison in El Salvador as part of Trump's crackdown on undocumented migrants. Most of the migrants who were summarily deported were alleged members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, which the Trump administration has declared a foreign terrorist organization. - 'Administrative error' - Justice Department lawyers later admitted that Abrego Garcia -- who is married to a US citizen -- was wrongly deported due to an 'administrative error.' Abrego Garcia had been living in the United States under protected legal status since 2019, when a judge ruled he should not be deported because he could be harmed in his home country. Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia had 'played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring' and was a smuggler of 'children and women' as well as members of the Salvadoran gang MS-13. 'This defendant trafficked firearms and narcotics throughout our country on multiple occasions,' she said. Bondi said that Abrego Garcia, who was indicted by a grand jury in Tennessee, would be returned to El Salvador upon completion of any prison sentence. Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen visited Abrego Garcia in April at the prison where he was being held in El Salvador and welcomed his return to the United States. 'For months the Trump Administration flouted the Supreme Court and our Constitution,' the senator from Maryland said in a statement. 'Today, they appear to have finally relented to our demands for compliance with court orders and with the due process rights afforded to everyone in the United States,' he said. 'The Administration will now have to make its case in the court of law, as it should have all along.' According to the indictment, Abrego Garcia was involved in smuggling undocumented migrants from Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras and other countries into the United States between 2016 and earlier this year.
Free Malaysia Today
11 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Appeals court to hear Anwar's interim stay to suspend trial on Tuesday
On Wednesday, Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's application to refer eight questions to the Federal Court as they failed to cross the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. (Bernama pic) PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal will hear Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's application for an interim stay of the trial of a civil suit filed by a former research assistant on Tuesday, pending the outcome of an appeal. Lawyer K Rajasegaran, who appeared for Anwar, said the date was fixed following case management before a court deputy registrar this afternoon. Rajasegaran said the court also fixed July 21 to hear a permanent stay application of the trial until the outcome of Anwar's appeal to set aside the High Court's refusal to refer eight legal questions arising from the suit. Anwar had wanted the Federal Court to determine whether a sitting prime minister could be given protection from 'frivolous and politically motivated' suits while holding office. In the stay application filed yesterday by Messrs Zain Megat & Murad, the solicitors said there existed special circumstances to suspend the assault suit scheduled to begin in the High Court on June 16. They said the appeal to refer the legal questions to the Federal Court would be nugatory if the trial proceeded. 'The adjournment in the High Court is of utmost importance and is necessary to preserve the principles of justice, equality and constitutional integrity,' they said. They said the postponement would allow for complex and high-impact constitutional questions to be properly determined and interpreted. On Wednesday, Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Anwar's reference application, when it ruled that all eight questions posed failed to cross the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964. She said none of the articles cited in the Federal Constitution, as argued by Anwar's lawyers, gave rise to any real, substantial and justiciable questions of law that require a determination by the apex court. Roz Mawar had ordered for the trial of Yusoff Rawther's suit to begin at 9am on June 16 as scheduled. The prime minister wanted the apex court to rule whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from a suit filed by Yusoff four years ago. The suit relates to events which allegedly took place before Anwar took office on Nov 24, 2022. Yusoff, a grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018. He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court. Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit.
New Straits Times
13 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: When commuting is a walk in the park
UNLESS people live off the grid, they would want homes near basic conveniences. With access to government services, supermarkets, schools and clinics, people also prefer living near bus or taxi terminals or commuter train stations for easy travel to the city. Residential areas near such transportation hubs have been fortunate to have infrastructure built around them. In the future, the plan is to reverse this: the National Transport Policy 2019–2030 (NTP) states that new housing projects will be developed on or near public transport stations. This concept, exemplified by the Kota Madani housing project, offers residences for low-income groups seeking a sustainable and organised urban lifestyle. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, in introducing the concept, said it might require changes to existing regulations, as such housing projects promote broader use of the public transport system. Anwar's announcement is timely, as public transport usage stands at only 20 per cent nationwide, significantly below the 40 per cent target set in the NTP. The challenge, said Transport Minister Anthony Loke, is ensuring that the NTP achieves its goals. Anwar's initiative marks a significant step toward addressing low public transport usage. Building homes near transit stations could help resolve this issue. Still, as Loke said, the challenges are entrenched. Low public transport usage stems from inconvenient routes, unreliable service, frequent delays, poor last-mile connectivity, and the social perception of car ownership as a status symbol. Since the mid-1980s, Malaysia's push into industrialisation spurred domestic car production, making private vehicle ownership easy, affordable and widespread. The obsession with cars is exemplified by the six million vehicles entering Kuala Lumpur daily, 2.2 million during peak hours. For public transport to succeed — like Hong Kong's MTR or Singapore's MRT — the government must make tough policy decisions to reduce driving and incentivise bus and train usage. One approach would be to impose a congestion charge for city entry to encourage greater use of buses and trains. Other than limited parking, the measure most hated by motorists is paying to enter the city. Inconsistent schedules, Delays and overcrowding — though frustrating — are issues of management and efficiency, not infrastructure failure. The same applies to poor last-mile connectivity, inadequate waiting areas, and substandard bus infrastructure. In short, there must be a competent system — or artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solutions — to manage scheduling and operations. As for those living off-grid or in remote areas, an AI-enabled e-hailing service could offer a practical mobility solution. Balancing these complex factors — improving public transport while managing urban traffic congestion — remains the ultimate challenge.
