Continued Israeli Incursions in South Lebanon: A Bid to Create New Realities on the Ground
The latest incidents have unfolded in the Marjayoun district and around the Wadi Hunin area, where Israeli military vehicles advanced more than 800 meters into Lebanese territory. According to analysts, these moves signal an effort to entrench a security presence that reflects 'an advanced strategy to impose a new status quo along the frontier.'
On Friday, Lebanon's National News Agency (NNA) reported that Israeli army bulldozers, protected by tanks stationed nearby, crossed the boundary at Wadi Hunin and moved towards a landfill south of the town of Adaisseh. The forces sealed off a road and erected earthen barriers, prompting heightened alert from the Lebanese side.
Separately, an Israeli patrol breached the withdrawal line in the outskirts of Kfar Shouba - penetrating 400 meters into Lebanese territory - and fired shots at shepherds without causing injuries.
The incursions did not stop there. Residents of Blida also reported a fresh advance of over 800 meters. Meanwhile, Israeli troops detonated a civilian structure in the Ghassouna area east of Adaisseh, using incendiary and stun grenades that sowed panic among local families.
In parallel, Israeli aerial attacks have intensified. On Friday, an Israeli drone struck a car traveling on the Nmeiriyeh–Sharqiyyeh road in Nabatieh district, killing one person and injuring five others, Lebanon's Health Ministry confirmed. The attack underscores the widening scope of targets, reaching deeper into southern Lebanon and extending beyond military sites to include civilian vehicles.
Another drone dropped a bomb on a small transport truck in the border town of Kfar Kila, causing material damage but no casualties. Such incidents have become a recurring pattern in the ongoing escalation.
Adding to the strain on civilians, an entire house in Kfar Kila was blown up after being rigged with explosives. In Meiss El Jabal, Israeli forces destroyed a newly renovated tile factory last week, as part of what Israeli spokesmen described as 'special operations' targeting weapons depots and infrastructure allegedly tied to Hezbollah in locations including Labouneh and Jabal Balat.
Israeli army spokesperson Avichay Adraee stated on Wednesday that the operations were based on intelligence gathering and surveillance of 'Hezbollah's combat means and terrorist infrastructure.' He added that special units were working to dismantle these networks to prevent Hezbollah from reestablishing its positions along the border. Adraee also released nighttime video footage showing Israeli infantry operating deep inside southern Lebanon.
A Systematic Effort to Empty the Border
Military analyst Brigadier General Naji Malaeb described these incursions as 'part of a systematic plan to reshape the situation on the border.' He told Asharq Al-Awsat that Israeli ground advances typically coincide with major diplomatic developments - whether a US envoy arriving in Beirut or Israeli delegations traveling to Washington.
'Every time there is a significant diplomatic event, we see coordinated maneuvers - airstrikes, artillery shelling, or limited ground incursions targeting civilian or logistical sites,' Malaeb noted.
He argued that Israel's consistent pattern of targeting rebuilt homes and small businesses reveals a clear message: preventing displaced residents from returning. 'Whenever villagers attempt to repair their homes or revive their livelihoods, the response is immediate,' he said, citing a recent case in Aitaroun where Israeli troops demolished a factory that had been reconstructed inside a residence.
'This is no longer just a violation of Lebanese sovereignty or UN Resolution 1701,' Malaeb concluded. 'It has evolved into a deliberate strategy to depopulate the border strip and impose new facts on the ground, creating, in effect, a buffer zone through indirect means.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Saudi Arabia sends an important message to Lebanon
The Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Saturday extended its 'sincere condolences to the Lebanese Republic over the death and injury of several Lebanese army personnel while carrying out their duties in southern Lebanon.' In its statement, the ministry praised 'the efforts of the Lebanese army to uphold the Lebanese government's sovereignty over all the country's territory, in a manner that ensures its security and stability and contributes to the prosperity of Lebanon and its people.' This statement goes beyond a standard humanitarian gesture or formal condolence; it conveys a clear political stance. At its core, it reaffirms the Lebanese army's vital role as one of the state's main pillars for restoring authority and strength, projecting control across all Lebanese territory, protecting borders and airspace from ongoing Israeli aggression, and preserving internal stability. That role will be especially critical in the upcoming 'weapons confiscation' phase — arguably the most challenging stage — which will require the cooperation of all political forces and movements to prevent any escalation into armed clashes that could drag the country into a devastating sectarian conflict. From the outbreak of the Lebanese Civil War in 1975 to the signing of the Taif Agreement in 1989 — brokered under Saudi Arabia's auspices — Riyadh served as a pivotal mediator among the warring factions, dedicated to ending the conflict and laying the foundations for political stability. In the years that followed, the Kingdom played a major role in the reconstruction of downtown Beirut — later hailed as a symbol of Lebanon's renaissance — providing sustained financial and political support that reflected an investment in the state as a whole, rather than in any single sect. The Kingdom did not shape its Lebanese partnerships through sectarian considerations or favor any side based on religious affiliation. For instance, King Faisal and former Lebanese President Suleiman Frangieh shared a relationship rooted in mutual respect. As reported by the Saudi newspaper Al-Jazirah on Sept. 28, 1971, Frangieh hosted a dinner banquet at Baabda Palace 'in honor of His Majesty King Faisal, attended by His Majesty's accompanying delegation.' At the time, an informed Lebanese source noted that 'the official talks between His Majesty King Faisal and His Excellency President Suleiman Frangieh aim to strengthen the bonds of cooperation and brotherhood between the two countries, expand trade exchanges and encourage tourism between them. The broader Arab situation will be at the forefront of the discussions.' This statement goes beyond a standard humanitarian gesture or formal condolence; it conveys a clear political stance. Hassan Al-Mustafa For his part, King Fahd was a steadfast supporter of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, not out of favoritism toward the esteemed Sunni community over others, but to promote the values Hariri embodied at the time: advancing education, fostering scholarships and driving state-building projects that served all of Lebanon. While still a prince, King Abdullah maintained a close friendship with Imam Musa Al-Sadr. Sources close to him recall that he had warned Al-Sadr against traveling to Libya, cautioning that 'Qaddafi could not be trusted.' Following Al-Sadr's disappearance, King Abdullah reportedly mobilized all his resources in support of the imam's family, determined to help uncover the truth about his fate. Today, King Salman maintains long-standing ties with Lebanon, anchored in media and cultural exchanges. Renowned for his broad intellect and close follow-up on media, publications and libraries, he has built enduring relationships with prominent Lebanese journalists, writers and intellectuals. These enduring and multifaceted ties underscore a deliberate political stance: engaging with national figures over sectarian affiliations with the aim of safeguarding Lebanon's unity and preventing it from becoming a stage for factional conflicts. In March, President Joseph Aoun paid his first visit to Saudi Arabia as head of state, meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The talks centered on key strategic priorities, including confining weapons to the authority of the Lebanese state, strengthening the army and ensuring the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the south. They also explored lifting the Saudi ban on Lebanese imports and reopening the Kingdom's doors to Lebanese tourists. The visit aimed to revive Beirut's stature as a prominent Arab capital with a rich and significant history. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam also visited the Kingdom, joining the crown prince in performing Eid prayers, a symbolic act underscoring national brotherhood and expressing a shared hope for revitalized bilateral relations founded on greater trust and deeper integration. The Kingdom's engagement in Lebanese affairs is not motivated by short-term gains but by the pursuit of lasting stability. Hassan Al-Mustafa What is the meaning and purpose of this gradual Saudi Arabian involvement in Lebanon? Riyadh's approach centers on the principle of 'the state over the sect' and 'the state over the militias,' as demonstrated by its clear support for the Lebanese army and firm stance that arms must remain under state authority. This strategy bolsters Lebanon's stability, safeguards it from internal conflicts and aligns it with Saudi interests, while laying the groundwork for a strong, sovereign state. Such a state would be capable of ending the Israeli occupation, ensuring the return of displaced communities to their villages and driving forward national reconstruction. If security and stability are achieved, they will pave the way for sustainable economic growth by reopening channels for trade, investment and tourism, thereby helping to break the cycle of economic collapse afflicting both the Lebanese state and its people. The influx of capital would directly improve living conditions, regardless of the people's views of its source, and restore a sense of hope for the future. All this stems from a long-term vision. The Kingdom's engagement in Lebanese affairs is not motivated by short-term gains but by the pursuit of lasting stability in the Eastern Mediterranean and the creation of a barrier against the spread of conflicts into the Arab world. This approach also opens the door to wider regional agreements or truces that could help prevent future wars. In contrast, what steps can Lebanon take to move forward, especially at this critical stage in its history? If Lebanon's elite — across its political, cultural and spiritual spheres — truly wish to translate this Saudi political interest, and that of the wider Gulf-Arab world, into tangible progress for its people, it must commit to deep and credible reforms that restore confidence in the state. Foremost among these are asserting full state control over borders and weapons, strengthening the army, dismantling sectarian quotas and adopting a governance model that uproots corruption and favoritism. Such a model must make every Lebanese citizen feel like they live in a state that is genuinely committed to reform, justice and equality, while being free from the grip of sectarianism, militias and partisan economics. • Hassan Al-Mustafa is a Saudi writer and researcher interested in Islamic movements, the development of religious discourse and the relationship between the Gulf Cooperation Council states and Iran. X: @Halmustafa
Asharq Al-Awsat
5 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Iraq Considers Oil Exports via Lebanon's Tripoli Port, to Study Reviving Iraq-Syria Pipeline
Iraq's oil ministry is considering exporting oil through Lebanon's Tripoli port and will study reviving the dormant Iraq-Syria oil export pipeline, it said on Tuesday. The ministry plans to form a joint committee to assess the pipeline's condition. The announcement came during a visit by Syria's energy minister to Baghdad to discuss cooperation in oil, gas and energy. Iraq dispatched a high-level delegation to Damascus in April to assess the feasibility of reviving the Iraq–Syria oil pipeline, a move Baghdad is counting on to diversify export routes amid expanding production capacity.
Arab News
13 hours ago
- Arab News
Nothing will be left: Israel prepares for Gaza City battle
JERUSALEM: In a dense urban landscape, with likely thousands of Hamas fighters lying in wait, taking Gaza City will be a difficult and costly slog for the Israeli army, security experts say. On Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu laid out his vision of victory in Gaza following 22 months of war --- with the military ordered to attack the last remaining Hamas strongholds in Gaza City and the central camps further south. With a pre-war population of some 760,000, according to official figures, Gaza City was the biggest of any municipal area in the Palestinian territories. But following the unprecedented Hamas attack on Israel in 2023 that sparked the war, its population has only swelled, with thousands of displaced people fleeing intensive military operations to the north. Gaza City itself has come under intense aerial bombardment, and its remaining apartment buildings now rub shoulders with tents and other makeshift shelters. Amir Avivi, a former Israeli general and head of the Israeli Defense and Security Forum think tank, described the city as the 'heart of Hamas's rule in Gaza.' 'Gaza City has always been the center of government and also has the strongest brigade of Hamas,' he said. The first challenge for Israeli troops relates to Netanyahu's call for the evacuation of civilians — how such a feat will be carried out remains unclear. Unlike the rest of the Strip, where most of the population has been displaced at least once, around 300,000 residents of Gaza City have not moved since the outbreak of the conflict, according to Avivi. Israel has already tried to push civilians further south to so-called humanitarian zones established by the military, but there is likely little space to accommodate more arrivals. 'You cannot put another one million people over there. It will be a horrible humanitarian crisis,' said Michael Milshtein, an Israeli former military intelligence officer. According to Avivi, humanitarian aid would be mainly distributed south of Gaza City in order to encourage residents to move toward future distribution sites managed by the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Up from just four currently, the GHF plans to operate 16 sites. However, Gaza's civil defense agency says Israeli troops are firing at and killing civilians daily around the sites. Human Rights Watch has called them a 'death trap,' while the UN and other groups have lashed out at what they call a militarization of aid. According to Michael Milshtein, who heads the Palestinian Studies Program at Tel Aviv University, Hamas's military wing could have as many as 10,000 to 15,000 fighters in Gaza City, many of them freshly recruited. 'It's very easy to convince a 17, 18, 19-year-old Palestinian to be a part of Al-Qassam Brigades,' Milshtein told AFP, referring to Hamas's armed wing as he cited a lack of opportunities for much Gaza's population. 'While (Israel's army) prepares itself, Hamas also prepares itself for the coming warfare, if it takes place,' he added, predicting that the battle could end up being 'very similar to Stalingrad.' He was referring to the battle for the city now known as Volgograd, one of the longest and bloodiest in World War II. The Israeli army will encounter obstacles including a vast network of tunnels where Israeli hostages are likely being held, along with weapons depots, hiding places and combat posts. Other obstacles could include improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and the use of civilians as human shields in a dense urban maze of narrow alleys and tall buildings, according to press reports. 'It's almost impossible to go in there without creating both hostage casualties and a large humanitarian disaster,' said Mairav Zonszein of the International Crisis Group. The material destruction, she added, will be enormous. 'They will simply destroy everything, and then nothing will be left,' she said. Despite rumored disagreements over the plan by the chief of the army Eyal Zamir, the general said his forces 'will be able to conquer Gaza City, just as it did in Khan Yunis and Rafah in the south,' according to a statement on Monday. 'Our forces have operated there in the past, and we will know how to do it again.'
