How to check your enrolment after concerns from voters
Photo:
123RF
The Electoral Commission says people who cannot find their enrolment details are likely on the dormant roll.
Voters need to be enrolled by tomorrow to receive a voting pack for local body elections but some people say they are no longer showing up on the roll.
Electoral commission deputy chief executive of operations Anusha Guler said its likely people are being moved to the dormant roll.
It follows Te Pāti Māori saying they are hearing complaints about
voters' details being altered
.
"We've heard some concerns that people have been unable to find their enrolment record on our website. We have checked and there are no technical issues with our enrol online system," Guler said.
"If you're Māori, I also want to assure you that your roll choice - Māori roll or general roll - is up to you. We won't put you on either roll by default and we won't change your roll without your permission."
The Electoral Commission said people can go online to vote.nz to enrol, check or update their details or call a free phone number for help.
For those who can't find their enrolment record, it might be because they're not enrolled or you're on the unpublished roll, the commission said.
There are a few other reasons why your enrolment record might not come up immediately or might not be available on vote.nz.
"When you look up your details on vote.nz your search must exactly match the name and address we have on our records. The same goes for verifying your information with ID - the names on your enrolment record and your ID must match exactly," Guler said.
"If we lose touch with you - for example if we get returned mail from an old address - we will try to contact you by email or text to ask you to update your details. If we can't contact you or don't hear back from you, you may be put on the dormant roll.
"If you're on the dormant roll, your record won't show up on vote.nz, but you'll be re-enrolled as soon as you fill in an enrolment form with your current address.
"If you've got any concerns about your enrolment, please get in touch with our enrolment team on 0800 36 76 56 or enquiries@elections.govt.nz and they can check your enrolment."
Guler said it is important to be enrolled at the address where prospective voters live by 1 August to get their voting papers for the local elections in the mail.
"If you enrol or update your address from 1 August, you can still vote, but you'll need to contact your council and cast a special vote," Guler said.
Those who are Māori, can choose the Māori roll or the general roll when first enrolling to vote. After that, they can change rolls at any time except in the three months before an election.
"During these three months before the local elections, you won't be able to change from the Māori roll to general roll, or general roll to Māori roll. Applications to change rolls will be processed after the local elections," Guler said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Door closing on chance to post vote
PHOTO: ODT FILES Today is the last day to enrol on the Electoral Register to receive a postal vote in the upcoming local elections. Before the Oamaru Mail went to print this week, statistics on the Electoral Commission website shows 83.94% of eligible voters in Waitaki are enrolled, leaving 3181 people eligible to vote but not enrolled. The most enrolled age-group is the 70 and overs, with 4113 (94.97%) enrolled, just 218 eligible voters in the age group are not enrolled. At the other end of the scale, just 53.83% of 18 to 24-year-olds are enrolled, leaving 789 eligible voters off the electoral register. Of those enrolled in Waitaki, 16,112 are on the General Roll and 516 on the Maori Roll. Nationwide, 88.62% of eligible voters are enrolled for the upcoming Local Body Elections. People enrolling after today will not get voting papers in the post and will need to contact their local council and cast a special vote in-person. Waitaki District Council says it will be letting people know when and where they will be able to do that next week. Today is also the last day for nomination to stand for council, mayor, community boards and local licensing trusts. Before the Oamaru Mail went to print this week, there were three nominations for Waitaki mayor, (David Wilson, Mel Tavendale and Guy Percival). One nomination has been posted for the sole Ahuriri Ward seat (Brent Cowles) and the Waihemo Ward seat (Frans Schlack). Two nominations had been posted for the two available Corriedale Ward seats (John McCone and Sven Thelning). Seven nominations had been posted for the six Oamaru Ward seats (Andy De Boer, Peter De Rues, Jim Hopkins, Ferdie Kruger, Courtney Linwood, Richard Vinbrux and Nathan Barnes). Nominations had also been posted for the five available seats on the Oamaru Licensing Trust and the Ahuriri Community Board. However, before the Oamaru Mail went to print only four nominations had been posted for the five seats available on the Waihemo Community Board.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Rats and mice to sort out: Parliament's tiny laws
Photo: VNP / Daniela Maoate-Cox The bills Parliament considers that are heavily reported by the media are generally the most contentious, the most impactful or the most far-reaching, with special emphasis on the most contentious. Bills that generate little animosity get little attention. Bills that will have scant impact receive scant love. And bills with a geographical reach that is negligible, get about that much coverage. As a result, it is easy to assume that all the things Parliament does are big and important. But sometimes Parliament manages the triple-whammy - a bill that everyone agrees on, which has negligible impact, and is also incredibly specific. So let's break with tradition look at it. This is especially true of two less common types of law: the unusual 'local bills' and the rare, and highly specific 'private bills'. These bills can be brought to the House for debate by any MP and each has a very specific impact. Local bills have a geographically specific impact, while private bills deal with a specific thing, an organisation, group, trust, charity, church, or even a specific person. The topics can be so unlikely that they might be accidentally mistaken for a lacklustre political spoof. On Wednesday for example, the House spent more than an hour on third reading speeches for a bill with an encompassing name - the Auckland Harbour Board and Takapuna Borough Council Empowering Act Amendment Bill, but that affected just one single building. It was not riveting stuff. The MP in charge was National's Simon Watts, who-whether intended ironically or not-rather grandly announced, "This is a moment we have all been waiting for". The bill had an admirable purpose - fixing an issue with the ongoing costs and rental income for a community asset; but why did such a local issue need to be debated and passed by the House? It was a fault of history. As always, history has a lot to answer for. The background for many modern local and private bills is very similar - fixing problems caused by historic legal drafting. Local organisations (including local government ones), are sometimes brought into being, empowered, or had constitutions enacted under specific legislation, written and passed by Parliament just for them. That includes many things like clubs, churches, amenities, and charities. Even patches of land or parks. That kind of empowering legislation used to be more common many decades ago, but does still happen. Unfortunately drafters are not prophetic seers, and the very specific rules and purposes included in these old laws inevitably cause issues over time. Now, when such an organisation wants to act outside its early restrictions they need Parliament to amend the original law. Let's consider this week's example. The 1923 Harbour Board etcetera law in question included stipulations for the use of a waterside property. Community activities like swimming and watersports were allowed but private gain was specifically outlawed. Just three years later, it became the Takapuna Boating Club but has since fallen into disrepair because it isn't able to raise money, for example from a café, to help cover maintenance costs. And so a new bill was required to carefully loosen those constraints. As Simon Watts noted during the debate: "It is important that while we preserve the community purpose, we don't pass a law that ends up being too restrictive in the future, meaning that another North Shore MP in a hundred years from now will have to come back and lament on the old laws that we're doing right now." That may all seem bizarrely specific and trivial, but it is, sadly, not unusual. Many local (and especially private) bills only exist to fix archaic legislation. In doing so they offer MPs a debate that is refreshingly amicable and without the usual layers of import and consequence. With so little at stake Parliament can be almost fun. This debate had MPs reminiscing about beach days, eulogising Sir Peter Blake and talking of plans to play Mahjong at the club. Simon Watts revealed his caucus referred to the bill as the "Takapuna Ice Cream Bill". Cameron Brewer suggested the bill's sponsor would get a weekend ticker tape parade through Takapuna's shopping thoroughfare. There were many oddities, but the highlight may have been ACT MP Simon Court enthusing like an awestruck fan over a dreamy possibility. "I would suggest to the member Mr Steve Abel, who spoke before, that on top of mahjong, there might even be a venue where he might be able to play some of his famous songs that he composed when he was a famous New Zealand folk singer." In the Speaker's chair, National's Barbara Kuriger chortled, "One never knows where one's endorsements might come from". The slightly breathless nature of the debate was helped along by the fact that National Party MPs seemed keen to make it last as long as possible, because they weren't in favour of some member's bills due to be debated afterwards. Governing party MPs get very little exercise in extemporising in the House about so very little. For example, Cameron Brewer's speech seemed to dawdle over every topic he could think of vaguely connected with the locality, including ice cream, cafés, local magazines and long-past America's Cups. He was not alone in the approach. When he finally concluded, Labour's Phil Twyford took the next call: "Well, the member Cameron Brewer did well to remain on his feet for nine minutes and 48 seconds, but it came at a terrible human cost. Those of us in the House this afternoon - we're the living evidence of that." *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Small-town surge tops growth of Taranaki council contestants
Hemi Haddon was the only candidate for Stratford's Māori ward, until two more contenders emerged on Friday. Photo: Supplied / Te Korimako o Taranaki Candidates have tripled in contests for Inglewood and Waitara's general wards, and Stratford's Māori ward, spotlighting stronger competition for Taranaki seats in this year's local elections. Most wards and constituencies have more candidates than 2022, countering the trend of ever-lower engagement with local democracy. Only Hemi Haddon had his hand up for the Stratford District Council Māori ward, until David Chadwick and Karley Hemopo joined the race, before nominations closed on Friday. Clive Tongaawhikau, the sole candidate in 2022, resigned recently, due to heavy community and whānau obligations. Likewise, Inglewood's New Plymouth District councillor Marie Pearce is retiring, after taking Kōhanga Moa ward unopposed last time. Mayoral aspirant Sarah Lucas will scrap it out with Jeremy Brooking and Christine Fabish to replace Pearce. Councillor Tony Bedford is calling it quits, after two terms for New Plymouth District's North ward, which has gained four extra candidates to have six contenders for one seat. North ward candidates include Gina Blackburn, Ngāti Mutunga's representative on NPDC's committee Te Huinga Taumatua. In 2022, 10 South Taranaki District councillors were elected unopposed, nullifying votes in all four general wards - Te Hāwera ward even needed a by-election to fill its last seat. In 2025, all but the Pātea general ward are contested. In a rematch for South Taranaki's Te Kūrae ward, sitting councillor Leanne Horo last time won double the votes of Caroline Waiwiri. Sole candidate Cheryl Luke-Maraki is elected unopposed to Te Tai Tonga ward, so Māori roll voters there get a single vote for two-term South Taranaki Mayor Phil Nixon or challenger Clem Coxhead. Similarly, Stratford District's rural ward has four candidates for four seats, so the countrydwellers only get a mayoral vote, as councillor Jono Erwood takes on incumbent Neil Volzke, pitching for his sixth term. New Plymouth's Te Purutanga Mauri Pūmanawa is again a [ two-horse race, with sitting councillor Te Waka McLeod] up against Peter Moeahu, who serves on several Taranaki council committees. Across all New Plymouth wards, there are 37 candidates, six more than 2022. All Taranaki Regional Council general wards are contested, but the candidate count has dropped by four to 20. The TRC chamber has been a bearpit this term, with a fierce fight for freshwater and a Treaty debate shutdown found to be "severely damaging" - all while government ministers discuss abolishing regional councils. As Wellington rebalances freshwater and resource rules to favour the dairy industry, the battle between the farmer lobby and environmentalists will play out in TRC constituencies. Dinnie Moeahu was the only tangata whenua councillor voted on to a Taranaki general ward in 2022. Photo: Supplied / Te Korimako o Taranaki Climate justice campaigner Urs Signer will go head-to-head with dairy stalwarts Donna Cram and Neil Walker - just two South Taranaki constituency seats are up for grabs. Walker hopes to extend his time at the table to 30 years, despite being undermined by a scathing report about his plot to quash debate on the Treaty principles bill. The single-seat North Taranaki constituency has three farm-sector candidates versus two environmentalists. Eco-advocates Tama Blackburn and Chris Wilkes face four-term sitting councillor and fertiliser manager Mike Davey, Farmlands store manager Lee Kennedy and Taranaki Federated Farmers president Leedom Gibbs - who's the Feds' appointee to TRC's powerful Policy and Planning committee. Another new contender for TRC is Spotswood College principal Nicola Ngarewa - sister of Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, who was South Taranaki deputy mayor, before becoming Te Tai Hauāuru MP. Also up for TRC's New Plymouth constituency is former National MP Jonathan Young, son of even more former National MP Venn Young. Bonita Bigham is again the sole candidate for the Māori constituency at TRC, so she'll be back for what might be the seat's last hurrah. Most Māori wards and constituencies , including the five at Taranaki's four councils, face extinction in this year's ballot. The government changed the law to mandate referendums, saying it would give communities a vote on a significant change to local democracy - and fulfilling National's coalition deals with Act and NZ First. No other type of [ ward can be voted down]. In 2022, Taranaki general ward voters elected just one Māori councillor - Dinnie Moeahu for New Plymouth's district-wide ward. Māori are more than 20 percent of the Taranaki population and hold four percent of general roll council seats. The five Māori wards take tangata whenua representation to 14 percent of all seats. All candidate lists are provisional and subject to confirmation next week. - LDR is local body reporting funded by RNZ and NZ on Air
