RELATED: FlexiSpot C7 Ergonomic Premium Office Chair Review
Thank you, FlexiSpot, for sending me this E7L Pro L-Shaped Standing Desk in exchange for an honest review.
I've used FlexiSpot gear before, including their standing desk converter and the E7 Premium, so when they asked if I wanted to try the L-shaped version, I was all in. More space? More stability? Yes, please. First Impressions (And Heavy Lifting)
The E7L Pro L-Shaped Standing Desk showed up in several boxes, including the bamboo desktop (which looks fantastic) and the seriously solid white frame. Heads up: the frame is heavy, which is actually great—it means this thing is built to last. But if you're not into lifting 50+ lbs solo, call in a favor from a friend.
The assembly looked a little intense at first glance—there are a lot of parts. But once I found FlexiSpot's video guide, things clicked into place (literally). The process took just over an hour, and that includes time spent staring at screws wondering where I left my Allen wrench. Spoiler: it was in the box.
Desk, Meet Real Life
Right away, I noticed how roomy this desk is. The L-shape gives you so much surface area—I've got a laptop, second monitor, notepad, a charging station, and somehow still have space for snacks and a plant I'll probably forget to water. Everything fits, and nothing feels crowded.
The triple motor system makes raising and lowering the desk super smooth. The controls are super sensitive. You barely have to touch them to activate the thing! I set my sitting and standing presets in seconds, and the desk adjusts with zero wobble. I'm tall, and the E7L actually works for my height—no more slouching or bumping knees on the underside.
Bonus features: A built-in USB port on the keypad (love this)
A child-lock feature so cats or kids can't mess with your settings
Baffles on the underside to keep all the cables neat and tidy So is it worth it?
Short answer? Yes. While assembly is a little involved and you will need a friend to lift the thing, it's a serious desk. If you're looking to upgrade your home office or creative space, the E7L is an awesome choice. It's sturdy, smooth, and has way more room than a standard rectangular desk. The design is sharp, the materials feel premium, and the adjustable height range works for all kinds of bodies and workflows.
Also: it just feels good to use. I've been standing more, stretching more, and—wildly—actually enjoying my workspace. Add in a 15-year warranty, and you're looking at a smart investment in your daily sanity.
RELATED: FlexiSpot C7 Ergonomic Premium Office Chair Review
RELATED: FlexiSpot E7 Premium Standing Desk Review
FlexiSpot C5 Ergonomic Office Chair Review
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI ROI Isn't Just Dollars: How To Measure Intangible Wins
Companies are investing millions in AI, but the biggest returns might be faster decisions, happier ... More teams and smarter workflows. Enterprises are pouring billions into AI. Retail companies alone plan to spend $33.2 million annually on AI initiatives, according to a 2025 IBM survey. But while some are already reporting wins — and others are still waiting for returns — industry experts say too many are asking the wrong question: Is AI making us richer? Instead, they say, the better question might be: Is it making us better? That shift in mindset is becoming essential today. Because, as more businesses deploy AI across their operations, the most valuable results aren't always the ones that show up in quarterly earnings. Sometimes the clearest wins come in faster decisions, smarter workflows and more satisfied employees. It's only natural for companies to prioritize financial gains when measuring the ROI on their AI investments. But according to experts like Adrienne Uthe, managing principal at Kronus Intelligence Group, that's not all that matters. 'Organizations can simply move much faster than ever before. Everyone can develop their own MVPs while solving problems at unprecedented speed. Junior workers gain more experience in a short period thanks to a healthy collaboration with their AI-driven sidekicks,' Uthe told me in an interview. Her argument is that like no other time in human history, professionals now have tools at their disposal that could make them more productive than ever. And there's real-world proof to support Uthe's claims. Consider the National Bank of Australia that, since it began using Microsoft 365 copilot, has drastically reduced the time spent on analyzing millions of security event logs. This increased efficiency has freed up valuable time for the company's engineers who can now apply their expertise to other pressing matters. The trend also aligns with a 2024 survey by PwC, which revealed over 80% of employees believe that the continuous use of generative AI tools will make them more efficient at work. And it's not just about doing more work faster. Companies like Elvee — which uses AI to help contact center agencies address employee attrition, retain top performers and recapture revenue — have also been at the backend of enabling employee performance with AI. In one particular example, Raz Dar, founder and CEO of Elvee, noted how their platform helped a manager notice that a top-performing contact center agent was quietly planning to quit. 'On the surface, it looked like everything was fine. The employee was a top performer. But the manager was shocked to see that the system showed the employee was at a high risk of leaving,' Dar said excitedly. The early alert gave the company time to intervene, rework the agent's schedule, and keep a key team member. No revenue changed hands, but something just as valuable happened: culture was preserved. And that, more than any dashboard metric, is what real AI ROI can look like. For Dar, this is another real-world pointer to the intangible but really powerful benefits of AI. He calls it 'culture-shaping AI,' emphasizing AI's role in helping to set the tone for employee performance and motivation across organizations. As more businesses begin to consider the impact of AI on their daily operations, it makes sense to spotlight the parameters to judge the value of the returns. When CEOs aren't thinking about monetary gains, they can consider other crucial things like employee satisfaction, customer feedback and even ethical concerns. 'Companies should track decision quality through accuracy rates, speed improvements, and confidence levels across key business processes. The best approach measures decision reversal rates and compares predicted versus actual outcomes. Focus on simple metrics that show whether AI-influenced decisions are actually better decisions,' said Brig Barker, managing principal at Kronus Intelligence Group. Uthe added that companies should focus on three areas: how fast decisions get made, how well information flows through the organization and how quickly teams can respond to market changes. 'If your workers say they enjoy greater satisfaction working with AI than before when they worked with it, then it means you're doing something right.' But employees aren't the only stakeholders AI affects. Customers matter, too, in the grand scheme of measuring AI ROI. How the users of an AI-powered product perceive it is crucial in determining whether it deserves to remain available or get pulled off the market. Seasoned customer experience expert Shep Hyken claims that more customers are feeling relaxed with the use of AI in service delivery. For instance, AI chatbots have become more popular in the last few years, enabling businesses to handle large volumes of customer complaints at a quicker pace than human support staff. In fact, the momentum of AI-powered customer support is so high that Hyken's annual CX survey showed 63% of U.S. customers expect more companies to adopt AI chatbots and other forms of automated customer support. In 2021, only 21% of respondents shared this sentiment. While the story of Klarna — which replaced 700 roles with AI chatbots in 2024 but quietly started rehiring for the same roles this year because its customers preferred human support — may cast a shadow over Hyken's claims, the forecast for AI in customer support looks good. Still, for companies whose clients don't speak highly of their AI deployment, it might be time to rethink their strategy and try again. AI ROI isn't just about cost savings or new revenue streams. It's about what changes — and improves — when AI becomes part of how a company works. While financial return may be the headline metric, especially when companies have poured significant capital into AI, it's not the only one that matters. Businesses must first decide why they're investing in AI — and only then decide what success actually looks like. If your AI investments end up making your employees work better and feel more satisfied, or they make your customers happier, or they make you, as a business leader, more efficient, then that's certainly a win. And as Dar said, 'these intangible wins often have tangible impact, even on finance. That's a win-win situation.' Uthe prescribes that companies should focus on decision speed, execution velocity and how fast teams can turn ideas into reality. She added that they must also track the time from problem identification to solution deployment, measure how AI amplifies their best people's capabilities and spread that performance across the organization. 'The goal,' she said 'should be to increase organizational acceleration.' Dar cautioned that replacing human agents with AI can backfire if you're not careful, explaining that many employees get spooked when they hear their company is piloting AI. But ironically, he noted that the best AI models need those same employees to train the system and handle the nuanced, emotional conversations AI can't. 'Retention is key if you want your AI to succeed,' he said.
Gizmodo
35 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Jeff Bezos's Washinton Post Plans to Add Random Opinion Writers Edited by AI
Given how artificial intelligence's pitfalls dominate the daily news cycle, you'd think that the media industry would take a cautionary approach to AI. Yeah, think again. In an effort to boost readership, the Washington Post plans to expand its opinion section to include newbie writers who will be guided by artificial intelligence. Since April, the Post has worked on scaling an initiative to bring new voices to the paper. Multiple people confirmed with the New York Times that the program, dubbed Ripple, involves publishing established Substack writers and nonprofessionals. On the surface, it sounds similar to previous contributor models utilized (not necessarily successfully) by the Huffington Post and Forbes. The biggest difference is that the Post won't guide new writers with a human. That's way too basic. Instead, the outlet will use Ember, an AI coach, to oversee the process. Per the Times, its current prototypes include a 'story strength' tracker and a sidebar laying out basic components like 'early thesis', 'supporting points,' and 'memorable ending'. It also features a live assistant to deliver writing prompts and help shape content. Each article, which will be published outside of the Post's usual paywall, will still be reviewed by a human before it goes live. Per the Times, Ember will begin testing this fall. But why test it at all? We've seen this exact same scenario play out before. Just two years ago, CNET came under fire after publishing AI-guided articles with barely any disclosure. Although editor-in-chief Connie Guglielmo later stated that each story was 'reviewed, fact-checked and edited by an editor with topical expertise', Futurism broke down how one of the articles highlighted by Guglielmo was riddled with errors. The Post has struggled to successfully adapt to the ever-changing media landscape. Last year, it launched a new subscription model in an attempt to boost revenue after losing $77 million. But a fancy subscription model can't save you if you're led by dickheads. In January, the Post laid off about 4 percent of its workforce in an effort to recoup losses. Just a month later, owner Jeff Bezos' controversial overhaul of the opinion section (which prompted opinion editor David Shipley to immediately resign) cost the outlet over 75,000 digital subscribers. Artificial intelligence could potentially be useful for journalism. Currently, the Times uses it to shift through large databases and recommend articles. Except Ember is being given a much more significant role. And given that journalists at multiple outlets, including the Atlantic and Politico, are pushing back against AI, the Post's entire plan seems especially ridiculous. But hey, what the hell do we know?
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'
President Donald Trump appeared to confirm the deterioration of his relationship with Elon Musk, saying he was 'very disappointed' in the tech billionaire after Musk repeatedly blasted the president's sweeping domestic agenda bill in recent days. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office less than one week after the two exchanged effusive praise on Musk's last day as a special government employee. Since then, Musk has strongly criticized what Trump calls his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that has passed the House and faces an uncertain path forward in the Senate. On Tuesday, Musk called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk lashed out at the legislation, a source familiar with the dynamic told CNN. 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump said, adding that while Musk has not yet personally attacked him, the president expected that could be next. Trump repeatedly claimed that Musk's concerns with the bill were centered on the repeal of electric vehicle subsidies that benefitted Tesla. Musk has admitted his company has struggled in the wake of his political involvement. Musk didn't wait to respond, posting his reactions in real time on his social media platform X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said. He added: 'Such ingratitude.' Musk denied Trump's claim that the Tesla CEO knew the inner workings of the bill ahead of time, and countered that the elimination of EV tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to the massive domestic policy bill. 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill' Musk in a separate post. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' One Republican strategist who has worked closely with the tech billionaire downplayed the idea that Musk's opposition is only about the EV subsidies, telling CNN that Musk was genuinely troubled by projections of how much the bill would add to the deficit – the reasoning Musk has publicly cited on multiple occasions. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the legislation passed by the House would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion. During Thursday's Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump reminisced about his campaign bromance with Musk, who contributed at least a quarter-billion dollars to efforts supporting Trump's 2024 presidential bid and once called himself Trump's 'first buddy.' 'Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won – Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' Trump said, referring to his chief of staff Susie Wiles, appearing to hint at tensions between Wiles and Musk. Trump appeared to moderate his tone at times, saying he 'always liked Elon' – before implicitly accusing him of so-called 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'He's not the first – people leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of 'Trump derangement syndrome,' I guess they call it, but we have it with others too,' he said. 'They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone,' he continued. 'The whole world is different, and they become hostile. I don't know what it is.' Kristen Holmes contributed to this report.
