logo
Report finds issues with Milwaukee's Fire and Police Commission

Report finds issues with Milwaukee's Fire and Police Commission

Yahoo26-02-2025

Protesters march in Milwaukee calling for more community control of the police. (Photo by Isiah Holmes/Wisconsin Examiner)
What has become of the city of Milwaukee's Fire and Police Commission (FPC) since the passage of Act 12, which traded its policy-making powers over the police department for a fiscal deal with the state? That's the question the Milwaukee Turners' – described as Milwaukee's oldest civic group – sought to answer with hard data.
From June to December 2024, the Turners' 'Confronting Mass Incarceration team' monitored the FPC – itself one of the nation's oldest civilian-led oversight bodies for police and fire departments. The team monitored the FPC's meetings, who attended, what attendees did, and how commissioners engaged in the meetings. A white paper published earlier this month, detailing the team's findings, noted among other things that:
The FPC spent 81% of its time discussing personnel matters, and often discussed these during closed sessions which the public cannot view. The Turners noted 359 minutes were spent discussing personnel matters, whereas just 49 minutes were spent on public comment.
The Turners noticed what they described in the white paper as 'an overall lack of active engagement and participation from commissioners.'
Law enforcement personnel attended FPC meetings more frequently than members of the general public. During the monitoring period, 30 police personnel attended meetings whereas 20 members of the public attended. Of those members of the public who attended the meetings, half engaged in public comment and of those, only three received a direct response from commissioners.
The report states the FPC 'appears to serve as a rubber stamp' and that the commission 'has failed to secure public trust.' Dr. Emily Sterk, a research and advocacy associate with Milwaukee Turners who worked on the project, explained why the numbers looked the way they do. While citizens can discuss whatever they want during public comment, commissioners can't discuss anything that isn't on the agenda due to open meetings laws. 'So therefore they just have this practice to, you know, have public comment but then not even address the public that is there,' Sterk told Wisconsin Examiner.
While she understands the legal reason for this practice, Sterk said, 'that is, for us, subjectively very troubling when a member of the public makes the time and effort to get themselves down there, go to this meeting which – as we alluded to in the white paper – the regular sessions are very frequently heavily delayed because of the closed sessions that are taking place.' As a result, the commission ends up engaging in back-and-forth discussions with city officials and law enforcement more frequently than the public, whose comments may be left unheard.
Leon Todd, executive director of the FPC, told Wisconsin Examiner that personnel matters such as promotions, hiring or setting recruitment standards 'are extremely important.' Todd added, 'I don't think it is necessarily problematic that the FPC spends a goodly amount of time on that. It is part of their core functions. It's been part of their core responsibilities for more than 150 years…Since 1885 no person has been appointed or promoted to any position in the police or fire departments without the express approval of the FPC board.'
Yet even this function of the FPC has come under fire. In January, the commission was criticized by conservative elected officials, right-wing media outlets and the Milwaukee Police Association after an officer was denied promotion. WISN12 reported that the FPC considered promotions for seven officers, and only denied officer Jason Daering. A couple of weeks later in early February, the FPC reversed its position and voted to promote Daering to sergeant. Prior to the final vote, FPC co-chair Bree Spencer said that the police department didn't provide a full file, that Daering did not appear for an interview and was unprepared. 'So we really encourage, going forward, that people take this process seriously,' said Spencer.
The commission's voting record was another issue for the Milwaukee Turners. In their report, the group noted that over its monitoring period last year, the FPC took up 122 agenda items, of which 120 received unanimous approval. Only two agenda items – one involving the promotion of a detective and another concerning reappointing a former police officer – received No votes, with both items receiving two No votes. 'Given the current practices of the FPC, including closed sessions and lack of Commissioner participation during regular sessions, the public is left unaware of why these aye or no votes were made,' the report states. 'We observed an overall lack of transparency when it comes to Commissioners' voting records. Even if Commissioners are actively participating in deliberation and debate during closed sessions, the public has no way of knowing this.'
Todd also pushed back against the Milwaukee Turners' claim that the FPC has become a rubber stamp. Harkening back to the pre-Act 12 era Todd, who was appointed by former mayor Tom Barrett in November 2020, recalled the FPC's record of pushing for police reform measures 'that the [police] department did not agree with.' From a ban on chokeholds and no-knock warrants, to approving a policy of publicly releasing video of incidents like police shootings within 15 days of the incident. Those decisions – made when the FPC was led by Chairman Ed Fallone and Vice Chairwoman Amanda Avalos – were 'probably, if not the reason, a big reason why the Legislature took away [FPC's] policy-making authority, because they were acting independently and listening to community members from Milwaukee,' Todd told Wisconsin Examiner.
After the passage of Act 12 in 2023, Fallone and Avalos resigned their positions in protest. Stripping the FPC of its decades-old policy-making powers emerged as a bargaining chip in negotiations between Milwaukee elected officials and the Republican-controlled Legislature. In exchange for targeting the FPC, reversing the Milwaukee Public School district decision to remove school resource officers from its facilities at the request of students and community members, and agreeing to never reduce the police force, Milwaukee was allowed to raise its sales tax which allowed the county to avoid a fiscal catastrophe. Act 12's law enforcement aspects had previously been proposed as bills favored by Republican lawmakers and the Milwaukee Police Association, which failed to pass.
For the FPC, it seems that many roads lead back to the shared revenue and sales tax deal codified by Act 12. In its report, Milwaukee Turners recommended that Act 12 be amended to return the policy-making powers of the FPC. This state-level solution, however, relies on cooperation from the Republican-controlled Legislature which helped craft, negotiate, and implement Act 12.
In the meantime, the Turners recommend that the FPC bring ideas for policy changes to the common council. 'We recommend that the FPC dedicate less of their regular sessions to closed door personnel matters, and instead publicly engage in discussions about new and amended [Standard Operating Procedures] that are brought forth by the [Milwaukee Police Department],' the report reads, adding that 'the Common Council might actively invite policy recommendations from the FPC, especially as it relates to the concerns of their constituents.'
Todd told Wisconsin Examiner that the commission adopted a new rule requiring that the police department provide copies of any new or amended policies to the FPC within 48 hours, and no less than 30 days before the policies take effect. When that happens, a communication file is created by the FPC which goes into the regular agenda, and thus becomes public. Todd said that so far, the commission has not sent policy recommendations to the common council.
Todd is considering other ways to beef up the FPC's oversight capacity. Specifically, he wants to encourage a focus on the FPC's audit unit as a way of being 'more proactive' and 'not just reactive.' Todd pointed to an audit on police pursuits, and the police department, Todd said, is also looking to create a vehicle pursuit committee. The commission also continues tracking citizen complaints about officer behavior, as well as progress the department makes in eliminating discriminatory stop and frisk practices as part of the Collins settlement agreement. This year, the audit unit is expecting to do six or seven audits which are unrelated to the Collins settlement, said Todd.
Additionally, an ordinance passed in the common council to ensure the elected body is quickly notified of policy changes.
How the commission attracts more members of the public to attend meetings is another issue. Todd acknowledged that there have been fewer citizens attending public comment after the passage of Act 12. 'I think that's unfortunate,' he told Wisconsin Examiner. 'I think that we welcome people to come and express their views, their input.'
The last major policy he could recall passed before Act 12 was the video release policy concerning police shootings and related deaths. Local activists fought for the reform, as did the families of people killed in incidents involving Milwaukee-area police.
Todd said that the FPC still has 'soft power' such as through audits, which it can use to influence the police department. 'So I'm hoping that we will get more public input going forward,' he said, noting that FPC recently welcomed in a new commissioner, Krissie Fung, from the Milwaukee Turners.
'Our findings highlight the importance of fostering a culture of police and fire accountability within the FPC,' the Turners' white paper concludes. 'By advocating for legislative changes to restore policy making authority, increasing public engagement, and ensuring rigorous Commissioner participation, the FPC can rebuild public confidence and strengthen its capacity to address systemic inequalities in policing.'
'We really hope to continue to provide civilian oversight of the FPC and see what happens over the course of the next few months,' said Sterk, 'especially as we continue our lobbying for the amendment of Act 12, as we hope members of the FPC and members of the public do as well.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP legislators approve $220 million increase for special education, $1.3 billion in tax cuts
GOP legislators approve $220 million increase for special education, $1.3 billion in tax cuts

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GOP legislators approve $220 million increase for special education, $1.3 billion in tax cuts

Joint Finance Co-Chair Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said at a press conference ahead of the meeting that he would tell advocates who wanted the 60% rate that the state budget has to be 'right-sized' and 'affordable.' (Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner) After many delays, the Wisconsin Joint Finance Committee met Thursday evening to approve its plan for K-12 education spending that included a 5% increase to special education funding for schools and its $1.3 billion tax plan that targets retirees and middle-income earners. Lawmakers on the powerful budget-writing committee went back and forth for nearly three hours about the plans with Republicans saying they made significant investments in education and would help Wisconsinites while Democrats argued the state should do more for schools. The committee approved a total of about $336 million total in new general purpose revenue for Wisconsin's K-12 schools — only about 10% of Gov. Tony Evers' proposed $3.1 billion in new spending. Special education costs will receive the majority of the allocation with an additional $220 million that will be split between the general special education reimbursement and a subset of high-cost special education services. The special education reimbursement funding includes $77.2 million in the first year of the budget, which will bring the rate at which the state reimburses school districts to an estimated 35%, and $151 million in the second year bringing the rate to an estimated 37.5%. It's well below the $1.13 billion or 60% reimbursement for special education that Evers had proposed and that advocates had said was essential to place school districts back on a sustainable funding path. Education advocates spent the last week lobbying for the additional funding — and warning lawmakers about the financial strain on districts and the resources the students could lose. Ahead of the meeting Thursday, Democrats and a coalition of Wisconsin parents of students with disabilities spoke to the urgent need for additional investment in the state's general special education reimbursement rate. 'Everywhere we've gone in the state of Wisconsin, whether it's rural school districts, urban school districts, whether it's school districts that have passed referendums and those that haven't, they all say the same thing — 60% primary special education funding is absolutely necessary for our schools to succeed,' Rep. Tip McGuire (D-Kenosha) said at the press conference. 'You can see that we have had a cycle of referendum throughout Wisconsin, and that cycle has to end.' The special education reimbursement peaked at 70% in 1973, according to the Wisconsin Policy Forum. After falling to a low of 24.9% in 2015-16, the state's share of special education costs has been incrementally increasing with some fluctuations. The Republican proposal represents, at maximum, about a 5% increase to the current rate by the second year. According to budget papers prepared by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, the investment lawmakers made last session was meant to bring the rate to 33.3%, but because it is a sum certain rate — meaning there was only a set amount of money set aside, regardless of expanding costs — the actual rates have been 32.4% in 2023-24 and an estimated 32.1% for 2024-25. Joint Finance Co-Chair Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said at a press conference ahead of the meeting that he would tell advocates who wanted the 60% rate that the state budget has to be 'right-sized' and 'affordable.' 'The governor's budget has always [had] reckless spending that the state can't afford, and so we're choosing to make key investments and priorities, and these investments today will be some of … the largest investments you'll see in the budget,' Born said. The committee also added $54.5 million to bring the additional reimbursement rate for a small number of high-cost special education services to 50% in the first year of the budget and 90% in the second year. The high-cost special education program provides additional aid when costs exceed $30,000 for a single student in one year. According to DPI, in 2025 only 3% of students with disabilities fell in the high-cost special education category. In 2024-25, the program only received $14.5 million from the state. Evers had proposed the state invest an additional $18.5 million. Republicans on the committee insisted that they were trying to compromise and making a significant investment in schools — noting that education likely will continue being the state's top expenditure in the budget. Meanwhile, Democrats spoke extensively about the need for higher rates of investment, read messages from superintendents and students in their districts and said Republicans were not doing what people asked for. 'High needs special education funding only reaches about 3% of Wisconsin's special education students,' Rep. Deb Andraca said. 'You're getting a couple good talking points, but you're not going to get the kinds of public schools that Wisconsin kids deserve.' During the committee meeting, Sen. Julian Bradley (R-New Berlin) criticized Democrats for saying they would vote against the proposals. He said Democrats would vote against any proposal if it isn't what they want. 'If we all voted no, we would return to base funding, which was good enough by the way for the governor last budget because he signed it,' Bradley said. 'There would be no increases, but instead we've introduced a motion which will increase funding.' McGuire responded by saying he wouldn't vote for a proposal that is 'condemning the state to continuing the cycle of referendum,' which he said Republicans are doing by minimally increasing the special education reimbursement rate and not investing any additional money in general aid. 'Wisconsinites across the state are having to choose between raising their own property taxes' and the schools, McGuire said. The Kenosha School District, which is in McGuire's legislative district, recently failed to pass referendum to help reduce a budget deficit. School leaders had said a significant increase in the special education reimbursement would prevent the district from having to seek a referendum again. 'They had a $19 million budget gap, and if this state went to 60% special education funding, you know roughly where we promised we would be, that would've gone down to $6 million,' McGuire said, '…$13 million of those dollars are our responsibility. That's been our failing, and we should live up to that.' 'What are we arguing about? We're putting more money in,' Sen. Patrick Testin (R-Stevens Point) said.'I would think that when this gets to his desk, Evers would sign this because it is a bigger increase than any of what he proposed while he was state superintendent.' McGuire said the investment in the high-cost special education is also good, but only applies to a small number of schools and students. 'You know, what would benefit all school districts in the state and will benefit all students who need special education? The primary special education reimbursement rate, which you put at 37.5[%], but everyone says should be at 60[%].' McGuire said. 'I don't think this is your intention, but I don't believe that we should be exchanging children who need our assistance for other children who need our assistance. Why can't we just help all of the kids who need our help?' Rep. Tony Kurtz (R-Wonewoc) said that the increase for high-cost special education will have a significant impact on some schools, especially smaller ones, and students, even if it's not many of them. 'To get 90% for them is huge for any of our rural districts. One child, which deserves an education, can break the bank for our small districts,' Kurtz said. 'Is it perfect? No, it's not perfect, but we have to stay within our means.' Committee co-chair Sen. Howard Marklein (R-Spring Green) echoed Kurtz's comments saying that there will be 'a lot of districts that are going to be awful happy about that.' 'They've been worried about sometimes, a student moves into the district, and it's of incredibly high, high needs,' Marklein said. The committee also declined to include additional general aid for school districts. Republicans on the committee said there was already a $325 per pupil increase to districts' revenue limits built into the budget from last session due to Evers' partial veto. The increase gives districts the option to raise property taxes, though it doesn't require them to, and does not include state funding for the increase. Sen. Romaine Quinn (R-Birchwood) told lawmakers not to forget about the increase, saying the 'insulting part about that is that everyone gets it. There are schools that don't need that,' Quinn said. '72% of my districts spend less than [the schools of] my Democratic colleagues on this panel.' School Administrators Alliance Executive Director Dee Pettack, Wisconsin Association of School Boards Executive Director Dan Rossmiller, Southeast Wisconsin School Alliance Executive Director Cathy Olig and Wisconsin Rural Schools Alliance Executive Director Jeff Eide said in a joint letter reacting to the proposal that lawmakers failed to hear the voices school leaders, parents and community and business leaders. 'While the $325 revenue limit authority exists, it is not funded by the state. Instead, it is entirely borne by local property taxpayers. In addition, school districts will not see the requested support in special education,' the leaders stated. 'Because of the lack of state support in these two critical areas, school districts will be left with no choice but to ask their local taxpayers to step up and shoulder the costs locally, regardless of their ability to pay.' The leaders said the state was investing minimally and school districts will continue to struggle to fund mandated primary special education programs. State Superintendent Jill Underly called the Republicans' proposal 'irresponsible' in a statement Friday and said it 'puts politics ahead of kids and disregards educators and public schools when they need support the most.' 'Our public schools desperately need and deserve funding that is flexible, spendable and predictable,' Underly said. 'This budget fails to deliver on all three. Once again, those in power had an opportunity to do right by Wisconsin's children — and once again, they turned their backs on them.' The committee also approved $30 million for the state's choice school programs, $20 million for mental health services in school, $250,000 for robotics league grants, $750,000 for a single school, the Lakeland STAR Academy (a provision that Evers vetoed last session), $100,000 for Special Olympics Wisconsin, $3 million for public library system aid, $500,000 for recovery high schools and $500,000 for Wisconsin Reading Corps. Republican lawmakers also approved tax cuts of about $1.3 billion for the budget Thursday evening after 8 p.m., including changes to the income tax brackets and a cut for retirees in Wisconsin. Born and Marklein said the cuts would help retirees and other Wisconsinites afford to stay in the state. 'These are average, hard-working people in our state that will benefit from our tax cut,' Marklein said. The income tax change will allow more people to qualify for the second tax bracket with a rate of 4.4% by raising the qualifying maximum income to $50,480 for single filers, $67,300 for joint filers and $33,650 for married-separate filers. This will reduce the state's revenues by $323 million in 2025-26 and $320 million in 2026-27. People currently eligible for the second tax bracket include: single filers making between $14,680 and $29,370, joint filers making between $19,580 and $39,150 and married separate filers making between $9,790 and $19,580. Wisconsin Republicans have been seeking another significant tax cut since the last budget cycle when Evers vetoed their proposals. After the rejection, Republicans started to narrow their tax cuts proposals to focus on retirees and a couple of other groups with the hope of getting Evers' approval. When negotiations on this year's budget reached an impasse, Evers had said he was willing to support Republicans' tax goals, but he wanted agreements from them, too. The proposal also includes an exclusion from income taxes for retirees that would reduce the state's revenues by $395 million in 2025-26 and $300 million in 2026-27. 'This isn't a high-income oriented kind of thing,' Marklein said during the meeting. 'It just helps a lot of average people in the state of Wisconsin, so it's very good tax policy.' Democrats appeared unimpressed with the tax proposal. The Legislative Fiscal Bureau told lawmakers that the income tax change would lead to about a maximum impact of $253 annually for married joint filers, $190 annually for single filers and $127 for married separate filers. 'So roughly $5 a week for a married couple,' McGuire said. McGuire said that Democrats just have the perspective that Wisconsin could invest more in the priorities that residents have been expressing. 'We heard from a lot of people about what they need,' McGuire said in reference to school districts. 'We also know that as they've been attempting to get those funds they've had to go to referendums across the state, and… we think that's harming communities and making it more difficult for people. As a perspective, we believe that that's a good place to invest in dollars.' The committee also voted to provide additional funding for the Wisconsin technical colleges, though it is, again, significantly less than what was requested by Evers and by the system. The proposal will provide an additional $13 million to the system. This includes $7 million in general aid for the system of 16 technical colleges, $2 million in aid meant for grants for artificial intelligence, $3 million for grants for textbooks and nearly $30,000 to support the operations of the system. Evers had proposed the state provide the system with $45 million in general aid Sen. LaTonya Johnson (D-Milwaukee) said the differences between Evers' proposals and what Republicans offered were stark. 'We hear my GOP colleagues talk about worker training all the time and this is their opportunity to make sure that our technical colleges have the resources that they need to make sure that we are training an adequate workforce,' Johnson said, noting that the state could be short by 1,000 nurses (many of whom start their education in technical colleges) by 2030. 'I've never had an employer complain about having an educated workforce, not once, but I have heard employers say that Wisconsin lacks the skill sets and educational skills they need. It seems my Republican colleagues are more concerned with starving our institutions of higher education, rather than making sure they have the resources they need.' Testin said the proposal was not a cut and that Republicans were investing in technical colleges. 'We see there's value in our technical colleges because they are working with the business community … getting students through the door quicker with less debt,' Testin said. 'Any conversations that this is a cut is just unrealistic. These are critical investments in the technical system.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Lawmakers cut a tribal liaison with prisons from the budget. Tribes say they think it would help.
Lawmakers cut a tribal liaison with prisons from the budget. Tribes say they think it would help.

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Lawmakers cut a tribal liaison with prisons from the budget. Tribes say they think it would help.

Flags of the 11 Native American tribes of Wisconsin in the Wisconsin State Capitol. (Wisconsin Examiner photo) At a state prison in Stanley, Wisconsin, participants in a Native American-focused group take part in traditional cultural practices. According to Ryan Greendeer, executive government relations officer with the Ho-Chunk Nation, Stanley Correctional Institution's chaplain recently reached out to the tribe with requests for the group's programming. The chaplain wanted teaching materials, as many materials in the current selection were old. He said that men learn songs and Native language with the materials, as well as history and culture. The chaplain said the men are eager to learn more about all things Native, according to Greendeer. He was also seeking a larger pipe bowl and poles to help build a new lodge. The pipe has a history of ceremonial use. The prison's annual report for fiscal year 2024 mentions a Native American smudge and drum group. The report says that each month, several religious organizations and volunteers come in to hold various services, and the list includes 'Sweat Lodge (Native American).' There were 79 American Indian or Alaska Native people at Stanley Correctional as of April 30, according to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (DOC). Gov. Tony Evers' budget recommendations for corrections included a tribal liaison position for the DOC. The liaison would be responsible for working with Native American tribes and bands on the agency's behalf. Each of the governor's cabinet agencies has already set at least one staff member to be a tribal liaison. The governor's proposal would create a new position, set aside for the job of tribal liaison for corrections. Evers also proposed creating a director of Native American affairs in the Department of Administration and tribal liaisons in several other agencies, including the Department of Justice and Department of Natural Resources. 'Gov. Evers' commitment has been—and always will be—to ensure that the state maintains strong partnerships with the Tribal Nations by recognizing and respecting the needs and perspectives of the Nations and Indigenous people,' Britt Cudaback, communications director for the governor's office, said in an email. The Legislature's Joint Finance Committee removed the proposed positions in May, along with hundreds of other items proposed by Evers. 'Unfortunately, [Evers] sends us an executive budget that's just piles full of stuff that doesn't make sense and spends recklessly and raises taxes and has way too much policy,' Joint Finance Committee co-chair Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam) said in May. Tribes already work with the state, including the Oneida Nation, which is located in northeast Wisconsin. The tribe told the Examiner that it continues to work with the state to make sure incarcerated Native Americans have proper access to culturally based practices and resources. With a tribal liaison that can help navigate the corrections system, the tribe's efforts to make sure resources are provided and distributed appropriately make better progress, the tribe said. 'These efforts will continue whether or not a tribal liaison position exists, although the impact on incarcerated individuals who use culturally based resources may be greater as efforts take longer,' the tribe said. The Oneida Nation said it 'supports tribes' efforts to ensure incarcerated members maintain access to appropriate support services as provided by tribal, state, and federal laws.' Maggie Olson, communications coordinator for the St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin, said the tribe is not located close to the corrections facilities where their tribal members are incarcerated. This is a significant barrier, she said. 'It would be nice to be able to have a better handle on where our people are within the system to ensure they are having their spiritual and cultural needs met,' Olson said in an email to the Examiner. 'It is much easier (at this time) to meet religious needs (think Christianity) within the correctional system than it is to meet the spiritual and cultural needs of Native Americans within the system.' A great first step would be having a dedicated person who can build relationships with incarcerated Native Americans, she said. In a statement, the tribe said the liaison 'would be a start to developing and enhancing tribal input with State initiatives.' The tribe said it wants to work with the DOC on access to supportive services in county jails. Olson said she met DOC Secretary Jared Hoy at an event on June 5 and that they had a great discussion about the potential benefits of a tribal liaison at the agency. 'With the uncertainties surrounding federal funding, we are hopeful state funding will be increased to tribal programs in Wisconsin,' Olson said. The tribe's criminal justice work involves partnership with the DOC. In the St. Croix Tribal Reintegration Program, case managers work with tribal members before and after their release from prison or jail, the tribe said. The program has a memo of understanding with the Department of Corrections, providing guidance for working relationships between tribal reentry and probation. All of the governor's cabinet agencies have consultation policies that say how they will work with tribal governments. Agencies and tribal elected officials have annual consultation meetings to talk about programs, laws and funding that may affect the tribe. Discussions at the annual state-tribal consultation tend to be about high-level policy, but they can delve into specifics, Greendeer said. He gave an example related to tribal members who are on probation or parole. 'For example, a topic that keeps coming up is re-entry programming for enrolled tribal member offenders,' Greendeer said. 'A concern discussed at a recent consultation was that probation/parole officers might not consider tribal norms/values, citing a lack of eye contact in saying a client is disengaged or disconnected.' The co-chairs and vice-chairs of the Joint Finance Committee did not respond to requests for comment. DOC communications director Beth Hardtke did not answer a question from the Examiner about the responsibilities and goals of the tribal liaison position. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Education advocates push for adequate K-12 funding
Education advocates push for adequate K-12 funding

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Education advocates push for adequate K-12 funding

A rally goer rolls out a scroll with the names of every school district that has gone to referendum since the last state budget. Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner. Education advocates are making a push for more investment in public schools from the state as the Republican-led Joint Finance Committee plans to take up portions of the budget related to K-12 schools during its Thursday meeting. The issue has been a top concern for Wisconsinites who came out to budget listening sessions and was one of Gov. Tony Evers' priorities in his budget proposal. Evers proposed that the state spend an additional $3.1 billion on K-12 education. Evers and Republican leaders were negotiating on the spending for education as well as taxes and other parts of the budget until last week when negotiations reached an impasse. Evers has said that Republicans were unwilling to compromise on his funding priorities, including making 'meaningful investments for K-12 schools, to continue Child Care Counts to help lower the cost of child care for working families and to prevent further campus closures and layoffs at our UW System.' He said he was willing to support their tax proposal, which Republicans have said included income and retiree tax cuts. Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) said on WISN 12's UpFront that Evers 'lied' about Republicans walking away from the negotiating table. 'We're willing to do it, just not as much as he wanted… When you read that statement, it makes it sound like we were at zero,' Vos said. 'We were not at zero on any of those topics. We tried to find a way to invest in child care that actually went to the parents, and to make sure that we weren't just having to go to a business. We tried to find a way to look at education so that money would actually go back to school districts across the state. It just wasn't enough for what he wanted.' Public education advocates said school districts are in dire need of a significant investment of state dollars, especially for special education. After lobbying for the last week, many are concerned that when Republicans finally announce their proposal it won't be enough. State Superintendent Jill Underly told the Wisconsin Examiner in an interview Wednesday afternoon that she is anticipating that Republicans will put forth more short-term solutions, but she said schools and students can't continue functioning in that way. Underly compared the situation of education funding in Wisconsin to a road trip. 'The gas tank is nearly empty, and you're trying to coast… you're turning the air conditioning off… going at a lower speed limit, just to save a little fuel and the state budget every two years. I kind of look at them as like these exits to gas stations,' Underly said. 'We keep passing up these opportunities to refuel. Schools are running on fumes, and we see the stress that is having an our system — the number of referendums, the anxiety around whether or not we're going to have the referendum or not in our communities. Wisconsin public schools have been underfunded for decades.' The one thing lawmakers must do, Underly said, is increase the special education reimbursement rate to a minimum of 60%, back to the levels of the 1990s. 'It used to be 60% but they haven't been keeping up their promise to public schools,' Underly said. 'They need to raise the special education reimbursement rate. Anything less than 60% is once again failing to meet urgent needs.' The Wisconsin Public Education Network is encouraging advocates to show up at the committee meeting Thursday and continue pushing lawmakers and Evers to invest. Executive Director Heather DuBois Bourenane told the Examiner that she is concerned lawmakers are planning on 'low balling' special education funding, even as she said she has never seen the education community so united in its insistence on one need. 'We're familiar with the way they work in that caucus and in the Joint Finance Committee,' DuBois Bourenane said. 'The pattern of the past has been to go around the state and listen to the concerns that are raised or at least get the appearance of listening, and then reject those concerns and demands and put forward a budget that fails in almost every way to prioritize the priority needs for our communities.' While it's unclear what Republicans will ultimately do, budget papers prepared by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau includes three options when it comes to special education reimbursement rate: the first is to raise the rate to 60% sum sufficient — as Evers has proposed; the second is to leave the rate at 31.5% sum certain by investing an additional $35.8 million and the third is to raise the rate to an estimated 35% by providing an additional $68.6 million in 2023-24 and $86.2 million in 2024-25. The paper also includes options for investing more in the high cost of special education, which provides additional aid to reimburse 90% of the cost of educating students whose special education costs exceed $30,000 in a single year. The School Administrators Alliance (SAA) sent an update to its members on Monday, pointing out what was in the budget papers and saying the committee 'appears poised to focus spending on High-Cost Special Education Aid and the School Levy Tax Credit, rather than significantly raising the primary special education categorical aid.' SAA Executive Director Dee Pettack said in the email that if that's the route lawmakers take, it would 'result in minimal new, spendable resources for classrooms and students.' Public school funding was one of the top priorities mentioned by Wisconsinites at the four budget hearings held by the budget committee across the state in March. 'I just think it's time to say enough is enough,' DuBois Bourenane said. 'We're really urging people to do whatever they can before our lawmakers vote on this budget, to say that we are really going to accept nothing less than a budget that stops this cycle of insufficient state support for priority needs and demand better.' Pettack and leaders of the Wisconsin Association of School Boards, Southeast Wisconsin School Alliance and the Wisconsin Rural Schools Alliance also issued a joint letter Tuesday urging the committee to 'meet this moment with the urgency it requires,' adding that the budget provides the opportunity to allocate resources that will help students achieve. The letter detailed the situation that a low special education reimbursement has placed districts in as they struggle to fund the mandated services and must fill in the gaps with funds from their general budgets. 'The lack of an adequate state reimbursement for mandated special education programs and services negatively affects all other academic programs, including career and technical education, reading interventionists, teachers and counselors, STEM, dual enrollment, music, art and more,' the organizations stated. 'While small increases in special education reimbursement have been achieved in recent state budgets, costs for special education programming and services have grown much faster than those increases, leaving public schools in a stagnant situation.' 'Should we fail in this task, we are not only hurting Wisconsin's youth today but also our chances to compete in tomorrow's economy,' the leaders wrote. If the proposal from Republicans isn't adequate, Underly said Evers doesn't have to sign the budget. Republican lawmakers have expressed confidence that they will put a budget on Evers' desk that he will sign. 'There's that, and then we keep negotiating. We keep things as they are right now. We keep moving forward,' Underly said. 'But our schools and our kids, they can't continue to wait for this… These are short term fixes, I think, that they keep talking about, and we can't continue down this path. We need to fix it so that we're setting ourselves up for success. Everything else is just really short sighted.' WPEN and others want Evers to use his veto power should the proposal not be sufficient. DuBois Bourenane said dozens of organizations have signed on to a letter calling on Evers to reject any budget that doesn't meet the state's needs and priorities. 'What we want them to do is negotiate in good faith and reject any budget that doesn't meet the needs of our kids, and just keep going back to the drawing board until you reach a bipartisan agreement that actually does meet those needs,' DuBois Bourenane said. 'Gov. Evers has the power to break this cycle. He has the power of his veto pen. He has the power of his negotiating authority, and we expect him to use it right and people have got his back.' The budget deadline is June 30. If it is not completed by then, the state continues to operate under the 2023-25 budget. 'Nobody wants [the process] to be drawn out any longer than it is,' DuBois Bourenane said. 'Those are valid concerns. But the fact is we are in a really critical tension point right now, and if any people care even a little bit about this, now is the time that they should be speaking out.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store