UN condemns Israel's 'weaponisation of food' in Gaza after more killed while waiting for aid
01:39
24/06/2025
In India, activists fight to stop child marriages
24/06/2025
Ecuador farmers cash in on surging cocoa prices
24/06/2025
French prime minister to meet pension negotiators after talks fail
24/06/2025
Trump outburst 'will be very disconcerting for Israelis'
24/06/2025
Trump and Middle East threaten to overshadow NATO summit
24/06/2025
Calls for focus to shift back to Gaza hostages after Iran ceasefire
24/06/2025
Wave of syringe attacks mar France's street music festival
24/06/2025
France hits out at Israel after strike on Tehran prison holding French citizens
24/06/2025
'Heaviest bombardment Tehran has seen since start of war'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
US intel says strikes did not destroy Iran nuclear program
US media on Tuesday cited people familiar with the Defense Intelligence Agency findings as saying the weekend strikes did not fully eliminate Iran's centrifuges or stockpile of enriched uranium. The strikes sealed off entrances to some facilities without destroying underground buildings, according to the report. White House Press Secretary Karline Leavitt confirmed the authenticity of the assessment but said it was "flat-out wrong and was classified as 'top secret' but was still leaked." "The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program," Leavitt posted on X. "Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration," she added. US B-2 bombers hit two Iranian nuclear sites with massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs over the weekend, while a guided missile submarine struck a third with Tomahawk cruise missiles. Trump called the strikes a "spectacular military success" and said they had "obliterated" the nuclear sites, while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Washington's forces had "devastated the Iranian nuclear program." General Dan Caine, the top US military officer, has struck a more cautious tone, saying the strikes caused "extremely severe damage" to the Iranian facilities. Iran's government said Tuesday that it had "taken the necessary measures" to ensure the continuation of its nuclear program. "Plans for restarting (the facilities) have been prepared in advance, and our strategy is to ensure that production and services are not disrupted," the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Mohammad Eslami, said in a statement aired on state television. An adviser to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, meanwhile said his country still had stocks of enriched uranium and that "the game is not over." Israel launched an unprecedented air campaign targeting Iranian nuclear sites, scientists and top military brass on June 13 in a bid to set back Tehran's nuclear efforts. Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up during his first term in 2018, but he ultimately decided to take military action. The US operation was massive, with Caine saying it involved more than 125 US aircraft including stealth bombers, fighters, aerial refueling tankers, a guided missile submarine and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Oil tumbles, stocks rise as fragile Israel
05:05 From the show Global oil prices tumbled for a second day while stocks rose sharply, as a ceasefire between Israel and Iran remains in place despite earlier violations. Meanwhile, the German government approves a draft budget which will sharply increase its defence spending as leaders arrived for a key NATO summit.
Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
Frédéric Biousse on Fast Retailing: How Uniqlo's methods undermined French fashion labels
, a key figure behind the rise of French accessible luxury, has stepped away from the fashion spotlight in recent years. Now known for his hospitality venture, Domaines de Fontenille in Luberon, he remains a close observer of the industry. From the rapid ascent of Sandro and the SMCP group to the repositioning of labels such as Soeur, Figaret and Sessùn —through the Experienced Capital fund he co-founded with former SMCP partners Elie Kouby and Emmanuel Pradère—Biousse has established a consistent track record in brand revival. Prior to these ventures, Biousse served as president of Comptoir des Cotonniers from 2004 to 2007, having been recruited by founder Tony Elisha. He was the first to lead the brand after its acquisition by Japan's Fast Retailing. In an interview with he reflects on the group's recent filing for court protection for both Comptoir des Cotonniers and Princesse Nearly two decades after the €250 million acquisition, he attributes the brands' decline not to market conditions but to strategic missteps. In his view, applying Uniqlo 's operational model to these French labels compromised their desirability. However, he believes their core identity remains intact, and he proposes an independent structure—offered to Tadashi Yanai —to reestablish their appeal to consumers seeking authenticity. As a former president of Comptoir des Cotonniers, how do you view Fast Retailing's decision to file for court protection for both Comptoir and Princesse Does this outcome affect you personally? Frédéric Biousse: I wouldn't say I'm emotional about it—more frustrated. What bothers me most is the simplistic narrative that fashion is dead, that brands like Shein and Temu have destroyed the industry. That's just not true. France is paying the price for years of stagnation and lack of innovation in fashion. Many brands that are collapsing today should have disappeared long ago. The real issue is the outdated business model, like what we saw at Vivarte —collection planning dominated by marketing. When marketing takes over, creativity dies. FNW: Do you think this is a broader industry problem? FB: Absolutely. More brands are still at risk. I regularly get approached with proposals to revive struggling labels. One major issue is the looming debt burden, especially with government-backed loans coming due. Many companies are in trouble. However, rather than staying on the defensive against Chinese competitors, our government and fashion federations should take a more proactive stance. We need to support creative brands with strong identities. There's no real industrial policy anymore. BPI (the French public investment bank) could do more to help emerging labels. Banks need encouragement to back fashion businesses, because the sector isn't dead. Strong brands like Sézane, Soeur, and Balzac—are thriving because they're well-run, product-driven and have a clear vision. FNW: Is that what Comptoir and Princesse lacked under Fast Retailing? FB: Exactly. It's all about leadership and shareholder choices. Comptoir was swallowed whole by Uniqlo. Japanese management, rigid IT systems and cross-functional processes were forced in, flattening creativity. They never understood that this brand needed protection. It had all the potential to double or even triple in size. FNW: But you were in charge at the time of the Fast Retailing acquisition. FB: I was. When Tony Elisha handed me the reins after the sale, he said: 'Frédéric, always protect the creative side.' And that's exactly what I did. Mr. Yanai respected me and gave me the freedom to lead. Back then, Comptoir accounted for 17% of Fast Retailing's net profits. We were even in talks to acquire Sandro in 2007. I believed it would create healthy competition and push creative boundaries. Mr. Yanai wasn't comfortable with the potential disruption, but he did allow me to leave and take on Sandro with Elie Kouby. FNW: Uniqlo has grown impressively. Why didn't that success extend to the French brands? FB: Uniqlo is brilliant—it's the smartest, most effective entry-level apparel brand on the market. Offering practical, accessible products is Mr. Yanai's genius. But Uniqlo isn't fashion—it's convenience. That's where French and European brands still have an edge. If Uniqlo mastered color better, they'd probably be twice as big. But applying the Uniqlo model to Comptoir or Princesse destroyed their desirability. FNW: Why? FB: Because true fashion starts with the product—it offers a dream. The best pieces are often the unexpected ones. Fashion is like surfing—the great surfers don't fear the wave wall. They move with it, ride the momentum. But today, companies put in leaders who've run subsidiaries or operations, not brands. They bring processes instead of vision. Fashion, retail, beauty andhospitality—all require agility, risk-taking and comfort with uncertainty. The more you bring in managers unfamiliar with fashion, the harder it is to nurture the chaos needed for innovation. FNW: Still, the group invested and attempted several relaunches. FB: They did, because they genuinely wanted it to succeed. But the right people were never put in place. There was a lot of ego involved, and a refusal to admit that the approach wasn't working. We've been witnessing this for years, and it's frustrating—especially because we know exactly what needs to be done. I even offered to buy the brand from Mr. Yanai. FNW: Did you make an offer to acquire the brand? FB: Yes. A few years ago, I emailed Mr. Yanai with a proposal to acquire Comptoir. I never received a reply. 'Price isn't the issue when you have a strong brand.' FNW: So what future do you see for Comptoir and Princesse FB: Only around 100 stores remain between them. It would be a real shame to see more closures. Integrating them into Uniqlo stripped them of their aspirational value. Lowering prices completely misses the point. A strong brand doesn't compete on price. By selling cheaper, lower-quality products, they'll inevitably sell less. That means smaller margins and no way to cover rent. It's a recipe for failure. FNW: Do you still see potential for the two brands? FB: Absolutely. I believe there's still a meaningful story to be written. I remain loyal—Tony Elisha and Georgette, who led the design side, gave me my first real opportunity. It changed the course of my life. Loumia and Mourad, who built Princesse into something remarkable, were extraordinary individuals. They lost their lives in the Mumbai attacks. I can't accept the idea that their legacy should end this way. FNW: Are you looking to take over Fast Retailing's French operations? FB: The company is under court protection, not liquidation. I have no interest in acquiring empty structures for minimal value. That would be unfair to both the banks and the employees. I believe in structured, sustainable solutions. FNW: What would your revival plan look like? FB: With Fast Retailing. Together. Elie Kouby and I have 30 years of trust in this industry. Rather than shut down the remaining network, the group could let us take a minority stake. We'd create an independent business unit, keep the stores, rebuild the offering with trusted manufacturers and develop a thoughtful relaunch. The goal would be to make these two labels into French gems we can be proud of again. FNW: For over 15 years now—particularly through Experienced Capital—you've advocated for new business models. Wouldn't this be a step back, reviving a structure some might consider outdated? FB: You're right—reviving a brand during an economic crisis is extremely challenging. But this situation is different. I spent three years working alongside Tony Elisha and then Mr. Yanai. It was an extraordinary period, marked by a collective journey that we later experienced again with Sandro and Maje, and that I've continued with Domaines de Fontenille. I know this brand's identity inside out. I know exactly how to lead a creative brand and set it on the right path. Any business can be transformed, but success isn't something you can buy. You have to bring the right people on board, be patient and rebuild from the ground up. Above all, it's essential not to repeat the same formula or mistakes from the past. FNW: You've maintained a lower profile in fashion in recent years. Is this a message directed at Fast Retailing? FB: I remain involved in selected projects at Experienced Capital and continue to advise on various initiatives. At one point, I felt there was nothing left to prove. But Comptoir feels like a moral responsibility. I truly believe that if Elie and I call on the French and European fashion community—if we say, 'Let's work together to bring these two brands back and make them a collective source of pride'—we can make it happen.
