Faith leaders protest ‘big, beautiful bill'
WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) – As Republicans move their big, beautiful bill through Congress, a group of faith leaders organized a protest on Monday to oppose it.
The demonstration was part of what activists have labeled 'Moral Mondays'. They argue the cuts included in this bill will hurt the most vulnerable communities.
To express their concerns, they held a march and rally. Then faith leaders went to the Capitol rotunda to pray, where Capitol police arrested them for unlawfully demonstrating in the rotunda.
The goal of all of their actions was to bring attention to their critiques of the bill. Charlottesville, Virginia based Reverend Tony Andres says he was there to voice his concerns about the planned $700 billion cut to Medicaid.
'This is a moral responsibility. It's not simply money. It's not simply politics,' Andres said. 'You've got people on Medicaid, Medicare, handicapped people who will be direly hit and some of them may well die because of this.'
Chicago, Illinois advocate Meg Georgevich is also worried about the cuts to food aid programs and how that might impact families and children.
'No child should starve for a tax cut,' Georgevich said.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) defended the bill.
'In this big, beautiful Bill, the reason we call it that is because there's benefits for everybody,' Johnson said.
He says the cost savings for Medicaid come from adding work requirements and preventing fraud.
'What we're doing is strengthening the program. We're reducing fraud waste and abuse that is rampant in Medicaid,' Johnson said.
Durham, North Carolina activist Karen Ziegler says work requirements have been tried and failed before.
'All it does is kick people who need to be on and deserve to be on these programs off the programs,' Ziegler said.
With Republicans in control of Congress the advocates are facing an uphill battle.
However, they're hopeful that showing up to oppose the legislation sends a message.
'It's important that people hear the voices of people who say this is not right. If we are silent it just will go on and on and on,' Andres said.
'This is not what the people want and if they are in office to represent their constituencies, then they need to rethink where they are,' Georgevich said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
5 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk may be the only person in the world who can criticize Donald Trump in public. For now.
If you come at Donald Trump, he's going to respond. Unless, apparently, you're Elon Musk. Trump hasn't said a word about Musk's public complaints about Trump's budget bill. It's hard to imagine Trump staying silent forever. But even this restraint tells you a lot about the Musk/Trump alliance. A pretty fundamental rule of political physics in our age: If you criticize Donald Trump, he roars back. Which makes what's happening now worth noting: Elon Musk is criticizing Donald Trump, and Trump … isn't responding. As you likely know by now, on Monday afternoon, Musk used his X account to complain about the Republican budget bill — the one that's supposed to be Trump's signature legislation, and the one that's literally called the " One Big Beautiful Bill" act because that's the name Trump likes. More specifically: Musk called the bill " a disgusting abomination." "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," he added. That story — the richest man in the world, and for at least several months, a key Trump ally, blasting a Trump project in public — dominated Monday's news cycle. Even Fox News had to cover it. And under normal circumstances, Trump would rage back. Not this time, though. Trump has yet to acknowledge Musk's broadside out loud, or on his Truth Social platform. When a Fox News reporter asked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt "how mad" Trump would be when he learned about Musk's comments, she had a restrained answer ready: "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." And when I asked the White House press office for comment Wednesday morning, they referred me to Leavitt's previous statement. Obvious conclusion: For now, at least, the Trump team is going out of its way not to stoke a feud with Musk. It seems very unlikely that Trump's silence is going to be permanent: Trump loves holding forth in front of the press, so someone's going to ask him about it at some point. Still, this level of what seems to be restraint is remarkable for a man who doesn't usually restrain himself, and who loathes people who poke at him in public. What's happening? For starters, it's worth noting that Trump has already gone through a version of this. Last week, Musk used much more muted language to criticize the same bill in a CBS interview, and those comments also became a news story. And Trump didn't fire back at Musk then, either — even when asked about it at a press conference. It's also worth noting that even though Musk used scathing language to condemn the bill on Monday, he never once criticized Trump directly. That gives both men rhetorical wiggle room: Musk can argue that his problems with the bill have nothing to do with the man who's promoting it. And Trump can lump in Musk's critique along with everyone else who has problems with the bill, including some Republicans like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. But it's also likely that the most likely thing is the most likely thing: That Donald Trump has enormous admiration for Elon Musk, and treats him differently than just about anyone else in the world. And that even though Musk has officially left his role as a part-time White House advisor, Trump still wants him on his side.


Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Uncertainty Equals Confusion
If you approach an intersection and you don't know which way to turn to reach your destination, you are 'frozen' in place until an external event compels you to decide: left, right, straight, or reverse? That's how many small business owners feel today. NFIB's Uncertainty Index is based on six questions asked of a random sample of member firms for over 50 years. Since 1986, the Uncertainty Index has averaged 68. But, since 2016 it has averaged 80 and over the last eight months, the Index has reached 51 year-high levels, the highest level hitting 110 in October 2024. For individual owners, the Uncertainty measure is the number of 'uncertain' responses each owner gives to the six questions incorporated by the Index. For all firms, the Index is the sum of the percentages giving an uncertain response to each of the six questions. Interestingly, it appears that the level of uncertainty has increased steadily over the past 50 years. Why that has occurred is unclear, possibly related to the expanding reach of government at all levels. Uncertainty in the current period is undoubtedly related to the significant changes in domestic and international policies impacting the economy. And, trying to pass a tax bill that satisfies 535 elected officials in Congress is always an uncertain process. There is a lot to worry about. The level of uncertainty varies significantly by industry. Small business owners in the transportation industry most frequently registered high levels of uncertainty (4+). Some of this uncertainty is caused by high levels of regulation (e.g., California), tariffs, port uncertainty, and high fuel costs, to name a few. Firms in the manufacturing and services industries also expressed higher levels of uncertainty. Retail firms were least frequently found giving 3 or more uncertain responses, even with tariff uncertainty. They were more 'certain' about how they are or will be impacted. Uncertainty Level by Industry As Chart 2 shows, we are living in a period of elevated uncertainty, starting in 2016 with election issues and then again in the Covid era. Although the 'Covid panic' has passed, politics, elections, and swift policy changes in D.C. continue to stir the pot of concerns. NFIB's Optimism Index has been in recession territory for over a year, as have many traditional indicators. But, the recession stayed away. The future path may become clearer once the budget battle is done and tariff negotiations resolved. Uncertainty Index


The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Schumer: Republican bill will raise energy prices 10 percent
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) is warning that the House-passed budget reconciliation bill will cause energy prices to increase by 10 percent because it will 'kill' clean energy programs around the country, increasing the nation's reliance on fossil fuels. 'Donald Trump and Republicans seem ready to kill clean energy in its tracks and raise people's energy costs in the process,' Schumer said Wednesday on the Senate floor. He argued that the nation will likely need 'ten times as much energy' as it currently consumers to power 'breakthroughs in artificial intelligence.' 'The Republican plan will increase average national electricity prices by about 10 percent. The Republican plan will increase total household energy costs by $32 billion,' the New York Democrat continued. 'That means American families will pay $32 billion more.' The House bill, which Senate Republicans are now reviewing, would terminate most clean-energy tax breaks after 2025. The U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that 21 percent of electricity generation in the United States in 2023 came from renewable energy sources. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said the GOP bill would reduce energy prices by unleashing domestic oil and gas drilling. 'It will open up leases on America's lands and waters for responsible conventional energy development. It will expand production opportunities for essential energy resources that the Biden administration tried to put on the sidelines,' Thune said. Their claims come as the Congressional Budget Office predicted earlier Wednesday that Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficit over roughly the next decade.