logo
Why the Trump Administration Is About to Set Fire to 500 Tons of Emergency Food

Why the Trump Administration Is About to Set Fire to 500 Tons of Emergency Food

Yahoo16-07-2025
Toward the end of the Biden administration, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) spent about $800,000 on high-energy biscuits used to help people impacted by natural disasters or fleeing war, according to a report by The Atlantic. Following Donald Trump's return to the White House, the food meant for children in Afghanistan and Pakistan reportedly languished in a Dubai warehouse as Trump and former DOGE chief Elon Musk dismantled much of the federal government, including the government's foreign aid department.
The publication said that previously, career staff could have handed off the biscuits to the World Food Programme to distribute them, but employees said that since Musk's so-called DOGE devastated USAID — firing and placing thousands of workers on leave — aid items cannot move without the new political leaders of the agency. And while the responsibility originally was given to Trump appointee Pete Marocco, it passed to Jeremy Lewin, who became deputy administrator for policy and programs for what's left of USAID. (Rolling Stone previously reported on Lewin's alleged history of violence and racist remarks.) Staffers who sent the memos requesting approval to move the emergency food said they never got a response, however, and it is unclear if either Marocco or Lewin ever received the memos.
Now, enough food to feed about 1.5 million children for a week — equal to nearly 500 metric tons of emergency food — is set to expire today, The Atlantic reports. Despite Secretary of State Marco Rubio ensuring representatives on the House Appropriations Committee in May that food aid would reach its intended recipients, the Trump administration reportedly plans to spend $130,000 to burn the biscuits instead of sending them to children in need.
While improper food storage, a flood, or a terrorist group may lead to a few dozen tons of food aid being lost a year, a USAID staffer said that he has never witnessed this many biscuits wasted over his decades with the agency.
Unfortunately, USAID inventory lists show that as of January, more than 60,000 metric tons of food already purchased by the U.S. government were sitting in warehouses across the world, including 36,000 pounds of peas, oil, and cereal. A former senior official at USAID's Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance told The Atlantic that when she left her job earlier in July, only a small portion of the food appeared to have moved, while a current employee said small shipments are starting to leave a warehouse in Djibouti. However, given that USAID has been gutted of key employees essential to coordinating and distributing the food to people across the world, whether those parcels will land in the right hands is uncertain.
More from Rolling Stone
Speaker Mike Johnson Splits From Trump, Calls for Release of Epstein Files
How Texas Bullied Big Banks Into Dropping Their Climate Commitments
What Trump Has Said About Jeffrey Epstein Over the Years
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Trump's new tariffs take effect, targeting dozens of trading partners
President Trump's new tariffs take effect, targeting dozens of trading partners

USA Today

time21 minutes ago

  • USA Today

President Trump's new tariffs take effect, targeting dozens of trading partners

President Donald Trump's higher tariff rates of 10% to 50% on dozens of trading partners kicked in on Aug. 7, testing his strategy for shrinking U.S. trade deficits without massive disruptions to global supply chains, higher inflation, and stiff retaliation from trading partners. U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency began collecting the higher tariffs at 12:01 a.m. ET after weeks of suspense over Trump's final tariff rates and frantic negotiations with major trading partners that sought to lower them. Goods loaded onto U.S.-bound vessels and in transit before the midnight deadline can enter at lower prior tariff rates before Oct. 5, according to a CBP notice to shippers issued this week. Imports from many countries had previously been subject to a baseline 10% import duty after Trump paused higher rates announced in early April. But since then, Trump has frequently modified his tariff plan, slapping some countries with much higher rates, including 50% for goods from Brazil, 39% from Switzerland, 35% from Canada and 25% from India. He announced on Aug. 6 a separate, 25% tariff on Indian goods to be imposed in 21 days over the South Asian country's purchases of Russian oil. "RECIPROCAL TARIFFS TAKE EFFECT AT MIDNIGHT TONIGHT!," Trump said on Truth Social just ahead of the deadline. "BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, LARGELY FROM COUNTRIES THAT HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR MANY YEARS, LAUGHING ALL THE WAY, WILL START FLOWING INTO THE USA. THE ONLY THING THAT CAN STOP AMERICA'S GREATNESS WOULD BE A RADICAL LEFT COURT THAT WANTS TO SEE OUR COUNTRY FAIL!" Eight major trading partners accounting for about 40% of U.S. trade flows have reached framework deals for trade and investment concessions to Trump, including the European Union, Japan, and South Korea, reducing their base tariff rates to 15%. Britain won a 10% rate, while Vietnam, Indonesia, Pakistan, and the Philippines secured rate reductions to 19% or 20%. Phones, jewelry, linens: Which products could cost more due to Trump's India tariffs? "For those countries, it's less-bad news," said William Reinsch, a senior fellow and trade expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. "There'll be some supply chain rearrangement. There'll be a new equilibrium. Prices here will go up, but it'll take a while for that to show up in a major way," Reinsch said. Countries with punishingly high duties, such as India and Canada, "will continue to scramble around trying to fix this," he added. Trump's order has specified that any goods determined to have been transshipped from a third country to evade higher U.S. tariffs will be subject to an additional 40% import duty, but his administration has released few details on how these goods would be identified or the provision enforced. Trump's July 31 tariff order imposed duties above 10% on 67 trading partners, while the rate was kept at 10% for those not listed. These import taxes are one part of a multilayered tariff strategy that includes national security-based sectoral tariffs on semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, autos, steel, aluminum, copper, lumber, and other goods. Trump said on Aug. 6 that the microchip duties could reach 100%. China is on a separate tariff track and will face a potential tariff increase on Aug. 12 unless Trump approves an extension of a prior truce after talks last week in Sweden. He has said he may impose additional tariffs on China's purchases of Russian oil as he seeks to pressure Moscow into ending its war in Ukraine. Guitars, bagels and booze: How Canadians became reluctant warriors in Trump tariff fight Revenues, price hikes Trump has touted the vast increase in federal revenues from his import tax collections, which are ultimately paid by companies importing the goods and consumers of end products. The higher rates will add to the total, which reached a record $27 billion in June. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said that U.S. tariff revenues could top $300 billion a year. The move will drive average U.S. tariff rates to around 20%, the highest in a century and up from 2.5% when Trump took office in January, the Atlantic Institute estimates. Commerce Department data released last week showed more evidence that tariffs began driving up U.S. prices in June, including for home furnishings and durable household equipment, recreational goods, and motor vehicles. Costs from Trump's tariff war are mounting for a wide swath of companies, including bellwethers Caterpillar, Marriott, Molson Coors, and Yum Brands. All told, global companies that have reported earnings so far this quarter are looking at a hit of around $15 billion to profits in 2025, Reuters' global tariff tracker shows. 'America's big case': What happens next in the court battle over Trump's tariffs? (Reporting by David Lawder and Andrea Shalal; Editing by Lincoln Feast)

Trump claims Howard Stern's SiriusXM show ‘went down' after the shock jock endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016
Trump claims Howard Stern's SiriusXM show ‘went down' after the shock jock endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump claims Howard Stern's SiriusXM show ‘went down' after the shock jock endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016

President Trump claimed Howard Stern's longtime SiriusXM show 'went down' because the legendary radio host endorsed Hillary Clinton before the 2016 presidential election. Trump was fielding questions from reporters inside the Oval Office when he was briefed on the reported uncertainty surrounding the 71-year-old and his titular show. 'Howard Stern is a name I haven't heard – I used to do his show, we used to have fun – but I haven't heard that name in a long time,' Trump said Wednesday in the White House. 5 President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on Aug. 6, 2025. REUTERS 'What happened? He got terminated?' he asked. Real America's Voice correspondent Brian Glenn, who brought up the topic with the president, claimed Stern and SiriusXM were parting ways over salary disagreements. 'You know when he went down? When he endorsed Hillary Clinton,' Trump said. 'He lost his audience. People said, 'Give me a break.' 'He went down when he endorsed Hillary Clinton,' the 79-year-old commander in chief emphasized. The longtime shock jock's future on the air remains uncertain as his five-year, $500 million contract with SiriusXM winds down. 5 Howard Stern attends the 2025 North Shore Animal League America Celebration of Rescue at Tribeca 360 in New York City on June 12, 2025. Getty Images Stern, who made a surprise episode of his famed show on Tuesday morning, would be open to a short-term contract at the right price, but is also considering retiring, the US Sun reported. The host promised he would be returning to his regular schedule on Sept. 2. with no indication of if and when he is leaving. 'We'll be back on the air live. I've been refueling, so to speak,' Stern told his listeners. The second reiteration of Stern's legendary show began in 2006 and was renewed by SiriusXM in 2020. At it's height, it drew 20 million daily listeners. 5 Donald Trump, Melania Trump, Beth Ostrosky and Howard Stern sit courtside at the Washington Wizards – New York Knicks game on Nov. 4, 2005. WireImage 5 Howard Stern interviews Donald Trump during a radio show on 1994. MediaPunch via Getty Images Trump and Stern are former friends, having attended each other's weddings and the two-time president being a frequent guest on the radio show. Their relationship went south following the radio host's endorsement of Hillary Clinton for the White House in 2016. In June 2022, Stern said he wanted to run for president if Trump was the GOP nominee in 2024. 5 Howard Stern interviews Paul Simon during an episode of 'The Howard Stern Show' on Sept. 22, 2023. The Howard Stern Show 'I'll beat his ass,' Stern told his listeners at the time. During the lead up to the Nov. 5, 2024, general election, Stern was one of the rare media personalities to get an interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, who was the Democratic presidential nominee. Trump fumed at Stern after the episode aired, claiming he gave Harris softball questions. 'BETA MALE Howard Stern made a fool of himself on his low rated radio show when he 'interviewed' Lyin' Kamala Harris, and hit her with so many SOFTBALL questions that even she was embarrassed,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'He looked like a real fool, working so hard to make a totally incompetent and ill-equipped person look as good as possible, which wasn't very good,' he added. Stern endorsed Harris, claiming he would vote for a wall before Trump. 'I don't even understand how this election is close,' Stern told Harris. 'Why do my fellow Americans want this kind of chaos overseas?'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store