Why the Trump Administration Is About to Set Fire to 500 Tons of Emergency Food
The publication said that previously, career staff could have handed off the biscuits to the World Food Programme to distribute them, but employees said that since Musk's so-called DOGE devastated USAID — firing and placing thousands of workers on leave — aid items cannot move without the new political leaders of the agency. And while the responsibility originally was given to Trump appointee Pete Marocco, it passed to Jeremy Lewin, who became deputy administrator for policy and programs for what's left of USAID. (Rolling Stone previously reported on Lewin's alleged history of violence and racist remarks.) Staffers who sent the memos requesting approval to move the emergency food said they never got a response, however, and it is unclear if either Marocco or Lewin ever received the memos.
Now, enough food to feed about 1.5 million children for a week — equal to nearly 500 metric tons of emergency food — is set to expire today, The Atlantic reports. Despite Secretary of State Marco Rubio ensuring representatives on the House Appropriations Committee in May that food aid would reach its intended recipients, the Trump administration reportedly plans to spend $130,000 to burn the biscuits instead of sending them to children in need.
While improper food storage, a flood, or a terrorist group may lead to a few dozen tons of food aid being lost a year, a USAID staffer said that he has never witnessed this many biscuits wasted over his decades with the agency.
Unfortunately, USAID inventory lists show that as of January, more than 60,000 metric tons of food already purchased by the U.S. government were sitting in warehouses across the world, including 36,000 pounds of peas, oil, and cereal. A former senior official at USAID's Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance told The Atlantic that when she left her job earlier in July, only a small portion of the food appeared to have moved, while a current employee said small shipments are starting to leave a warehouse in Djibouti. However, given that USAID has been gutted of key employees essential to coordinating and distributing the food to people across the world, whether those parcels will land in the right hands is uncertain.
More from Rolling Stone
Speaker Mike Johnson Splits From Trump, Calls for Release of Epstein Files
How Texas Bullied Big Banks Into Dropping Their Climate Commitments
What Trump Has Said About Jeffrey Epstein Over the Years
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
20 minutes ago
- CNBC
Union Pacific in mega US railroad merger talks with rival Norfolk
Union Pacific said on Thursday it was in advanced discussions with rival Norfolk Southern for a possible mega merger that would create a transcontinental railroad behemoth. Norfolk shares were up 3.5%, while Union Pacific fell 2.3% in premarket trading. A deal, if it goes through, will combine Union Pacific's dominant position in the Western two-thirds of the U.S. with Norfolk's 19,500-mile route predominantly spanning 22 eastern states. Norfolk has a market value of about $63.2 billion, while Union Pacific was valued at around $138 billion, according to LSEG data. There can be no assurances as to whether an agreement for a transaction will be reached or as to its terms, Union Pacific said. The North American railroad industry has struggled with volatile freight volumes, rising labor and fuel costs, and growing pressure from shippers over service reliability. If the two companies agree to a deal, it would be largest-ever buyout in the sector. It would also shape up as a key test of the Trump administration's appetite for big-ticket mergers and faces a plethora of regulatory hurdles. The first challenge would be securing approval from the Surface Transportation Board (STB), the federal agency that oversees railroads, currently led by Patrick Fuchs, a Trump appointee named to the post in January. It would also require the support of worker unions and might invite scrutiny from several other federal bodies. Major railroad unions have long pushed back against consolidation, warning that such deals threaten jobs and risk throwing rail service into disarray. The last major consolidation in the industry was the $31 billion merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern, which created the first and only single line rail network connecting Canada, the United States and Mexico. The deal, which closed in 2023, faced intense regulatory pushback over concerns it would stifle competition, eliminate jobs and disrupt service but was eventually approved.
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Flake: ‘All of us should be concerned' by Columbia, CBS deals with Trump
Former Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) on Wednesday said the public should be concerned about the Trump administration's recent settlements with Columbia University and CBS. Columbia on Wednesday agreed to pay $221 million to the Trump administration so it can recoup federal funding, while CBS's parent company, Paramount Global, signed a $16 million settlement with the president earlier this month over editorial content decisions made in former Vice President Harris's interview with '60 Minutes.' 'I think all of us should be concerned where this goes,' Flake said during a Wednesday appearance on CNN's 'NewsNight with Abby Phillip.' 'I wouldn't want Donald Trump, I wouldn't want Joe Biden, I wouldn't want anybody, any president, to be the arbiter of what is truth and what is not, and what universities have to do to be able to attract foreign students or what not,' he added. Columbia's acting university President Claire Shipman said the deal with the Trump administration would allow the school to maintain its independence and restore funding after a period of 'institutional uncertainty.' However, Flake said the White House's influence is becoming overarching with recent agreements seeped in directives at schools, news companies and law firms. 'This has gone too far in many areas, particularly with the law firms, basically telling them they've got to pay up or pony up, or they're going to be investigated or left aside,' Flake told Phillip.
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Only 13 percent see transparency on Epstein case: Fox News poll
Just 13 percent of voters in a new survey said that they think the Trump administration has been open and transparent with information in its probe of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's case. The Fox News poll, released late Wednesday, shows that Republicans were more favorable in assessing the Trump administration's handling of what's been dubbed the 'Epstein files,' but 60 percent of GOP respondents said they do not think the administration has been transparent. Meanwhile, 74 percent of Democrats and 64 percent of independents said they didn't think that the president had been open and transparent, according to the survey. Epstein, who was known in elite circles in New York and Florida, died in a New York City prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He was a former associate of Trump, but the two had a falling out decades ago. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI concluded its probe earlier this month, finding that Epstein didn't have a 'client list' that would connect his crimes to anyone else. Congress has become bogged down amid pressure to release more information on the case, though. House lawmakers left for their August recess as Democrats sought to force the release of more documents through efforts at the Capitol. 'There's no purpose for the Congress to push an administration to do something they're already doing,' House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told reporters during a news conference Wednesday. Johnson added that the chamber would take 'appropriate action' when it returns this fall if the Trump administration does not release more information. The latest poll also found that 19 percent of respondents surveyed said they had not been following the Epstein case, including a quarter of independents. Fox News surveyed 1,000 registered voters across the country from July 18-21 and the poll has a margin of error of 3 percentage points.
