logo
Two Women, A Kashmiri Pandit & A Strike Called Sindoor: Decoding India's Boldest Briefing Yet

Two Women, A Kashmiri Pandit & A Strike Called Sindoor: Decoding India's Boldest Briefing Yet

News1807-05-2025

Last Updated:
The operation's name carried an intricate symbolism, which is now seen as a mark of feminine identity, power and also a retribution for killing civilians in front of their wives
Two women in uniform—Colonel Sofia Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh—along with India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, a seasoned diplomat and Kashmiri Pandit—stood at the frontline of not just the country's military narrative, but a national moment.
The government's decision to select the panel to hold the most crucial press briefing in recent times, and also carefully name the operation against terror hotbeds in Pakistan as Operation Sindoor, is a move that is rich with symbolism and strategic clarity. The representation itself spoke volumes without needing to say much.
This was not just a routine military briefing, it was a calibrated and calculated assertion of power, identity, and narrative control. By placing women in uniform and a voice from the Kashmir Valley at the forefront, the government framed Operation Sindoor not just as a tactical success, but as a statement of inclusive strength—military, moral, and national. As they delivered the crucial press conference on details of Operation Sindoor, their presence was a powerful statement in itself.
In a domain long reserved for men, the spotlight now belonged to women who had earned it through precision, discipline, and command.
'Sindoor' as Symbolism
The operation's name—Sindoor—carried an intricately layered symbolism, which is now seen as a mark of feminine identity, protection, power and also a retribution for killing the civilians in front of their wives. The operation and the briefing were just not reflections of military success. It was also about the unveiling of a new chapter in India's strategic ethos, where women don't just serve—they lead and avenge as well.
In the fog of heightened geopolitical tensions, the voices of two formidable Indian women pierced through the clutter with clarity and authority. Colonel Qureshi and Wing Commander Singh were selected to take charge of building a firm narrative.
As the Narendra Modi government executed a decisive strike across the border, these two officers were entrusted with briefing the nation and the world, symbolising not only military prowess but also the growing role of women in India's strategic command.
A Strategic Shift
Colonel Sofia Qureshi, known as a seasoned officer from the Army Signal Corps and the first woman to lead an Indian Army contingent in a multinational exercise in 2016, brought composure and precision to the Army's narrative.
Her way of briefing with details was a blend of operational and diplomatic firmness. She emphasised that the strike was a pre-emptive counter-terror operation targeting terror launch pads across the Line of Control (LoC).
Her tone and presentation appeared firm and was devoid of rhetoric—it was a message of resolve, not revenge. Qureshi, calm and authoritative, stood as the quiet testament to the evolving gender dynamics within India's defence forces, where competence is commanding the room, not gender. Col Qureshi is a soldier by legacy and by choice as well.
Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, a fighter controller with the Indian Air Force, echoed this balance of professionalism and power. With airspace violations a constant threat in cross-border conflict, Wing Commander Singh explained the precision and coordination that characterised the Indian Air Force's involvement.
Her statements were crisp, technical, and infused with unmistakable confidence. A symbol of the new IAF, she also represented the generation of women who've moved beyond symbolic roles into the realm of real-time combat operations and decision-making.
Together, both Qureshi and Singh did more than just brief the media—they embodied a narrative shift. India's military message was not just about retaliation, but evolution. By placing two women at the forefront of strategic communication during a critical military operation, India signalled that its doctrine of strength includes intelligence, inclusion, and transformation. In them, the nation saw not only warriors, but also architects of a new-era defence domain.
A Kashmiri Voice At Helm Of Messaging
India's foreign secretary Vikram Misri's presence on the panel carried quiet but unmistakable weight and also established the strength of India's foreign policy. A seasoned diplomat, who held substantial positions including deputy national security adviser (NSA), Misri is also a Kashmiri Pandit—his roots entwined with a history of exile, resilience, and unforgotten loss.
In choosing him to frame the strategic narrative and diplomatic contours of Operation Sindoor, the Modi government signalled more than tactical resolve. It also invoked historical memory.
Misri's calm, precise articulation with authority of India's position lent depth to the narrative—this was not just a response to terror, but a reaffirmation that those once silenced by violence now help shape the national response to it.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
Operation Sindoor Pahalgam attack pm narendra modi Vikram Misri
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 07, 2025, 12:19 IST
News india Two Women, A Kashmiri Pandit & A Strike Called Sindoor: Decoding India's Boldest Briefing Yet

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistani army acts as custodian of ideologies, religion: Former diplomat DP Srivastava
Pakistani army acts as custodian of ideologies, religion: Former diplomat DP Srivastava

Hans India

time32 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Pakistani army acts as custodian of ideologies, religion: Former diplomat DP Srivastava

Former Indian diplomat D.P. Srivastava stated that Pakistan's Army challenges the concept of sovereignty by acting as a custodian of ideologies and religion, rather than focusing on national frontiers like the military forces of other nations. Srivastava also slammed the radical Islamist ideology in Pakistan, which pits the nation against its neighbouring countries, including India. In an interview with IANS, the former diplomat also talked about Pakistani Army's Field Marshal General Asim Munir's April 16 speech, just days before the Pahalgam terror attack, in which 26 innocent people lost their lives at the hands of terrorists belonging to The Resistance Front (TRF), an offshoot of Pakistan-based terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba. He hailed Operation Sindoor and said that it reflected a major shift in India's security doctrine. He also commented on Prime Minister Narendra Modi's G7 invite. The following are the excerpts from the interview: IANS: Could you tell us something about your book "Pakistan -- Ideologies, Strategies and Interests"? D.P. Srivastava: My postings took me to Karachi, Pakistan, and the early 1990s. I dealt with Pakistan, among other issues, in the UN division of the Ministry of External Affairs for eight years in the '90s, and during this, I dealt with Kashmir talks to the Pokhran nuclear test and Kargil. The inspiration for the book came from my posting to Karachi, where I heard the phrase 'Nazaria-e-Pakistan', which means the ideology of Pakistan. This is the very phrase used by Gen Munir, who mentioned this in his speech on April 16, days before the Pahalgam terror attack. My book traces the interpretation of ideology and elite interest in the making of Pakistan's domestic and foreign policy. IANS: What is the ideology of Pakistan? Gen Asim Munir mentioned "superior ideology" and the two-nation theory in his speech on April 16. What is this ideology? D.P. Srivastava: The ideology of Pakistan remains vague due to various influential factors within the country. In 1972, two provincial governments were dismissed, and the principal opposition party, the National Awami Party, was banned after the Supreme Court of Pakistan stated that the party was contrary to the ideology of Pakistan. Notably, this occurred before the formation of the country's new constitution, indicating that the ideology preceded the Constitution in Pakistan. There are different views of what this ideology is. Iqbal, who is known as the best explainer of Pakistani ideology, said that in Islam, religion and state are integral to each other, so he ruled out the idea of secularism, and he also opposed the idea of nationalism. Iqbal also stressed the concept of Umma, which is pan-Islamism, and these are the concepts at the root of Pakistan's current trouble where the jihadi groups do not accept the supremacy of the Parliament, the sovereignty of which, is also challenged by the Army. The jihadi philosophy has always pitted Pakistan against its neighbours, including, what they call "the Hindu India, Shia Iran, and Sunni Afghanistan". IANS: What is the mindset of the Pakistan Army? D.P. Srivastava: To understand the mindset Pakistan Army, one should go back to Gen Asim Munir's April 16 speech, where he reminded his Pakistani audience that they belong to a superior ideology. What is this ideology, one may ask? (Former Pakistani President) Ayub Khan described it as Islam. It is very strange that the Pakistani army chiefs talk about ideology and Islam. In other nations, the armies protect the national frontiers, while in Pakistan, the army has become a custodian of ideologies and religion. Seems like Gen Munir has assumed the priest and a general. The Pakistani army has institutionalised its role in the running of the government, where the civilian parties have taken the backseat. This mindset is also reflected in the neglect of socioeconomic indicators. Pakistan's army regards itself as the state, and it has this mindset has led to excessive defensive expenditure to the neglect of economic indicators. IANS: How do you see Operation Sindoor? Is it part of a larger strategic shift in India's security policy against Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism? D.P. Srivastava: Operation Sindoor represents a strategic shift in India's security doctrine, as the Prime Minister has underlined. Pakistan has used the threat of escalation to the nuclear level in the case of India's conventional response to subconventional threats like terror attacks. This time, however, there was no statement from the Pakistani side about nuclear escalation during Operation Sindhoor. So Pakistan's bluff has been called, that it cannot escalate a local conflict or deter India from a military response to a terror attack, and this is a major shift in the paradigm. It also sends a message to the global community that India will exercise its right of self-defence, and we have the strength to do so. We did that in a very responsible manner. We avoided escalation. The escalation came mostly from the Pakistani side. India's initial strike was only against the terror camps. We avoided hitting any Pakistani, civil or military installation. It was Pakistan which attacked Indian Air Force bases, and that forced India to attack Pakistani military installations, and that brought Pakistan quickly to its knees. The Pakistani DGMO called his Indian counterpart, begging for a ceasefire. This message has also gone home and has been understood well by the international community. IANS: Prime Minister Modi has accepted an invitation by Canadian PM Mark Carney to the G7 Summit. Do you think this will help mend the strained India-Canada ties? D.P. Srivastava: The Prime Minister has accepted the invitation to go to the G7 summit. So the focus will be on global issues, not on bilateral relations. But, of course, when the leaders meet, they discuss the entire range of issues, and this will be a good opportunity to bring the bilateral relations back on an even keel. We had good relations with Canada, and I believe, there's a better understanding of the Indian position in the new government there, about the impact of terrorism. And, I think the new government is unlikely to use these incidents as an electoral card. So we hope that this visit will bring about a clearer understanding between the two countries.

US trade team extends India stay as talks gather momentum
US trade team extends India stay as talks gather momentum

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

US trade team extends India stay as talks gather momentum

A US trade team that's currently in India for negotiations has extended its stay, according to people familiar with the matter, in a sign talks are progressing ahead of a July deadline. The team, which was initially scheduled to hold talks with Indian officials on June 5-6, will now be staying till Tuesday to continue discussions, the people said, asking not to be identified because the information isn't public. Most of the issues may get finalized within a week, the people estimated. India and the US are working on a phased trade deal with an early agreement targeted for July, the deadline for implementation of the so-called reciprocal tariffs. At the same time, those tariffs are facing legal challenges in Washington. India's Commerce Ministry and the US Trade Representative's office in Washington didn't respond to email requests for comment outside of regular business hours. Local Indian media earlier reported the extension of the visit. Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal described his meeting with US counterpart Howard Lutnick during a visit to the US in May as 'constructive.' Earlier this month, Lutnick said he's 'very optimistic' about prospects for a trade deal between the US and India 'in the not-too-distant future.' India was one of the first countries to begin negotiating a trade deal with the US, hoping to avert President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs, which are scheduled to kick in on July 9. The talks come against the backdrop of recent statements by Goyal in Paris on June 1, where he outlined that India and the United States are working toward providing preferential market access to their respective businesses. On Trump's plan to increase tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50%, Goyal told ANI that both countries remain committed to addressing trade issues through bilateral dialogue. "Let us wait and watch... both the US and India share good relations and we will continue to work together to resolve all these issues bilaterally," Goyal said.

Op Sindoor feather in cap of Modi government? 100%, says Chandrababu Naidu
Op Sindoor feather in cap of Modi government? 100%, says Chandrababu Naidu

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Op Sindoor feather in cap of Modi government? 100%, says Chandrababu Naidu

Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu on Sunday endorsed India's Operation Sindoor, saying it was a feather in the cap for the government and praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi, calling him a "global leader".In an exclusive interview with India Today TV's Consulting Editor Rajdeep Sardesai, Naidu said PM Modi played a role in halting the military conflict between India and Pakistan, saying his wisdom per cent. This (Operation Sindoor) is a feather in the cap of the Modi government. No other leader can do this so perfectly without precision. The Pahalgam terror attack was unfortunate and husbands were killed in front of their wives," he said. He said PM Modi named India's military operation as Sindoor to fulfill the sentiments of the Indian women and take revenge against terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack, which killed 25 tourists and a local."Within 20 minutes, we destroyed terror pockets and did not attack civilians and defence installations. The conflict ended at the right time. PM Modi ended the fighting. Is it not our credit? His wisdom prevailed. If the war is prolonged, then we will lose," Naidu Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, India destroyed terror camps at nine locations across Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK), killing over 100 terrorists. Pakistan then escalated the situation, by firing a barrage of drones and missiles towards border cities and defence installations in India. However, India hit back and launched a counter-offensive, damaging several Pakistani military bases, before both countries agreed to stop about Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's claim whether India succumbed to the US's pressure, Naidu said there "was no need to surrender to anybody"."We have our own strategies. Who will control Trump? He will talk as he likes. But at the same time, the wisdom of PM Modi prevailed. We are very clear. We won't quarrel unnecessarily. If anybody comes after us, we won't leave them. We are capable of protecting our nation," he Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister said while India wants friendly relations with all countries, there was "no need to have any recommendation or support from anywhere"."PM Modi is emerging as a tall leader globally. That is the pride of our nation," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store