logo
Berkeley's latest downtown drama: Pickleball on the top of a parking garage

Berkeley's latest downtown drama: Pickleball on the top of a parking garage

The trend of converting little-used parking garage rooftops to pickleball courts could be coming to downtown Berkeley, although, like most things involving the booming sport, there is opposition brewing.
Neighborhood Pickleball LLC, started by Orinda resident Jim Jenkins, is proposing to put three courts on the 6th floor of the parking garage at 2061 Allston Way, a structure that lies to the east of the Berkeley YMCA and across the street from the Mangalam Research Center and Berkeley City College.
The proposal comes as remote work has left once-full garages largely vacant. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency is exploring the possibility of putting pickleball on two of its under-utilized garages — Sutter-Stockton and 5th and Mission– as use has fallen by 61% since 2018.
Other garage rooftops-to-pickleball conversions are in the works in New York, New Hampshire, Maryland and Texas.
Jenkins said that he started looking at parking garages after visiting a friend's pickleball club in Austin, Texas, which features five courts atop a car park. He said he liked the low-key community vibe, which reminded him of the early days of the pandemic when the racquet sport was just taking off — before the courts became overcrowded and in some cases hours were cut back because of noise complaints from neighbors or conflict with tennis players.
'It feels like a neighborhood park, it doesn't feel like a big pickleball facility,' he said. 'It's optimized for community and social interaction over sheer number of pickleball courts.'
When Jenkins expressed his admiration to Jay Lerner, the Austin Club owner, 'He was like 'Go back to the Bay Area and find a garage.''
'I looked at every garage from Berkeley to Oakland to San Francisco all the way down to San Jose,' Jenkins said. 'What I learned is that there is nobody parking on top of a single garage in the Bay Area. They are all dead. And many of them have closed the top several floors.'
Several of the garages don't work for pickleball because the surface is not level, but the Allston Way property is perfect and he said the owners are enthusiastic.
Jenkins says the Berkeley club would be low-key with a small membership and some corporate events. There will be an astroturf area with picnic tables, umbrellas and Adirondack chairs for socializing. The three courts would take up about one-third of the rooftop.
'I'm not doing this to be rich,' he said. 'It would be a place for folks to come and learn and grow and laugh and have a good time.'
Opposition to the high-pitched popping of pickleball paddle on plastic ball has made the sport a pariah in some neighborhoods. A campaign to eliminate pickleball from courts at San Francisco's Presidio Wall — an initiative launched by a homeowner who had her own private pickleball court — prompted the city to cut public hours of play. In Piedmont the City Council cut hours of pickleball play from 84 to 55.
Meanwhile, Jenkins said that, like many pickleball players, he finds himself driving all over the Bay Area in search of courts where dozens of people are not waiting to play. Overcrowded public courts have 'scattered communities,' with many players joining private clubs like the Bay Club, which has 125 courts across the West Coast, including some at the Bay Club Gateway on the Embarcadero, where abutting condo owners are suing over noise.
In downtown Berkeley, where the city council has to approve the use permit, there may already be some opposition forming. Jack Petranker, director of the Mangalam Research Center for Buddhist Languages which sits across from the garage at 2018 Allston Way, said he saw the notices posted on the property indicating that Neighborhood Pickleball LLC had filed for a use permit to put courts on the roof. He said he had been unfamiliar with the sport but was not thrilled with what he read about it.
'I saw reports that it sounded like gunshots — plastic on plastic,' he said. 'It would be pretty disruptive.'
Mangalam Research Center, which publishes books and holds conferences and lectures, said the courts would be directly across from the managing editor's office as well as from a residential unit where several full-time volunteers are housed.
He reached out to Berkeley City Councilmember Igor Tregub, who said he couldn't take a position because the proposed use permit would come before the council.
'Right now it's early days in the process and I'm looking forward to hearing from the community,' he said. 'My commitment is to be able to have recreational opportunities in the downtown and ensure that the quality of life of the neighbors is also preserved.'
Jenkins said when he started playing four years ago he assumed Bay Area cities would rush to accommodate the burgeoning sport. If that had been the case, he wouldn't feel the need to open his own club.
'It turned out that I was totally wrong,' he said. 'Every city said, 'This is a big pain in the butt. The complaints are a nightmare so we are going to let the private folks come in and build the courts.''

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PFF sees Elgton Jenkins as top-10 NFL center entering 2025
PFF sees Elgton Jenkins as top-10 NFL center entering 2025

USA Today

time16 hours ago

  • USA Today

PFF sees Elgton Jenkins as top-10 NFL center entering 2025

PFF sees Elgton Jenkins as top-10 NFL center entering 2025 A ranking of the top 32 centers in the NFL from Pro Football Focus helps highlight the potential of improvement for the Green Bay Packers by moving Elgton Jenkins from center to guard in 2025. Josh Myers, a multi-year starter for the Packers at center who departed for the New York Jets in free agency, isn't even ranked in the top 32 centers. Jenkins, meanwhile, is already viewed as a top-10 player at the position: PFF ranked Jenkins at No. 9. From Mason Cameron of PFF: "After playing primarily at guard throughout his NFL career, Jenkins will make the jump to center in 2025. He has logged just 378 snaps at center in his pro career but has experience there from college, giving hope that his overall ability will translate. Jenkins' 81.6 PFF pass-blocking grade over the past two seasons ranks second among guards." The Packers signed left guard Aaron Banks in free agency, so Jenkins -- a Pro Bowler at guard in the past -- is moving to center, a position he's played at the pro level and extensively at Mississippi State. Where does Banks rank among guards? PFF positioned him at No. 32 at the position entering 2025. Not among the best, but in the top half of starters. The Packers are hoping Jenkins provides a big upgrade at center while Banks keeps the level of play steady at left guard -- raising the ceiling of the entire offensive line. While tough and smart, Myers lacked consistency down to down and was often a liability in the run game. The Packers never considered a re-signing and let him leave after his rookie deal expired this spring. Lacking interest on the open market, Myers signed a one-year deal with the Jets and isn't expected to be a starter. He'll be a backup behind Joe Tippmann, a second-round pick in the 2023 draft out of Wisconsin. Creed Humphrey, a multi-year All-Pro whom the Packers bypassed to take Myers in 2021, retained the top spot of the center rankings. Although Frank Ragnow of the Detroit Lions is retiring, two other centers in the NFC North ranked above Jenkins: Drew Dalman of the Chicago Bears at No. 5, and Ryan Kelly of the Minnesota Vikings at No. 8 -- two offseason signings.

Trump's Vision of Government: Members Only
Trump's Vision of Government: Members Only

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Vision of Government: Members Only

'No MAGA left behind.' So read the tweet sent by Donald Trump's pardon attorney, Ed Martin, following the president's pardon of former Culpeper County, Virginia, Sheriff Scott Jenkins. Jenkins was convicted by a jury in December and sentenced to 10 years for what the lead prosecutor, Zachary T. Lee, characterized as a 'cash-for-badges' scheme in which Jenkins received $75,000 in exchange for appointing local business leaders as auxiliary deputy sheriffs. It was about as cut-and-dry a case of bribery as one might conjure up. Yet Martin's tweet made clear that, however obvious Jenkins's violations of the public trust may have been, he possessed the one asset that exempted him from justice: He's a made man in Magaland. Jenkins has been a consistent and vocal supporter of Donald Trump, who posted on Truth Social that the sheriff was 'a victim of an overzealous Biden Department of Justice, and doesn't deserve to spend a single day in jail.' Naturally, there's no evidence that Jenkins was in any way a victim of prosecutorial malfeasance, but there is ample evidence that the pardon criteria followed by the Trump administration are based primarily on one thing: loyalty—demonstrated either through one's actions (including the commission of crimes on the president's behalf) or, alternatively, by paying a high enough price to demonstrate fealty. Elizabeth Fago, the mother of tax cheat Paul Walczak, did both—ponying up $1 million to attend a Trump dinner. She was also careful to note on her application for her son's clemency that she'd raised millions of dollars for Trump's campaign, while reminding them, too, of her efforts to publish the addiction diary of Joe Biden's daughter Ashley. Walczak got his pardon. So have many others for whom Trump has expressed support—not because they were innocent, because overwhelmingly they were no such thing, but because they're either MAGA members or tapped to join the club. Stewart Rhodes, leader of the Oath Keepers, had been sentenced to 18 years for his planning of the January 6 Capitol assault. He's free after Trump commuted that sentence, much to the horror of Rhodes's ex-wife Tasha Adams, who has accused him of being a serial domestic abuser and has called him a 'danger to America.' Rhodes's MAGA membership card not only got him clemency, but also the privilege of meeting with Republican lawmakers once he was sprung. Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio did even better, getting to join Trump at Mar-a-Lago last month after being sentenced to 22 years in prison for his role in the January 6 attack. Tarrio reported that he and his mother had a 'great conversation' with the president. Meanwhile, visa holders like Rümeysa Öztürk and hundreds of others face different fates. They can be kidnapped off the street and imprisoned. Some, like Maryland resident Kilmar Abegro Garcia, makeup artist Andry José Hernández Romero, and scores of Venezuelans can all be sent away to a gulag in El Salvador without any due process, despite court rulings that indicate such actions are unconstitutional. Many thousands of others sit in American jails or prisons, including federal penitentiaries, because they cannot pay bail, or have drug addictions, or were the victims of systematic bias. Nothing is being done for them. Why? They are not MAGA members. They are not protected. Just like any made man in the Mafia, to be a member of the MAGA Club you must vow allegiance to the group. The mob has omertà, its code of silence. MAGA has its own version—omaga, you might call it: Don't ever speak ill of the president or question his motives. You must buy wholly into the MAGA narrative to be considered a full MAGA member. Like any multilevel marketing scheme, the more you pay into the cult and spread its gospel, the more privileges you earn. It's why we see Cabinet meetings wherein department heads try to one-up each other in their praise of the president. Like any other gang of scheming capos, they're trying to please the Don. They're afraid of being turned out of the club. There is a principle known as Wilhoit's Law, deriving from a classical music composer who first posted it on the site Crooked Timber. It states, 'Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.' With Trump's criminal syndicate running the show, the out-groups are various: liberals, Black people, single women, strong women, the LGBTQ+ community, undocumented immigrants, most other immigrant groups, environmentalists, and anyone who doesn't drink at the Fountain of Trump. The president has no intention whatsoever of representing these people, even if they make up relatively half of the country. His goal, instead, is to elevate MAGA members above them. Most of those members will stay with him, he's realized, even if he takes away vital government services they need, such as Medicaid and protections against hazardous foods and unrestrained monopolies, because he has empowered them. Critically, he has given them the very commodity they desperately crave: social status and a feeling of belonging. Democrats are a nuisance because they make people reflect upon things; Trump makes them part of the in-group, in on the joke and entitled to special consideration. Because the gospel of the MAGA Club must remain whole and cannot be challenged, universities and journalists (the ones outside of the right-wing propaganda network) will always be enemies of the Magaverse as well. For all their faults, the overwhelming majority of universities still practice the scientific method and value objective observation and free discussion, even if they may falter in the execution of both from time to time. And those journalists who cannot be quelled into subservience will always be the bane of liars, opportunists, and bullies. This club membership mentality represents a stark break from the politics of the recent past. Presidents have generally looked to convert naysayers to their cause and unite Americans behind their agendas, to build support. Even Nixon, who railed about the press, created an enemies list, and wasn't beyond accusing people of being Communists throughout his career, was also capable of expressing sympathetic understanding for those who disagreed with him, including Vietnam protesters whom he said shared his good intentions and wanted to save American lives. He vilified some, but craved the support of the majority of the nation—the 'silent majority,' as he called it. Trump, on the other hand, has never expressed any sort of sympathy or magnanimity for those who disagree with him. He calls protesters 'terrorist sympathizers' and characterizes them as violent extremists. In his first administration, he even threatened to shoot them. And yet he set the actual MAGA terrorists that attacked the Capitol on January 6 free from prison en masse, no questions asked. Even Trump's social media posts—his incessant trolling (including, recently, a posting with alt-right hate symbol Pepe the Frog)—are intended as signals to club members. Membership has its privileges, including up-to-the-minute updates on whose eye Trump is poking, be they the libs, antifascists, 'alien invaders,' or the critics who dare to question him. That party will never end, so keep your club membership! His recent post about Biden being replaced by a robot, for one, could only have two possible explanations: Trump is stupid enough to believe it (not ruling that out) or he's signaling once again to his supporters that their club—the 'in' group—is mocking and humiliating the outsiders. He made sure to continue to tell his supporters not to feel sorry for Biden, despite his cancer diagnosis, and to continue to attack him because he's a 'vicious' person. He wants to make sure they're still empowered to be callous. The entire point is to expand the ideology behind Wilhoit's Law to a national and perhaps international scale, pitting the aggrieved against their perceived adversaries. Naturally, Trump did not invent this system of ideological rewards and punishments; he has merely built upon groundwork laid by Fox 'News,' Salem Media, and a vast right-wing network of conservative talk show hosts, influencers, and podcasters who have been beating the jingoistic drum of division for decades, positing (as practically every authoritarian regime throughout history has done) that the true greatness of the nation has been undermined by saboteurs from within. Here, he does not finger corporate titans for blame, but rather the poor, the underrepresented, and the maligned classes who have historically been disinvited from elite circles. The privileged want to retain their privileges, the bullies among them yearn to bully again, and neither want to be questioned or criticized. It's why their version of free speech includes an absence of consequences. Consequences only apply to those without power. Life in the big MAGA club is consequence-free.

Browns are happy to potentially get $600 million in state money for new stadium
Browns are happy to potentially get $600 million in state money for new stadium

NBC Sports

timea day ago

  • NBC Sports

Browns are happy to potentially get $600 million in state money for new stadium

The proprietors of the Factory of Sadness are happy with progress they're making toward building a new one. Although the mechanism isn't clear, the Browns are hoping to get $600 million in state funding for a $2.4 billion venue to be built in Brook Park. Assuming the Art Modell Law doesn't get in the way. On Wednesday, the team made Haslam Sports Group executive V.P. and COO Dave Jenkins available to reporters to discuss recent developments. 'We're very excited that the Senate chose to include $600 million in their version of the budget . . . but not nearly to the finish line yet,' Jenkins said. 'So, there's been three versions of $600 million dollars, starting with the governor, him putting it in first obviously signaled a desire at the state level to enable this project — seconded by the House, their version, and again, three different constructs.' The state has until June 30 to finalize a budget that will raise the money by increasing taxes on gambling, issuing state bonds, or taking money from the unclaimed property fund. Jenkins was also asked about criticism arising from the reluctance of ownership to privately fund the stadium. 'I think we've been pretty clear from the outset that it takes a public-private partnership to enable this project,' Jenkins said. 'And I think there's a bit of conflating of issues here. So to say that the $600 million going to us is created by pulling from other sources is, I think, a pretty unfair and inaccurate way of presenting it. So we defer to state leadership. Again, all three branches of government have signaled a willingness and a desire to enable this project, and we'll see what happens on June 30.' But the $600 million that goes to the Browns necessarily could have gone elsewhere. Balancing a public budget is a zero-sum game. Less that goes to one column is more than can go to another. The Browns still need to get $600 million in local funding to make it a true 50-50 public-private partnership. The county is out if the Browns insist on going to Brook Park, so they'll need to find that $600 million elsewhere. Regardless, the Browns are optimistic that the $600 million from the state will happen. "[T]here's three different ideas on the table now,' Jenkins said. 'So what happens . . . behind closed doors? I think those three branches of government will work hard — they've all said $600 million is OK for the project and they want to do it, and they want to enable the project. So I think they'll work collaboratively to find a final solution.' There's still a lot more that needs to happen before the stadium can be built. Coming up with $1.2 billion in public funding is half the financing battle, and the Browns could be closing in on getting half of that.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store