
I shopped at B&M and Home Bargains… but which store had the best bargains for lowest prices?
ON the high street, a battle of the bargains is raging and busy mums can't get enough of discount stores B&M and Home Bargains.
Writer and mum-of-three Lynsey Hope compares 15 everyday essentials from each – and reveals which one offers the best value.
1
From baby wipes and toothpaste to crisps and shampoo, discount giant B&M is a treasure trove for families wanting to stock up on everyday essentials.
Not only does the budget chain sell cleaning and beauty products at rock-bottom prices, but they also stock oodles of edible goods, such as chocolate and crisps – the sort of snacks most families devour by the bagful.
As a busy working mum with three children - Jacob, ten, Olive, eight, and Ivy, five - B&M has become one of my favourite places to pick up a variety of goods I use all the time.
As the cost-of-living crisis continues, I'm always on the lookout for best buys for the whole family, whether that's cereal, batteries or washing-up liquid.
All of us mums love a bargain and these stores often sell items even cheaper than you would find in the supermarket.
But is B&M really the best place for bargains?
Its biggest rival, Home Bargains, is experiencing record growth.
Profits grew by 34.2 per cent to a record £434million in the year to June 2024. There were a staggering 617 stores across the UK at the end of 2024 — 23 more than the previous year.
More Home Bargains outlets are due to open in Watford and Newport this summer, while other retailers struggle.
B&M, for example, issued a profit warning last month and said like-for-like sales were down by 3.1 per cent.
But they still have 686 stores in the UK with a plan to expand to 1,200 sites in the next few years
So, when it comes to B&M versus Home Bargains, which one offers better value?
I bought a basket of 15 essentials at each shop and tallied up how much they cost on the day.
It's worth noting that these prices can fluctuate, so while this comparison reflects what I paid at the time, costs may vary depending on when you shop.
Here's what happened when I took to the aisles to investigate . . .
B&M
Home Bargains
LYNSEY'S VERDICT
I WAS really surprised to find that Home Bargains was cheaper than B&M.
I shopped around for lots of items and many things like washing up liquid, fabric conditioner and shampoo were the same price in both stores.
However, Home Bargains did have some everyday stuff at lower prices.
I picked up some sun cream, batteries and baby wipes all a bit cheaper at Home Bargains.
It's only a small saving, but given I get through a lot of these, it's definitely a saving worth having.
Even a pouch of Quality Street was 51p cheaper than it was at B&M, and one of my favourite sheet masks – a real mum treat – was 30p cheaper.
Lots of this stuff was 'on offer', so I'll have to go back to see if these bargain prices continue. I shopped at both stores at around 4pm, so it's possible B&M would have discounted further if I'd gone closer to the 10pm closing time.
Food products seemed cheaper at Home Bargains, but the candle I picked up was cheaper at B&M.
There was only a penny in it, but they also had a much better selection of gifts and home products, such as photo frames and towels.
There was also a better selection of toys. I didn't buy anything this time, but with lots of children's parties coming up, I'd definitely go back to B&M for those.
More importantly, both stores offered much lower prices than most supermarkets.
The six pack of Walkers crisps was £1.95 in both stores. These would set you back £2.20 at Morrisons and Sainsburys, £2.15 at Tesco and £2 at Asda.
And the tiny tin of Vaseline was cheaper here than it would be if you bought it from Sainsbury's, Ocado or Waitrose. The sun cream I chose – £6.49 in Home Bargains – would cost you £7.50 at Boots.
WATCH FOR PROMOTIONS
CONSUMER expert Helen Dewdney, of thecomplainingcow.co.uk, says: "BOTH shops usually offer good value for money. However, it really depends on what it is you want to buy as to which one will work for you.
"For everyday essential food stuffs, like bread and canned goods, Home Bargains may offer better deals.
"Conversely, for household items and toiletries, B&M might provide more savings.
"To ensure you are getting the best prices, you have to carefully compare the different items. Neither store has universal pricing across items, so consumers should compare individual items and if you want it buy it before it goes as stock can vary.
"Sometimes you have to be lucky as B&M often discounts items later in the day, bringing the price to lower than Home Bargains. Of course, Home Bargains may also discount some food items later in the day.
"Both have frequent promotions, but it's only a saving if you need the item – so be careful of buying something just because it is on promotion.
"B&M has one advantage over Home Bargains in that it has an app with a barcode scanner where you can uncover discounts in store. Both run promotions, so check on websites and signs.
"Be careful of sizes and multi-pack deals which may be cheaper in the supermarket."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
25 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal
Downing Street would not say on Tuesday whether British steel exporters would be hit with 50% tariffs from the US from Wednesday, despite an agreement to eliminate the charges. Last week US President Mr Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on the imports of steel from 25% to 50%. The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised. The steel industry is working on the understanding that the sector will be impacted by the new rules and the 50% levy will likely affect UK steelmakersfrom Wednesday. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. Asked whether it was 'embarrassing' that steelmakers could face a worse situation despite the announcement of the deal last month, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of announcements for the United States. 'But what you've seen so far is the US and the UK agree a landmark deal across sectors to protect British industries – cars, steel, aluminium – and you've seen the welcoming statements the industries have made in support of the agreement. 'When it comes to implementation of the agreement, that work is ongoing.' Number 10 later insisted that Mr Trump would keep his word on the UK-US deal. Asked if Mr Trump could be trusted, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Yes, absolutely. We have a very close relationship with the US. I think that's reflected in the fact that this deal has been signed, and that it is, as we've said before, the first of its kind.' UK Steel has previously said the tariff announcement is a 'body blow' for the industry. Director general Gareth Stace said: 'The deal that the Prime Minister and President Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into confusion. 'Uncertainty remains as to whether and when our second biggest export market will be open for business or is being firmly shut in our faces.' Meanwhile, a Tata Steel director told the Business and Trade Committee on Tuesday that the UK 'absolutely' needs to go faster in supporting the steel industry in response to US tariffs. Russell Codling, director of markets, business development and commercial services at Tata said: 'It is not just for us making sure that this deal (with the US) is the right deal, it is also about making sure that the trade protection measures are the appropriate ones in the UK, and they are at least as good as other trading partners around the world.' When asked if the UK needs to go faster on the issue, Mr Codling said: 'Absolutely.' The same committee also heard from leaders in other sectors that have been affected by the tariff arrangements, including car manufacturing. An industry figure told the MPs that motoring firms would 'of course' like the 100,000 quota for a 10% tariff on car imports into the US to be higher. Murray Paul, public affairs director at Jaguar Land Rover said: 'Of course we'd prefer for it to be higher. 'But I think if we're honest it's there or thereabouts what the current market volume is of producing from the UK into the US. 'We are expectant that it's administered fairly, that if there's a small amount of pain that that is distributed equally amongst British manufacturers of goods. 'Obviously, we would like it to grow in the future because we think there's a growth opportunity in the US market as the incredible cars that we produce in this country are admired around the world.' A Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers and officials have worked tirelessly to ensure that the UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US, helping us deliver on the Plan for Change. 'The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course.'


North Wales Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal
Downing Street would not say on Tuesday whether British steel exporters would be hit with 50% tariffs from the US from Wednesday, despite an agreement to eliminate the charges. Last week US President Mr Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on the imports of steel from 25% to 50%. The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised. The steel industry is working on the understanding that the sector will be impacted by the new rules and the 50% levy will likely affect UK steelmakersfrom Wednesday. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. Asked whether it was 'embarrassing' that steelmakers could face a worse situation despite the announcement of the deal last month, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of announcements for the United States. 'But what you've seen so far is the US and the UK agree a landmark deal across sectors to protect British industries – cars, steel, aluminium – and you've seen the welcoming statements the industries have made in support of the agreement. 'When it comes to implementation of the agreement, that work is ongoing.' Number 10 later insisted that Mr Trump would keep his word on the UK-US deal. Asked if Mr Trump could be trusted, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Yes, absolutely. We have a very close relationship with the US. I think that's reflected in the fact that this deal has been signed, and that it is, as we've said before, the first of its kind.' UK Steel has previously said the tariff announcement is a 'body blow' for the industry. Director general Gareth Stace said: 'The deal that the Prime Minister and President Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into confusion. 'Uncertainty remains as to whether and when our second biggest export market will be open for business or is being firmly shut in our faces.' Meanwhile, a Tata Steel director told the Business and Trade Committee on Tuesday that the UK 'absolutely' needs to go faster in supporting the steel industry in response to US tariffs. Russell Codling, director of markets, business development and commercial services at Tata said: 'It is not just for us making sure that this deal (with the US) is the right deal, it is also about making sure that the trade protection measures are the appropriate ones in the UK, and they are at least as good as other trading partners around the world.' When asked if the UK needs to go faster on the issue, Mr Codling said: 'Absolutely.' The same committee also heard from leaders in other sectors that have been affected by the tariff arrangements, including car manufacturing. An industry figure told the MPs that motoring firms would 'of course' like the 100,000 quota for a 10% tariff on car imports into the US to be higher. Murray Paul, public affairs director at Jaguar Land Rover said: 'Of course we'd prefer for it to be higher. 'But I think if we're honest it's there or thereabouts what the current market volume is of producing from the UK into the US. 'We are expectant that it's administered fairly, that if there's a small amount of pain that that is distributed equally amongst British manufacturers of goods. 'Obviously, we would like it to grow in the future because we think there's a growth opportunity in the US market as the incredible cars that we produce in this country are admired around the world.' A Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers and officials have worked tirelessly to ensure that the UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US, helping us deliver on the Plan for Change. 'The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course.'


Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The downfall of Jadon Sancho – English football's lost talent
There may just about be time left for the next act that salvages Jadon Sancho's career at the top, but in a game that moves as quickly as this, it will have to come soon for the one-time great hope of English football. There was no bigger name in the England Under-17 squad that won its age cohort's World Cup in 2017, albeit without Sancho at the end as he was recalled by Borussia Dortmund. No more sought-after prince-across-the-water in the Premier League four years later when Sancho eventually joined Manchester United for £72.9 million. From the age of 12 upwards, possibly all the way to that doomed United move, there was no player in European football as highly-rated as Sancho in his age-group. But either the curse of United has struck Sancho, or the demands of the club were simply beyond him. Twice United have tried to get rid of him and twice, most recently with Chelsea, he has come back. This summer he represents just one more problem for United in a window where circumstances demand they must sell or re-loan at least four forward players. Marcus Rashford, Antony, Alejandro Garnacho and now Sancho – back from his second United loan, this time at Chelsea. Both sides see the outcome of the Chelsea adventure differently. For United, the £5 million penalty for Chelsea to release them from their obligation to buy Sancho covers part of his wages in this, his final contracted year. Chelsea will argue the deal made sense for them then and now. Sancho's time at Chelsea last season was by no means a bust. There were some good performances in his 41 appearances, and a goal in the final of the Europa Conference League last month, when he came on as a substitute. The problem for a player who was once regarded as one of his kind is that, at his age, and his cost, there are plenty of alternatives. Four years ago, there was only Sancho on his level – aged 21 and brought back to England by United as the best player of the English turn-of-the-millennium generation. He was the first footballer born in the 21st Century to be named in an England squad. Restless as a junior player, he left Watford when Manchester City – the most successful academy of the era – came calling. Then he left again when City could not guarantee first-team football. He departed for Dortmund, cutting a path that others have followed, and it has not bothered him whom he upset along the way. When finally he signed for United four years ago, after a long pursuit, Ole Gunnar Solskjaer described Sancho as 'an integral part of the first-team squad for years to come'. Sancho never scored a goal for his new manager, who was sacked in November 2021. Within a year he had, in Erik ten Hag's words, an injury that was 'physical' but 'also the connection with mental'. That prefaced the pair's monumental fallout in September 2023 and the beginning of the end for Sancho at United. Blame must fall on both sides. As with many prodigies, understanding the world from which their talent has largely protected them can be difficult. Gareth Southgate was never sold on Sancho, even during his best two seasons at Dortmund between 2019 and 2021. Sancho's penultimate cap for England was the Euro 2020 final against Italy in July 2021 in which he and others were racially abused in the aftermath. He has not played for England since the October of that year. At his best, Sancho was a maverick. Produced by English football's new advanced academy system that was introduced when he was 11 but, regardless of the advances in coaching, a complete natural. He was not lightning fast but capable of spotting the opportunities that presented themselves in games in an instant. He had great touch and balance. He had the kind of trickery that made him very hard to cope with when he was on his game. Not everything he tried on a pitch came off – but there was more than enough to make his name. He was as big a prospect as England had at the time. In the England Under-17s in 2017, he played on the opposite wing to Callum Hudson-Odoi, another great English academy hope who has had to resurrect his career. That team included Phil Foden, Marc Guehi and Morgan Gibbs-White among others who have forged great professional careers. But the cohort born in 2002 – Cole Palmer, Morgan Rogers, Noni Madueke – are snapping at their heels. Sancho will have made a lot of money in salary by the time his United contract expires next summer, although by then his club will hope to have sold him. He has never played for Ruben Amorim and resurrecting his career at the club now seems unlikely. United never felt they were taking a risk with Sancho. Like Paul Pogba and Romelu Lukaku and since 2021, Antony, United believed they were investing in players who would as good as guarantee them performances. Sancho is the fourth most expensive signing in United's history. Yet as his contract runs down, and the club look around for his third loan, none of this comes as a surprise any longer. Both sides will likely point at the other when it comes to the failure of a great young English talent to supply the effect that was hoped – and both, in part, will be right.