Europe calls for renewed nuclear diplomacy after efforts fall short
European officials have urged Tehran to return to the negotiating table on Monday, despite the US bombing of Iran underscoring the limits of diplomacy.
Most European leaders have refrained from criticising the Israeli and US air attacks. Irish Foreign Minister Simon Harris, one of the few officials to describe the US strikes as "very unhelpful", said negotiations were the only path to "avoid an already tinderbox situation getting even worse".
There was little progress last week at talks in Geneva between Iran and the E3 countries - the UK, France and Germany - and US President Donald Trump described the meeting as unhelpful. Yet both sides had said they were happy to continue negotiations, a position Iran abruptly reversed after the US hit three of its main nuclear sites at the weekend.
Speaking in Istanbul, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who was reported to be visibly angry, declared diplomacy 'irrelevant' in light of the attacks and warned of a retaliatory response. 'It's not time for diplomacy now,' he said.
In Brussels, Germany's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul appeared to acknowledge that European efforts were falling short.
"Iran says it only wants to negotiate with Europe and we see that as a good sign but we do also say that's not sufficient. We want to see the US involved," Mr Wadephul said after a breakfast with EU counterparts to discuss Iran.
Senior EU officials say there is no alternative to diplomacy. Asked by The National to react to Mr Trump's comments about the Geneva talks, the EU's foreign affairs chief, Kaja Kallas, defended them.
"It was very important that we do this outreach. We have done this before," Ms Kallas said, referring to the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, from which Mr Trump pulled out three years later during his first presidency. "Iran was opening up to discuss all topics nuclear but also broader security issues concerning Europe," Ms Kallas added.
Ms Kallas's predecessors had played a lead mediation role between Iran and world powers during the nuclear deal negotiations. Yet a shifting geopolitical landscape in the Middle East has weakened the EU's diplomatic weight, with Israel viewed as unrestrained in its regional military operations in the aftermath of the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks. The EU has also refrained from using its full leverage on the Gaza war, despite calls from some countries to reconsider establishing ties with Israel.
Of the E3, only the UK is believed to have been briefed in advance about US strikes on Iran early Sunday. Hours before, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot had said on X that talks between Europe and Iran would "accelerate." That now appears unlikely.
Speaking in Brussels, Mr Barrot pushed back against Mr Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's calls for regime change in Iran. "The objective is not only to temporarily delay Iran's access to nuclear weapons for us Europeans, but to delay it permanently," he said, warning that the only alternative was "eternal war against Iran". Mr Barrot added: "If anyone has another idea, I invite them to come forward."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
12 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
Qatar shuts down airspace temporarily amid regional developments
23 June 2025 19:46 (Reuters)Qatar said it has shut down airspace temporarily as part of measures taken amid developments in the region, a statement by the Qatari foreign ministry said on X. It said the move comes to ensure safety of residents and visitors. Israel-Iran Conflict Continue full coverage
Zawya
35 minutes ago
- Zawya
Fed's Bowman open to cutting rates at July policy meeting
Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, recently tapped by President Trump as the central bank's top bank overseer, said Monday the time to cut interest rates may be fast approaching as she is growing more worried about risks to the job market and is less concerned tariffs will cause an inflation problem. 'It is time to consider adjusting the policy rate,' Bowman said in the text of remarks to be delivered before a gathering held in Prague, Czech Republic. Bowman said inflation appears to be on a sustained path back to 2% and she said she expects 'only minimal impact' on inflation from trade policy. 'Should inflation pressures remain contained, I would support lowering the policy rate as soon as our next meeting in order to bring it closer to its neutral setting and to sustain a healthy labor market,' Bowman said. Last week, the Federal Reserve meeting in a gathering that left its overnight target-rate range fixed between 4.25% and 4.5%. Officials remained in a wait-and-see mode amid the considerable economic uncertainty created by President Donald Trump's erratically implemented trade policy. Fed officials are worried surging import taxes could depress growth while restarting what had been cooling inflation pressures. Bowman said in her speech that she supported the Fed's decision to hold steady. But the appears to see far fewer storm clouds ahead for the economy, and in her speech, she said more clarity is arriving over the outlook. Bowman's openness to cutting rates is joined by that of Fed Governor Christopher Waller, who said in a television interview Friday he'd also consider a rate cut at the July 29-30 meeting. Waller is widely considered to be in the running to succeed Fed Chair Jerome Powell, whose term ends next year. Trump has repeatedly pressured the Fed to pursue very large rate cuts amid insults to Powell. Observers believe any Fed chair would need to align with Trump's desire for much lower short-term borrowing costs. In her remarks, Bowman noted the job market is still in a good place but she's more worried about what lies ahead for the sector, and that's part of what's informing her dovish monetary policy views. 'We should also recognize that downside risks to our employment mandate could soon become more salient, given recent softness in spending and signs of fragility in the labor market,' Bowman said. The Fed official was also quite sanguine on the inflation outlook, saying 'it appears that any upward pressure from higher tariffs on goods prices is being offset by other factors and that the underlying trend in core [Personal Consumption Expenditures] inflation is moving much closer to our 2% target than is currently apparent in the data.' (Reporting by Michael S. Derby, Editing by Louise Heavens)
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Turkey rejects open-door policy for refugees if Iran falls apart
Israeli and US attacks on Iran risk sparking a regional war or even triggering regime change in the country, a development that has concerned Turkish officials in Ankara since September. The Israeli strikes that began earlier this month initially targeted Iran's nuclear infrastructure and air defence systems. Over time, however, Israel shifted its focus toward the Iranian government's command structure and later moved on to domestic security buildings. For example, on Monday, Israeli forces reportedly targeted the internal headquarters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as well as the notorious Evin prison, where political prisoners are held. One Israeli minister even suggested that Israel was cooperating with the Iranian opposition, reinforcing Defence Minister Israel Katz's public statements that Israel seeks regime change or at least aims to undermine the Tehran government. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters That is a prospect that US President Donald Trump tried to normalise on Sunday night with a post on Truth Social. 'If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' he asked. The Turkish government is acutely aware of the repercussions of regime-change operations and wars, having experienced the destabilising effects of the 2003 US-led Iraqi invasion and, more recently, the 2011-24 Syrian civil war. These conflicts have often resulted in hundreds of thousands of refugees crossing into Turkey and have disrupted key sectors such as energy and trade. Turkish society remains highly sensitive about the presence of refugees, notably the 2.7 million Syrians, many of whom are now returning to Syria after the fall of Bashar al-Assad's government. Experts and officials emphasise that there is currently no new wave of refugees. However, several sources familiar with the issue told Middle East Eye that as early as September, the Turkish government conducted in-depth studies on potential migration scenarios. They estimated that a full-scale war between Israel and Iran could push up to one million Iranian refugees towards the Turkish border. 'Ankara would fulfil its obligations under humanitarian law, but it would not implement an open-door policy' Serhan Afacan, president, Center for Iranian Studies Turkey has the experience. In 2012, then-foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu attempted to control the influx of Syrian refugees by capping their number at 100,000 and threatening to establish a safe zone in northern Syria. However, the number of refugees quickly surpassed three million in the following years, which taught Ankara a difficult lesson. Now, sources say Ankara is unlikely to accept any refugees except those in urgent need of emergency assistance. 'If the worst-case scenario were to occur and there was a mass migration from Iran to Turkey, whether permanent or in transit, Ankara would fulfil its obligations under humanitarian law, but it would not implement an open-door policy,' Serhan Afacan, president of the Center for Iranian Studies in Ankara, told Middle East Eye. A Turkish official, speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed that Ankara would no longer apply an 'open door' policy toward any neighbouring country in the event of a refugee wave. Iranians currently can enter Turkey without a visa. An elite influx? Many Turkish citizens are particularly wary of the possible arrival of the 4.5 million Afghans currently living in Iran. However, Afacan noted that millions of Turkish-speaking ethnic Azerbaijanis also live in Iran. He said that if they were to gather at the border, it could shift the debate in Turkey and stir nationalistic sentiments. 'But at present, there are no indications that Turks in Iran are planning to migrate,' Afacan added. Last week, sources from the Turkish defence ministry told journalists there is currently no sign of a refugee influx into Turkey. Why has Turkey stopped short of condemning the US strikes on Iran? Read More » One source stated that additional security measures have been implemented along all borders, including with Iran, and there is no uncontrolled migration. The Turkish Armed Forces are said to be prepared for all possible scenarios arising from regional developments. This raises the question of whether Turkey would allow Iranian elites, including government officials, to enter if their government collapses. Many Iranians have already bought homes or acquired Turkish citizenship through investment in recent years. According to interior ministry data released this year, 76,000 Iranians hold residence permits in Turkey. At least 35,000 have purchased homes since 2019, according to the Turkish Statistical Institute data released in 2024. It is unclear whether all these purchases were made to obtain Turkish citizenship, but a naturalisation consultancy expert told MEE that Iranians are among the top nationalities seeking Turkish citizenship. Between 2012 and 2024, a total of 384,000 homes were sold to foreigners. Afacan said many Iranian officials and military officers already own property in Turkey. For instance, during the emergency elections following President Ebrahim Raisi's death in a helicopter crash last year, there was a major controversy over claims that Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and his family owned several luxurious apartments in an upscale Istanbul residence. Afacan added that, as in the aftermath of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, albeit on a much smaller scale, a significant number of Iranian government officials would likely head to Turkey if the government were to fall. 'I do not believe that Turkey would close its doors to such individuals in that kind of scenario,' he said.
