Plans for Mayo data centre opposed by Sally Rooney stalled after appeal
This follows a third party appeal lodged with
An Bord Pleanála
against Mayo County Council's decision to grant planning permission last month to Mayo Data Hub Ltd for a data centre at Mullafarry and Tawnaghmore Upper, Killala.
Advertisement
One of the objectors to the data centre, Colin Doyle from Station Rd, Ennis, Co Clare has lodged the third party appeal.
The data centre for a site, located 1.8km to the south of Killala and 10.5km to the north of Ballina, will require 50MW average electrical power to operate.
A planning report lodged with the application by John Spain Associates states that proposed development "will attract complementary technology-based companies within the ICT sector and complementary industries to the west of Ireland which will provide for higher paying jobs and activate the local economy'.
The planning report also states that the electricity grid in the west of Ireland is currently unconstrained with sufficient capacity to accommodate the required connection for the data centre.
Advertisement
The report states that the project 'was in fact situated in this part of Ireland after consultation with Eirgrid because this location is outside grid constrained areas and in a region with a surplus of renewable power'.
In his original objection with the Council, Mr Doyle stated that his main concern was indirect greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) generated by the data centre and the resulting impact on climate.
In her own objection to the centre, Sally Rooney told the Council that 'I urge you in the strongest possible terms to refuse planning permission for this wasteful, unnecessary and environmentally toxic proposal'.
Ms Rooney said that she was making this submission 'as a resident of Co Mayo and a concerned citizen.'
Advertisement
The Normal People and Intermezzo author said: "Climate change represents an immediate and unprecedented threat to our way of life here in Mayo and to the future of human life around the world'.
She said: "Unless we act now to stop runaway overheating, children born today are likely to witness a catastrophic breakdown of global civilisation.'
Ms Rooney said that in 2023, 'private corporate data centres accounted for 21 per cent of Ireland's total electricity usage – more than all urban households combined'.
Ms Rooney said: 'The truth is that these data centres exist largely to support online advertising. Some estimates suggest that online ads account for 50 per cent of internet data usage; others put the figure between 60 per cent and 80 per cent.
Advertisement
She said: 'Whatever the specific figure, online advertising is extremely energy-intensive and is increasing in scale all the time, requiring more data centres, more energy, and more fossil fuels.
Ms Rooney said: 'Advertising, needless to say, is pointless. It adds no value to the real economy. It does not improve the overall quality of life for anyone. It is an utter waste of resources. At the best of times, this seems a shame; at a time of urgent global crisis, it is a catastrophe.'
"Wasteful consumption of electricity is a disaster. Not only does it drive energy prices upward for ordinary consumers; it also increases the total demand for energy and thus the total demand for fossil fuels'
Ms Rooney said that as the applicants have conceded that the project will result in the emission of more carbon dioxide" into our already overheated atmosphere".
Advertisement
She said: 'This additional atmospheric carbon will contribute to climate change not only here in County Mayo, but everywhere on the earth, as part of the catastrophic planetary crisis that is global warming.'
Ms Rooney further contended that 'Carbon credits' and 'offsetting programmes' deployed by operators of data centres 'act only as a smokescreen for corporations that want to emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere for profit'.
She said: "These gases have already been responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent people, and in the coming years we can be confident they will claim the lives of thousands more. No complicated EU policy instrument can wave that fact away.'
In her six page submission, Ms Rooney further states that 'Not only would this proposed data centre represent a wasteful use of precious and limited electricity; it could also endanger that vital resource for other users, including hospitals and homes.'
A decision is due on the appeal in September.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Medtronic raises annual profit forecast on lower tariff impact
Aug 19 (Reuters) - Medical-device maker Medtronic (MDT.N), opens new tab raised its fiscal 2026 profit forecast on Tuesday and said it expects a smaller-than-expected impact from the tariffs proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. The Galway, Ireland-based company expects annual adjusted profit between $5.60 and $5.66 per share, compared with its previous forecast range of $5.50 to $5.60 per share. Investors have high expectations of medical-device makers, as they continue to benefit from healthy demand for non-urgent surgeries - especially among older Americans - over the last few quarters. Medtronic trimmed its assumed tariff impact to be about $185 million for the year, versus a previous range of $200 million to $350 million.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Our Green council can't do the basics like fix potholes – now they want a four-day week'
In his days as a prop forward for the Scotland rugby team, Norrie Rowan was known as a powerhouse – a player who wouldn't let anyone get in his way. But even he admits he almost met his match with the bureaucracy of Edinburgh council 's planning department. The businessman, who was capped 13 times for the national side in the 1980s, has owned and let a portfolio of rental properties for many years. But new regulations in Scotland require anyone running short-term lets to apply for both planning permission and a licence. And although Rowan's experiences in the front row of the scrum had prepared him for a struggle, he was astonished by the difficulties he encountered when negotiating council officialdom. 'It's more exasperating than you can imagine,' the 73-year-old explains. 'The properties were ready. The process could have been signed off in no time – but it was hit by delay after delay. Trying to get through to anyone on the phone was impossible and no one ever seemed to respond to emails or messages. It just felt like nothing was happening. It stretched out for months.' Rowan still has another application pending – as have hundreds of other property owners in the city who hope to let out their houses and flats. But however bad the system is now, he fears it will only get worse. For the City of Edinburgh Council is currently considering a controversial move: the introduction of a four-day week for its staff. Although exact details haven't yet been finalised, the measure will likely mean a significant number of the authority's 18,000 employees being handed a 20 per cent reduction in their working hours... but without any equivalent reduction in pay. The four-day week is a radical idea that, with the backing of unions and the Left-wing parties, is gaining traction in town halls across the UK. According to the Green councillor championing the idea in Edinburgh, it simply has no downside. Claire Miller, who represents central Edinburgh, claims reduced hours would offer employees a better work-life balance, making them happier and more productive, and so lead to improved delivery of services for residents. In June, her motion – that the council should explore the benefits of a four-day week and examine how best to implement it – was backed by the Labour group which runs the city, as well as the SNP and the Liberal Democrats. After the vote, Miller said: 'Under a four-day week, our services would remain as they are, with no changes as far as residents are concerned. It's that rare 'unicorn' policy, one where we can help our budgets but also provide genuine benefits for our workers – and our residents.' For Rowan, Miller's 'unicorn' comparison seems appropriate. 'It's a mythical creature. Totally made up!' he says with exasperation. 'Giving staff a day off will just make things worse. Contacting the council will be even harder if staff are working fewer days. 'At the moment, in summer, things already feel like they grind to a halt as different people in different departments take time off for holidays. But with a four-day week, it will be like that all year round – the whole process will just slow down even further. It's preposterous.' Edinburgh's push towards reduced hours follows South Cambridgeshire District Council last month becoming the first in the UK to permanently adopt a four-day week for its staff – including bin collectors, tax administrators and housing officials. The council confirmed staff will carry out '100 per cent of their work in around 80 per cent of their contracted hours, without reduction in pay'. A limited trial of the four-day week had been running since 2023 – although opinions differ about the outcome. An independent analysis cited by the council claimed 21 out of 24 local services improved or stayed the same. But a survey of residents by market research company DJS Research looking at 13 services found that three became worse under the scheme with bin collections, council tax services and the customer contact centre showing 'statistically significant decrease'. Meanwhile The Telegraph has revealed that five councils – including Edinburgh, plus Glasgow, Belfast, Fermanagh and Omagh – are actively considering a four-day week, and a further 25 are discussing it internally. According to campaign group the Four Day Week Foundation, change can't come quickly enough. It states: 'The nine-to-five, five-day working week is outdated and no longer suits the realities of modern life. We invented the weekend a century ago and are long overdue an update.' For Miller, the policy is a vital reaction to staff burn-out caused by years of growing workload and budget cuts. 'We've put so much pressure on our workers that it's really hard for them to be productive because they're all really stressed,' she says. 'We've got huge sickness absence rates with work-related stress, depression and anxiety. But if we can pay more attention to what would make workers well, and well-rested, when they come to work, that will have benefits in terms of them being able to deliver services.' She adds: 'Exactly what a four-day week looks like still needs to be decided. But we need to pull back from the idea that you can just ask people to deliver more and more and more – because they clearly can't. 'Instead, we need to design something that both allows delivery of service outcomes, but also reduces the working week for workers, mindful of their physical and mental well-being.' Unsurprisingly, not everyone in Edinburgh – where residents have just been hit with an 8 per cent hike in council tax – backs her proposal. One major complaint from businesses in the city is that delays in the planning system are directly harming people's livelihoods. Tourism is a major part of the economy, with hundreds of thousands of visitors from around the world drawn each year by the famous Castle which dominates the city skyline and by the annual International and Fringe festivals But, as with Rowan, the crackdown on short-term lets is imposing a huge burden of red tape on anyone wishing to let out a property – with the system facing a massive backlog. Fiona Campbell, the chief executive of the Association of Scotland's Self-Caterers, says: 'There are already significant and damaging delays within City of Edinburgh council's planning department for processing licensing applications for short-term lets, and I don't see how working fewer days is going to help this at all. It is far more likely that this unnecessary move will makes things even worse.' The key argument by those in favour of the four-day week – that asking staff to work fewer hours actually boosts productivity – is met with some scepticism by Edinburgh's Tories. Cllr Christopher Cowdy explains: 'It's not that people feel the four-day week is necessarily a ghastly idea in itself. It's just that so many residents feel the city is run badly. The basics are not being done properly: the potholes, the litter, the weeding, the bin collections, the graffiti, the dog-fouling. 'Things aren't working as they should, yet the council is looking at reducing the hours of its staff. 'Increasing productivity is key to improving service delivery and improving how people feel about the services they're receiving from the council. But how do you get more productivity from working fewer hours – especially when it comes to manual work like weeding or bin collection?' Another key claim for the four-day week is that it allows staff to enjoy a better work-life balance – which advocates of the policy say could solve intractable staffing issues in the council. Miller says: 'Ultimately, providing more attractive work terms and conditions could improve problems of recruitment and staff retention and save money on agency staff.' But Cowdy warns a four-day week risks alienating taxpayers and many in the private sector for where a four-day week is rarely an option by handing a perceived perk to publicly-funded staff. 'People could well be ticked off if they're struggling or facing difficulties in life while the council workers they are paying for are having a greatly improved work-life balance,' he argues. And he warns the scheme might also backfire if staff use their extra day off to take up a part-time job. He says: 'Human nature suggests many won't use the extra day to improve their work-life balance, they will simply use it for a side hustle to earn themselves more money. That would cause an issue with the public because it would hand council staff a significant increase in their earning ability.' Council officials are now preparing a report exploring whether a four-day week could improve recruitment, retention, productivity and health of council workers – and what the options might be for implementing the policy. A council spokesperson said: 'As approved by full council, a report will be brought to a future Finance and Resources Committee. The report will examine this issue in more detail including reviewing evidence from other organisations.' Cowdy, who sits on the committee, believes that, whatever the findings, the public must be consulted before the four-day week is introduced. 'It's an issue of public trust,' he insists. 'The taxpayers who are paying for the council salaries have to be comfortable about these proposals. Currently, it's an incredibly difficult message for the council to sell – even if it can actually be shown that reduced hours increase productivity. 'If the council simply says yes, we know your council tax is going up, and yes, we know there are lots of complaints about services, but we're going to allow staff earn the same wages but work 20 per cent fewer hours – that's just not going to go down well with the vast majority of residents.'
BreakingNews.ie
17 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Row could collapse Cityjet rescue plans, court hears
A row over demands by contractors involving a potential investor in the refinancing of debt-ridden airline Cityjet, over proposed upfront payment terms for future maintenance work, could collapse rescue plans for the company which is currently in examinership, the High Court was told on Monday. Now the joint examiners to the carrier, Kieran Wallace and Andrew O'Leary, of specialist firm Interpath Advisory, are to ask the High Court on Wednesday for declarations that the attempted modification of maintenance contracts is invalid. Advertisement Barrister Stephen Byrne, counsel for the examiners, told Ms Justice Eileen Roberts that the effect of the proposed contractual amendments would have a material impact on Cityjet's ability to continue in examinership. Mr Wallace, in written evidence grounding the application, told Judge Roberts that the new demands could cause the examinership to fail. The court granted the joint examiners short service to bring a notice of motion regarding the new issues before the court on Wednesday. Cityjet's sole shareholder, Strategic Alliance of Regional Airlines (SARA), which itself is 80 per cent owned by Air Investment Valencia (AIV), has significant service contracts with sister entities and subsidiaries of SARA. The court heard that a key condition for the joint examiners to any reinvestment by the shareholder entities was a renegotiation of the company's various maintenance contracts in order to facilitate the survival of the company, as outlined by the joint examiners and an independent expert. Advertisement Mr Wallace stated that since his and Mr O'Leary's appointment, they have had regular engagement with certain shareholder entities in respect of potential reinvestment in the company as outlined in an earlier report to the High Court. He said it had become clear that the SARA shareholder entities would not make sufficiently significant concessions on contracts such as would be required to ensure a reasonable prospect of the survival of Cityjet as a going concern. Demands had been made by the contractors for payments to be made up front on a monthly basis with almost immediate effect. Mr Wallace said he and Mr O'Leary had decided to pursue alternative investment proposals from other interested parties, and another investment proposal had already been agreed and entered into by the company. Mr Byrne said that in correspondence with SARA legal representatives, the joint examiners had stated their view it was impermissible for any contracts to be varied. The matter comes up again before Mr Justice Quinn who initially appointed the joint examiners.
