logo
RFK Jr. wants to change a program that stopped vaccine makers from leaving the US market. They could flee again.

RFK Jr. wants to change a program that stopped vaccine makers from leaving the US market. They could flee again.

CNN3 days ago
This story originally appeared on ProPublica, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive their biggest stories as soon as they're published.
Five months after taking over the federal agency responsible for the health of all Americans, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to overhaul an obscure but vital program that underpins the nation's childhood immunization system.
Depending on what he does, the results could be catastrophic.
In his crosshairs is the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, a system designed to provide fair and quick payouts for people who suffer rare but serious side effects from shots — without having to prove that drugmakers were negligent. Congress created the program in the 1980s when lawsuits drove vaccine makers from the market. A special tax on immunizations funds the awards, and manufacturers benefit from legal protections that make it harder to win big-money verdicts against them in civil courts.
Kennedy, who founded an anti-vaccination group and previously accused the pharmaceutical industry of inflicting 'unnecessary and risky vaccines' on children for profits, has long argued that the program removes any incentive for the industry to make safe products.
In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, Kennedy condemned what he called corruption in the program and said he had assigned a team to overhaul it and expand who could seek compensation. He didn't detail his plans but did repeat the long-debunked claim that vaccines cause autism and suggested, without citing any evidence, that shots could also be responsible for a litany of chronic ailments, from diabetes to narcolepsy.
There are a number of ways he could blow up the program and prompt vaccine makers to stop selling shots in the U.S., like they did in the 1980s. The trust fund that pays awards, for instance, could run out of money if the government made it easy for Kennedy's laundry list of common health problems to qualify for payments from the fund.
Or he could pick away at the program one shot at a time. Right now, immunizations routinely recommended for children or pregnant women are covered by the program. Kennedy has the power to drop vaccines from the list, a move that would open up their manufacturers to the kinds of lawsuits that made them flee years ago.
Dr. Eddy Bresnitz, who served as New Jersey's state epidemiologist and then spent a dozen years as a vaccine executive at Merck, is among those worried.
'If his unstated goal is to basically destroy the vaccine industry, that could do it,' said Bresnitz, who retired from Merck and has consulted for vaccine manufacturers. 'I still believe, having worked in the industry, that they care about protecting American health, but they are also for-profit companies with shareholders, and anything that detracts from the bottom line that can be avoided, they will avoid.'
A spokesperson for PhRMA, a U.S. trade group for pharmaceutical companies, told ProPublica in a written statement that upending the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program 'would threaten continued patient access to FDA approved vaccines.'
The spokesperson, Andrew Powaleny, said the program 'has compensated thousands of claims while helping ensure the continued availability of a safe and effective vaccine supply. It remains a vital safeguard for public health and importantly doesn't shield manufacturers from liability.'
Since its inception, the compensation fund has paid about $4.8 billion in awards for harm from serious side effects, such as life-threatening allergic reactions and Guillain-Barré syndrome, an autoimmune condition that can cause paralysis. The federal agency that oversees the program found that for every 1 million doses of vaccine distributed between 2006 and 2023, about one person was compensated for an injury.
Since becoming Health and Human Services secretary, Kennedy has turned the staid world of immunizations on its ear. He reneged on the U.S. government's pledge to fund vaccinations for the world's poorest kids. He fired every member of the federal advisory group that recommends which shots Americans get, and his new slate vowed to scrutinize the U.S. childhood immunization schedule. Measles, a vaccine-preventable disease eliminated here in 2000, roared back and hit a grim record — more cases than the U.S. has seen in 33 years, including three deaths. When a U.S. senator asked Kennedy if he recommended measles shots, Kennedy answered, 'Senator, if I advised you to swim in a lake that I knew there to be alligators in, wouldn't you want me to tell you there were alligators in it?'
Fed up, the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical societies sued Kennedy last week, accusing him of dismantling 'the longstanding, Congressionally-authorized, science- and evidence-based vaccine infrastructure that has prevented the deaths of untold millions of Americans.' (The federal government has yet to respond to the suit.)
Just about all drugs have side effects. What's unusual about vaccines is that they're given to healthy people — even newborns on their first day of life. And many shots protect not just the individuals receiving them but also the broader community by making it harder for deadly scourges to spread. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that routine childhood immunizations have prevented more than 1.1 million deaths and 32 million hospitalizations among the generation of Americans born between 1994 and 2023.
To most people, the nation's vaccine system feels like a solid, reliable fact of life, doling out shots to children like clockwork. But in reality it is surprisingly fragile.
There are only a handful of companies that make nearly all of the shots children receive. Only one manufacturer makes chickenpox vaccines. And just two or three make the shots that protect against more than a dozen diseases, including polio and measles. If any were to drop out, the country could find itself in the same crisis that led President Ronald Reagan to sign the law creating the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in 1986.
Back then, pharmaceutical companies faced hundreds of lawsuits alleging that the vaccine protecting kids from whooping cough, diphtheria and tetanus caused unrelenting seizures that led to severe disabilities. (Today's version of this shot is different.) One vaccine maker after another left the U.S. market.
At one point, pediatricians could only buy whooping cough vaccines from a single company. Shortages were so bad that the CDC recommended doctors stop giving booster shots to preserve supplies for the most vulnerable babies.
While Congress debated what to do, public health clinics' cost per dose jumped 5,000% in five years.
'We were really concerned that we would lose all vaccines, and we would get major resurgences of vaccine-preventable diseases,' recalled Dr. Walter Orenstein, a vaccine expert who worked in the CDC's immunization division at the time.
A Forbes headline captured the anxiety of parents, pediatricians and public health workers: 'Scared Shotless.' So a bipartisan group in Congress hammered out the no-fault system.
Today, the program covers vaccines routinely recommended for children or pregnant women once Congress approves the special tax that funds awards. (COVID-19 shots are part of a separate, often-maligned system for handling claims of harm, though Kennedy has said he's looking at ways to add them to the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.)
Under program rules, people who say they are harmed by covered vaccines can't head straight to civil court to sue manufacturers. First, they have to go through the no-fault system. The law established a table of injuries and the time frame for when those conditions must have appeared in order to be considered for quicker payouts. A tax on those vaccines — now 75 cents for every disease that a shot protects against — flows into a trust fund that pays those approved for awards. Win or lose, the program, for the most part, pays attorney fees and forbids lawyers from taking a cut of the money paid to the injured.
The law set up a dedicated vaccine court where government officials known as special masters, who operate like judges, rule on cases without juries. People can ask for compensation for health problems not listed on the injury table, and they don't have to prove that the vaccine maker was negligent or failed to warn them about the medical condition they wound up with. At the same time, they can't claim punitive damages, which drive up payouts in civil courts, and pain and suffering payments are capped at $250,000.
Plaintiffs who aren't satisfied with the outcome or whose cases drag on too long can exit the program and file their cases in traditional civil courts. There they can pursue punitive damages, contingency-fee agreements with lawyers and the usual evidence gathering that plaintiffs use to hold companies accountable for wrongdoing.
But a Supreme Court ruling, interpreting the law that created the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, limited the kinds of claims that can prevail in civil court. So while the program isn't a full liability shield for vaccine makers, its very existence significantly narrows the cases trial lawyers can file.
Kennedy has been involved in such civil litigation. In his federal disclosures, he revealed that he referred plaintiffs to a law firm filing cases against Merck over its HPV shot in exchange for a 10% cut of the fees if they win. After a heated exchange with Sen. Elizabeth Warren during his confirmation proceedings, Kennedy said his share of any money from those cases would instead go to one of his adult sons, who he later said is a lawyer in California. His son Conor works as an attorney at the Los Angeles law firm benefiting from his referrals. When ProPublica asked about this arrangement, Conor Kennedy wrote, 'I don't work on those cases and I'm not receiving any money from them.'
In March, a North Carolina federal judge overseeing hundreds of cases that alleged Merck failed to warn patients about serious side effects from its HPV vaccine ruled in favor of Merck; an appeal is pending.
The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program succeeded in stabilizing the business of childhood vaccines, with many more shots developed and approved in the decades since it was established. But even ardent supporters acknowledge there are problems. The program's staff levels haven't kept up with the caseload. The law capped the number of special masters at eight, and congressional bills to increase that have failed. An influx of adult claims swamped the system after adverse reactions to flu shots became eligible for compensation in 2005 and serious shoulder problems were added to the injury table in 2017.
The quick and smooth system of payouts originally envisioned has evolved into a more adversarial one with lawyers for the Department of Justice duking it out with plaintiffs' attorneys, which Kennedy says runs counter to the program's intent. Many cases drag on for years.
In his recent interview with Carlson, he described 'the lawyers of the Department of Justice, the leaders of it' working on the cases as corrupt. 'They saw their job as protecting the trust fund rather than taking care of people who made this national sacrifice, and we're going to change all that,' he said. 'And I've brought in a team this week that is starting to work on that.'
The system is 'supposed to be generous and fast and gives a tie to the runner,' he told Carlson. 'In other words, if there's doubts about, you know, whether somebody's injury came from a vaccine or not, you're going to assume they got it and compensate them.'
Kennedy didn't identify who is on the team reviewing the program. At one point in the interview, he said, 'We just brought a guy in this week who's going to be revolutionizing the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.'
The HHS employee directory now lists Andrew Downing as a counselor working in Kennedy's office. Downing for many years has filed claims with the program and suits in civil courts on behalf of clients alleging harm from shots. Last month, HHS awarded a contract for 'Vaccine Injury Compensation Program expertise' to Downing's firm, as NOTUS has reported.
Downing did not respond to a voicemail left at his law office. HHS didn't reply to a request to make him and Kennedy available for an interview and declined to answer detailed questions about its plans for the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. In the past, an HHS spokesperson has said that Kennedy is 'not anti-vaccine — he is pro-safety.'
While it's not clear what changes Downing and Kennedy have in mind, Kennedy's interview with Carlson offered some insights. Kennedy said he was working to expand the program's three-year statute of limitations so that more people can be compensated. Downing has complained that patients who have certain autoimmune disorders don't realize their ailments were caused by a vaccine until it's too late to file. Congress would have to change the law to allow this, experts said.
A key issue is whether Kennedy will try to add new ailments to the list of injuries that qualify for quicker awards.
In the Carlson interview, Kennedy dismissed the many studies and scientific consensus that shots don't cause autism as nothing more than statistical trickery. 'We're going to do real science,' Kennedy said.
The vaccine court spent years in the 2000s trying cases that alleged autism was caused by the vaccine ingredient thimerosal and the shot that protects people from measles, mumps and rubella. Facing more than 5,000 claims, the court asked a committee of attorneys representing children with autism to pick test cases that represented themes common in the broader group. In the cases that went to trial, the special masters considered more than 900 medical articles and heard testimony from dozens of experts. In each of those cases, the special masters found that the shots didn't cause autism.
In at least two subsequent cases, children with autism were granted compensation because they met the criteria listed in the program's injury table, according to a vaccine court decision. That table, for instance, lists certain forms of encephalopathy — a type of brain dysfunction — as a rare side effect of shots that protect people from whooping cough, measles, mumps and rubella. In a 2016 vaccine court ruling, Special Master George L. Hastings Jr. explained, 'The compensation of these two cases, thus does not afford any support to the notion that vaccinations can contribute to the causation of autism.'
Hastings noted that when Congress set up the injury table, the lawmakers acknowledged that people would get compensated for 'some injuries that were not, in fact, truly vaccine-caused.'
Many disabling neurological disorders in children become apparent around the time kids get their shots. Figuring out whether the timing was coincidental or an indication that the vaccines caused the problem has been a huge challenge.
Devastating seizures in young children were the impetus for the compensation program. But in the mid-1990s, after a yearslong review of the evidence, HHS removed seizure disorder from the injury table and narrowed the type of encephalopathy that would automatically qualify for compensation. Scientists subsequently have discovered genetic mutations that cause some of the most severe forms of epilepsy.
What's different now, though, is that Kennedy, as HHS secretary, has the power to add autism or other disorders to that injury table. Experts say he'd have to go through the federal government's cumbersome rulemaking process to do so. He could also lean on federal employees to green-light more claims.
In addition, Kennedy has made it clear he's thinking about illnesses beyond autism. 'We have now this epidemic of immune dysregulation in our country, and there's no way to rule out vaccines as one of the key culprits,' he told Carlson. Kennedy mentioned diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, seizure disorders, ADHD, speech delay, language delay, tics, Tourette syndrome, narcolepsy, peanut allergies and eczema.
President Donald Trump's budget estimated that the value of the investments in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program trust fund could reach $4.8 billion this year. While that's a lot of money, a life-care plan for a child with severe autism can cost tens of millions of dollars, and the CDC reported in April that 1 in 31 children is diagnosed with autism by their 8th birthday. The other illnesses Kennedy mentioned also affect a wide swath of the U.S. population.
Dr. Paul Offit, a co-inventor of a rotavirus vaccine and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, for years has sparred with Kennedy over vaccines. Offit fears that Kennedy will use flawed studies to justify adding autism and other common medical problems to the injury table, no matter how much they conflict with robust scientific research.
'You can do that, and you will bankrupt the program,' he said. 'These are ways to end vaccine manufacturing in this country.'
If the trust fund were to run out of money, Congress would have to act, said Dorit Reiss, a law professor at University of California Law San Francisco who has studied the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Congress could increase the excise tax on vaccines, she said, or pass a law limiting what's on the injury table. Or Congress could abolish the program, and the vaccine makers would find themselves back in the situation they faced in the 1980s.
'That's not unrealistic,' Reiss said.
Rep. Paul Gosar, an Arizona Republican, last year proposed the End the Vaccine Carveout Act, which would have allowed people to bypass the no-fault system and head straight to civil court. His press release for the bill — written in September, before Kennedy's ascension to HHS secretary — quoted Kennedy saying, 'If we want safe and effective vaccines, we need to end the liability shield.'
The legislation never came up for a vote. A spokesperson for the congressman said he expects to introduce it again 'in the very near future.'
Renée Gentry, director of the George Washington University Law School's Vaccine Injury Litigation Clinic, thinks it's unlikely Congress will blow up the no-fault program. But Gentry, who represents people filing claims for injuries, said it's hard to predict what Congress, faced with a doomsday scenario, would do.
'Normally Democrats are friends of plaintiffs' lawyers,' she said. 'But talking about vaccines on the Hill is like walking on a razor blade that's on fire.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Over 260,000 pools sold across Canada under recall after reports of nine deaths in U.S.
Over 260,000 pools sold across Canada under recall after reports of nine deaths in U.S.

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Over 260,000 pools sold across Canada under recall after reports of nine deaths in U.S.

Health Canada has issued a recall notice for more than 260,000 above-ground swimming pools sold in Canada since the early 2000s after nine kids drowned in the United States. Another five million pools are under a recall advisory in the U.S. The notices cover a range of Bestway, Intex Recreation and Polygroup pools sold by major retailers as far back as 2002. Health Canada and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission say the pools have compression straps running along the outside of the product that 'may create a foothold' for small children and allow them to access the water unattended. That can pose a serious drowning risk, the regulators warn, and they're asking consumers to contact the companies for a repair. To date, the CPSC believes nine children across the U.S. have drowned after gaining access to these now-recalled pools in this way. Those deaths occurred between 2007 and 2022, involving children between the ages of 22 months and three years old. Health Canada said in its recall that the pool companies have not received any reports of incidents or injuries in Canada. Consumers in possession of these pools are urged to immediately contact Bestway, Intex and/or Polygroup to receive the free repair kit — which will consist of a rope to replace the compression strap. Owners of these pools should otherwise ensure that small children cannot access the pool without supervision, regulators note — and could alternatively drain the pool until the repair is made. All of the pools being recalled are 48 inches or taller — and can be identified by brand and model names listed on both the CPSC and Health Canada's recall notices. Sales of the pools ranged by model and location, but date as far back to 2002 and as recently as 2025. About 5 million of these now-recalled pools were sold across the U.S. — including both online and in-stores at major retailers like Walmart, Target, Lowe's, Costco and Amazon. Another 266,000 were sold in Canada. -With files from The Canadian Press The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Nick Offerman Was So Upset About This "Huge Mistake" Trump Made That He Stopped By "The Daily Show" To Give An Emotional Speech
Nick Offerman Was So Upset About This "Huge Mistake" Trump Made That He Stopped By "The Daily Show" To Give An Emotional Speech

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Nick Offerman Was So Upset About This "Huge Mistake" Trump Made That He Stopped By "The Daily Show" To Give An Emotional Speech

Nick Offerman has called out President Donald Trump after his 'big, beautiful bill' — which he signed into law earlier this month — slashed hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to America's national parks. Related: 'Let me get this straight, Mr. President. You cut $267 million to get back $90 million. Now, I'm no mathematician but I believe that's called shitting the bed,' said Offerman in an appearance on Tuesday's episode of The Daily Show. 'But then again, I didn't go to Wharton Business College.' The Parks & Recreation star — who portrayed libertarian official Ron Swanson — turned to several news reports detailing how America's 'pastoral gifts' are 'under attack' as staffing levels have seen a notable dip across the National Park System since January, per the National Parks Conservation Association. One clip noted that park scientists, in some cases, have been forced to help clean toilets due to staffing shortages. Related: Offerman — who quipped that the situation is like "Good Will Hunting but in reverse" — stressed that the cuts are a 'huge mistake.' 'No scientist has the strength to clean the skid marks of a man who's been eating beans and campfire hot dogs for the past three days! They're weak,' he joked. Related: He went on to refer to Trump 'shaking down foreigners' after he issued an executive order earlier this month that calls for foreign tourists to face higher park entry fees, a move that the administration expects to generate more than $90 million annually. After highlighting how national parks contributed a record $55.6 billion to the U.S. economy and supported over 415,000 jobs just two years ago, Offerman explained why the parks are a 'true miracle.' 'It is an affordable vacation that everyone can take inside our own borders, whether you're traveling with your family or abandoning your constituents during a crisis,' quipped the actor as a photo of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) amid his Cancun controversy appeared on screen. Offerman, who recently revealed why Ron Swanson would've 'despised' Trump, then mocked the president for speaking so 'fondly' of national parks in years past. Related: He turned to a 2020 clip of Trump who, when referencing sequoia trees at Yosemite National Park, appeared to pronounce the park's name as 'yo-semites.' 'It's Yosemite,' Offerman remarked. ''Yo, Semites,' is what a bad undercover cop might say to a group of Hasidic Jews.' Watch Nick on The Daily Show below: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

7 lessons I learned about end-of-life planning when my mother died, as a financial advisor
7 lessons I learned about end-of-life planning when my mother died, as a financial advisor

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

7 lessons I learned about end-of-life planning when my mother died, as a financial advisor

Melissa Shaw became her mother's primary caregiver after a sudden terminal cancer diagnosis. Shaw, a financial advisor, learned crucial lessons about end-of-life planning and caregiving. Her biggest lessons include the importance of Medigap, healthcare proxies, and life insurance. This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Melissa Shaw, a 46-year-old financial advisor in Palo Alto, California. It has been edited for length and clarity. I've been a financial advisor since 2011 and have worked at Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, or TIAA, as a wealth management advisor for over seven years. I help clients with estate and incapacity planning, but I encountered completely different issues when my own mother became terminally ill and I became her primary caregiver in October 2024. Her diagnosis was sudden. Doctors found stage four cancer that had metastasized to her back, causing a fracture. Within weeks, my family moved her from Las Vegas to Northern California to be closer to me. She died by the end of December — it was a two-month ordeal. Becoming her caregiver was emotionally intense Initially, she seemed fine, but she declined rapidly. It was shocking and unexpected. I visited the hospital daily and took on the bulk of decision-making responsibilities. Thankfully, TIAA offers generous caregiver benefits and flexibility, and I had savings to help cover unexpected costs. I've learned many valuable lessons through this experience about end-of-life planning. 1. Medicare supplemental plans are essential Since enrolling in Medicare at the age of 65, my mom opted for a Medigap (Medicare Supplement Insurance) plan instead of a Medicare Advantage plan, and that decision proved vital. Her Medigap plan covered 20% of medical costs that original Medicare didn't, including any doctor or procedure approved by Medicare, without referrals or prior authorizations. Every doctor she saw was relieved she had it. If you or a loved one is approaching 65 — especially with ongoing health issues — I strongly recommend researching Medigap options during the Medigap Open Enrollment Period, when insurers can't deny coverage or charge more due to pre-existing conditions. 2. Assign a designated healthcare decision-maker ASAP My mom didn't assign a designated decision-maker, and I couldn't make health decisions for her. When her health rapidly declined in the last three weeks of her life, she became barely cognizant and luckily was able to manage a scribbled signature for a necessary procedure. I started to prepare a POA and healthcare proxy, but by the time it was ready, she was no longer mentally competent enough to sign it. She signed an advanced directive form with the hospital when she started the cancer treatment, which allowed me to make some decisions on her behalf. I learned how imperative it is to name a health proxy at any age. 3. Banking may not be easily accessible After she died, we were unable to access her bank account funds for 45 days due to a waiting period intended to protect creditors. Luckily, she had a term life insurance policy that paid out quickly to help cover immediate expenses. Additionally, she didn't name a beneficiary for the bank accounts, which is a common mistake. Many assume that checking accounts don't need beneficiaries, but even modest balances may end up in probate, which can be a significant hassle. Also, the bank was unable to share her transaction history, so I had no way of knowing which bills had already been paid. 4. Sign up for life insurance We received her life insurance proceeds quickly; all that was required was a death certificate. Clients may want to consider insurance as a liquidity measure at death to cover immediate expenses, such as funeral costs and bills. 5. Prepare for end-of-life costs I was surprised by how expensive it is to bury someone. We were quoted up to $25,000 for burial plots in California. Even cremation, which we chose, came to around $23,000 after including the niche (a final resting spot to house cremated remains) and the funeral. Prepaying or researching in advance can prevent financial issues. 6. Prepare for the difficulties of caretaking I spent many nights in the hospital with my mom. Her condition changed from day to day; it was an emotional roller coaster. Balancing work, caregiving, and my own emotional health was difficult. I'm married, and my kids were 5 and 7 years old. I wasn't seeing them regularly during the two months she was sick. Luckily, TIAA offered eight weeks of caregiver leave. Many caregivers only have access to unpaid leave through the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), so it's important to plan for potential income loss. If you can take paid leave, do it, because it's tough to balance the emotional toll it takes. 7. Wills aren't everything Wills are essential for securing guardianship and expressing personal wishes, but they don't guarantee that all your assets will be transferred correctly. Retirement accounts, such as IRAs or 403(b)s, are typically passed by beneficiary designations, rather than through wills or trusts. Many other assets are passed via trusts. You should work with both a financial advisor and an estate attorney to discuss your needs. I did the best I could, but if I could do things differently, I would've taken an official leave from work to focus solely on caring for my mother. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store