
U.S. Navy sailor is convicted of spying for China
Advertisement
A second sailor, who was arrested at the same time as Wei, was sentenced last year to 27 months in prison after pleading guilty to conspiring with a Chinese intelligence officer and accepting a bribe.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Prosecutors said that Wei, a naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in China, had betrayed his adopted country when he used his security clearance to obtain closely-held details about the U.S. naval fleet and military operations.
In February 2022, a Chinese intelligence officer recruited Wei on social media, presenting himself as a naval enthusiast who worked for the state-owned China Shipbuilding Industry Corp., investigators said. In a conversation about a week later, Wei told a friend in the Navy that the person had offered him $500 for daily updates on which ships were docked at the base.
Advertisement
He told the friend that he was 'no idiot' and that what he was being asked 'is quite obviously espionage,' adding an expletive, according to the Justice Department, which cited the comment during Wei's trial.
In one instance, Wei agreed to provide a Chinese intelligence officer with information about 'the number and training of U.S. Marines during an upcoming international maritime warfare exercise,' according to a federal indictment.
In exchange for $5,000, prosecutors said, he gave the contact at least 30 technical and mechanical ship manuals.
'The defendant's actions represent an egregious betrayal of the trust placed in him as a member of the U.S. military,' Adam Gordon, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of California, said in a statement Wednesday. 'By trading military secrets to the People's Republic of China for cash, he jeopardized not only the lives of his fellow sailors but also the security of the entire nation and our allies. The jury's verdict serves as a crucial reminder that the Department of Justice will vigorously prosecute traitors.'
In an email Wednesday, Sean Jones, a lawyer for Wei, said that his client was considering an appeal. While he acknowledged wrongdoing by Wei, Jones said that his client should not have been charged under the Espionage Act.
'There was clearly substantial evidence of my client's inappropriate communications with his contact in China,' Jones said. 'However the testimony, evidence and even the arguments of the government attorneys made it absolutely clear that Jinchao harbored no anti-American sentiment or intent to harm the U.S.A. He was manipulated by someone he thought was a friend, and betrayed his better judgment.'
Advertisement
Wei, who the prosecutors said was evidently seeking U.S. citizenship while working clandestinely with China, was acquitted on one count of unlawful procurement of citizenship.
The Navy said it had no immediate comment on Wei's conviction.
During the trial, Wei's lawyer disputed whether the information he divulged was as sensitive as the federal government had suggested, the military newspaper Stars and Stripes reported.
Arguing that the documents shared by his client could be found online, Jones said that Wei spent most of his days sanding and painting the ship that he was assigned to, and that he was not as important as prosecutors had contended.
This article originally appeared in
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


American Press
23 minutes ago
- American Press
What to know about the Menendez brothers' parole hearings
Lyle and Erik Menendez are scheduled to face separate parole hearings beginning Thursday in California and — depending on the outcomes — could eventually be released from prison nearly 30 years after being convicted of killing their parents. A panel of parole officers will evaluate each of the brothers via videoconference. They'll appear from prison in San Diego. In 1995, a jury convicted both brothers of first-degree murder in the 1989 murders of Jose and Kitty Menendez inside their Los Angeles-area home. The brothers were sentenced to life in prison without parole in 1996. They became eligible for parole after a Los Angeles judge in May reduced their sentences from life in prison without the possibility of parole to 50 years to life, making them immediately eligible for parole under California law because they were under the ages of 26 when they committed their crimes. Who are the Menendez brothers and what did they do? Lyle and Erik Menendez are the sons of Jose and Kitty Menendez. Jose Menendez, a Cuban-American business executive who at one time was an executive at RCA Records, moved his family from Princeton, New Jersey, to California when his sons were teenagers. On Aug. 20, 1989, Lyle Menendez dialed 911 to report the shotgun-killings of their parents inside their home. Both brothers told investigators that the murders were related to the Mafia or had something to do with their father's business dealings. At the time, Erik was 18 and Lyle was 21. With access to the family's wealth, the brothers spent small fortunes on Rolex watches, cars and houses. But two months after the killings, Erik Menendez confessed to his psychologist that he and his brother killed their parents. What were the brothers charged with? They were arrested early the following year and each charged with first-degree murder. The brothers claimed their father had emotionally and sexually abused them since childhood. Prosecutors contended that getting hold of their father's money was the motive behind the couple's killings. The brothers' first trial started in 1993. Their attorneys never disputed the pair killed their parents, but argued that they acted out of self-defense. Their trials resulted in hung juries. In 1995, a jury convicted both brothers of three counts, including first-degree murder, plus lying in-wait and special circumstance allegations. They were sentenced to life in prison without parole in 1996. How did they spend their years in prison? For years after their conviction, the brothers filed petitions for appeals of their cases while in prison. State and federal judges denied the petitions. The brothers have gotten an education, participated in self-help classes and started various support groups for fellow prisoners. They also launched a prison beautification project inspired by the Norwegian approach to incarceration that believes rehabilitation in humane prisons surrounded by nature leads to successful reintegration into society, even for those who have committed terrible crimes. Over the years, the Menendez case continued to fascinate the public and the young, handsome brothers became celebrities of sorts. They became the subjects of true crime shows, including last year's nine-episode crime drama 'Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story' on Netflix. A few weeks after that was aired, then-LA County District Attorney George Gascón announced he was reviewing new evidence in the case. On Oct. 24, 2024, prosecutors said they will petition the court to resentence the brothers. In May 2025, an LA County Superior Court judge granted them a new sentence of 50 years to life, making them immediately eligible for parole. What will the parole board consider? Erik and Lyle Menendez will be evaluated, individually, by a panel of two or three parole hearing officers. Erik's hearing is scheduled Thursday morning. Lyle's will be held Friday. The board will assess whether the brothers pose an 'unreasonable risk of danger to society' if released, considering factors like criminal history, motivation for the crime, signs of remorse, behavior while in prison and plans for the future, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Nearly all of the Menendez family support the brothers' release from prison. Milton Andersen, the brothers' uncle who opposed their release, died from cancer in March. Could one receive parole and not the other? The brothers have separate hearings and will be evaluated independently of each other. Los Angeles trial attorney David Ring has said if one brother was 'a troublemaker' in prison and the other wasn't, it's conceivable that one could stay locked up while the other is freed. But Ring, who's not involved with the Menendez case, said that's unlikely. How soon could they get out? If granted parole, it could be months before the brothers are released from prison. The chief legal counsel has 120 days to review the case. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom then has 30 days to affirm or deny the parole. If he approves it, they could then leave prison. Newsom has not made any statements indicating his position on the case, but said during a May press conference that he has both approved and rejected decisions by the parole board before.


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
House Oversight Chair says panel to release Epstein files ‘as quickly as we can,' while protecting victims
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer said his 'goal' is to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein quickly once the Justice Department starts turning them over Friday, but stressed they want to be careful not to do anything that could harm victims. 'We're going to review (them) and we'll work as quickly as we can. You know, this is sensitive information. We want to make sure we don't do anything to harm or jeopardize any victims that were involved in this, but we're going to be transparent. We were doing what we said we would do. We're getting the documents, and I believe the White House will work with us,' he told reporters on Capitol Hill. When pressed by CNN on why the committee would not immediately release the files since DOJ was instructed by the House subpoena to redact victims' identities and other sensitive information, Comer responded, 'I can't imagine very many scenarios where we would further redact anything.' 'Usually we have concerns over over-redaction. So we're just going to see what they send us and we'll go from there,' he said. Comer added that he was still expecting that the committee would receive records on Friday. Earlier in the week, a spokesperson for the committee suggested it might be a more involved process to release the material. 'The Committee intends to make the records public after thorough review to ensure all victims' identification and child sexual abuse material are redacted. The Committee will also consult with the DOJ to ensure any documents released do not negatively impact ongoing criminal cases and investigations,' the spokesperson said.


CNN
24 minutes ago
- CNN
House Oversight Chair says panel to release Epstein files ‘as quickly as we can,' while protecting victims
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer said his 'goal' is to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein quickly once the Justice Department starts turning them over Friday, but stressed they want to be careful not to do anything that could harm victims. 'We're going to review (them) and we'll work as quickly as we can. You know, this is sensitive information. We want to make sure we don't do anything to harm or jeopardize any victims that were involved in this, but we're going to be transparent. We were doing what we said we would do. We're getting the documents, and I believe the White House will work with us,' he told reporters on Capitol Hill. When pressed by CNN on why the committee would not immediately release the files since DOJ was instructed by the House subpoena to redact victims' identities and other sensitive information, Comer responded, 'I can't imagine very many scenarios where we would further redact anything.' 'Usually we have concerns over over-redaction. So we're just going to see what they send us and we'll go from there,' he said. Comer added that he was still expecting that the committee would receive records on Friday. Earlier in the week, a spokesperson for the committee suggested it might be a more involved process to release the material. 'The Committee intends to make the records public after thorough review to ensure all victims' identification and child sexual abuse material are redacted. The Committee will also consult with the DOJ to ensure any documents released do not negatively impact ongoing criminal cases and investigations,' the spokesperson said.