Taoiseach rejects US politicians' claims that Occupied Territories Bill is ‘diplomatic intoxication'
Mike Huckabee's comments came amid similar criticisms from a number of senior
US
politicians, who warned the
Government
that enacting the
Occupied Territories Bill
would be harmful for
Ireland
.
The proposed Bill is expected to go before the Dáil in the autumn. The legislation would prohibit trading with companies operating in illegal settlements in the West Bank and other occupied territories.
At least 10 members of Congress have shared their criticisms of the Bill on X (formerly Twitter) in what would appear to be a concerted campaign.
READ MORE
On Wednesday Mr Huckabee posted: 'Did the Irish fall into a vat of Guinness & propose something so stupid that it would be attributed to act of diplomatic intoxication? It will harm Arabs as much as Israelis. Sober up Ireland! Call
@IsraelMFA
& say you're sorry!'
[
Government effort to ban occupied territories trade gets EU boost
Opens in new window
]
Responding, Mr Martin said: 'I reject the comments made by the ambassador. The situation is very serious in Gaza, including an appalling loss of human life. Terrible war crimes are being committed.'
Mr Martin said there is 'continuing shocking behaviour' in the West Bank, including 'the freedom that's given to extreme settlers to destroy settlements and housing belonging to Palestinians who've been there on that land for generations'.
There have been claims that US companies based in Ireland could be subject to fines and penalties if the Bill passes, as it could breach American laws that prohibit BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) activity against Israel.
Mr Martin said BDS legislation could 'inadvertently' affect companies.
'We don't want companies that are based in Ireland and employing people punished in any shape or form. That would be counterproductive in terms of the objective being to leverage pressure on Israel, not on Ireland,' Mr Martin said.
'But we will consider that, and obviously we will take legal opinion on it.'
But the Taoiseach added that the 'situation has moved on', with the European Union confirming member states should consider the legal opinion of the International Court of Justice in the context of member states' trade relationships with the occupied territories.
'To be fair to president Trump, he's a man who doesn't like war, and I would hope that he can exert pressure to bring about an end to the terrible and horrific killing in Gaza.'
Lisa McClain, the chair of the House Republicans, said 'any legislation boycotting, divesting or sanctioning Israel would be a huge mistake for Ireland'.
'This type of extreme anti-Semitic hate is unacceptable and should be rejected.'
Republican senator Lindsey Graham posted: 'I hope that Ireland will reconsider their efforts to economically isolate Israel [...] I do not believe these efforts would be well received in the United States and they certainly would not go unnoticed.'
Senator Rick Scott, also a Republican, said: 'This foolish move not only wrongfully targets Israel & the Jewish Community, but also harms American businesses. They should think twice about the message they're sending by passing this Bill, which complicates our economic relationship & targets our ally.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Letters to the Editor, July 28th: On Gaza and religion, the cost of sexual abuse redress, and Galway traffic
Sir, – As a Christian, I was brought up to have a deep respect for the religions of others, including the Jewish religion – which forms a significant part of my cultural inheritance. Seeing the photograph of a hunger-ravaged 1½-year-old boy in Gaza city on the front page of The Irish Times (July 23rd) and the photograph of a crowd of emaciated, starving, terrified, crying children holding up pots and basins and begging for food in Khan Yunis (World News, July 24th) forced me to immediately look up what the Jewish religion has to say about the moral requirement to provide food to those who are hungry; what I found confirmed what I already knew: 'If your enemy is hungry, give him bread to eat. If your enemy is thirsty, give him water to drink' (Proverbs 25:1). 'Give sustenance to the poor of the non-Jews along with the poor of Israel' (Gittin 61a). READ MORE 'While eating and drinking, one must feed the foreigner, the orphan, the widow, and other poor unfortunates' (Mishneh Torah, 6:18). Criticisms of the actions of Israel in Gaza are commonly branded as anti-Semitic by the Israeli authorities and those who support Israel, but is not the enforced starvation of the population of Gaza – including children, babies and pregnant women – not only a heinous crime against our common humanity, but also an action that is utterly forbidden by the Jewish religion. Jewish people and their religious leaders who are sickened by this need to raise their voices in protest. – Yours, etc, CHRIS FITZPATRICK, Terenure, Dublin 6. Sir, – While we are aware that there is a level of censorship within Israel which seems to have justified, perhaps hidden, and manipulated the reality of Gaza, the truth remains that Jewish people, in particular the diaspora in other countries around the world, are not unaware of the starvation, the degradation, and annihilation of the people of Gaza. In consideration of their own horrific past, where are the voices of the decent Jewish people around the world, particularly in America, who must stand up and be counted, to say enough is enough, and not in our name? Your strong voices must be heard. Shout your disgust. You know and witness with your own eyes. To use a famous quote: 'The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.' – Yours, etc, ANGELA CURRIE, Belfast, Northern Ireland. Sir, – While the perpetration of genocide by the Israeli government on Palestinians in Gaza is monstrous, other countries are complicit by their actions, and others by their inactions. It is horrifying that the US supports Israel with arms to bomb and shoot civilians, backs the 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation', which fails, intentionally or unintentionally, to distribute enough water and food for life, and also seems to have given up on international law, humanitarian norms and the UN. However, it is Germany's actions that shock me the most. Just as post-Famine Ireland understands starvation, post-Holocaust Germany understands genocide, and its policy is supposed to be 'Never Again'. Yet, unbelievably, Germany is a significant arms supplier to Israel, and consistently refuses to back EU sanctions against that rogue state. Wann wird man je verstehen? – Yours, etc, CLAIRE WHEELER, Oaklands Park, Dublin 4. Womb with no view Sir, – The Irish Times has listed the 21 top earners among Irish chief executive officers. All men. (' Irish CEO pay soars as flight by our top plcs to Wall Street delivers the dollars ,' July 25th). Obviously no womb at the top. – Yours, etc, GEMMA McCROHAN, Ballinteer, Dublin 16. Deferring alcohol health warnings Sir, – The Government delaying until 2029 the placing of health warnings on alcoholic drinks is a shameful disgrace proving beyond any shadow of doubt the bias of this Government. In this case it shows a leaning more towards the profiteers than towards the general good of the Irish people. During the delay there will certainly be more new alcohol-related illnesses, tragedies, addictions and deaths. Some of these will be due directly to the labelling delay by the Government. When this happens, the Government must be accountable, and take a degree of responsibility and blame. – Yours, etc, ALBERT KERR, Bray, Co Wicklow. HSE and losing millions of euros Sir, – Martin Wall's report on the tens of millions of euro lost or written off by the HSE raises serious questions about accountability at management and board level ('Tens of millions in HSE money lost say auditors', July 26th). Surely the external auditors when faced with this level of losses would be likely to qualify the HSE's annual accounts? This in turn would have serious consequences for the HSE board, and senior management. Certainly, as a taxpayer it is difficult to understand why my taxes can be squandered without there being serious consequences for the decision makers. It is time for the Minister for Health, Jennifer Carroll MacNeill, to take a stronger line with the HSE board. – Yours, etc, MIKE CORMACK, Blackrock, Co Dublin. Sir, – The article concerning losses incurred by the HSE makes for very uncomfortable and frustrating reading. This is the organisation which consistently exceeds its budget and looks for further expenditure while at the same time presides over a litany of massive and irresponsible waste. This can only be described as incompetence of the highest order. It remains an unfillable money pit. When is the Government and in particular the Minister for Health going to demand and obtain radical change? Those departments which are underfunded should be asking the same questions. – Yours, etc, JOHN BURNETT, Carrigaline, Cork. Addressing cost of redress scheme Sir, – Stephen Collins writes that 'senior civil servants who have raised concerns about the potentially enormous cost to the State of a redress scheme for victims of sexual abuse in schools have performed an important service' (' A redress scheme for school abuse survivors could become a barrister-fattening exercise ,' July 25th). That concern might carry weight – if the Government hadn't spent the past week discussing how it will spend a large budget surplus. Collins overlooks another crucial point: that many institutions have not honoured their indemnity agreements with the Government – efforts to enforce these agreements could generate significant revenue to support redress. During a recent debate with me in Seanad Éireann, Minister for Education Helen McEntee left me in no doubt that enforcing indemnity agreements was an option she favoured. As a long-time advocate for redress for victims of abuse, it's important to point out that redress comes in many forms; it's not all about money. I've seen too many people broken and traumatised by their experiences while in institutions, schools and 'care' settings. Time has passed for many seeking to tell their story and obtain redress – many are now dead. Figures stating a redress scheme 'costing tens of billions of euro' are suspect. Spending a small percentage of our surplus would help reckon with a dark period of our history and the monies would go back into communities nationwide. While we cannot change the past, we can do the right thing in the present . – Yours, etc, SENATOR VICTOR BOYHAN, Leinster House, Dublin 2 . Galway traffic conundrum Sir, – I live in Galway, a city clogged and wheezing almost terminally, due to car traffic. Anthony Moran (Letters, June 24th) describes the city as it is, and will be, unless Murt Coleman's (Letters, July 23rd) ideas are taken on board and implemented. The traffic problem affects the city, county and region on a daily basis from accessing work and hospital appointments to getting to shops, businesses and schools. There are too many resulting negatives to list but one is that attracting people to the area is getting more and more difficult because of traffic and housing. Everybody, including politicians and officials, knows this because traffic affects everybody and everybody complains about it. Mr Moran may be right about the eventual fate of the Galway outer bypass but as to the 'deluded fantasy' of Light Rail – when Stephen Hawking wondered how Albert Einstein came up with such formidable scientific theories, one of the reasons he offered was that Einstein was 'undaunted by common sense'. And 'common sense' isn't cutting it here either; our city needs ambition and imagination and the ability to change for the better. Light Rail is a project that will serve the Galway area and region for the next 100 years or more, but we must begin the project now. – Yours, etc, SEAMUS McMANUS, Tuam Road, Galway. Abortion debate Sir, – Repeal offers safety to women, according to Brian Kennedy (Letters, July 23rd). What about safety for the baby? The safest place for any baby should be its mother's womb. – Yours, etc, MARIAN WHITE, Stillorgan, Co Dublin. Some jobs for the boys Sir, – Before any contract is signed or a single cent is spent (on the National Development Plan), may I suggest that Micheál Martin, Simon Harris, Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers take a flight aboard the government jet. Their first stop should be the southern end of Lough Derg, to view the Parteen Weir and Ardnacrusha. Built as part of the Shannon hydro-electric scheme, Ardnacrusha cost £5 million, almost one-fifth of the State's annual budget at the time. It became a symbol of bold, forward-thinking infrastructure. Next, they might fly offshore to view the Fastnet Rock lighthouse. Constructed over 120 years ago from more than 2,000 dovetailed granite blocks, it was completed for £90,000 and remains a triumph of engineering and endurance. On the return leg, they should fly over the Derrybrien wind farm, soon to be dismantled at great cost both financially and to the environment. Before landing they should get an aerial view of the still-unfinished National Children's Hospital. A project years behind schedule, many times over budget and built in a congested location. Perhaps after this aerial tour, they will reflect on the contrast: once, Ireland built transformative national infrastructure with limited resources. Today with abundant resources we seem unable to deliver major projects on time or within budget. Any government can spend money. It only deserves credit however when it ensures projects are delivered on time, on budget, and are built to provide facilities that will be beneficial to all for years to come. – Yours, etc, NOEL SHANAGHY, Co Waterford. Sir, – Apparently, €45 million has been allocated by the National Transport Authority for 6km of cycle lane from Dundrum to Dún Laoghaire, without a cost/benefit analysis. Is this the most expensive cycle lane ever built in Ireland? – Yours, etc, OLGA BARRY, Dún Laoghaire, Co Dublin. Not in for the long haul Sir, – In your article on Aer Lingus customer service (July 21st), one traveller noted that, as bad as the airline's customer service is, the warmth and professionalism of check-in desk staff has always encouraged him to choose the airline when travelling with young children. At the time of reading, I entirely agreed and would add that the care shown by cabin crew staff on transatlantic flights, in particular, is why I've been making the same choice for my family for the past seven years and for myself for much longer. But a flight from Dublin to Cleveland last week demonstrated that the airline's strategy to expand services to more US cities is damaging this reputation of a warm Irish welcome. Our recent experience of flying with Aer Lingus included a flight that was overbooked, an hour-long wait at check-in, and a frazzled clerk who initially failed to check in our five-year-old son and then assigned him to a seat on his own. The aircraft flying to certain US destinations – Cleveland, Indianapolis, perhaps others – are just not fit for long-haul travel. For seven hours, we shared cramped rows, a single, narrow aisle, and toilets only at the back of the aircraft with about 170 economy passengers. With this set-up, it took an age for the four cabin crew to navigate the aisle, fire meals, drinks, etc, at passengers, and I don't know where or if they took breaks. Their welcome was noticeably, and understandably, more tepid than usual. Dublin Airport might also want to have a word with its flagship airline. After the chaos of check-in, the rest of our journey through security and US preclearance was mercifully efficient, fast and pleasant. But this was lost on the American tourists seated near us who I overheard saying: 'Aer Lingus is trash. That is one of the most disorganised airports I've ever been in.' Maybe it's time for Aer Lingus to reassess and rein in some of its transatlantic ambitions. – Yours, etc, GRÁINNE McEVOY, South Bend, Indiana. Ireland's housing crisis Sir, – I totally agree with Michael Gilmartin's letter (July 26th) in saying that it is an impossibility to fix the housing crisis with a growing population and migration. Even to build the required housing units means we have to bring more workers here to build them. As he says, the constant obsession with jobs and economic growth cannot continue with finite resources; sooner or later a government is going to have to accept this. Unfortunately, it's hard to foresee a party brave enough to make this stand in an election, especially seeing the drubbing that the usual whipping boys, the Green Party, receive. – Yours, etc, ENDA SCANLON, Ennis, Co Clare.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trade deal includes ‘zero for zero' arrangement for aviation, says Simon Harris
The agreed trade deal between the European Union and the United States has secured a 'zero for zero' arrangement for aviation, Simon Harris has said. The Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade wrote to the Government Trade Forum on Sunday night to say that while a 15 per cent baseline tariff was 'regrettable', it was the maximum tariff that could be imposed on the pharmaceutical sector even after the US administration's investigation into the sector's imports. He also confirmed that a 'zero for zero' agreement had also been secured for certain aircraft components, agricultural products and chemicals. The details were included in a letter sent by Mr Harris to the trade forum, which includes Government Ministers, State agencies, business organisations and trade unions. READ MORE In the letter, Mr Harris said that Sunday's agreement between European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump in Scotland will 'avoid tariffs of 30 per cent being imposed by the US on August 1st and will also avoid the EU imposing its own countermeasures'. Mr Harris described this as 'much-needed certainty for Irish, European and American businesses who together represent the most integrated trading relationship in the world'. 'While ultimately it is regrettable that the baseline tariff of 15 per cent is included in the agreement, it is important that we now have more certainty on the foundations for the EU-US trade relationship, which is essential for jobs, growth and investment. President von der Leyen described this as 15 per cent tariffs across the board and all-inclusive,' he said. 'We will examine the detail of the agreement in the coming days but it is our understanding from president von der Leyen that this rate of 15 per cent is a ceiling on any potential tariffs that may be imposed following the conclusion of the section 232 investigations, including those relating to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. The EU will continue to work with the US to underline the closely integrated nature of the EU and US pharmaceutical sector.' 'While the baseline tariff is 15 per cent, there are important exclusions from that, including a zero-for-zero arrangement on aviation. Ireland had made the case throughout these negotiations for zero-for-zero arrangements in as many sectors as possible.' [ EU pushing to cap future tariffs on pharma in US deal Opens in new window ] 'The commission president has also confirmed that there has been agreement on zero tariff levels on a number of key strategic products – including all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain agricultural products, semiconductor equipment, natural resources and critical raw materials. As the framework negotiations continue, the EU will keep working to add more products.' He told the forum that the Irish Government will now be examining the 'full implications' of the agreement on the all-island economy, including any differential tariff rates on either side of the Border. He said the Government will also now be looking into the 'implications' of a 15 per cent tariff rate.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Call for Government to urgently support Irish businesses most at risk from US tariffs
Social Democrats finance spokesman Cian O'Callaghan says the Government must publish an updated summer economic statement to account for the EU 's tariff agreement with the US . In a statement on Sunday evening, Mr O'Callaghan welcomed a deal that 'avoids a catastrophic trade war', but said it is 'beyond doubt . . . that a 15 per cent tariff rate will be very damaging for many Irish businesses'. 'It is less than a week since the Government published its summer economic statement, using an assumption of no tariffs,' he added. 'This was despite the dogs on the street being aware that a 10 per cent tariff rate was the best possible outcome.' Mr O'Callaghan was one of a number of figures in Irish politics to publish statements regarding the trade deal on Sunday evening. Labour leader Ivana Bacik called on the Government to engage with Irish businesses, warning that continued uncertainty around pharmaceutical exports is evidence of 'just how difficult it is to engage constructively with the Trump administration'. READ MORE 'We in Labour are calling on the Government to fast-track the development of a new, modernised short-time work scheme to ensure that skilled jobs are not lost in sectors under pressure,' Ms Bacik said. 'Other EU countries have long-standing schemes that help employers retain staff during economic shocks. We need a system in place in Ireland that can respond to future volatility or sectoral downturns quickly and effectively.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin welcomed the agreement, saying it 'will help to protect many jobs in Ireland'. He added that it 'brings clarity and predictability to the trading relationship between the EU and the US – the biggest in the world". Mr Martin acknowledged that higher tariffs will make trade 'more expensive and more challenging' but said that the agreement 'creates a new era of stability that can hopefully contribute to a growing and deepening relationship between the EU and the US'. [ EU-US deal good for Ireland as it averts trade war but vital details remain unclear Opens in new window ] The Taoiseach pledged to study the details of the agreement, including its implications for Irish businesses exporting to the US and for other sectors operating here. 'Given the very real risk that existed for escalation and for the imposition of punitively high tariffs, this news will be welcomed by many,' his statement concluded. There were further calls to support Irish businesses from Sinn Féin spokesperson on foreign affairs and trade, Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire. 'Ultimately, while a deal is preferable to tit-for-tat tariffs, the reality is, tariffs of this kind are bad for businesses, consumers and workers,' he said. 'We need to take the necessary steps to support our indigenous businesses, to increase exports to new markets, to grow talent across the island and to trade across the island and internationally." Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris echoed the Taoiseach in welcoming the transatlantic trade agreement, noting that European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen described the 15 per cent tariff rate as 'all-inclusive'. 'While Ireland regrets that the baseline tariff of 15 per cent is included in the agreement, it is important that we now have more certainty on the foundations of the EU-US trade relationship, which is essential for jobs, growth and investment,' Mr Harris said. Finally, Danny McCoy, CEO of business lobby Ibec, said the trade agreement represents a 'substantial burden for many industries', particularly those relying heavily on the US market to operate. 'Our message to the Government, as it was with the 10 per cent tariff, is that the most exposed sectors will require support similar to the interventions provided as a response to Brexit,' Mr McCoy said.
