Anti-racism and anti-immigration protesters in Falkirk face off outside asylum hotel
Stand Up to Racism Scotland, Falkirk Trades Union Council and local people said they organised the gathering in Falkirk on Saturday to show that refugees are welcome in the town.
Organisers described it as a 'safely stewarded community event with music, speeches from the local community, the trade union movement, local campaigns, faith groups and others'.
Demonstrators held placards with messages such as 'stop the far right', 'refugees welcome' and 'migrants make our NHS'.
Police said Kemper Avenue in Falkirk was closed due to protest activity which began at about 11am.
The road reopened on Saturday night, with Police Scotland confirming a 26-year-old man was arrested in connection with a breach of the cordon line.
The group Save Our Future & Our Kids Futures had announced plans to hold a protest outside the hotel known as the Cladhan.
In a social media post the group said it was 'standing against uncontrolled illegal immigration, with people being placed in our communities without transparency, accountability, or consultation'.
It added: 'This is not about hate, racism, or division. This is about safety, justice, and standing up for the people of Falkirk who deserve better.'
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Protesters, some waving union flags, chanted 'send them home' while anti-racism demonstrators responded with chants of 'refugees are welcome here' and 'this is what community looks like'.
Similar protests have been held in recent months in Epping, Essex, near the Bell hotel which houses asylum seekers.
In July, some of the demonstrations descended into violent disorder with 28 people arrested after police officers were injured.
The protests in Essex started after an asylum seeker housed at the hotel was accused of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. He is in custody awaiting further court hearings.
Earlier this August, several demonstrators were detained after rival groups faced off over a hotel accommodating asylum seekers in north London.
The counter-protest outside the Thistle City Barbican hotel in Islington was organised by local branches of Stand Up to Racism and was supported by the former Labour leader and Islington North MP Jeremy Corbyn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
a minute ago
- Reuters
Criticism of UK's domestic abuse risk assessment prompts rethink
LONDON, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Britain's main domestic abuse risk-assessment questionnaire, DASH, is set to be updated by its lead author and leading charity SafeLives amid evidence its limitations may have contributed to deadly failures. Reuters reported last week that many people were failed by the questionnaire, which has been used by police, social workers, and others for more than 15 years to gauge domestic abuse risk. Following the report, The Telegraph said at least 55 women killed in domestic abuse cases had been graded by DASH as being at standard or medium risk. The Times said some victims were downgraded from high to medium risk before they were killed. SafeLives CEO Ellen Miller said the charity, which co-developed DASH with the form's lead author Laura Richards, had been tasked by the interior ministry with a project to scope "how a review could work through, how a bigger rewrite could happen." Miller, in a later statement, said SafeLives was not reviewing DASH for the government but would "look at the whole picture of how risk is identified and acted on," calling for a government-led review of the entire risk response. The interior ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Richards told Reuters she was "working with SafeLives to update DASH," saying such tools should "always be improved" to help save lives. The DASH system relies on yes-or-no answers and usually requires 14 "yes" responses before a person is classified as high risk and referred for extra support. SafeLives provides DASH training, which some critics say gives the charity a vested interest in protecting the tool. Miller said the organisation did not use DASH as a "cash cow." Reuters spoke with mothers whose daughters were classified as medium risk despite clear warning signs, and were later murdered by their partners. Like Miller, Richards said the problem was not DASH itself but how police used it and that more appropriate training was needed. The National Police Chiefs' Council said the College of Policing reviewed DASH in 2015 and identified inconsistencies, but a review of international literature at the time did not find a better alternative. As a result, it developed a new tool, DARA, which it says better captures controlling and coercive behaviour and incorporates open-ended questions. The tool has been recommended to police forces but its adoption is not mandatory.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Will a ‘war on newts' get Britain building again?
Get ready for a new environmental battle royale. To kickstart our flagging economy, Rachel Reeves is said to be preparing an onslaught against protected species in order to accelerate infrastructure building. The chancellor is going beyond what has previously been proposed, in pursuit of her 'further and faster' economic growth agenda. She wants to tear up European regulations which developers blame for slowing construction projects. Already, the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which is wending its way through Parliament, will allow builders to bypass existing controls by paying into a nature restoration fund to improve habitats on other sites. While the full ramifications of that draft legislation have not sunk in – cue protests as campaigners argue that one habitat is being sacrificed while another benefits, and that the net result is reduced wildlife and fauna – her latest move will also provoke anger. Among the changes reportedly being mooted by Reeves are plans for a smaller, UK-only, list of safeguarded species. The new shortened line-up would afford more weight to creatures viewed as relatively rare in Europe but common in Britain. Another is the abolition of the EU 'precautionary principle' that requires constructors to show their projects will have no impact on protected natural sites. It would be replaced with a new test based on the risks and benefits of building. Also in Reeves' sights is said to be imposing limits on the legal challenges that can be brought by environmentalists. She has previously indicated as to where her thinking was heading. Speaking to the House of Lords economic affairs committee last month, Reeves said: 'The reason that HS2 is not coming to my city of Leeds anymore anytime soon, is because, I'm afraid, as a country, we've cared more about the bats than we have about the commuter times for people in Leeds and West Yorkshire, and we've got to change that. Because I care more about a young family getting on the housing ladder than I do about protecting some snails, and I care more about my energy bills and my constituents than I do about the views of people from their windows.' Strongly put – but also disingenuous. It is the case that HS2 did have to incur a £100m extra bill for a 'bat tunnel' to guarantee the wellbeing of bats on one section of the line in Buckinghamshire – but that is not the reason the fast-railway is not venturing to Leeds. It has more to do with the spiralling cost of the new service. If it had gone the distance to West Yorkshire, the final tally for that leg alone would have been £36bn. In that context, £100m on some bats is neither here nor there. The bats were also in the south, and had nothing to do with the Yorkshire extension. The fact is that these issues when they arise make ideal media fodder; they are a headline-writer's dream. So it is with the 'fish disco' at Hinckley Point C nuclear plant which plays sound to dissuade fish from entering the cooling system. Again, the expense is tiny, versus the overall price of a nuclear power station. It is true there are repeated problems for developers coming up against bats, newts and the like, and not just regarding large-scale national projects but on housing sites. Often, though, it's the time taken in deciding how to proceed that causes the issue. If Reeves could do something about that, rather than drive a bulldozer through the regulations which were introduced for a purpose, she might find it less controversial and that progress is smoother. It is also a distraction for another reason. While it sounds good and emotive to blame people for wishing to preserve the views from their windows, that is not, in the main, why so few young families are failing to get on the housing ladder. It's a contributory factor, but it is one of several, of which others are more significant – not least the sheer difficulty in obtaining a mortgage for first-time buyers, whatever the local council expects in offset, the need for roads and services, the provision of car parking, the pollution it will cause. These are just some, there are more.
Daily Mail
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Britain's porn crackdown in numbers: Pornhub loses more than 1 MILLION visitors in just two weeks – as Brits refuse to show their ID to prove they're over–18
Britain's pornography crackdown has sent the number of visits to the most popular adult sites tumbling as Britons refuse to show their ID to prove their age. Visits to many sites halved within two weeks of the introduction of enhanced age verification rules under the Online Safety Act. Pornhub, the UK's most popular adult site, has lost more than one million visitors since the start of the new restrictions, according to data gathered by Similarweb. Between July 24 (the day before the rules came into effect) and August 8, Pornhub's average daily visits fell from 3.2 million to two million – a reduction of 47 per cent. This comes as Britain's Online Safety Act ushers in some of the world's most restrictive rules on accessing online pornography. Since July 25, visitors to adult sites have had to verify that they are over 18 either by providing credit card details, uploading a picture of their ID, or using a selfie to estimate their age. These rules, intended to make it harder for under–18s to see explicit material, have seen huge reductions in the number of Britons accessing pornography. Similarweb data found that visits to the 90 most popular sites fell 23 per cent between July and August, with the largest sites taking the biggest hits. Daily visits to Pornhub actually spiked on the day the new rules came into place, reaching 4.1 million visitors on July 25. However, this has now fallen to 1.8 million as of the latest available data from August 18. Likewise, average daily visits to XHamster, the third most popular site, fell 39 per cent from 1.7 million to 1.2 million between July and August. XVideos, another popular adult site in the UK, saw average daily visitor numbers fall by 47 per cent over the same timeframe. Similarly, the popular adult content site OnlyFans saw average daily visits decline by eight per cent month on month. At the same time, data shows that downloads of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) have massively increased. A VPN allows someone to disguise their internet traffic so that they appear to be in a different country, bypassing the UK's age verification laws. Some VPNs, such as NordVPN and Proton, have boasted of tenfold increases in usage since the new rules came into force, and VPN apps topped the Apple Store's most downloaded list. Since someone using a VPN would not appear to be browsing from the UK in Similarweb's data, it isn't clear how much of the change is due to individuals using VPNs. Although average visits to adult sites from the UK fell, the change was not distributed evenly, with some smaller sites showing explosive growth. For example, daily visitors to the site ' increased more than 130 per cent month on month. A spokesperson for Pornhub said in a statement: 'As we've seen in many jurisdictions around the world, there is often a drop in traffic for compliant sites and an increase in traffic for non–compliant sites.' The regulator Ofcom is already investigating four companies that control over 30 different sites for not doing enough to prevent under–18s accessing explicit content. The Online Safety Act requires the operators of online platforms to prevent children from viewing 'harmful content'. That includes explicit content, like pornography, but also content that encourages self–harm or suicide, promotes dangerous challenges, shows serious violence, or incites hatred against people. Platforms found to be in breach of the act could face a range of punishments, including fines of £18 million or 10 per cent of global turnover. In extreme cases, companies may be blocked from operating in the UK. The laws were created in response to what many consider to be an alarming rise in young children accessing disturbing or harmful content online. A study conducted last year by the charity Internet Matters found that seven in 10 children aged nine to 13 said they had been exposed to harmful content online. Children in this age group reported coming across hate speech (13 per cent), coming across mis/disinformation (15 per cent), and one in ten has seen violent content or content that promotes violence. Similarly, Ofcom research has found that eight per cent of UK children aged eight to 14 visited a porn site at least once a month. However, Similarweb's data shows that daily visitors to social media sites have been largely unaffected by the changes. X, formerly Twitter, and Reddit have shown relatively steady traffic figures since introducing age verification checks, despite both sites hosting pornographic content. Children as young as EIGHT are finding adult content online New research from Ofcom reveals the extent to which children are accessing porn online, and underlines the need for new measures to protect them. It found that eight per cent of children aged 8–14 in the UK visited an online porn site or app in a month – including around 3 per cent of 8–9–year–olds – the youngest children in the study. Ofcom's research tracked the use of websites and apps by 8–14–year–olds across smartphones, tablets and computers over a month. Boys aged 13–14 (19 per cent) were mostly likely to visit a porn service, significantly more than girls the same age (11 per cent). With older teenagers also likely accessing pornography, the total number of under–18s exposed to adult content will be higher still.
