Suffolk County Executive Ed Romaine signs off on longer terms for lawmakers — now voters get to decide
But voters will still need to approve the term-limit change on the November ballot.
The 'Term Limit Preservation Act' will ask voters on Nov. 4 whether they support doubling the term length for county legislators, while still capping their total time in office at 12 years.
Advertisement
Suffolk County Executive Ed Romaine signed a new measure Friday that could lead lawmakers in the county to serve twice as long.
Brandon Cruz / NY Post
Romaine signed the bill to place the measure on the ballot in Hauppauge, framing the move as a way to give residents more control over how local government functions due to a new controversial state law dictating election schedules.
'This is an opportunity,' Romaine said.
Advertisement
'If you think that less politics and more government is a good thing, then this is something to support.'
The proposal, first passed by the legislature in early July, stems from a 2023 state law signed by Gov. Kathy Hochul that moves all local elections in New York to even-numbered years to coincide with state and federal races — which Hochul said would reduce voter fatigue and save taxpayer dollars.
But Long Island politicians, especially Republicans, say they're worried about important local issues being drowned out by the national noise, and argue the shift has created confusion and could wreak havoc on the county's election calendar.
The legislation signed by Romaine will allow lawmakers to serve four-year terms, but voters still need to approve the term-limit change on the November ballot.
Suffolk County Government
Advertisement
'If the elections stay in even years, I am concerned that local issues will get lost in the shuffle of national and state politics,' Romaine told reporters.
He said this amendment would allow legislators to spend less time campaigning and more time doing the work of local government, as they would essentially win in November and have to start immediately campaigning again due to the changes.
If the ballot measure passes, current lawmakers would be allowed to serve out their final term if it goes beyond the 12 year maximum — a move politicians claimed was to avoid the 'chaos' of midterm resignations.
Advertisement
Although lawmakers used the shift in election years as justification to beef up the length they could serve without campaigning, Suffolk recently pushed to stretch lawmakers' terms from two to four years in 2020.
More than 70% of voters voted against the measure on ballots.
Westchester County's Board of Legislators similarly tried to extend term limits in 2024, with voters promptly voting against the measure.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
27 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Senate confirms Trump's pick for counterterrorism agency, a former Green Beret with extremist ties
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate confirmed President Donald Trump's pick to lead the National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent, on Wednesday evening as Republicans looked past his connections to right-wing extremists and support for conspiracy theories about the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. Kent won confirmation on a 53-44 party-line vote. He had already been working for Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. As the head of the National Counterterrorism Center, he will oversee an agency tasked with analyzing and detecting terrorist threats. In the role, he plans to devote agency resources to targeting Latin American gangs and other criminal groups tied to migration. He is the latest Trump loyalist to win Senate confirmation to the upper echelons of U.S. national security leadership at a time when Trump is stretching his presidential wartime powers to accomplish his goals. 'President Trump is committed to identifying these cartels and these violent gang members and making sure that we locate them and that we get them out of our country,' Kent said at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee in April. Kent enters the top role at the counterterrorism center after two unsuccessful campaigns for Congress in Washington state, as well as a military career that saw him deployed 11 times as a Green Beret, followed by work at the CIA. His first wife, a Navy cryptologist, was killed by a suicide bomber in 2019 while fighting the Islamic State group in Syria. Yet Democrats strongly opposed his confirmation, pointing to his past ties to far-right figures and conspiracy theories. During his 2022 congressional campaign, Kent paid Graham Jorgensen, a member of the far-right military group the Proud Boys, for consulting work. He also worked closely with Joey Gibson, the founder of the Christian nationalist group Patriot Prayer, and attracted support from a variety of far-right figures. During his Senate confirmation hearing, Kent also refused to distance himself from a conspiracy theory that federal agents had somehow instigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack at the Capitol, as well as false claims that Trump won the 2020 election over President Joe Biden. They also raised grave concerns over a recent incident where Kent, as Gabbard's chief of staff, told an intelligence analyst to revise an assessment of the relationship between the Venezuelan government and a transnational gang. The revisions supported Trump's assertions that members of the gang could be removed under the Alien Enemies Act — a wartime provision. Democrats said it showed Kent cannot be trusted to handle some of the nation's most important and sensitive intelligence. Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said any counterterrorism director 'must be trusted to tell the truth and to uphold the core principles of the intelligence community: Objectivity, nonpartisanship and fidelity to fact.' 'Unfortunately, Mr. Kent has shown time and again that he cannot meet the standard,' Warner added. Sen. Tom Cotton, the GOP chair of the intelligence committee, said in a floor speech that Kent 'has dedicated his career to fighting terrorism and keeping Americans safe.' ___
NBC News
28 minutes ago
- NBC News
Inside the GOP's new Texas congressional map proposal: From the Politics Desk
Welcome to the online version of From the Politics Desk, an evening newsletter that brings you the NBC News Politics team's latest reporting and analysis from the White House, Capitol Hill and the campaign trail. Happy Wednesday! Today's edition digs into Republicans' new proposed congressional map in Texas, which would give the party the chance to pick up five additional seats in the midterms. Plus, Andrea Mitchell looks at the Environmental Protection Agency's deregulation moves under the Trump administration. — Scott Bland Texas Republicans unveil congressional map giving them a chance to pick up 5 seats By Adam Edelman and Ben Kamisar Texas Republicans on Wednesday released a proposed new congressional map that would give the GOP a path to pick up five seats in next year's midterm elections. The proposal, which follows President Donald Trump's public pressing for a new map in the state, would shift district lines in ways that target current Democratic members of Congress in districts in and around Austin, Dallas and Houston, as well as two already endangered Democrats representing South Texas districts that Trump carried last year. If it were enacted, the proposal could have a major effect on the battle for control of the House in 2026. Republicans hold a slim, three-seat advantage right now, but this map could add extra padding as they seek to keep the House for the final two years of Trump's presidency. They already control 25 of the 38 congressional districts in Texas. In a sign of how carefully the new lines are drawn to maximize the GOP's standing, Trump would have carried 30 out of 38 seats on this new map last year, none by single-digit margins. Democratic voters are packed into eight districts that former Vice President Kamala Harris would have won by at least 15 percentage points each last year, according to analysis from the nonpartisan Texas Legislative Council. See how the current map compares to the new proposal) The proposal may still change before state lawmakers consider it further, and members of the special redistricting committee may still refer new proposals for consideration throughout the special session. Amid a scorching summer, a rollback on carbon regulations Analysis by Andrea Mitchell With more than 100 million people melting in a heat wave that's notable even for July, is this the time for the Trump administration to propose rolling back long-accepted regulations on fossil fuels, including long-accepted limits on power plants and vehicle emissions? Apparently, it is, as Environmental Protect Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin is following through on his pledge to eliminate what he called 'the holy grail of the climate change religion.' Zeldin said this week that by regulating fossil fuels in 2009, during the Obama administration, the EPA ignored the 'benefits' of carbon dioxide and refused to consider the economic costs of regulation. Last year was the hottest year on record, with wildfires, dangerous flooding and hotter ocean temperatures that meteorologists say made Hurricane Helene stronger, causing greater inland damage. The Obama administration's so-called endangerment finding made a widely accepted scientific case that human emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases endanger human health. Scientists warn the United States is about to cross a dangerous threshold: making it impossible to avoid surpassing 1.5 degrees Celsius in global warming since the preindustrial era, the accepted international goal to prevent disastrous impacts from climate change. Environmental author Michael Mann, a professor of climate science at the University of Pennsylvania, told me on NBC News' new podcast, 'Here's the Scoop,' that protecting the environment has been a bipartisan goal dating to President Richard Nixon's creation of the EPA. Ronald Reagan signed the protocols banning the chemicals that were destroying the ozone layer. George H.W. Bush led passage of regulations to deal with acid rain emissions from factories. Pollution is also expensive: The world's largest reinsurer, Munich Re, reports that climate-influenced natural disasters have cost us $93 billion so far this year, with the United States accounting for more than 70% of weather-related damage. With President Donald Trump having dropped out of the Paris Climate Accords in his first term and now appointing Cabinet members who reject established elements of climate science, China and the European Union are now driving global moves to limit climate change. That has placed China, the world's other large emitter alongside the United States, as a new leader for what Mann calls 'the adult in the room. It's their gain and our loss,' as China now leads the world in producing solar panels and other green technologies, he said. At the same time, the State Department has fired its climate experts even as veteran diplomats and intelligence agencies say the overheated climate is a national security issue — fueling migration, famine and civil wars.
28 minutes ago
Trump blasts Republican Sen. Hawley over stock trade ban: 'pawn'
Republican Sen. Josh Hawley engaged in a fiery debate with members of his own party before joining Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee Wednesday to advance a bill that would ban members of Congress or their spouses from trading or holding individual stocks. Later, President Donald Trump blasted Hawley for move, calling him a "pawn." The bill -- the HONEST Act, which stands for the Halting Ownership of Non-Ethical Securities and Trusts -- was recently modified so that the ban on insider trading includes the president and vice president. That provision wouldn't go into effect until after Trump and Vice President JD Vance leave office, however. Hawley voted with Democrats to pass the bill through committee by a vote of 8-7. It's now up to Senate Majority Leader John Thune to decide whether to bring the bill to the floor for a vote. Hawley led the charge to advance this legislation, but was met with push back from members of his own party who said some of the bill's provisions would disincentivize business owners from running for office. Several Republicans also claimed Hawley was attacking them for their wealth. Hawley said when he was elected, he sold his trusts and assets in an effort to "practice what I preach." "I don't have individual stocks. I don't trade in stock. I'm not a billionaire -- unlike others on this committee, and what I think is the American people are sending us a clear message," Hawley said. Later, Republican Sen. Rick Scott, one of the chamber's wealthiest members, went back at Hawley for those comments. "I don't know how many people in the audience, how many of you don't want to make money. Anybody want to be poor?," said Scott, who is a longtime businessman and founder of a large healthcare company. "I don't." "So this idea that we are going to attack people because they make money is wrong. Is absolutely wrong. We should cherish all of our different backgrounds. Every one of us has a different background," Scott added. Many Democrats said they are united behind the bill, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer saying they are "for a stock trading ban." Hawley -- a Republican firebrand -- was in a rare position of receiving Democratic support with Sen. Richard Blumenthal saying, "thanks to Sen. Hawley for campaigning this cause." Hawley claimed in his statement that he wanted to "find out where members stand" on the issue. "Members of Congress should be focused on delivering results for their constituents, not returns on investments. It's time to find out where members stand," he said. "It's time we restore trust in Congress and ban all members from trading and holding stocks." A number of Republican senators have said in recent days that they were supportive of Hawley's efforts to push the stock trading ban. Republican Sen. Roger Marshall said on Tuesday, before the vote, that he "very much" supported a ban on stock trading. "Certainly, I think as a member of Congress, we do sometimes have some inside information that we may know something before the stock markets move … it's not fair to the rest of the Americans. I do think that it's been abused up here," Marshall said. Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno said Tuesday he was also in favor of the efforts, saying "it's great." On his social media site, Trump called Hawley a "pawn" and a "second-tier Senator," adding that the GOP lawmaker is "playing right into the dirty hands of the Democrats" over the senator's support for the bill. Hawley said he had not spoken to Trump since the president's post on Truth Social bashing the bill, but said he hopes to get the legislation to a place that Trump supports it. "I mean, I want to get him to a place where he supports this, because if he doesn't, it's just not going to go anywhere," Hawley said. "If he just says I'm going to veto this, than that'll be it. So I don't want that." Earlier in the day, asked about the HONEST Act during a bill signing Wednesday, Trump said he didn't know much about it. "I don't know about it, but I like it conceptually," Trump said.
