Soviet-era passenger plane crashes in Russia's far east, killing all 48 on board
The burning fuselage of the plane, which was made in 1976, was spotted by a search helicopter after it disappeared from radar screens. It had been attempting to land for a second time after failing to touch down on its first approach, the Far Eastern Transport Prosecutor's Office said in a statement.
Operated by the privately owned Siberian regional airline Angara, it had been en route from the city of Blagoveshchensk near the Chinese border to Tynda, an important railway junction in the Amur region. It was carrying 42 passengers, including five children, and six crew.
The regional governor and federal investigators confirmed that everyone on board had been killed.
Investigators said they had opened a criminal case into the suspected violation of air traffic and air transport rules, resulting in the death of more than two people through negligence. The plane had recently passed a technical safety inspection, Russian news agencies reported, and had been involved in four apparently minor incidents since 2018.
The crash is likely to raise new questions about the viability of continuing to fly such old planes in far-flung corners of Russia at a time when Western sanctions have crimped Moscow's ability to access investment and spare parts.
It may also prompt other countries that operate the aircraft to review their fleets. North Korea, Kazakhstan, Laos, Cuba, Ethiopia, Myanmar and Zimbabwe operate the An-24, according to the authoritative RussianPlanes web portal.
Video shot from a helicopter showed pale smoke rising from the crash site in a densely forested hilly area around 15 kilometers from Tynda. There were no roads to the site and a rescue team had to use heavy machinery to cut a path there.
Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed his condolences to the families of those killed and held a minute's silence at the start of a government meeting.
At least one Chinese citizen was reported to have been on board and Chinese President Xi Jinping sent his condolences to Putin.
Moscow said it had set up a commission to deal with the aftermath in addition to the criminal and air safety investigations. A representative of Angara said they could not offer any more details.
An Angara Airlines plane takes off from an airport in Irkutsk, Russia, in 2014. |
Reuters
Angara is based in the Siberian city of Irkutsk and serves airports in Siberia and Russia's far east. Before Thursday's crash, it operated 10 An-24s built between 1972 and 1976, according to RussianPlanes.
It was one of two Siberian airlines that last year asked the Russian government to extend the service life of the Antonov aircraft, as Russian planemakers scramble to plug the gap left by an exodus of foreign manufacturers.
Nicknamed "flying tractors" by some, the propeller-driven An-24s are regarded as reliable workhorses inside Russia and are well-suited to Siberia as they are able to operate in sub-zero conditions and don't have to land on runways.
But airline executives, pilots and industry experts say the cost of maintaining the Antonovs — which make up a fraction of Russia's fleet of over 1,000 passenger planes — has increased after Western sanctions against Russia over its war in Ukraine hit investment and access to parts.
Almost 1,340 An-24 planes were built in the Soviet Union. Eighty-eight have now been lost because of crashes and 65 because of serious incidents without casualties, and 75 are currently in operation, according to data from the RussianPlanes web-portal and Reuters analysis.
Their age has long been of concern. Dmitry Medvedev, then president, proposed grounding Russia's An-24 fleet in 2011 after one of them crashed in Siberia, killing seven people.
Many of the planes are due to be retired from service in the coming years, but mass production of the new Ladoga aircraft, the same class as the An-24, is not due to begin until 2027 at the earliest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
3 days ago
- Asahi Shimbun
Film sheds light on settlers' sex deal with Soviets in Manchuria
Fumie Matsubara, director of 'Kurokawa no Onnatachi,' discusses her documentary film in Osaka's Yodogawa Ward on June 19. (Akari Uozumi) A statue called 'Otome no Hi' (Monument to the maidens) was erected in 1982 in Gifu Prefecture. But an explanation on who the 'maidens' were and why they were being commemorated did not appear until 36 years later. A plaque inscribed with an epitaph explaining the long-hidden shame of the former village of Kurokawa was set up in 2018. And now, a documentary film sheds further light on the plight of the maidens, who were forced to 'sexually entertain' Soviet soldiers in exchange for their protection of the village's settlement in Manchuria after Japan's defeat in World War II. Directed by Fumie Matsubara, 'Kurokawa no Onnatachi' ('In Their Own Words: The Women of Kurokawa') focuses on women who started talking on camera about their traumatic experiences of sexual violence nearly 70 years after the war. It also features an association of bereaved family members of the Manchurian settlers who, inspired by the women, went to great lengths to set up the explanatory plaque at the stone monument. PROTECTION DEAL Settlers from Kurokawa, now part of Shirakawa town, emigrated to Manchuria in northeast China when it was under Japanese rule. After the war ended and the Japanese troops went home, the settlers were left to fend for themselves in hostile territory. From September through November 1945, they offered about 15 unmarried females between 17 and 21 years old to Soviet soldiers in return for protection against looters and angry locals. Four of the women died in Manchuria. The settlers eventually returned to Japan and kept mum about the sexual services. But the surviving women who came home suffered from defamatory insults. GOING PUBLIC The stone monument was erected to console the souls of the four women who died far from home. Director Matsubara has been covering the Kurokawa settlers since 2018, when she was working at TV Asahi Corp. and presented a two-minute news clip about the completion of the explanatory plaque. At the time, she was also pursuing a political scandal over falsified Finance Ministry documents concerning the heavily discounted sale of state-owned land to Moritomo Gakuen, a private educational institution. 'At a time when history was being forged, ordinary people were squarely facing an inconvenient fact of history,' Matsubara recalled. 'I felt it was a great consolation.' The film captures the changes the women went through after they shared their experiences. Harue Sato was 20 years old when she was in Manchuria and is one of the first women who went public about her ordeal. Students and locals started visiting her home to hear her stories. A senior high school teacher in the area offers a class on wartime violence based on Sato's recounts. Reiko Yasue, who was 17 when the war ended, had kept her past a secret even from family members. She would only talk about her experiences on condition of anonymity. She couldn't sleep when she remembered her days of anguish, and she rarely smiled. But her wounds began to heal when her granddaughter and other supporters, who learned about the sexual violence through news reports and books, gave her warm words. 'I really felt that dignity can be restored when you have supporters,' Matsubara said. She decided to make the documentary to show the strength of the women who publicly spoke about their tragedy and those who listen to their stories. The director asked Shinobu Otake, who has appeared in many films, television shows and theater productions that deal with the theme of peace, to serve as the narrator. The actress immediately accepted the offer. 'Inspired by what the women told them, everyone started searching for what they could do, including making this film' Matsubara said. 'I hope each audience member will also become one of the collaborators to convey their legacy.' The 99-minute film is currently showing nationwide.
Japan Today
4 days ago
- Japan Today
Russian Boeing 737 lands safely after turning back with cabin pressure issue, flight data shows
By Gleb Stolyarov and Andrew Osborn A Russian passenger plane operated by S7 Airlines landed safely on Friday after turning back to Novosibirsk airport in Siberia to check its cabin pressure systems, flight tracking data showed. S7 had said in a statement earlier on Friday that the plane, which had been flying to the southern Russian resort city of Sochi, had been forced to return to its departure airport "to check the cabin pressure control system." The tracking website indicated that the plane, a Boeing 737 with seating capacity for 176 passengers manufactured in 2001, landed safely. The website had earlier indicated that the plane sent an emergency signal. The site tracked it turning back and then repeatedly circling and flying in large loops to use up its fuel before landing. The airline said in a statement that a replacement aircraft had been prepared to carry passengers to their original destination of Sochi. The Western Siberian Transport Prosecutor's office said it had been monitoring the incident. The incident comes a day after an An-24 passenger plane crashed in Russia's far east as it was preparing to land, killing all 48 people on board in an incident that spotlighted the continued use of old, Soviet-era aircraft. © (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025.
The Diplomat
4 days ago
- The Diplomat
The Bodhisattva and the Shrine: Cultural Repatriation and Diplomacy in Japan-South Korea Relations
Unresolved colonial histories and collective traumas continue to shape relations in East Asia through significant historical objects.A 14th-century gilt bronze statue of Kanzeon Bodhisattva was recently returned to Japan from South Korea, following a prolonged legal battle between the two countries over current ownership. The statue had been stolen from Japan's Kannon Temple in 2012 – but South Korea's Buseok Temple claimed to be its rightful owner, pointing out it had only made its way to Japan after being stolen from Korea centuries before. A 2023 court decision, which overturned a previous ruling in favor of Buseok Temple, stated that Kannon Temple had gained legal ownership of the statue through adverse possession. The judgment sparked backlash among Koreans who viewed it as rewarding historical theft. The international movement in favor of returning stolen cultural heritage is gaining momentum. While the pace of restitution remains uneven, governments, museums, and even private actors are increasingly responding. However, the return of looted artifacts is not just about righting historical wrongs; it is also a measure of cultural diplomacy and soft power. In this emerging landscape, the choices made by states and nonstate actors reveal what kind of long-term global values they seek to project. While many of the most widely known cases of stolen art persist in Europe, unresolved colonial histories and collective traumas continue to shape relations in East Asia through significant historical objects, such as the contested Bodhisattva statue, which is now housed at the Tsushima Museum. But not all repatriations have followed this uncertain path. South Korea recently welcomed back Gwanwoldang, a Joseon-era royal shrine building, which had stood in Japan for the last century. Choi Eung-chon, head of the Korean Heritage Service, praised the development as 'an exemplary case that actualizes the values of mutual respect and empathy through cultural heritage.' He added, 'We hope it will become a symbol of cultural solidarity and future-oriented cooperation between Korea and Japan.' The shrine was transported to Japan in 1924, during Japan's colonial rule over the Korean Peninsula. Though bilateral talks to give the shrine back to South Korea began in 2010, the handover gathered momentum once Japanese archaeologist and ethnologist Sato Takao stepped in with his full support after becoming chief priest of Kotoku-in Temple, where the shrine had been moved in the 1930s. Despite facing pressure from right-wing Japanese nationalists, Sato advocated for the return of Gwanwoldang throughout negotiations, citing both the shrine's historical origins and preservation benefits. He also personally financed the meticulous dismantling and transport of the structure. According to Sato, 'It is a global trend to return cultural heritage taken out during the imperialist era. What matters is the mindset.' Such examples of progressive leadership remain rare in the realm of repatriation, even while countries and communities increasingly demand accountability that goes beyond symbolic gestures. Museums and governments often refuse the repatriation of artifacts, for reasons ranging from conservation to 'universal' platforming, and legal ownership. By contrast, Sato's proactive repatriation demonstrates how nonstate actors can swiftly facilitate relationships and soft power through ethical choices that lay the groundwork for lasting diplomatic bridges and regional trust. Recovering such objects – whether seized, purchased, or gifted – typically relies on political will and legal channels, often straining diplomatic efforts during years of stalled negotiations. This can discourage diplomatic relations on other fronts, as potential allies become locked into avoidable ethical stalemates. With East Asia already heavy with colonial histories and implications, repatriation is a relatively accessible – if largely neglected – tool for geopolitical strategy. The case of the Bodhisattva statue exemplifies a fractured moment in Japan-South Korea relations, marked by theft on both sides as well as international norms that sidestep deeper issues of colonialism and imperialism. While ongoing battles for artifacts continue under comparable constraints throughout the world, Japan and South Korea also share heritage diplomacy successes that can serve as a model for such disputes. The Gwanwoldang shrine – currently in storage in Paju, South Korea and awaiting restoration – is an example of how artifacts of significance can not only be given back with mutual dignity and even admiration between actors, but how they can fuel further exchanges that would have been unlikely beforehand. During the official ceremony at the National Palace Museum in Seoul, Sato announced to the audience, 'We will discuss ways to raise a 100-million yen fund to support academic exchanges on Korean and Japanese cultural heritage and donate it to the Overseas Material Cultural Heritage Foundation. It took 24 years to completely return the Gwanwoldang to Korea. I'm proud to finish something important.'
