Interest rate on CPF Special, MediSave and Retirement accounts remains at 4% for Q3 2025
The interest rate on the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Special, MediSave and Retirement accounts (SMRA) will remain unchanged at 4 per cent from July to September 2025.
Savings in these accounts will earn the floor rate of 4 per cent a year in the third quarter, as the SMRA pegged rate remains below the floor rate, according to a joint statement by the CPF Board and Housing Board on May 22.
The interest rate is pegged to the 12-month average yield of the 10-year Singapore Government Securities, plus 1 per cent.
The interest rates for the Ordinary Account and for HDB housing loans remain unchanged at 2.5 per cent and 2.6 per cent, respectively.
CPF members below 55 years old will continue to earn an extra 1 per cent interest on the first $60,000 of their combined account balances, capped at $20,000 for the Ordinary Account.
Those aged 55 and above will continue to earn an extra 2 per cent interest on the first $30,000 of their combined balances, capped at $20,000 for the Ordinary Account, and an extra 1 per cent on the next $30,000.
The extra interest earned on the Ordinary Account will go into a member's Special Account or Retirement Account, said the statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Paper
4 days ago
- New Paper
'What exactly are the rest of us paying for?': Ex-restaurateur questions fairness of home-based cafés
A former restaurant and bar owner has sparked debate over the rise of unlicensed home-based cafés, calling out what he sees as double standards in Singapore's F&B industry. In a strongly worded LinkedIn post, Mr Ee Chien Chua, who said he ran a licensed eatery and bar for six years, detailed the costs and compliance burdens borne by legitimate food operators: from commercial rent to fire certifications, grease trap maintenance, pest control, and CPF contributions. Paid leave, inspections, food handler permits -- he said he had done it all by the book. "So you'll have to forgive me when I say: I don't think this new wave of 'home cafés or restaurants' is a fair game." His post was written in response to a recent The Straits Times article featuring young brewers operating cafés out of their homes, serving specialty coffee and matcha. While applauding their entrepreneurial spirit, he questioned the apparent regulatory gap surrounding such setups. "The rules exist for a reason - for hygiene, for safety, for accountability," he wrote. "When you invite the public into your home for a paid meal or drink, and you're not licensed or regulated like the rest of us… how is that fair to those trying to survive in the real F&B world?" He also expressed concern over the perceived lack of enforcement by government agencies, questioning whether authorities were overlooking residential units operating as cafés and bars. "Where's the consistency? Where's the enforcement?" he wrote, raising questions about liquor licensing, food safety, and whether live-in domestic helpers assisting with food preparation may breach employment regulations. "This is called: 1. Double standards. 2. Hypocrisy." He concluded with a pointed question: "If this is okay now… can anyone just turn their home into a restaurant? And if so, what exactly are the rest of us paying for?" His post struck a chord with many in the F&B industry. "Fairness and safety can't be optional. The system needs to work for everyone," one commenter wrote. Another added: "I feel you, brother. I used to run my own venues too. Crazy rent, staff costs, everything. Every month felt like a war." Some said it was only a matter of time before regulations caught up. "Likely a ban or a very heavy restriction," one predicted. Others, however, pushed back. One commenter argued that home cafés had clear limitations - lacking scale, street visibility, and walk-in traffic - and often relied on a fragile mix of Instagram orders and goodwill from neighbours. "It's not that they have an unfair advantage," the person wrote. "If anything, it shows how inaccessible the 'proper' route has become. Maybe the problem isn't the rules - it's that the rules don't leave room for anyone to start small anymore." Another called the situation "symptomatic of a broken system", pointing to labour shortages, soaring rent and tax hikes that have left traditional F&B operators struggling. "Focusing on HBBs [home-based businesses] as villains won't fix any of that," the commenter said. "What's needed is a serious policy-level rethink of how we support both new and established players."
Straits Times
6 days ago
- Straits Times
How CPF Life can enable retirees above 65 to have new credit cards
Retirees who have planned for high monthly payouts from CPF Life will have no problem meeting the $15,000 annual income threshold. PHOTO: LIANHE ZAOBAO If you have been topping up your CPF Retirement Account to plan for higher payouts from age 65, here's another piece of good news – the lifelong monthly income from CPF Life will give your creditworthiness a boost should you need to apply for a new credit card or loan. Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) rules state that people who are over 55 and retired must show they have an annual income of at least $15,000 if applying for an unsecured loan facility such as credit cards. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
7 days ago
- Straits Times
Banks can consider CPF Life payouts as retirees' income for new unsecured loans: MAS
Retirees above 65 who get decent monthly payouts from CPF Life can qualify for a new credit card if they meet the $15,000 annual income threshold. PHOTO: LIANHE ZAOBAO Banks can consider CPF Life payouts as retirees' income for new unsecured loans: MAS SINGAPORE – Retirees above 65 years old who get decent monthly payouts from CPF Life can qualify for new unsecured loan facilities such as credit cards if they pass the $15,000 annual income threshold set by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). While MAS does not prescribe specific incomes to assess a borrower's eligibility, it notes that banks can look at regular incomes that retirees get, such as rents, interest or dividend and annuity payouts, such as those from CPF Life or private insurers. But borrowers must show with that they are currently earning such income to qualify. The issue of eligibility of older folk for credit cards was highlighted in The Straits Times Forum recently when 64-year-old retiree Brian Yim wrote about his plight of having an existing card from Trust Bank cancelled just because he wanted to increase its $2,000 credit limit for an overseas holiday. He submitted his Central Provident Fund (CPF) statement, which showed that he had more than the prevailing enhanced retirement sum of $426,000, but the bank asked instead for a bank statement that shows a cash balance of $750,000. An MAS spokesperson told The Straits Times that another qualifying test for retirees above 55 is to have a minimum net worth of $750,000 because if this amount is put in a fixed deposit that earns 2 per cent interest, for instance, the annual income would be $15,000. This means that regular income is still preferred for paying bills. Hence, banks 'may consider various up-to-date income sources, such as a borrower's rental income and annuity payouts', the spokesperson said. ST learnt that most banks do not look at retirees' CPF for credit checks, but this practice is likely to change with MAS' confirmation that the CPF Life payout is a good income source. It would be hard for banks to reject CPF Life payouts since such lifelong income is guaranteed by the Singapore Government. Those reaching 55 in 2025 will get monthly payouts of $1,700, or $20,400 annually, from age 65 if they save $213,000 in their Retirement Account. They can also choose to top up to the maximum of $426,000, for a monthly payout of $3,300, or $39,600 annually. Mr Yim, who turns 65 later this year, says his expected payout would more than exceed MAS' $15,000 threshold but he has no intention of reinstating his Trust credit card. 'I am now happily charging to my five other credit cards that better deserve my business,' he said. Tan Ooi Boon is the Invest editor of The Straits Times. More on this Topic Why high CPF Life payouts means less need to have more savings Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
