Abusive social media posts directed at MSPs tripled in past year
It comes after the Scottish Parliament employed two members of staff – including a former police inspector – to trawl the social media accounts of 69 MSPs.
The pair found 23,507 posts considered abusive between 2024 and 2025. However, the posts did not reach the required level to be considered criminal.
Last year, the figure was 8,110.
READ NEXT: Tesco tease plans to improve popular superstore
In the most recent year, 257 posts were referred to Police Scotland – down from 461 the previous year – with one case proceeding to court.
The SNP saw the highest level of abuse, with 15,749 posts directed towards its MSPs. Scottish Labour MSPs were next with 4,150, while the Conservatives were targeted in 1,888 posts.
Scottish Green and Liberal Democrat MSPs faced 939 and 729 abusive posts respectively, while 52 messages targeted independent members.
Male MSPs received vastly more abuse than their female colleagues, with 19,511 messages compared to 3,996.
READ NEXT: American rock band to perform at Glasgow nightclub
Lynsey Hamill, Holyrood's director of operations and digital, said: 'Whilst it is too early to draw any firm conclusions on trends and success of the scheme when comparing data from the pilot year and year one, we can see the scale of online abuse of MSPs is now readily apparent and growing.
'This chimes with feedback we have had from members for some time now.'
A Scottish Parliament spokesperson added: 'The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) is acutely aware of the rising level of threat against elected representatives.
'Last year, the SPCB invested £125,000 to make permanent its online threat managing service.
'Under the service, potentially criminal threats are identified by the Parliament's security team and escalated to Police Scotland for its action.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'Untrained' blue light police are at risk of breaking the law by driving at night time
Hundreds of blue-light police officers risk breaking the law by driving at night because they have not received specialist training, it was claimed yesterday. New UK-wide regulations which are set to come into force by the end of the year say emergency response officers must be trained in driving at speed and during the hours of darkness. A shortage of instructors means nearly one in three frontline officers are still waiting for specialist training - and are unlikely to be fully trained in time for the expected law change. The body representing rank-and-file officers has launched a furious attack on ministers for failing to provide adequate funding for the single service – leading to a shortage of instructors. Last night Brian Jones, vice-chairman of the Scottish Police Federation (SPF), accused Police Scotland of playing 'Russian roulette' with the 'health, safety and welfare of the country's police officers'. Mr Jones said: 'There are roughly 7,900 front line cops working 24/7 on response policing. 'From that number, I would suggest that nearly 30 per cent are still awaiting their driving course – to enable them to use emergency sirens and blue lights and importantly exceed the speed limits legally if necessary to attend public emergencies. The current estimates to clear that backlog is currently somewhere in the region of six to seven years. 'I know that some areas of the country have had instances where they have no officers trained to respond to emergency situations in a police car – legally; that is scandalous.' Mr Jones said: 'When Sir Stephen House was appointed as Chief Constable, the service had 64 instructors as of 2013 - but under his tenure that dropped to around 20. 'There is only one service with a greater driver training backlog - that is the Metropolitan Police in London. 'The UK Government has legal primacy over the road safety legislation much to the annoyance of the Scottish Government. 'New laws will demand national minimum standards for training emergency responders from all blue-light services.' Mr Jones said this 'will include night driving - no one in Scotland has been trained during the night', adding: 'Legally, they will not be able to respond to emergency situations using sirens and blue lights and exceed the speed limit. 'Of course, the root cause of all this is that Police Scotland continue to be chronically underfunded by the Scottish Government and dangerous situations like this will continue to arise as long as the current financial provisions continue.' The regulations legally requiring training for high-speed and night driving are part of the Road Traffic Act 2006 which are expected to become enforceable from the end of this year. They state that the police driver is only exempt from the speed limit if the vehicle is being driven by a person who 'has satisfactorily completed a course of training in the driving of vehicles at high speed'. The row follows several fatal collisions in the UK involving emergency vehicles and members of the public. Earlier this year, the SPF claimed armed response officers awaiting training who attend emergency incidents in high-performance cars are in breach of regulations that require them to achieve minimum driving standards that came into force in November 2022. In February, the Scottish Police Authority heard that 350 armed police officers - who deal with terror attacks, murders and the highest priority calls - were waiting to complete an advanced four-week driving course at Tulliallan, the police training college. Last night Scottish Tory community safety spokesman Sharon Dowey said: 'It is staggering that SNP cuts to police budgets could result in this terrifying situation becoming a reality. 'Lives will undoubtedly be put at risk if Scotland's roads are ultimately not policed overnight. 'We need officers right across the country who can respond to incidents at any time of day or night. 'If the SNP are serious about protecting community safety, then they must prioritise funding the force so that all necessary training can be completed.' Assistant Chief Constable Lynn Ratcliff said: 'Communities can be reassured that our local policing teams have sufficient numbers of officers trained in emergency response skills. 'Armed response officers are already able to respond to emergencies, but we are enhancing their training even further.
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Assisted dying: The heat and emotion of today's significant vote
Today's vote is hugely significant. It now looks highly likely that assisted dying will be introduced in England and vote by MPs to approve Kim Leadbeater's bill is arguably the biggest vote regarding bodily autonomy since the legalisation of abortion in Great Britain in the baking heat of London's Parliament Square today, hundreds of campaigners stood chanting their views - both for and against assisted dying - amid a sea of colourful banners and was emotion too. Some carried photos of loved ones who died in pain, while others expressed their fears for the vulnerable in debate around assisted dying has been a polarised one - and there are still hurdles to cross before it will be a reality here. What happens next? The Terminally Ill (End of Life) Bill will now go to the Lords, where it is likely to spend several months undergoing the same line-by-line scrutiny that it did before this year, perhaps around October, the bill would come back to the Commons for any changes to be voted on and it could then be sent for Royal Assent. So when could assisted dying become available in England and Wales?The government has said it could take up to four years to set up an assisted dying service, meaning it could be 2029 or even 2030 before the first medically-assisted death minister Stephen Kinnock said this delay was needed to ensure "safe and effective implementation" of an "entirely new service with robust safeguards and protections" which would need to be "carefully developed and tested".Under the proposals, mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with a life expectancy of less than six months would be eligible for an assisted would need to make two separate declarations, signed and witnessed, about their "clear, settled and informed" wish to die, and satisfy two independent doctors that they are eligible, and have not been would be at least a seven-day gap between each application would then go before a multidisciplinary panel comprising a psychiatrist, social worker and a panel would hear evidence from at least one of the doctors and the applicant, possibly via live the panel approved the application there would be a further 14-day "period of reflection" which could be cut to 48 hours if the patient is likely to die within a month. Ms Leadbeater has said the whole process could take up to two months, which does raise the risk of people dying while they are waiting for process is also far longer than other comparable services on which the Leadbeater bill is Oregon, the first US state to legalise assisted dying nearly 30 years ago, there is a 15-day waiting period between the first and second request. Since 2020, this restriction has been lifted for patients at risk of imminent California, the 15-day cooling off period has been cut to 48 hours because of the risk of patients dying before their medically assisted death is chief medical officer for England Professor Chris Whitty has cautioned against creating a system that would risk terminally ill patients being "stuck in a bureaucratic thicket" in their final months of the Leadbeater bill contains a lot of detail, there is still plenty to sort out if it becomes law. Training for doctors If the legislation is passed, the Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who voted against the bill, will be required to set up an assisted dying service under the NHS This means sorting out the training for doctors who will assess patients for capacity and for any signs of coercion or pressure, plus creating safeguards for those with a learning MPs first voted on the issue in November, the plans included a High Court judge who would need to approve each proposal has now been dropped and replaced with the new service will be overseen by a voluntary assisted dying commissioner, who will be either a serving or retired senior role will include appointing members of review panels, referring cases to them and monitoring the operation of the law. Although the proposed law is based on legislation in 10 US states and Australia, there are important California, patients are able to store the lethal medication at home and they are not required to have a medical professional present when they the Leadbeater bill, a doctor would prepare the drug, and be present when the patient self-administers would usually mean swallowing the lethal substance, although if that is not possible, the bill allows for a "medical device" to be used to enable the patient to ingest will be strict limits on what a doctor can and can't do. Mr Kinnock said it would be legal for them to help a patient sit up and make them comfortable, but not for them to tip a cup of pills into their health secretary will regulate what drugs can be used. In all likelihood these will come in a powdered form and need to be mixed with liquid for swallowing. Elsewhere in the world I was present at an assisted death in California and witnessed the doctor adding fruit juice to the drug in order to make it more palatable and less bitter for the patient to that occasion the patient, Wayne Hawkins, was unconscious within a few minutes of swallowing the drug and died in around 35 iplayer - Assisted dying: The Final ChoiceDeaths usually occur within an hour although there have been rare cases of it taking several some other countries that have legalised assisted dying, euthanasia is permitted, whereby a doctor or nurse administers the lethal dose, usually by is allowed in the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, but even for most supporters of assisted dying here, it is seen as a step too impact assessment, carried out by civil servants estimated there could be between 1,042 and 4,559 assisted deaths in the 10th year after the law came into upper estimate would represent around 1% of all deaths in England and happens to the Leadbeater bill in the coming months, assisted dying is coming to the British Isle of Man has already approved an assisted dying bill and Jersey is also committed to changing the law.A bill to legalise assisted dying in Scotland has passed an initial vote at Holyrood, but faces further hurdles. The Scottish bill does not have a life expectancy timescale for eligibility and instead refers to advanced and progressive disease that is expected to cause premature dying, or assisted suicide as many critics prefer to call it, remains illegal in most of the medicine means that healthcare systems can keep people alive longer than ever before, but often with limited quality of say that assisted dying gives autonomy and control to patients. For opponents it is a chilling and dangerous step which puts the vulnerable at risk of happens to the bill at Westminster, this heated and polarising debate will continue.
Daily Mirror
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Russia issues 'catastrophic' nuclear warning to US as Trump ponders Iran strikes
United States president Donald Trump has not yet ruled out whether to use American nuclear weapons to attack the underground Fordow enrichment site in Iran Russia has sent a stark warning to the USA as it considers whether to use tactical nuclear weapons in Iran. The Kremlin believes that even if the Americans were to use their weapons carefully the consequences would be "catastrophic". Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told the Russian TASS news agency there "have been a lot of speculation". Asked about media reports that Donald Trump was still deciding about what to do, and had not yet ruled out whether to use nuclear weapons to attack the underground Fordow enrichment site in Iran, Mr Peskov said: "This would be a catastrophic development. But there are so many speculations that in fact, it's impossible to comment on them." The heavily guarded mysterious Fordow bunker is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, around 60 miles of Iran's capital Tehran. It remains the most heavily defended known enrichment site in Iran, buried some 80 to 90 metres underground. Israel is believed to lack the capability to destroy the site on its own and would need the help of American bombers. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordow was part of that plan. Russia has presented itself as a possible mediating force between US-backed Israel and Iran, although Donald Trump has publicly been reluctant to accept the offer. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene rejected US calls to surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them'. US officials said this week that Trump had rejected an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei, later adding that there were no plans to kill him 'at least not for now'.
