logo
The Legend of Kon: Inside Kon Knueppel's burning desire to be great

The Legend of Kon: Inside Kon Knueppel's burning desire to be great

Fox Sports03-04-2025

Kon Knueppel can remember sitting in his room on Duke's campus and watching the NBA Draft last June. Before he got to Durham, there was only one question on his mind:
What can I do this summer to show that I deserve to get minutes as a freshman at Duke?
But that night, as he watched one-and-done freshmen Reed Sheppard, Stephon Castle and Rob Dillingham get selected in the top 10, not to mention a Duke one-and-done player in Jared McCain land in the top 20, something hit Knueppel.
"After watching the draft, I said to myself, 'I want that to be me next year,'" Knueppel told FOX Sports. "I started getting up at 5:30 a.m. every day during the summer except Sundays to work as hard as possible. I really, really enjoy just doing my work and getting out that extra work."
This is Knueppel, the 60-year-old stuck in a 19-year-old's body, termed by his family as an "old soul" with maturity beyond his years. He possesses a relentless passion that matches the standards of Jon Scheyer and Duke in every way and the instincts and talent to help a team in a variety of ways when he's on the floor.
The oldest of five boys, Knueppel comes from legendary basketball genes in the state of Wisconsin. His father, Kon I, was a four-time All-Lake Michigan Conference selection at Wisconsin Lutheran College, setting the school's record for career points with 2,064. His mother, Chari Nordgaard Knueppel, enjoyed an even more legendary career, being one of only three players in Green Bay women's basketball history to have her jersey retired as the Phoenix's all-time leading scorer with 1,964 career points.
Kon I and Chari knew they were going to get married just 11 days into their relationship, and then came Kon II, who had a special aura to him that even the nurses at Aurora Sinai Medical Center noticed.
"The day he was born, his eyes were bright, wide open and focused," Chari said. "The nurses said to me, 'He looks like he's two months old already with the way that he's looking at you.' He was taking everything in from Day 1, just so observant and aware of everybody. He's been that way his whole life."
But Knueppel's love of basketball didn't come as immediate as his rapid maturation.
"When Kon was 5 and 6 years old, he was not into sports at all," said Jeff Nordgaard, Knueppel's uncle on his mom's side, who was a second-round NBA Draft pick of the Milwaukee Bucks in 1996 before playing mostly internationally at the pro level for 13 years. "We are a sports family. But he was really smart, using words in his vocabulary that were beyond what any of the little kids would say.
"We were starting to think he would be a non-athlete, which was totally fine, but still one of those things that surprised us."
And then, one purchase made by the Knueppel family changed everything:
The Nintendo Wii.
His parents did not previously have a video game console in the house and made it a point to limit those types of things. But without that Wii, Knueppel might've never developed the love for the game of basketball he has now.
"I didn't like basketball before the Wii. I just wasn't interested in it growing up," Knueppel said. "But we got that Wii and I started playing NBA Jam and 2K. I fell in love with players. From there, I was passionate to find out as much as I humanly could about NBA players.
"My obsession probably kind of got ridiculous, but that's how I fell in love with the game. Obviously, when you couple that with great coaches and parents, they really encouraged it. But that Wii changed it all."
In addition to his love for the Wii, Knueppel also developed a passion for reading about basketball, specifically the "Big Book of Basketball."
"He read the Big Book of Basketball probably about four times, starting when he was 10 years old," Chari said. "So then he wanted to talk to people about everything he read. That's just who he is: an old soul."
Knueppel took that passion from video games and reading to the court, and it didn't take long for Norgaard, who coached Knueppel in fourth and fifth grade in the AAU ranks, to understand that his nephew was different.
"At that time, his feel and IQ was that of a high school kid," Norgaard said of Knueppel. "He was very skilled but not overly impressive physically. His feel, poise and composure, along with his shotmaking, made him stand out above the rest."
For Knueppel, the thought of playing basketball, especially at the Division I level, had never crossed his mind. He was playing multiple sports and just embracing being a kid, even when he entered the ninth grade at Wisconsin Lutheran High School.
"Even going into my freshman year of high school, I knew I was a good player in the state and in middle school, but I still thought I'd probably end up playing Division III ball at Wisconsin Lutheran College or something," Knueppel said. "But it became evident pretty early on that I probably could be a low-major to mid-major Division I player. And then, I just kept working and by the end of my freshman year, that summer of AAU is when things took off for me."
For the proud Milwaukee native, it was a trip to his hometown Marquette University's team camp that changed it all.
"I just remember Shaka Smart explaining drills for us, and then we'd jump into a couple of games followed by open practice," Knueppel said. "When our team was on the court and he was explaining stuff to us, I noticed he was looking at me a lot. Right after that, one of the assistants talked to me and the next day, I got an offer over the phone from them. And then, right after that, I told my parents I had to get a whole lot better because I didn't think I was that good yet."
Two more years went by, and with it came offers from Alabama, Wisconsin, Virginia, Notre Dame, USC and more. Being from such a tight-knit family, Knueppel thought long and hard about staying close to home.
"It was a super-tough decision because I did want to stay near home," Knueppel said. "That was my original thought process — until I visited Duke. I loved how small the campus was. There was such appeal to it, not to mention the staff being great people and being able to play on a great team, so I told myself: 'If a campus was in Milwaukee, where would I go?' Ultimately, that was Duke."
Knueppel's parents made it clear that the decision was up to him, and in the end, Duke was the clear choice.
"When he told us he wanted to go to Duke, we said 'Why?' And he responded: 'I want to play against the best players every day in practice, because that will make me better. I want to keep it fun and playing on a big stage in every game I play in, with a soldout crowd, is a lot of fun.'
"The third thing was to compete for a national championship. It was that simple, and we were sold. Between playing road games in packed houses, the atmosphere of Cameron Indoor Stadium and when you have to guard Cooper Flagg or try to drive on Khaman Maluach or playing with veterans like Mason Gillis and Sion James, that's the ultimate test."
Fast-forward to present day, and Knueppel has enjoyed a standout freshman season. He has helped lead the Blue Devils to a spot in the Final Four, combining for 41 points, nine rebounds and eight assists in wins over Arizona (Sweet 16) and Alabama (Elite Eight). The 6-foot-7 sharpshooting guard has shown why he's projected to be a top-10 selection in this summer's NBA Draft, but not everything has looked like a Hollywood movie script for Knueppel this season.
"I was really homesick when I got to Duke," Knueppel said. "Obviously, I'm really close with my four brothers [Kager, Kinston, Kash and Kid] so I missed them. But you know, I was able to really lean into basketball, and I was in the gym all the time in the summer, leaning into the guys, managers and coaches. Eventually, I got comfortable."
Knueppel relied upon his classmates: Flagg, Muluach and Darren Harris, along with a sixth-year grad student in Neal Begovic, who Knueppel got to know when he went on a visit to Stanford as a sophomore in high school.
"Neal really helped me," Knueppel said. "He's a great friend and got me accustomed to college life. He invited me over every Sunday to watch football. Those types of things really helped."
Knueppel's road to being one of the top stars heading into this year's Final Four has been a fascinating one. He started his college career with 22 points on 8-for-14 shooting from the floor against Maine. Two games later against Kentucky, he was done in by a 5-for-20 showing in a loss. In Duke's win over Auburn in early December, he only took three shots. However, in his last 13 games, Knueppel has notched 14-or-more points in all but one of them, the Blue Devils' first-round tournament win over Mount St. Mary's.
"I think a lot of it is learning," Chari said. "I think you're in a different place in college as a freshman in December than you are in March and April. He had a lot of great people helping him to be aggressive and to play more freely. The staff wants him to do that and I think he's gotten better and better at that as the year's gone on.
"I like 5-for-22 better than 2-for-3, personally. But there were definitely ups and downs, ebbs and flows to a college season, but that made him stronger, and now he's got two games left to let it fly in a Duke uniform."
Knueppel has been playing his best basketball of the season as late, shooting 11-for-22 from the floor and 4-of-6 from 3-point territory over his last two games. His presence for this Duke team on both ends of the floor is vital because he plays mostly mistake-free basketball while being a solid defensive presence and a better passer than the numbers show.
"This guy's a stud right here," Scheyer said of Knueppel on the TBS postgame interview after Duke's 85-65 East Regional Final win over Alabama. "He's the ultimate warrior, competitor, and he really carried us throughout tonight.
"Kon's versatility is huge for us, and his size. He's able to pass. He's able to finish. You feel he's always going to get off a good look because he has great pivots in the paint and great patience."
That competitive nature comes from growing up in a blue-collar household, with Chari running a daycare since 2006 and Kon I working as a school counselor in the Milwaukee public schools system. Chari does have plans to retire this summer to focus on all of her five boys and their busy basketball schedules.
"We knew we wanted lots of kids and we had five in five and a half years," Chari said with a laugh. "I certainly wasn't paying for daycare with how much that was going to cost, so I decided to stay home and run the daycare."
Even when running that daycare, though, Chari was motivating her children to hit the gym to get more shots up.
"I am really fierce about getting to the gym every day," Char saidi. "My husband could sometimes be like, 'Hey, they already had practice. They already got their lift in. Can't we give them the day off?' And I'm like, 'No way!' We're going to get at least 100 shots up. We're for sure doing that."
That work ethic instilled in the Knueppel boys is what drives them to be great, and in return, has created a dilemma heading into Final Four Week. Kager, 17, and Kinston, 16, both have their opening weekend of AAU ball. While mom thought it would be best for the two boys to join their younger brothers for Saturday's showdown with Houston, the ever-competitive Kon II stepped in.
"I always say, 'You don't miss basketball to watch basketball,' Knueppel said. "I get it's the Final Four, but if they want to play the game, I think they should play. I think they're counting on us to get it done on Saturday, but that's going to be an absolute battle."
But Chari and Kon I's parenting goes beyond teaching their children about having a correct work ethic. Having character and strong moral and ethical qualities is extremely important to Knueppel, who is also very attached to his faith.
"When Duke was playing Louisville in the ACC Tournament, the Louisville strength coach asked all of our managers who was the best player to them? Who was it that treated them the best? And they all said Kon," Chari said. "After Kon won the ACC Tournament MVP, he texted his dad and I saying, 'I just wanted to share this little nugget with you.' And we were more proud about that than the ACC MVP.
"For his dad and I, that's what really matters to us. That means more than anything that has to do with basketball, that you're a good Christian and that you treat people the right way."
As for what lies ahead for Knueppel on the basketball court, it's a date with a Houston team that enters the Final Four having won 30 of its last 31 games while owning the No. 1-ranked defense in America and holding Tennessee to 15 points in the first half, the fewest by a top-2 seed in NCAA Tournament history.
Knueppel brought up how much he has admired Houston's DNA over the years.
"They're machines, man," Knueppel said. "They play for him. They just play so hard and it's very, very admirable watching them play. Sometimes it's not the prettiest offensively, but it doesn't matter one bit because they play so hard on defense. L.J. Cryer can fill it up and on the boards. They're unreal."
Not bad for a scouting report from Knueppel. Not bad for a kid who thought he would be lucky to get a D3 offer as a freshman in high school, only to become a five-star prospect and one of the most sought-after recruits in the nation. Not bad for an old soul who has those same wide eyes born out of Aurora Sinai Hospital set on a national championship.
John Fanta is a national college basketball broadcaster and writer for FOX Sports. He covers the sport in a variety of capacities, from calling games on FS1 to serving as lead host on the BIG EAST Digital Network to providing commentary on The Field of 68 Media Network. Follow him at @John_Fanta .
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account , and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily!
recommended
Get more from College Basketball Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Thunder's Aaron Wiggins is ‘grateful' for Finals opportunity in Game 2
Why Thunder's Aaron Wiggins is ‘grateful' for Finals opportunity in Game 2

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why Thunder's Aaron Wiggins is ‘grateful' for Finals opportunity in Game 2

The post Why Thunder's Aaron Wiggins is 'grateful' for Finals opportunity in Game 2 appeared first on ClutchPoints. OKLAHOMA CITY — For Oklahoma City Thunder guard Aaron Wiggins, staying ready amid inconsistent playing time never promises an increased role on the biggest stage in the NBA. After finishing with three points and one steal in nine minutes, Wiggins turned in his biggest performance of the postseason. He finished with 18 points on 6-of-11 shots, including 5-of-8 from deep, four rebounds, one assist, and one steal in a 123-107 win against the Indiana Pacers. Advertisement After a one-point loss, the Thunder tied the NBA Finals, 1-1. After Wiggins and the Thunder put the finishing touches on a 16-point blowout win in Game 2, he spoke about his humble beginnings and why staying ready is critical to his role in Oklahoma City. 'I think about it all the time, being from Greenboro, my journey early on, it taught me to be grateful,' Wiggins said. 'To take advantage of the opportunities I get, teams that I played for, and I was kind of like a late bloomer. That helped my journey. It kind of helped me mentally to not be afraid, regardless of what moment may be in front of me, or of what is asked of me.' Wiggins and Thunder veteran Alex Caruso (20) combined for 38 points against the Pacers, which is the third time two bench players combined each scored 18+ points in a single NBA Finals game since the 1970-71 campaign. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander on Aaron Wiggins' play in Thunder win Kyle Terada-Imagn Images Thunder All-Star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander commended Aaron Wiggins' performance in Game 2. After hearing plenty of oohs and aahs off of Wiggins' impressive dribble move against Tyrese Haliburton, it was that kind of night for the Thunder reserve. Advertisement Wiggins' performance was the talk of the Thunder's media availability after Game 2, which Gilgeous-Alexander took the time to highlight Wiggins' 18-point performance. 'It's big time. It's impressive to me. He's been exactly who he's been all year throughout the playoffs,' Gilgeous-Alexander said. 'Sometimes he [gets] 20 minutes. Sometimes gets two minutes. Sometimes he gets 10. It's all over the place, and no matter what, he finds a way to impact winning for us. And you need it in the biggest moments. No one-man show when you're in the NBA championship. 'For him to rise to the occasion or just be who he's been in the biggest moment of his basketball career is pretty gutsy. Says a lot about the competitor and the man he is,' Gilgeous-Alexander concluded. The Thunder will look to grab their first lead of the NBA Finals in Game 3 against the Pacers on Wednesday. Advertisement Related: Thunder's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander shouts out Aaron Wiggins' 'impressive' Game 2 performance Related: Thunder's Shai Gilgeous-Alexander drops 'best fans' revelation that fueled Game 2 win

Golden State Warriors Fans Have Request For NBA During Offseason
Golden State Warriors Fans Have Request For NBA During Offseason

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Golden State Warriors Fans Have Request For NBA During Offseason

Golden State Warriors Fans Have Request For NBA During Offseason originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Golden State Warriors, along with 27 other teams, are watching the NBA Finals ensue just before the offseason kicks off. Advertisement Soon, the NBA Draft will roll around, followed quickly by free agency and the Summer League. The Warriors will have an actionable offseason plan ready to build around Stephen Curry, Jimmy Butler and Draymond Green. Late in the season, it was made clear that Golden State can build around the trio while competing at the highest level. Still, Warriors general manager Mike Dunleavy Jr. is going to have to make big offseason moves. While the franchise aims to make proper basketball moves -- like bringing in a big man or adding perimeter shooting -- they've also got the opportunity to make identity changes. Jerseys, branding and identity are something fans keep a close eye on. Every team already has a leaked city jersey, which is simply a rumor at this point in time, with nothing having been confirmed. This design mock-up is similar to a past edition of the city uniforms the Warriors used. Still, Golden State fans have a clear favorite and wish for the NBA to deploy once again. Advertisement They want the league to return the Warriors' classic jersey to their lineup. "I'm saying," one fan responded, giving their stamp of approval. Another fan responded with three fire emojis, seconding the motion. Fans across the league often enjoy having a splash of a classic feel in the Rolodex of jerseys each season, complementing the two main jerseys and the city jersey. Some teams, like the Orlando Magic, are implementing their classic look into their everyday wear. If the Warriors were to add a classic jersey, specifically the one the fans were raving about, to their lineup, they would certainly receive a positive reaction. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 9, 2025, where it first appeared.

2025 NBA Draft: Why all eyes are on Victor Wembanyama, the Spurs and the No. 2 pick
2025 NBA Draft: Why all eyes are on Victor Wembanyama, the Spurs and the No. 2 pick

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

2025 NBA Draft: Why all eyes are on Victor Wembanyama, the Spurs and the No. 2 pick

Victor Wembanyama is a 7-foot-5 alien who warps the court on both ends and might be the most important draft pick since LeBron James. The San Antonio Spurs have one job: don't screw it up. The modern blueprint is crystal clear: space the floor, play with pace, and surround your star with shooters and decision-makers. Instead, they're on track to stack three shaky-shooting ball-handlers like it's still 2005. Last year, San Antonio drafted Stephon Castle, who won Rookie of the Year. At the deadline, they traded for De'Aaron Fox. And now they're expected to take Dylan Harper with the second pick in the 2025 NBA Draft, a 6-5 lefty who thrives with the ball in his hands. That's potentially adding three shot-creators in 12 months with not a reliable jumper between them. Advertisement San Antonio's vision is obvious: give Wemby playmakers so he doesn't have to do everything himself. But in today's NBA, it's not just about who can create, it's about who can space the floor. This is the pick that will define the direction of the Spurs, either clarifying their identity or blurring it even further. The situation in San Antonio Here are the shooting numbers for Castle, Fox, and Harper, via Synergy Sports — Fox's entire NBA career; Castle's NBA and college games; and Harper's college and high school games since 2023: Fox hasn't become a great shooter in eight NBA seasons. He's increased his volume from 1.1 catch-and-shoot 3s per game in his first two years to 3.2 in his last two, but the percentages haven't budged: 35.5% then, 35.2% now. Still below the league average of 37.2%. Advertisement And it's not just from deep. From midrange to the line, Fox has always been streaky. These flaws made his acquisition a gamble for San Antonio. But the low cost of expendable assets made him more than worth it. All-Star caliber players that actually want to play for the Spurs are hard to come by. Early returns were underwhelming, though. In 210 minutes together, Castle and Fox got outscored by 10.5 points per 100 possessions. In their 33 minutes with Wemby: minus-12.3. It's a small sample, but the results were ugly before Fox's season was ended by surgery to repair a tendon on his left hand. Still, Fox's arrival takes the pressure off Castle to be a full-time lead guard. Castle, for his part, had a strong rookie year. He looked like the Swiss Army knife scouts promised by defending, cutting, making the extra pass, and overall looking like the NBA's new Andre Iguodala. Castle flashed playmaking upside, and he didn't need the ball to contribute. But he shot just 28.5% from 3, which mirrors his college numbers: Though Castle is still only 20, his shooting has always been the primary concern about his future going back to youth levels. If Castle doesn't become a reliable shooter at some point in his career, it'll make it more difficult to get him minutes if the Spurs have more options to handle the ball. Advertisement Harper's form looks fine and he's confident. He even hit 36.8% of his catch-and-shoot 3s as a freshman at Rutgers, which isn't all too bad. But the rest of his profile is loaded with red flags. These aren't the numbers of a sure-thing shooter. An even closer look at Harper's 3-point misses adds more cause for concern. I watched all 104 of Harper's misses at Rutgers and he didn't just miss short or long. He missed in every direction. On dribble jumpers, 26.5% were short, and 14.7% were either air balls or blocked, pointing to rhythm issues, lower-body power inconsistencies, and a low release point. On catch-and-shoot attempts, 22.2% of his misses went left and 19.4% went right, revealing directional instability even on his cleanest looks. In total, 24 of his 104 misses either hit the backboard, air-balled, or were blocked, while nearly one-third sprayed left or right. Harper is clearly still searching for his shot. Advertisement The Spurs could bet he steadily improves, but if so it's more of a hope than a plan. The case for Harper Harper's appeal is related to the way he lived in the paint at Rutgers, finishing 67.5% of his shots at the rim. He doesn't blow by you with blazing speed, but he's got a herky-jerky, keep-you-guessing handle where every move sets up the next. There's a craft to him with the way he splits pick-and-rolls and manipulates defenders that makes him look more like an NBA veteran than a 19-year-old incoming rookie. And he doesn't need a screen to get into the paint either. With a beefy frame and elite body control, Harper barrels downhill at will. Defenses knew he was coming — 47.4% of his shots came in the paint — and they still couldn't stop it. On his drives inside, he's not a genius-level passer, but he's composed, accurate, and tough to speed up. Harper doesn't cough the ball up despite a high degree of difficulty in his reps. He's capable of making every pass on the floor, and his feel should only improve over time. (Taylor Wilhelm/Yahoo Sports Illustration) Harper compares himself to Cade Cunningham, which makes sense since they're both jumbo guards with an all-around offensive skill set and defensive versatility. Much like Cunningham, Harper looks like a future starter at a minimum, and maybe much more. But one difference is this: Cade went first overall to a team that cleared the runway for him. San Antonio already has Castle, Fox, and Wemby. There's no runway left. But Harper's path to stardom likely requires space, touches, and shooters around him, not sharing a clogged paint. Advertisement And that's the paradox. Harper's talent justifies the pick. His fit makes it risky. If San Antonio takes him, it is effectively copying the Oklahoma City and Indiana blueprint with multiple playmakers and positional flexibility. But those teams work because they surround their stars with players who can either shoot, slash, or process quickly enough to keep defenses honest. And their stars can play that way too. San Antonio's potential perimeter trio wouldn't check all of those boxes. They're more slashers, not spacers who stretch defenses. None scare you without the rock, and each of them have their respective issues with it too. The Thunder and Pacers show that players can improve their shots. Tyrese Haliburton dropped in the draft because of concerns about his form, and now he's hitting game-winners in the NBA Finals. Andrew Nembhard entered the league as an unpolished shooter and is in the middle of a playoff run making nearly half of his 3s. In Oklahoma City, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Jalen Williams, Lu Dort, and basically the entire roster have improved. Of course, it helps when you hire Chip Engelland. In 2022, the Thunder poached the NBA's most respected shot doctor after he spent nearly two decades in San Antonio. Since then, Oklahoma City's shooting has trended up. San Antonio's has flatlined. Jeremy Sochan is just as suspect of a shooter as he was at Baylor. Keldon Johnson has regressed. Devin Vassell has smooth mechanics and touch, but even he's never cracked 40% from 3. The Spurs used to be the league's gold standard for skill development. Now no one's getting better as a shooter except for Wemby himself. But in his two seasons, the Spurs have ranked 28th and 20th in 3-point percentage. Advertisement Is having three guards with iffy jumpers really the best way for the Spurs to optimize Wembanyama? Is it best if your second-, third-, and fourth-best players all have erratic jumpers? Because this isn't just about skill sets overlapping in the backcourt, it's about how they impact the generational player they're supposed to elevate. The Wemby fit We've yet to see Wembanyama surrounded by four shooters. We haven't even seen him run two-man actions with a competent partner. Inverted pick-and-rolls. Quick slips into space. Dribble handoffs. Stuff that would weaponize his passing and make life easier for everyone. Wemby averaged just 4.8 handoffs per game this past season. For comparison: Domantas Sabonis led the league at 21.1. Rookie Alex Sarr logged 8.1. Even Zach Collins, Wemby's own backup, had more at 4.9. It's absurd that this is true. Yes, Wemby is often the receiver of a handoff. But with his vision, shooting, and ball-handling, he should be initiating more of those actions in an ecosystem that provides him space to go to work. The whole point of adding shot-creators is to get Wembanyama easy shots in the paint. No surprises there: Wemby shot an absurd 79% at the rim last season. He's a cheat code in the paint. But he took only 3.2 restricted area attempts per game. That's the same volume as Lauri Markkanen, Rui Hachimura, and Jonathan Kuminga. You know who else took more? Jeremy Sochan. Yes, Sochan had 5.1 per game. Sochan had more rim attempts than Wemby. What are we doing here? Advertisement The problem is obvious: there's no room. Sochan can't shoot (career 29% from deep) and the rest of the perimeter isn't any better. So even though Wemby can shoot, he has to for the offense to breathe. The Spurs have added creators, but they haven't added spacing to open lanes for Wemby he should be owning. The paths forward The Spurs are at a crossroads. Their actions say they want to win now. Their roster says they're not ready. And Wembanyama's rookie contract clock is ticking. So, what should they do? Option 1: Draft Harper, keep Fox and Castle In 2022, the Kings chose Fox over Tyrese Haliburton. Not because Haliburton was worse, but because they didn't think the two could coexist. Maybe they were right. Trading Haliburton for Sabonis helped end a 16-year playoff drought. Advertisement But in hindsight, they acted too fast. Now Haliburton is clearly the better point guard and running one of the best offenses in the league, and the Kings are still trying to figure out what their post-Fox future looks like. The lesson isn't don't choose. The lesson is don't choose before you have to. That's the case for keeping the trio intact. Draft Harper. Let it breathe. Give the coaching staff a year or two or three to figure out who works best with Wemby. Castle's cutting, Harper's slashing, Fox's speed all bring value. Maybe it works. And on defense, it should. Castle was already guarding top options as a rookie. Harper has the size and instincts to be switchable. And when Fox is locked in, he's a defensive playmaker fighting through screens and picking up steals. If the Spurs stick with all three, they could smother perimeter scorers and funnel everything to the league's best rim protector. But Wemby is such a dominant paint protector that he can erase defensive breakdowns. What he can't do is manufacture spacing for himself on the other end. So there'd be more pressure for them to figure it out on offense no matter how good the team's defense becomes. And that concern is shared for the guards, not just Wemby. Harper projects best as a lead initiator with shooting around him, not as the third wheel on a team that can't space the floor. There were better lottery outcomes for him. And if Harper is the pick, what happens to Castle? He's not a shooter. He's not running the offense. So is the reigning Rookie of the Year now a low-usage cutter who doesn't space the floor? It's unclear how Castle's development tracks next to Fox and Harper. Advertisement This option doesn't just assume internal development. It assumes internal compliance that no one pushes for touches, for usage, for clarity. It assumes Wemby will keep deferring while the team figures itself out. San Antonio has a pile of extra first-rounders and zero albatross deals, so they can patch holes on the fly if things sour. So they could take Harper and wait. But if they're wrong, they won't just waste touches. They'll waste time. Option 2: Trade Castle If San Antonio believes Harper has higher long-term upside as a lead initiator, they could explore the idea of moving Castle while his value is sky-high. He's the reigning Rookie of the Year. He's young, versatile, and scalable. And he plays with a maturity being his years. But if his jumper never comes around, and Fox and Harper are ahead of him on the ball, his role could get squeezed quickly. Advertisement Maybe the Bucks would prefer Castle and picks over Harper in a deal for Giannis Antetokounmpo. Maybe the Celtics bite on a Castle-Vassell-picks package for Jaylen Brown. Maybe another young star becomes available. Option 3: Trade down Teams like the Jazz, Wizards, Pelicans, and Nets all need initiators. Maybe one of them would offer a haul to move up for Harper. Looking at the history of trade downs, usually a team would give up their own first and one future first. But considering Harper's upside perhaps the Spurs could haggle for much more. The Nets, holding the 8th pick and a mountain of future firsts plus Cam Johnson, are the most interesting trade partner. Harper is a local kid with star potential, and the Nets have a clean slate he could grow with. If the Spurs want to pivot toward shooting, Johnson plus picks is a logical foundation. Advertisement In that range, Duke wing Kon Knueppel, Arizona forward Carter Bryant, and Washington State wing Cedric Coward would all be strong fits. They bring shooting and versatility, which is exactly what the current Spurs core lacks. The question: Are any of them worth passing on Harper's ceiling for? Option 4: Trade out of the draft for a star The Spurs might not need another teenager. They already have youth like Wemby, Castle, Vassell, Sochan, and a war chest of future picks even after adding Fox. So maybe the next move is to skip the draft entirely and chase a star. Right now, the Giannis whispers persist. They've also been linked to Kevin Durant. Around the league, sources say the Spurs have explored packaging the 14th pick with a player to upgrade the roster. Whether that upgrade is marginal or massive depends on who shakes loose, but it's clear San Antonio isn't waiting around. So if Giannis actually is available, maybe San Antonio's willing to put Harper on the table. Advertisement Option 5: Trade Fox Fox signed up to be Tony Parker to Wembanyama's Tim Duncan. But the Spurs weren't planning on drafting another primary ball-handler months later. Plans change. There's a case to move Fox before he signs a four-year, $229 million extension — or even a cheaper hometown discount deal. He turns 28 later this year. He's made just one playoff appearance. He still doesn't have a reliable jumper. And for a guard who lives off speed, any athletic slippage could get ugly, fast. And even if he ages gracefully and ends up being by far the most expensive of three quality shot-creators, he won't come close to having the trade value he holds right now. San Antonio has one last window to sell high. Advertisement Harper, on the other hand, is 19 with real long-term upside. Castle is younger, cheaper, and easier to fit in because he's a far better cutter and defender than Fox. It's not as if Fox and Wemby made a great first impression. Granted they ran only 46 pick-and-rolls together, they scored a measly 0.77 points per play. A full training camp might help, but maybe not if the team's shooting situation doesn't improve. Plus Castle and Harper also need touches. Fox/Wemby simply might not be the high-usage combo they envisioned. If moving Fox were on the table, the logical targets are the teams that were connected to him at the deadline: Miami Heat: Fox for Duncan Robinson, Haywood Highsmith, Nikola Jović, the No. 20 pick, and unprotected firsts in 2030 and 2032. Fox upgrades Miami's point guard spot, while San Antonio gets picks and three shooters including a young piece in Jović. Brooklyn Nets: Fox for Cam Johnson and draft capital. Johnson spaces the floor and fits the timeline. Houston Rockets: Fox (plus Malaki Branham and Blake Wesley) for Fred VanVleet, Jabari Smith, the 10th pick, and future firsts. FVV gives the Spurs a vet, while Smith would be a fascinating fit next to Wemby. Other playmaking-needy teams like the Bulls, Magic, Suns, and Timberwolves could emerge as dark horses. Phoenix is especially interesting: if the Spurs really want Durant, Fox's salary helps make the math work. Keldon Johnson, Harrison Barnes, or Devin Vassell could be added to build a separate bigger deal. Advertisement But there's real risk here. Fox is a known commodity as an All-Star in his prime, capable of carrying an offense, capable of making Wemby's life easier today. Harper is unproven. If his jumper never levels up or his fit with Castle overlaps too much, San Antonio may have traded a sure thing for a question mark. You don't get many chances to pair a young superstar with a reliable point guard who actually wants to be there. If Harper doesn't hit, they'll spend the next five years trying to replace what they already had. When San Antonio traded for Fox, they were trying to make the playoffs. Instead, both Fox and Wemby got hurt. The team cratered. And the lottery gave them an unexpected gift. Don't waste the alien If the Spurs keep loading up on guards with questionable jumpers, they're doing it around a star who should be the gravitational center of the entire offense. Instead, they're building a roster that pulls him to the perimeter while everyone else clogs the lane. Advertisement It's not that Castle, Fox, and Harper are bad players. It's that together, they risk becoming a well-intentioned mess. Add inconsistent shooters like Sochan and Johnson, and the Spurs look like a roster that needs less of a tweak and more of an overhaul. Maybe keeping all three guards works. Maybe Castle becomes a league-average shooter, maybe Harper becomes a star, and maybe Fox finds his ideal role. But that's a lot of maybes and this isn't the kind of decision you get to re-do. The Spurs don't just have a top pick. They have a rare opportunity to choose a direction, and not waste Wemby's prime untangling a roster that never fit. Advertisement Because we've seen this before. Kevin Garnett in Minnesota. Anthony Davis in New Orleans. Generational bigs held back by years of mismatched rosters and delayed decisions. The cautionary tales are clear. So is the counterexample — and the Spurs know it better than anyone. Tim Duncan's prime was maximized because San Antonio built with precision. Shooting. Defense. Clarity. Manu Ginobili didn't need the ball to impact the game. Tony Parker could bend defenses without dominating possessions. Everyone fit around Duncan, and San Antonio always evolved with the times as the NBA changed. And because of that, it lasted two decades. Wembanyama deserves that kind of infrastructure. And right now, it feels like the Spurs are building a roster better suited for 2005. But the blueprint has never been clearer: surround your generational star with players who space the floor, make quick decisions, and elevate him without always needing the ball to do it. Do that, and Wembanyama changes the sport. Don't, and years from now we'll talk about how the Spurs landed an alien and built a roster that made him look human.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store