Diving into DeepSeek: inside the 7 February Guardian Weekly
It's been a tale of technology and tariffs this week as a Chinese-developed chatbot delivered the first shock to stock markets after appearing to have stolen a march on US tech supremacy. For our big story, technology editors Robert Booth and Dan Milmo dived into the implications of DeepSeek, a cheaper and less energy intensive AI tool than Silicon Valley rivals such as OpenAI's ChatGPT.
Within days of DeepSeek's stealth launch, it had raced up the download charts but equally as fast, its limitations when questioned on tricky subjects such as contentious Chinese history were pointed out by testers. With the help of typical Turing test questions we, however, report that all chatbots on the market have their limitations. And, as commentator Kenan Malik writes, the real shock of the new pretender owes more to economics than technical developments.
Meanwhile, barely recovered from their tech tremors, the markets reeled again as Donald Trump unveiled his promised tariff tactics. While Mexico and Canada won a month's reprieve after agreeing to shore up their borders against Trump's claims of migrants and illegal drugs coming into the US, China stood up to the White House by imposing its own tariffs on US imports. In a week when the news, seemingly, never had a moment to draw breath, this edition of Guardian Weekly is a chance to reflect on these two globally significant events.
Try the Guardian Weekly with our time-limited 12 for 12 offer
Spotlight | My home was crushed and buried Gaza-based reporter Malek A Tantesh records her family's arduous walk back to Beit Lahia in northern Gaza, the joy of making her way home but the sorrow of the destruction she saw
Environment | Why icebreakers are a hot topic in the Arctic?While Donald Trump seems intent on securing Greenland, our Nordic correspondent Miranda Bryant speaks to local experts, who explain that it will be no mean feat to control shipping routes through the prized Northwest Passage
Feature | My inside storyImprisoned for her part in the UK's Just Stop Oil protests, Louise Lancaster reflects on prison conditions and what she has learned from her time in jail
Opinion | Labour is sacrificing everything to the god of GDPThe government is committing environmental vandalism via chancellor Rachel Reeves' push for growth at all costs and is no better than its Tory predecessors, says George Monbiot
Culture | Bridget Jones is back As the ultimate singleton returns, older and wiser after 25 years, the star and creator of the new movie, Renée Zellweger and Helen Fielding, tell Hollie Richardson why her appeal hasn't dimmed
Wider fears about the direction of artificial intelligence were allayed somewhat by this sweet tale of an 'AI granny' chatbot named Daisy, designed to frustrate telephone fraudsters with a stream of befuddling inquiries about cups of tea, knitting and how computers work. Graham Snowdon, editor
Audio | Alice Weidel: the far-right banker Elon Musk wants as German chancellor
Video | How immigration is used as a political weapon
Gallery | Marianne Faithfull – a life in pictures
We'd love to hear your thoughts on the magazine: for submissions to our letters page, please email weekly.letters@theguardian.com. For anything else, it's editorial.feedback@theguardian.com
Facebook
Instagram
Get the Guardian Weekly magazine delivered to your home address
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Live Israel ‘ready to strike Iran' over its nuclear programme
Israel is considering launching a military strike against Iran in the coming days without American support, Western officials say. The officials said fears of either no deal or a weak deal between Donald Trump and the Islamic Republic to curtail its nuclear programme had forced Israeli strategists to consider a unilateral attack against Tehran. It comes as the UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors found that Iran had broken its non-proliferation agreement for the first time in 20 years. The governors demanded Iran provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. In response to the ruling, the Islamic Republic said it had no choice but to respond by establishing a new enrichment facility in a 'secure location'. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran will not abandon its right to uranium enrichment because of mounting frictions in the region, adding that a 'friendly' country had alerted Tehran over a potential military strike by Israel.
The National
41 minutes ago
- The National
Lesley Riddoch: The SNP's usual attack lines won't work now
Joani Reid must possess steely determination to be Labour MP for East Kilbride and Strathaven. But then she is grand-daughter of the shipyard legend and independence campaigner Jimmy Reid. And he must have been birling in his grave yesterday as his lass contemptuously stuck it to the SNP during Prime Minister's Questions. 'Can I ask the Prime Minister, has he seen calls from within the SNP for John Swinney to resign? And does he agree with me that a leader who's only ever lost elections to the Labour Party should stay put?' This prompted gales of laughter from the Labour front bench. And that hurt. There wasn't even a cutaway showing a furious Stephen Flynn. With just nine MPs, the SNP is now treated as a spent force at Westminster (even though they have a bigger parliamentary group than Reform UK). And as a friend of mine observes, 'no-one kicks a dead dog'. So, the fact a Labour MP saw fit to take game at a recent moment of weakness, suggests they know fine well the SNP is still tipped to become the biggest party in the 2026 Holyrood elections. Yet it felt as if she had just kicked sand in nobody's face. Hard to watch. But then mockery is just one of the things that come your way when you lose. And defeat in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election was certainly a loss, no matter how much the SNP dresses it up otherwise. The other thing that happens is public questioning of the man in charge and his suitability to lead. READ MORE: SNP minister responds to 'secret meeting to discuss John Swinney leadership' reports This was turbo-charged by news that 25 'senior SNP figures' held a secret meeting on Monday where the removal of John Swinney as party leader was discussed. According to this paper: 'Attendees said the First Minister has two weeks to come up with a new strategy on independence or face a 'bloodbath' at the SNP conference.' For those of us bemoaning the indy-free nature of the Hamilton by-election campaign, such straight-talking and muscular movement within the party is long overdue. And it's tempting to join the ranks of those commenting on Swinney's leadership. But there's a more important question that needs greater focus. What will boost support for independence through the 2026 election and beyond? When that is answered, we can see who is right for the tough task of inspiring a new, more engaged and more combative SNP. First Minister John Swinney is facing unrest within the SNPJust challenging the current leader with no clear vision of what lies ahead, risks upending the boat without a canny new captain and prompting more barbed remarks at Swinney's expense. And that actually helps no-one but his Unionist opponents. As it is, the terrain leading to 2026 brings to mind the Battle of Flodden Field, fought in 1513, where the Scots were exposed on all sides and suffered heavy losses, including the death of their king. Let's be clear, it's not going to come to that. But the SNP finds itself politically outflanked on all sides. And it'll take energy, purpose, dynamism and a clear unapologetic strategy for independence to fight clear, and as Jonathan Shafi notes, that means more than occasionally intoning the I-word. Why? Because after years and even decades in the doldrums, Labour is out confidently gunning for the SNP. And if they don't hit their mark, there's every chance Reform will. READ MORE: 'Everything for Keir Starmer is England': Brian Cox calls for Scottish unity The polls still suggest the SNP will be the largest party in 2026 and many supporters will feel there's no need to panic. But a year is a very long time in politics. And it's been ages since the SNP faced challenge from two parties 'on the rise'. Let's take Labour first. In yesterday's spending review, the Chancellor pledged defence spending cash for the Clyde and Rosyth and finally gave the thumbs up to the Acorn carbon capture project near Peterhead, thus pledging jobs for the oil and gas-focused Grampian area while also stealing one of the SNP's biggest grievances about the Westminster Labour Government. Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison was right to tell Radio Scotland she fears that 'only development and not delivery costs are being covered. If there was a big figure to come, I think they'd be giving it now'. That's a fair point, but right now it can easily look carnaptious. The SNP have got what they wanted and are still not happy. You can see Ian Murray's script already. Scottish Secretary Ian MurrayOf course, there IS a critical position on Acorn but the CCS-supporting SNP can't make it. According to Oil Change International: 'CCS (carbon capture) has been failing for half a century and its only significant success has been the billions pocketed by industry in public subsidies. 'With the decision to grant funding for the Acorn and Viking carbon capture projects, Rachel Reeves has added to that track record. Instead of funding real transition policies like training for workers, port upgrades and investments in the UK wind industry, the Chancellor chose to funnel more money to the oil and gas industry's latest distraction tactic. 'The Government still has an opportunity to get serious about a just transition and put money where it is really needed, which is not the pockets of oil and gas bosses.' I'd say that is very fair comment. But it's not a defence line the SNP can use unless they get real about the very marginal part CCS can play in a future without fossil fuels. Other SNP attack lines were also closed down by yesterday's review. READ MORE: UK Government announces funding for Acorn carbon capture project in Scotland Scotland will now host the UK's most powerful supercomputer following a U-turn on the University of Edinburgh project. It was selected to host the project years ago by the Tories who promised £800m. But last August, Labour scrapped that plan claiming it was an 'unfunded commitment'. Cue academic fury. But now that faux pas has been corrected. So, like the Winter Fuel Payment U-turn which lets the brass-necked Scottish Secretary accuse the SNP of failing pensioners (breath-taking cheek), so the new £750m 'landmark' investment is being larged up by Labour as 'placing Edinburgh at the forefront of the UK's technological revolution'. Which means SNP complaints will sound like sour grapes. That is the intention. Ditto £250m for the Faslane nuclear base which fits into Murray's Radio Scotland pledge on nuclear power in the wake of Rachel Reeves' £14 billion to complete Sizewell C. 'If Labour wins in 2026, we'll reverse the SNP's veto on nuclear energy.' Now nothing nuclear would be needed in Scotland if we could develop our own energy mix. But we don't. And more engineering jobs pleases unions like the GMB. It works for substantial nuclear industry and pressure groups. And it works for some climate change activists willing to overlook the facts of exorbitant cost, decade-long delays, Fukushima-like safety concerns and Dounreay-like radioactive contamination. The Faslane nuclear base will undergo a major renovation (Image: PA) Yip, it's crazy, but if the Scottish Government wants to maintain its nuclear veto, it must make the arguments instead of resting on CND laurels and fight for its right to party. It needs a wholesale critique of a UK energy system that was privatised to within an inch of its life by Thatcher 30 years ago. A system that doesn't work for Scotland. But we don't hear a peep. Without some coherent attack lines, Scots may think the hardware piling up in our landscape extracting energy for southern shareholders is done at the behest of the Scottish Government, since they are last in the food chain giving planning consent. It's not true. Energy, grids, pylons, cables and turbines are all reserved to Westminster. But if the SNP does no serious work to reallocate responsibility, the underwhelming jobs and tiny income boosts of the green transition will all be blamed on the SNP. And if people don't come to that conclusion themselves, you can bet your bottom dollar Nigel Farage will be there to help them. So, the SNP's old attack lines are almost gone. Claims of success belong largely to the old glory days. There's the problem. Who in the SNP has the courage, energy and collaborative spirit needed to unravel it?
BreakingNews.ie
41 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Bid to dissolve Israeli parliament defeated in vote
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government survived an attempt to dissolve parliament early on Thursday. Most of Mr Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox coalition partners joined him in voting against a Bill that would have forced them to register for military service while the country is at war. Advertisement The vote was the most serious challenge to the government since the October 7, 2023, attack by Hamas, the biggest security failure in Israel's history and the trigger for the ongoing war in Gaza. The Bill's failure means no other Bill to dissolve Knesset can be submitted for at least six months, shoring up Mr Netanyahu's embattled coalition. The ultra-Orthodox parties are furious that the government has failed to pass a law exempting their community from mandatory military service. Ultra-Orthodox Jewish men block a highway during a protest against army recruitment in Bnei Brak, Israel (Leo Correa/AP/PA) The issue has long divided the Jewish Israeli public, especially during the 20-month war in the Gaza Strip. Advertisement Israel's opposition had hoped the public anger over the exemptions would help topple the government. But just two of the 18 ultra-Orthodox members of the Knesset, Israel's parliament, supported the bill to dissolve. Most Haredi MKs agreed to vote against the bill after foreign affairs and defence committee chairman Yuli Edelstein said he and the ultra-Orthodox parties had reached an understanding on the basis of a new draft law, which they will continue discussing over the coming week. Military service is mandatory for most Jews in Israel but the politically powerful ultra-Orthodox, who make up roughly 13% of Israeli society, have traditionally received exemptions if they are studying full-time in religious seminaries. The ultra-Orthodox, also known as Haredim, or 'God-fearing' in Hebrew, say that integrating into the army threatens their traditional way of life. Advertisement Each year, roughly 13,000 ultra-Orthodox men reach the conscription age of 18, but less than 10% enlist, according to parliament's state control committee, which held a hearing examining the issue. Israel is engaged in the longest active war in the country's history, which has stretched its military to the breaking point. The Haredim's widespread refusal to serve, and threats to topple the government during war-time, have enraged many Israelis, especially those who have served multiple rounds of reserve duty.
