
Europe is at an energy crossroads - could a supergrid be the answer?
The Russia-Ukraine war, accelerating climate change and ongoing tariff tensions with the US and China have all highlighted one thing: Europe is at an energy crossroads.
In an attempt to significantly ramp up its energy independence, the EU has revealed that it will be adding a further 89 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy capacity in 2025. That's an increase of 10GW from 2024, with the majority coming from new solar projects.
This move is estimated to help the bloc reach its 2030 climate goals, which involve reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55 per cent by the end of this decade, compared to 1990 levels. A supergrid would also decrease the EU's dependence on gas imports.
However, events such as the recent Spain and Portugal power outage have illustrated that the continent may need a more structural energy solution.
Some experts think a European supergrid is the answer.
This would mean drawing up a cross-border high voltage electricity grid, complemented by a sufficient grid infrastructure at all voltage levels. Such a grid would likely be capable of providing electricity to the whole of Europe, including Türkiye, as well as some parts of North Africa.
As electricity demand continues to increase every year, one of the main benefits of a European supergrid could be energy stability. Even though Europe is investing more in renewable energy projects such as solar and wind, these cannot be relied upon all the time.
Wind turbines cannot generate electricity once the wind stops blowing, while solar panels also stop working at night. As such, these facilities cannot produce a continuous flow of electricity.
In other cases, renewable electricity production may surpass demand - especially during times of high wind and solar generation.
This surplus can not only weaken electricity prices, but also prompt manufacturers to give away electricity, instead of exporting it or storing it.
Michael Ashley Schulman, founding partner and chief investment officer (CIO) at Running Point Capital Advisors, says that, 'As the continent leans harder into renewables, it's clear that wind in the north, sun in the south, and scattered hydro (energy) need a way to meet in the middle.
'A supergrid would allow green energy to flow across borders efficiently, balancing supply and demand; it could smooth out energy highs and lows, cut prices, boost resilience, and help Europe ditch fossil fuels faster.'
Instead of a single supergrid, Europe may very well need several, and not necessarily a Europe-wide supergrid, according to Hubert de la Grandière, CEO ofSuperGrid Institute.
'Several multi-terminal high voltage DC (HVDC) networks are already planned by France, Great Britain, Germany and Italy, among others. These are 'small supergrids,' he explains.
'Like motorways in the last century, a supergrid will probably emerge through progressive connections between several HVDC links and multi-terminal networks, providing these are designed to be scalable or extended.'
De la Gandière also highlights that offshore supergrids, which are the first examples of emerging European supergrid infrastructure, could be an effective way to save CO2, costs and materials for the significant integration of offshore wind energy.
Alexandros Fakas Kakouris, senior manager of energy and policy systems at Renewables Grid Initiative, points out that: 'Electricity grids enable electrification, renewable energy sources (RES) and market integration, thus making them central to achieving a timely, cost- and resource-efficient energy transition.
'In turn, this will boost EU energy security, competitiveness, and allow societies and industries to leverage its multifold benefits.'
However, a supergrid may not be the only solution, and will still need to be part of a broader transformation, instead of a substitute for it.
Therese Guttmann, Institute for Ecological Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business, explains: 'A supergrid must serve ecological integrity, social equity, and energy democracy - not just economic efficiency or corporate scale. It should connect regions, not concentrate control.'
Climate change, in the form of extreme weather events like floods and heatwaves, significantly increases risks to existing conventional energy infrastructure, while accentuating the variability of solar and wind power.
A supergrid could help maintain energy resilience and security by diversifying electricity transmission pathways and connecting different countries with more energy sources.
Whether at a super-sized level or not, investment is sorely needed. According to the European Commission, approximately €584bn in grid investment is required by the end of this decade, in order to stay on track for energy transition goals.
The International Energy Association (IEA) has also said that 'lack of grid development, including expansion, presents risks to electricity security, while both limiting the pace and increasing the cost of clean transition.'
Kakouris points out: 'Due to the expected increase in RES penetration, often located in remote areas, a lack of sufficient grid capacity, both cross borders and within countries, could quickly become a relevant bottleneck of the energy transition in many areas and raise operational challenges.'
But Guttman advises caution when it comes to building supergrids, despite climate change.
'Urgency is not a license for reckless infrastructure. A supergrid built in haste, without ecological and social safeguards, risks solving one crisis while deepening others. We need systems that decarbonise and decentralise, that speed up and stay fair,' she tells Euronews Green.
A supergrid cannot replace other complementary energy distribution solutions, according to Doron Shmueli, CEO of MayMaan Research.
'While a supergrid could help better distribute renewable energy across Europe, it should be seen as a complementary solution, not the sole answer,' he says.
'A combination of large-scale infrastructure improvements and decentralised energy solutions, like existing off-grid technology, is essential for reducing reliance on overburdened grids.'
Although several EU member states such as Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany have been attempting to develop national supergrids, efforts to build a Europe-wide supergrid have slowed down in recent years.
Aside from the huge financial investment it would require, one of the biggest reasons for this slowdown is highly complex permitting processes across member states.
Ineffective implementation of EU and national legislation, as well as the challenges of coordination between the EU's many private and public institutions and regulations have made it harder to establish a European supergrid. Public opposition, including from municipalities, has also contributed to this issue.
'Stitching together dozens of national grids isn't just an engineering project; it's a political minefield. Every country guards its energy sovereignty like crown jewels, and nobody wants new power lines in their backyard,' says Schulman.
'Add sky-high costs, cybersecurity risks of a hyperconnected system, and regulatory spaghetti, and you see why the supergrid remains more PowerPoint dream than reality. Europe doesn't just need cables - it needs political will, big wallets, and the ability to think beyond its own borders.'
Cost allocations in a cross-border scenario can be challenging, as benefits can often be seen far away from where the investments need to be made, potentially leading to disputes between member states.
Kakouris urges long-term thinking. 'Achieving system optimisation requires prioritising the 'best value' approach at the right moment, over the 'least cost' one. Otherwise, limited ambition with regard to electricity grid development will, with certainty, prolong reliance on fossil fuels,' he says.
Other challenges include establishing clear interfaces and rules at the system level, so that converters from different manufacturers can work together, as well as finding enough manpower and industrial capability to sustain the supergrid.
The recent Iberian power outage has also raised concerns of a European supergrid potentially being too interconnected, and so vulnerable to large-scale outages and cyberattacks.
'On one hand, the outage highlights the fragility of isolated grids and makes the case for broader, interconnected networks that can back each other up in a crisis,' considers Schulman. 'On the other hand, it reminds everyone that linking dozens of countries together could mean one localised failure ripples across the whole system.
'A supergrid would offer more resilience if done right, but also bigger risks if security, coordination, and redundancy aren't bulletproof. In short, the blackout makes a supergrid look more necessary, but also more perilous if half-baked.'
Guttman emphasises that a supergrid isn't just about wires.
'It's about power, access, and direction. Without addressing questions of governance, distribution, and legitimacy, large-scale projects stall or face resistance, no matter how 'green' they claim to be,' she says.
'The real challenge is not technical - it's visionary. Can we build a grid that supports a just transition, respects local agency, and stays within ecological limits? If not, we risk replacing fossil lock-in with a new form of centralised, green extractivism.'
'How is that not a community guideline violation? I feel like I just watched a crime.' That's what TikTok user @werty1627 said when she posted her response to the latest viral TikTok that spawned countless reaction videos and stitches (where users clip parts of other creator's videos into their own).
In this one, a woman whose screen name is Chels is making typical recipe content. It starts out uneventfully, her chirpy voiceover narrating the action in the style you come to expect from such material. 'Y'all let's make a crab boil in the air fryer…'
You see her hands, clad in blue plastic gloves adding potatoes and corn to the bowl of a glass air fryer. But that's where the fun ends and the video takes a turn.
She adds two live Maryland blue crabs to the bowl and proceeds to dump enough seasoning on them to colour the whole dish orange. She then states that she turned the air fryer on to 400 degrees Fahrenheit (200 C) and cooked them for 15 minutes while she looked on.
She goes on to sheepishly say, 'Do not knock it until you try it. It was sad watching them kinda…you know. But these crabs came out so good and juicy. I was not expecting them to come out this good.'
But the internet disagrees. The overwhelming take from across the app was that cooking crabs alive is, to steal a phrase from the kids, diabolical.
Josh Cottle is an anatomy teacher and self-proclaimed science nerd. And with nearly a million followers and 27 million likes, he's one of the most beloved science creators on TikTok.
He said, 'This is terribly inhumane. Crabs […] have a pretty advanced nervous system. They have nociceptors just like you and have demonstrated avoidance behavior from pain.
'They can learn a stimulus and avoid it in the future. They will also demonstrate something called limb guarding. If something is injured, like if they break their claw, they will guard that and keep it away from further stimulation, indicating that they do feel pain.'
Research from the University of Gothenburg backs him up. Their study published in October 2024 is among the first to prove that painful stimuli are sent to the brain of shore crabs, providing evidence for pain in crustaceans.
Paul McCartney's famed quote became a popular animal rights slogan, "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be vegetarian."
But this video suggests that we are a long way off from that. Despite watching the crabs' painful demise through a glass air fryer, few users declared they were going vegetarian.
Instead, social media has turned the slaughterhouse into a spectacle, and this is an escalation of what people are willing to do for views and virality.
One can argue that the countless stitches and comment backlash indicate that animal cruelty is deeply unpopular, but unpopularity doesn't mean it can't be monetised. Rage bait views are still views nonetheless and, frankly, negative reactions make videos trend just as highly as, if not more than, positive ones.
According to a 2024 report from the UK Safer Internet Centre, there has been a significant rise in animal abuse reports across social media channels.
This correlates with 2023 findings from the RSPCA, which attributes a rise in animal abuse in England and Wales to social media, citing their Kindness Index, a national survey of attitudes towards animal welfare. Their research found that 43 per cent of 16- to 17-year-olds had witnessed cruelty online that year, with Instagram, TikTok and X being the main platforms on which they saw it.
Another case in point: just this past week, an American woman in a suburb of Philadelphia was found guilty on four charges of aggravated cruelty to animals.
According to police, Anigar Monsee tortured animals to gain popularity on social media. In one video, Monsee is seen with a chicken.
Speaking to Action News, Upper Darby Police Superintendent Timothy Bernhardt said, "During the video, she is soliciting more likes and more viewers. And once she gets to the point where she is satisfied with the number of viewers, she then proceeds - over the course of 10 minutes - to harm and ultimately kill that chicken."
Such a conviction would be impossible to secure for crabs, however.
In the United States, crabs, being invertebrates, are not explicitly covered under federal animal cruelty statutes like the Animal Welfare Act, which primarily applies to warm-blooded animals and certain invertebrates like some marine mammals and farm animals.
In the European Union, animal welfare laws tend to be more comprehensive and include protections for a wider range of animals, including certain invertebrates like crustaceans.
The EU's legislation on animal welfare, such as Regulation (EC) No 338/97 and subsequent amendments, has increasingly recognised invertebrates, especially crustaceans like crabs and lobsters, as capable of feeling pain and stress.
Specifically, the EU has taken steps to improve the humane treatment of crustaceans, including regulations around how they should be kept and slaughtered to minimise suffering. For instance, some countries have banned live boiling of lobsters and crabs without stunning, reflecting a recognition of their capacity to suffer.
Unfortunately, Chels - now dubbed by TikTok's search as the 'glass air fryer crab lady' and who could not be reached for comment at the time of this writing - did not get that memo.
She declares near the end of her video that she will be air frying her crabs from now on. No word yet on whether or not her future crab dinners will come with a show.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
France's Macron to visit Greenland
Macron's office said he had been invited to visit on June 15 by the territory's prime minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen and Danish leader Mette Frederiksen. The three will hold talks focused on North Atlantic and Arctic security, climate change, the energy transition and the supply of critical minerals, the French presidency said. The visit will contribute to fostering "European sovereignty" and was aiming at "strengthening cooperation" with Greenland, it added. Frederiksen called the visit "a concrete testimony of European unity" in a statement. "It has been uplifting to see the strong international support for Greenland and the Kingdom in the difficult foreign policy situation in recent months," she said. Danish and Greenlandic leaders have insisted that the autonomous territory, where a majority are in favour of independence in the long term, must decide its own future, and have repeatedly said Washington "will never get Greenland".


Euronews
6 hours ago
- Euronews
European Commission goes on the offensive against NGO accusations
The European commission on Saturday denied German media reports that it had signed 'secret contracts' with environmental NGOs to promote the bloc's climate policy. 'Contrary to media allegations, there are no secret contracts between the European Commission and NGOs,' a commission spokesperson told Euronews. 'The Commission exercises a high degree of transparency when it comes to providing funding to NGOs. The commission's denial comes after German newspaper Welt Am Sonntag claimed that the EU's Executive arm had allegedly secretly paid environmental NGOs up to €700,000 to promote the bloc's climate policy. The paper said it got hold of 'secret contracts' from 2022, which involved well-known NGOs like 'ClientEarth,' and 'Friends of the Earth.' In the Welt Am Sonntag claims, the former allegedly 'received €350,000 'and was supposed to 'entangle German coal-fired power plants in court cases in order to increase the operators' financial and legal risk,' the paper said. The paper also reported that EC officials commissioned the latter to fight against the Mercosur free trade agreement between Europe and South America – 'even though colleagues in their own house were pushing it forward at the same time,' the paper reported. In its statement to Euronews on Saturday, the European Commission underlined that 'NGOs play a crucial role in shaping, monitoring, and enforcing legislation. NGOs also remain fully autonomous and free to establish their own views on all policy matters.' The German report comes at a time when the issue of NGO funding has become an extremely divisive political issue in Brussels. The conservative European People's Party (EPP) has claimed that the Commission instructed NGOs to lobby members of the parliament to further specific policies within the Green Deal, a central political agenda of president Ursula von der Leyen's first term between 2019 and 2024. MEP Monika Hohlmeier (Germany/EPP), told Euronews back in January that her concerns were raised when she examined some 30 funding contracts from 2022 and 2023, as part of the parliament's annual scrutiny of EU budget spending. In January, Budget Commissioner Piotr Serafin conceded that some financing from the EU's €5.4 billion environmental programme LIFE may have been inappropriate. 'I have to admit that it was inappropriate for some services in the Commission to enter into agreements that oblige NGOs to lobby members of the European Parliament specifically,' he said. But he also defended the role of NGOs in EU policy making. In April, the European Court of Auditors (ECA) also concluded following a lengthy probe that the Commission's funding of NGOs was 'opaque' and exposed the executive to 'reputational risk.' But the court did not find any breach of EU values from NGOs. To overcome ambiguities, the European Commission issued clear guidance last year to streamline how it provides funding to NGOs. On Saturday, the commission spokesperson told Euronews that EU funding to NGOs was provided 'based on grant agreements, which are complemented by work programmes whose preparation falls under the responsibility of NGOs.' 'As per the guidance, the Commission has instructed its services not to sign off on work programmes if those contain overly specific activities directed at EU institutions or their representatives,' the EC statement added. The institution will take 'further measures,' the spokesperson said, to strengthen transparency and include appropriate safeguards. 'We have been working closely with the European Parliament and the European Court of Auditors to improve this transparency even further. Information on recipients of EU funding, including the names of recipients and amounts, is publicly available on the Commission´s Financial Transparency System website,' the statement said. Argentine President Javier Milei has met with Pope Leo XIV in the Vatican on Saturday, where they discussed the importance of urgent efforts towards achieving peace. The Pope and Milei also spoke about bilateral relations, as well as "matters of common interest, such as social-economic progress, the fight against poverty, and the commitment to social cohesion," a statement by the Holy See Press Office noted. After his meeting with the pope, the Argentine President met with the Vatican Secretary of State cardinal Pietro Parolin, accompanied by the Under-Secretary for Relations with States, Reverend Msgr. Mirosław Wachowski. Milei arrived in Rome on Friday, the first stop of his 10-day European tour, where he attended the signing of a natural gas export deal, local media reported. The event was also attended by Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who hosted the Argentine president for a private dinner afterwards. Shortly after his meeting with Pope Leo XIV, Milei departed for Spain, to attend the Madrid Economic Forum. After Spain, the Argentine president will also visit France, and will end his trip in Israel, where he will receive an award in recognition of his support of Israel in a ceremony at the Knesset on 11 June.


Euronews
7 hours ago
- Euronews
Pope Leo XIV welcomes Argentine President Javier Milei at Vatican
Argentine President Javier Milei has met with Pope Leo XIV in the Vatican on Saturday, where they discussed the importance of urgent efforts towards achieving peace. The Pope and Milei also spoke about bilateral relations, as well as "matters of common interest, such as social-economic progress, the fight against poverty, and the commitment to social cohesion," a statement by the Holy See Press Office noted. After his meeting with the pope, the Argentine President met with the Vatican Secretary of State cardinal Pietro Parolin, accompanied by the Under-Secretary for Relations with States, Reverend Msgr. Mirosław Wachowski. Milei arrived in Rome on Friday, the first stop of his 10-day European tour, where he attended the signing of a natural gas export deal, local media reported. The event was also attended by Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who hosted the Argentine president for a private dinner afterwards. Shortly after his meeting with Pope Leo XIV, Milei departed for Spain, to attend the Madrid Economic Forum. After Spain, the Argentine president will also visit France, and will end his trip in Israel, where he will receive an award in recognition of his support of Israel in a ceremony at the Knesset on 11 June. While the Spanish socialist government wants to increase defence spending in line with the demands of US President Donald Trump and European allies, a thousand demonstrators from Podemos, Izquierda Unida and Sumar protested this Saturday in the Spanish capital against increasing the military budget. The demonstration has taken on special relevance after the firm warning of Izquierda Unida (IU) that they are questioning their place in the coalition government. Its parliamentary spokesman, Enrique Santiago, has been categorical in stating that it is practically impossible for his party to continue in an executive that assumes this course. He also urged Pedro Sánchez to stand firm in the face of pressure from NATO, despite the reproaches he may receive, recalling that IU, of which minister Sira Rego is a member, firmly rejects the increase in defence spending. Sumar's presence at Saturday's protest was undoubtedly the most striking. The internal debate within the electoral coalition has once again intensified in the run-up to the NATO summit in The Hague at the end of June, where allied countries are expected to make a new commitment to allocate up to 5% of GDP to defence, up from the current 2%. Labour minister and leader of the left-wing coalition, Yolanda Díaz, has long distanced herself from Sánchez's position, though without breaking the unity of the government. Podemos has also publicly denounced the increase in defence spending approved by the government, saying it is a "betrayal" of progressive principles and a direct alignment with the strategic interests of the United States and NATO. MEP Irene Montero warned on Saturday that, by prioritising rearmament, the central government is laying the foundations for future cuts in social policies, especially affecting public education and programmes such as the Co-Responsibles Plan, aimed at improving family reconciliation. According to a survey by the Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS), published in March, 75% of Spaniards are actually in favour of increasing military spending, especially after Donald Trump's re-election.