Trump's tariff threat bolsters Lula in Brazil, hurts Bolsonaro
Trump sent a letter this month to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva threatening a 50% import tax and directly linking the decision to Bolsonaro's trial on charges related to his supporters' 2023 attack on the capital, which the U.S. president called a 'witch hunt.'
'This trial should end immediately!' Trump wrote Thursday evening in a second letter, this one addressed to Bolsonaro. He added that he had 'strongly voiced' his disapproval through his tariff policy.
Rather than backing down, Brazil's Supreme Court escalated the case, worsening Bolsonaro's legal troubles. On Friday morning, federal police raided Bolsonaro's home and political office. The former president was ordered to wear an ankle monitor, banned from using social media and hit with other restrictions.
Meanwhile, Lula — who had seen his popularity decline, growing opposition in Congress and increasing obstacles to another reelection bid — seems to have gained politically from the situation.
Now the 79-year-old leftist Lula, in office for the third nonconsecutive term of his long political career, is seeing renewed acceptance, congressional support against Trump and pleas to run one last time to defend Brazil's sovereignty.
Lula has appeared more energized in public since Trump's announcement. At a national students assembly Thursday, he wore a blue cap reading 'Sovereign Brazil Unites Us' — a contrast to Trump's red MAGA cap.
'A gringo will not give orders to this president,' he told the crowd, and called the tariff hike 'unacceptable blackmail.'
The impact on Lula is not a first. Trump's actions targeting other countries have boosted ideological rivals in Canada and Australia instead of strengthening his allies at a local level.
Private pollster Atlas said Tuesday that Lula's unpopularity had reversed course after his feud with Trump. Lula's job approval went from at 47.3% in June to 49.7% since the tariffs battle began, Atlas said. The poll of more than 2,800 people was conducted July 11to13, with a margin of error of 2 percentage points. The study also said 62.2% of Brazilians think the higher tariffs are unjustified, while 36.8% agree with the move.
Even Bolsonaro's former vice president, Sen. Hamilton Mourão, criticized Trump's move as undue interference in Brazil's politics, though he said he joined the U.S. president in condemning the trial against the far-right leader.
Social media analytics firm Palver analyzed 20,000 messages about Trump on WhatsApp, Brazil's most widely used communication platform, a day after Trump's announcement. Its analysis said right-wing users dominated viral content, but spontaneous conversations leaned left, mocking Bolsonaro as submissive and defending Brazil's sovereignty.
'Trump has put Lula back in the game,' said Thomas Traumann, an independent political consultant and former spokesman for the Brazilian presidency who only weeks ago argued that Lula had lost his front-runner status in the presidential race as he struggled to deliver on his promises on the economy.
'Trump handed it to Lula on a silver platter,' Traumann said.
Business leaders who until recently sided with Bolsonaro are having to court Lula to negotiate with Trump. Agribusiness, Brazil's largest economic sector and a traditional right-wing stronghold, united to criticize the U.S. president's move. Industry groups were quick to denounce the tariffs as politically motivated and lacking commercial justification.
'In general, with the major exception of a more radical conservative wing, [Trump's move] generated national outrage for violating Brazil's sovereignty,' lawmaker Arnaldo Jardim, a member of the congressional agricultural caucus, told the Associated Press.
Jardim, who pushed for the approval of a reciprocity bill that could be used by Lula if there's no agreement until the Aug. 1 deadline, hardly sides with the Brazilian leader.
'Even among sectors that initially thought this could benefit Bolsonaro, many had to reconsider their positions,' he said.
Top congressional leaders who recently helped nix a Lula decree to raise a transactions tax were moving toward a head-on collision with him. After Trump's announcement, they signed a joint statement agreeing with Lula's promise to use the reciprocity law against the U.S.
In another change, Brazil's Congress decided to start moving on Lula's plan to give an income tax break to millions of poorer Brazilians. Many politicians said that such an initiative was dead after Lula became the first president in three decades to have a decree annulled by lawmakers.
At the Supreme Court, Bolsonaro is only getting deeper into trouble as his trial continues.
Last week, Brazil's chief prosecutor called for a guilty verdict, accusing the former president of leading an armed criminal organization, attempting to stage a coup and attempting violent abolition of the democratic rule of law, among other charges.
After Bolsonaro lost his reelection bid and Lula was inaugurated in January 2023, a mob of Bolsonaro supporters ransacked government buildings in Brasilia, injuring dozens of law enforcement officers. It was reminiscent of the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol two years earlier, in which a pro-Trump mob violently attacked the U.S. Capitol, killing and injuring police officers while trying to overturn Trump's election loss to Joe Biden.
The defense will next likely present its case in the coming weeks, after which the panel of Supreme Court justices in the trial will vote on whether to convict or acquit him.
The former president also suffered more consequences — the court's latest restrictions on Bolsonaro, including the ankle monitor, are part of a second investigation against one of his sons, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a Brazilian lawmaker who currently lives in the United States and is known for his close ties to Trump. He has been under scrutiny for allegedly working with U.S. authorities to impose sanctions against Brazilian officials.
Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the criminal cases against Bolsonaro, said the Bolsonaros' actions attempted to pressure the Brazilian judiciary by involving the U.S.
The court's decision cited both Trump's letter to Lula and several social media posts by the Bolsonaros in support of sanctions against Brazilian officials and speaking favorably about tariffs.
'A sovereign country like Brazil will always know how to defend its democracy and sovereignty,' De Moraes said. 'The judiciary will not allow any attempt to subject the functioning of the Supreme Court to the scrutiny of another state through hostile acts.'
Jair Bolsonaro told journalists in Brasilia, the country's capital, that the ankle monitoring was a 'supreme humiliation.'
'I never thought about leaving Brazil, I never thought about going to an embassy, but the precautionary measures are because of that,' the former president said.
In a statement, Eduardo Bolsonaro accused De Moraes of trying to criminalize Trump and the U.S. government.
'Since he has no power over them, he decided to make my father a hostage,' the younger Bolsonaro said of the judge.
Pessoa and Savarese write for the Associated Press.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nucor Corp (NUE) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Financial Performance and Strategic ...
EBITDA: Approximately $1.3 billion for the second quarter. Earnings Per Share (EPS): $2.60 per diluted share. Shareholder Returns: $329 million returned through dividends and buybacks in the quarter; $758 million total for the first half of the year. Capital Expenditures: $954 million for the quarter; on track for approximately $3 billion for the year. Steel Mills Segment Pretax Earnings: $843 million, more than triple the prior quarter. Steel Products Segment Pretax Earnings: $392 million, a 28% increase over the previous quarter. Raw Materials Segment Pretax Earnings: Approximately $57 million, a 95% increase over the first quarter. Net Earnings: $603 million for the second quarter. Debt and Cash Position: Total debt to capital ratio of approximately 24%; cash of approximately $2.5 billion. Steel Mills Backlog: Up nearly 30% over the same time last year. Steel Products Backlog: Up approximately 20% from a year ago. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Sign with GPK. Release Date: July 29, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Nucor Corp (NYSE:NUE) achieved a significant improvement in financial performance with an EBITDA of approximately $1.3 billion and earnings of $2.60 per diluted share, driven by higher average selling prices and stable realized pricing. The company returned $329 million to shareholders through dividends and buybacks in the second quarter, totaling $758 million for the first half of the year. Nucor's Brandenburg plate mill achieved positive EBITDA for the quarter, with shipments reaching record levels, indicating strong operational performance. The Steel Products segment saw a 28% increase in pretax earnings over the previous quarter, with robust demand and healthy backlog levels extending into 2026. Nucor's strategic investments in new facilities, such as the rebar micro mill in Lexington and the Kingman melt shop, are progressing well, with several projects nearing completion, positioning the company for future growth. Negative Points Nucor expects consolidated earnings to be nominally lower in the third quarter due to modest margin compression in the Steel Mills segment. The company faces challenges from unfairly traded imports, particularly in corrosion-resistant and rebar products, necessitating ongoing trade law enforcement. Preoperating and start-up costs remain a concern, with approximately $136 million incurred in the second quarter, impacting overall profitability. The potential impact of tariffs, particularly on Brazilian imports, poses a risk to raw material costs and could affect margins if implemented. Despite strong demand, the pricing environment is described as broadly stable, with some segments experiencing margin compression due to lag effects in pricing realization. Q & A Highlights Q: On Steel Products, you mentioned margin compression. Can you break that down for us? Is it due to higher input costs? How should we think about pricing directionally from the second to the third quarter? A: Leon Topalian, CEO: The nominal adjustment in pricing isn't due to weak demand drivers but rather a lag effect from orders taken in late Q4 or early Q1 now being realized. We've recently announced a price increase, and demand drivers remain robust. John Hollatz, EVP: Margin expansion and contraction are normal with steel price movements. Our downstream businesses have custom-engineered products with value-added solutions, and demand remains solid. Q: Among the steel products, which are running at relatively lower utilization, and what are your best opportunities to displace imports in the second half of the year? A: Leon Topalian, CEO: Our capability set is the most diverse among North American steel producers. We're running roughly 85% utilization rates across the steel mills segment, with more opportunities in sheet, plate, rebar, and long products. Import levels are still too high, and we advocate for strong, fair trade. Q: Could you speak to the preoperating start-up costs and the period-by-period outlook for Lexington and Kingman as they start contributing to EBITDA positively? A: Leon Topalian, CEO: We're excited about the Lexington micro mill and Kingman, Arizona, both geographically well-positioned. Stephen Laxton, CFO: Pre-op start-up costs came down quarter-over-quarter, driven by Brandenburg reaching breakeven. Expect $140 million to $150 million in pre-op costs per quarter for the second half of the year. Q: Can you talk about the margin compression expected in the steel mills segment for the third quarter? A: Leon Topalian, CEO: The potential pressure in flat sheet, particularly due to slabs from Brazil, could impact earnings. We have mitigation strategies, including self-supply through our sheet mills. There's significant upside in other segments like Brandenburg, long products, and beams. Q: Are there any direct tax benefits from the "big beautiful bill" in the back half of the year or for 2026? A: Stephen Laxton, CFO: The bill is forward-facing, with limited immediate benefits. It will have a pronounced effect on R&D spending, allowing us to expense it upfront rather than amortizing over seven years, providing positive net present value benefits. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Business Insider
15 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump considers skipping G20 summit, slams South Africa's 'very bad' policies
United States President Donald Trump has indicated he may not attend the upcoming G20 summit scheduled to take place in South Africa this November, citing his disapproval of the country's policies. President Trump may skip the upcoming G20 summit in South Africa due to policy disagreements. Tensions between the U.S. and South Africa have escalated over issues including land reform laws, foreign policy stances, and relations with BRICS nations. Trump's potential absence highlights growing diplomatic friction, which could impact U.S.–Africa relations long-term. Trump's remarks come amid a deepening strain in U.S.–South Africa relations, fueled by long-standing disagreements over a range of issues including South Africa's land reform laws, its pro-Palestinian stance in the Israel–Gaza conflict, and its growing alignment with BRICS nations. These tensions have prompted the Trump administration to impose multiple sanctions on South Africa, including a 30% tariff on selected South African goods, a move that has further deteriorated bilateral relations. Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said, 'I think maybe I'll send somebody else because I've had a lot of problems with South Africa. They have some very bad policies.' South African officials have yet to issue a formal response to the statement. However, analysts warn that Trump's comments could escalate diplomatic friction ahead of the summit, which many see as a pivotal opportunity for developing countries to press for more inclusive global governance. Trump's policy dispute with South Africa Since the start of his second term in 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump has intensified tensions with South Africa, reviving a diplomatic chill driven by ideological rifts and competing global alliances. His administration has openly criticized South Africa's growing ties with Russia and China, its opposition to Western foreign policy, and its leadership role in BRICS and the Global South. The strain deepened earlier this year when US Secretary of State, Senator Marco Rubio declined an invitation to a G20 preparatory meeting in Johannesburg, citing South Africa's alignment with anti-Western regimes. Soon after, the White House instructed the U.S. Embassy in Pretoria to avoid making logistical arrangements for the G20 summit, signaling a potential boycott unless South Africa altered its stance. The friction reflects Washington's broader frustration with Pretoria's increasingly independent foreign policy, including support for Palestine, resistance to U.S.-backed sanctions, and its decision to host Russian President Vladimir Putin despite an ICC warrant. With the G20 summit now in focus, Trump's administration sees South Africa as part of a rising bloc challenging U.S. influence. What began as diplomatic friction has grown into a full-blown policy standoff that could redefine U.S.–Africa relations for years to come. Trump's potential absence from the summit could have diplomatic implications, as it would mark a rare snub of a major global economic forum hosted on African soil.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UN investigator says US sanctions over her criticism of Israel will seriously impact her life
Italy Israel Palestinians ROME (AP) — An independent U.N. investigator and outspoken critic of Israel's policies in Gaza says that the sanctions recently imposed on her by the Trump administration will have serious impacts on her life and work. Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza, is a member of a group of experts chosen by the 47-member U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva. She is tasked with probing human rights abuses in the Palestinian territories and has been vocal about what she has described as the 'genocide' by Israel against Palestinians in Gaza. Both Israel and the United States, which provides military support to its close ally, have strongly denied that accusation. Washington has decried what it called a 'campaign of political and economic warfare' against the U.S. and Israel, and earlier this month imposed sanctions on Albanese, following an unsuccessful U.S. pressure campaign to force the international body to remove her from her post. 'It's very serious to be on the list of the people sanctioned by the U.S.,' Albanese told The Associated Press in Rome on Tuesday, adding that individuals sanctioned by the U.S. cannot have financial interactions or credit cards with any American bank. When used in 'a political way," she said the sanctions 'are harmful, dangerous.' 'My daughter is American. I've been living in the U.S. and I have some assets there. So of course, it's going to harm me,' Albanese said. 'What can I do? I did everything I did in good faith, and knowing that, my commitment to justice is more important than personal interests.' The sanctions have not dissuaded Albanese from her work — or her viewpoints — and in July, she published a new report, focused on what she defines as 'Israel's genocidal economy' in Palestinian territories. 'There's an entire ecosystem that has allowed Israel's occupation to thrive. And then it has also morphed into an economy of genocide,' she said. In the conclusion of the report, Albanese calls for sanctions against Israel and prosecution of 'architects, executors and profiteers of this genocide.' Albanese noted a recent shift in perceptions in Europe and around the world following an outcry over images of emaciated children in Gaza and reports of dozens of hunger-related deaths after nearly 22 months of war. 'It's shocking," she said. "I don't think that there are words left to describe what's happening to the Palestinian people.' The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel and killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 people captive. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not differentiate between combatants and civilians but says more than half the dead are women and children. Nearly 21 months into the conflict that displaced the vast majority of Gaza's 2.3 million people, the United Nations says hunger is rampant after a lengthy Israeli blockade on food entering the territory and medical care is extremely limited. Solve the daily Crossword