Arch Insurance North America Names Five Division Presidents
Linda Fallon has been named Division President, Consumer Business, which includes the Travel, Accident & Health unit and the Warranty and Lenders Solutions unit.
Mark Lange has been named Division President, Middle Market and Entertainment.
Justin Psaki has been named Division President, Financial, Professional and Programs, which includes management liability, professional liability and cyber as well as the P&C Programs unit.
Rich Stock has been named Division President, Casualty and Surety.
Valerie Turpin has been named Division President, Property and Marine.
All five Division Presidents will report to Brian First, President of Arch Insurance North America.
'The alignment of our business units into these five divisions reflects the tremendous growth that Arch Insurance North America has experienced in the past five years,' First said. 'Each of these Arch leaders has played a meaningful role in that expansion, and I look forward to their continued contributions toward further growth, profitability and the development of their teams.'
For more information about Arch Insurance North America, and its product offerings, visit: https://insurance.archgroup.com/business/north-america/
About Arch Insurance North America
Arch Insurance North America, part of Arch Capital Group Ltd., includes Arch's insurance operations in the United States and Canada. Business in the U.S. is written by Arch Insurance Company, Arch Specialty Insurance Company, Arch Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Arch Wilsure Insurance Company and Arch Indemnity Insurance Company. Business in Canada is written by Arch Insurance Canada Ltd.
About Arch Capital Group Ltd.
Arch Capital Group Ltd. (Nasdaq: ACGL) is a publicly listed Bermuda exempted company with approximately $24.3 billion in capital at March 31, 2025. Arch, which is part of the S&P 500 Index, provides insurance, reinsurance and mortgage insurance on a worldwide basis through its wholly owned subsidiaries.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for forward−looking statements. This release or any other written or oral statements made by or on behalf of Arch Capital Group Ltd. and its subsidiaries may include forward−looking statements, which reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events and financial performance. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in or incorporated by reference in this release are forward−looking statements.
Forward−looking statements can generally be identified by the use of forward−looking terminology such as "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "believe" or "continue" or their negative or variations or similar terminology. Forward−looking statements involve the Company's current assessment of risks and uncertainties. Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. A non-exclusive list of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements includes the following: adverse general economic and market conditions; increased competition; pricing and policy term trends; fluctuations in the actions of rating agencies and the Company's ability to maintain and improve its ratings; investment performance; the loss of key personnel; the adequacy of the Company's loss reserves, severity and/or frequency of losses, greater than expected loss ratios and adverse development on claim and/or claim expense liabilities; greater frequency or severity of unpredictable natural and man-made catastrophic events, including the effect of contagious diseases on our business; the impact of acts of terrorism and acts of war; changes in regulations and/or tax laws in the United States or elsewhere; ability to successfully integrate, establish and maintain operating procedures as well as integrate the businesses the Company has acquired or may acquire into the existing operations; changes in accounting principles or policies; material differences between actual and expected assessments for guaranty funds and mandatory pooling arrangements; availability and cost to the Company of reinsurance to manage our gross and net exposures; the failure of others to meet their obligations to the Company; an incident, disruption in operations or other cyber event caused by cyber attacks, the use of artificial intelligence technologies or other technology on the Company's systems or those of the Company's business partners and service providers, which could negatively impact the Company's business and/or expose the Company to litigation; and other factors identified in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The foregoing review of important factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with other cautionary statements that are included herein or elsewhere. All subsequent written and oral forward−looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on the Company's behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The Company's forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release or as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward−looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Source — Arch Insurance North America
Tag — arch-insurance
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors in Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) have seen strong returns of 180% over the past five years
When you buy a stock there is always a possibility that it could drop 100%. But on the bright side, you can make far more than 100% on a really good stock. Long term Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:MPWR) shareholders would be well aware of this, since the stock is up 170% in five years. It's also good to see the share price up 22% over the last quarter. But this could be related to the strong market, which is up 16% in the last three months. So let's investigate and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One way to examine how market sentiment has changed over time is to look at the interaction between a company's share price and its earnings per share (EPS). During five years of share price growth, Monolithic Power Systems achieved compound earnings per share (EPS) growth of 70% per year. This EPS growth is higher than the 22% average annual increase in the share price. So one could conclude that the broader market has become more cautious towards the stock. The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). We know that Monolithic Power Systems has improved its bottom line over the last three years, but what does the future have in store? Take a more thorough look at Monolithic Power Systems' financial health with this free report on its balance sheet. What About Dividends? It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. As it happens, Monolithic Power Systems' TSR for the last 5 years was 180%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! A Different Perspective While the broader market gained around 19% in the last year, Monolithic Power Systems shareholders lost 12% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 23% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Even so, be aware that Monolithic Power Systems is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 2 of those don't sit too well with us... We will like Monolithic Power Systems better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With 80% institutional ownership, Axon Enterprise, Inc. (NASDAQ:AXON) is a favorite amongst the big guns
Key Insights Institutions' substantial holdings in Axon Enterprise implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership Insiders have been selling lately AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Every investor in Axon Enterprise, Inc. (NASDAQ:AXON) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 80% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Axon Enterprise. Check out our latest analysis for Axon Enterprise What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Axon Enterprise? Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that Axon Enterprise does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Axon Enterprise, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Axon Enterprise. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. With 9.3% and 4.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Patrick Smith directly holds 3.9% of the total shares outstanding. Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. Insider Ownership Of Axon Enterprise The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Axon Enterprise, Inc.. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$2.6b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently. General Public Ownership With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Axon Enterprise. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. Next Steps: I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Axon Enterprise you should be aware of. If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Associated Press
15 minutes ago
- Associated Press
REPL CLASS ACTION ALERT: FDA Response Letter Leads to Replimune Group, Inc. Class Action – Investors are Notified to Contact BFA Law by September 22 Deadline
NEW YORK, July 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Replimune Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: REPL) and certain of the Company's senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Replimune, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: Investors have until September 22, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors who purchased Replimune securities. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts and is captioned Jboor v. Replimune Group, Inc., et al., No 1:25-cv-12085. Why Was Replimune Sued for Securities Fraud? Replimune is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing oncolytic immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer. Replimune's lead product candidate is RP1, a treatment for melanoma. On June 6, 2024, the Company announced positive top line results from its IGNYTE Phase 1/2 clinical trial for RP1 in combination with the immunotherapy drug nivolumab. On November 21, 2024, Replimune announced that it had submitted a biologics license application ('BLA') to the FDA for RP1 on the strength of the results of the IGNYTE Phase 1/2 trial. During the relevant period, the Company repeatedly touted the results of the IGNYTE Phase 1/2 trial. In truth, the IGNYTE Phase 1/2 trial design was not adequate to produce reliable results. The Stock Declines as the Truth Is Revealed On July 22, 2025, Replimune announced that it received a Complete Response Letter from the FDA regarding the BLA for RP1. According to the Company, '[t]he FDA has indicated that the IGNYTE trial is not considered to be an adequate and well-controlled clinical investigation that provides substantial evidence of effectiveness.' More specifically, 'the FDA said the trial cannot be adequately interpreted due to the heterogeneity of the patient population.' On this news, the price of Replimune stock fell more than 75% on July 22, 2025. Click here for more information: What Can You Do? If you invested in Replimune you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact: Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212.789.3619 Why Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP? BFA is a leading international law firm representing plaintiffs in securities class actions and shareholder litigation. It has been named a top plaintiff law firm by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, and ISS SCAS, and its attorneys have been named 'Elite Trial Lawyers' by the National Law Journal, among the top '500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers' by Lawdragon, 'Titans of the Plaintiffs' Bar' by Law360 and 'SuperLawyers' by Thomson Reuters. Among its recent notable successes, BFA recovered over $900 million in value from Tesla, Inc.'s Board of Directors, as well as $420 million from Teva Pharmaceutical Ind. Ltd. For more information about BFA and its attorneys, please visit Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
