
Daffodils to commemorate the 82nd anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising
ADVERTISEMENT
Wreaths and flowers were laid at the Monument to the Heroes in the Polish capital on Saturday to mark the 82nd anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. Today, the daffodil has become a symbol of commemoration.
The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943 was the largest armed Jewish uprising during the Second World War. On the 19th of April, a group of young men led by Mordechai Anielewicz resisted and fought back Nazi troops who had entered the Warsaw Ghetto in an effort to deport its inhabitants to concentration camps.
In an interview with Euronews, Zofia Bojańczyk, coordinator of the Daffodil Campaign by the POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews, spoke about the importance of today's commemoration.
"The insurgents knew that they had no chance against the machinery of extermination that the Germans represented. So it was a fight for dignity, for a dignified death, without any hope of victory," Bojańczyk said.
Civilians being expelled from their homes after the suppression of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. Photo from Jurgen Stroop's report from May 16, 1943.
Wirtualny Sztetl
Although the uprising was destined to fail, the insurgents achieved some early successes in the first few days.
"This handful of Jews, young people, poorly armed, were mainly able to surprise the Germans," Bojanczyk said.
"Let's remember that it's 1943, the war has been going on for four years, the Germans had been murdering Jews, so these young people had already seen the deaths of their friends, their family, they themselves had been through hell, the Holocaust, and the Germans were completely surprised to meet any resistance from the Jewish side."
The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising seen from the "Aryan side" at the intersection of Świętojerska and Bonifraterska Streets and Krasiński Square; the ghetto wall is visible.
Fot. R. Damec / Archiwum A. Sobieckiej / POLIN
'You had to die with a weapon in your hand.'
The POLIN Museum of the History of Polish Jews is committed to commemorating the war heroes, including Marek Edelman, the last surviving leader of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising.
Bojanczyk said that "in addition to being an important figure for solidarity, an outstanding doctor, he survived the Holocaust and was a guardian of Jewish memory."
82nd anniversary of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising
Paweł Głogowski/ Euronews
In a
Facebook
post, the museum remembers Edelman as follows:
"He had no illusions - he knew they would not defeat the German army. And yet he fought. Not for himself, but for those who did not want to die passively. After the war, he spoke of the uprising in simple words:
'You had to die with a weapon in your hand
.' But his fight did not end in 1943 - throughout his life he defended the weak, as a doctor saving people's hearts and as a social activist fighting for the dignity of others."
Why daffodils?
Marek Edelman, who died in 2009, became a prominent voice of conscience in Poland. Every anniversary of the uprising, Edelman would receive a bouquet of yellow daffodils from an anonymous person.
"Very often it was daffodils, because it's the season for daffodils. And he would place this bouquet at the monument to the heroes of the ghetto in Warsaw's Muranów district, where the Museum of the History of Polish Jews POLIN, which organises the Daffodil Campaign, is located today opposite this monument. And together with Marek Edelman, more and more people came, also making this gesture of remembrance, also laying yellow flowers at the monument." Bojańczyk said.
Graphic depicting Mark Edelman
facebook.com/polinmuseum
Since 2013, volunteers of the POLIN Museum have been handing out paper yellow daffodils to residents of Warsaw, asking them to pin them to their clothes. By doing so, they commemorate the anniversary of the uprising and all those who fought in the Warsaw Ghetto.
"When I say all those who fought, I mean not only the insurgents who fought with weapons in their hands, but also those who resisted civilly. These were people who hid in attics, in bunkers and fought for every hour and every day of their lives," Bojańczyk said.
ADVERTISEMENT
"But these were also people who supported the uprising from the other side of the wall, between them trying to supply weapons, arranging money, false evidence and so on. So it's a whole group of people who made the whole apparatus out of this resistance that happened"
The Museum of the History of Polish Jews Polin in Warsaw
Paweł Głogowski/ Euronews
Strong Warsaw identity
In 2013, the volunteer base was sparse. However, since then, more than 15,000 volunteers have taken part in the action, handing out more than two million yellow flowers.
"And the action has gone from being just local, to being not only nationwide, but also reaching a multitude of countries around the world with its reach," emphasised Bojańczyk.
Daffodils have been sent to more than 30 countries.
ADVERTISEMENT
"This year our daffodils will actually be carried from Buenos Aires to Melbourne, Australia," Bojańczyk added.
"Our volunteers are mainly people who do not have Jewish roots, so for them the motivation is not family history, but they are such flesh-and-blood Varsovians or people who have a strong identity with Warsaw, that this is the history of their city, that it happened here in Warsaw. And they are driven by such a really very strong sense that Warsaw is a city of two uprisings and very often we remember and rightly and very well the uprising in 1944, but that before the Warsaw Uprising there was also the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising in 1943."
Empathy, help, openness
Every year, more and more schools join the Daffodil Campaign. Bojańczyk said more than 6,000 schools, libraries, institutions from all over Poland joined this year.
The Daffodils campaign is organised to commemorate the heroes of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising
Paweł Głogowski/ Euronews
"But what's important is that it's not just history, such as learning the dates of those important figures who took part in the uprising and so on. It's also kind of taking a closer look at concepts like empathy, helping, openness, being open to the other person. If we are open-minded and open-hearted towards another person, then what happened in 1943, or rather the whole machine, what led to the Holocaust, would simply never happen again," Bojańczyk concluded.
ADVERTISEMENT
The article uses a photograph from the Virtual Shtetl archive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
9 hours ago
- Euronews
Israel hits Iran, killing military command and top nuclear scientists
'Ask your intelligence, what is Russia planning this summer in Belarus?' Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in Lithuania on 2 June. Addressing a group of nine NATO member countries in eastern and central Europe, Ukraine's president urged them to "bring more strength together" for the possible Russian threat coming from the territory of Belarus. Belarus opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya told Euronews the large-scale joint military exercises between Russia and Belarus taking place in the autumn might indeed pose a threat to NATO's Eastern flank. 'Don't forget the last military drills in Belarus ended with the attack on Ukraine', she said, referring to the upcoming Zapad 2021 manoeuvres. In autumn 2021, just months before Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Moscow and Minsk held military exercises in Belarus, training, among other things, for assault operations in densely populated areas with the use of Russian equipment. Back in 2022 Russia used Belarus as a launching pad for its attacks and full-scale invasion of Ukraine. But Moscow didn't get the people of Belarus to participate in the assault, says Tsikhanouskaya, adding that Belarusians will not go against the Baltic states. 'They might be forced, but it doesn't mean that they will fight there. I hope that people will prefer to escape or change sides, but not fight with the Lithuanians or Poles, especially knowing how much these countries are supporting us'. The Belarus opposition leader believes that this support is also for her. Since fleeing Belarus in 2020, she has been living in Lithuania, where she is now hearing the concerns and worries about whether her native country can stage an attack on the country which welcomed her when she had to leave home. 'It is a rather dire atmosphere with all the discussions over possible attacks on Lithuania, because Lithuania will be the first country on the way to the European Union', she admits, saying there are also concerns over whether NATO will stand up for Lithuania. 'There are discussions of whether NATO will come to rescue Lithuanias, will there be enough time,' Tsikhanouskaya explains. Tsikhanouskaya remains optimistic that NATO will step in despite the recent reports of European officials being concerned that Washington might even withdraw US troops from the Baltic states. 'I really do believe in NATO alliance, that with their unity and their power they will send a very clear signal to Putin 'Don't dare'.' She hopes a similar strong signal will be sent to Aliaksandr Lukashenka of Belarus as well, as the further militarisation of the country is getting worse, Tsikhanouskaya says. 'People notice how regime is militarising our society. There are many enterprises and factories now are working for Russian military. We have all the proofs how enterprises participate in this war against Ukraine.' Tsikhanouskaya told Euronews that Aliaksandr Lukashenka is also forcing the militarisation of Belarusian society. 'We see how young people are very much involved into this militarisation in schools, in universities, where the militarisation subjects are being taught," she explained. She said that this way, Lukashenka's regime was trying to show the population that there is an external enemy to unite against — a strategy also used by Moscow. 'They want to show we have external enemies, somebody wants to invade us, so they are saying they try to prepare the nation for some for some possible danger in the future," Tsikhanouskaya pointed out. But compared to the similar militarisation strategy in Russia, this won't work on the people of Belarus, Tsikhanouskaya said. And although there is a complete understanding that Belarus might be used by Russia "with the help of Lukashenka for possible future attacks on Ukraine or on the European Union," people will resist the direct involvement. 'I don't think that the same method will work with the Belarusian nation, because Belarusians really don't understand how it is to fight against our neighbor and how to kill our neighbours," Tsikhanouskaya concluded. Israel has carried out an attack on the Iranian capital of Tehran, in strikes aimed at the country's nuclear programme which also killed several top military officials as well as nuclear scientists. Iran has responded by launching at least 100 drones towards Israel. IDF spokesperson Brig. General Effie Defrin said Israel is working to intercept the drones. A state of emergency has been declared. Israel's strikes on Iran, which took place late Thursday into Friday, reportedly killed Hossein Salami, chief of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, as well as the chief of staff of the Iranian armed forced. Two top nuclear scientists were also killed, according to Iranian state media. Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu said the strikes were a "targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival", claiming that "if not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time." The Iranian government said Israel's attacks had "proven that it does not abide by any rule of international law. We affirm our right to retaliate, and we will respond to this terrorist entity firmly and decisively." Earlier, explosions were heard in the Iranian capital, Tehran, as Israel claimed it was attacking the country. Iranian state media reported explosions in the northeastern parts of the city. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed early Friday that an Israeli strike hit Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Natanz. In a statement on X, the IAEA's Director General, Rafael Mariano Grossi, said: 'The IAEA is closely monitoring the deeply concerning situation in Iran... The Agency is in contact with Iranian authorities regarding radiation levels. We are also in contact with our inspectors in the country.' Israeli leaders cast the "preemptive assault" as a fight for the nation's survival, adding that it was necessary to head off what they described as an imminent threat that Iran would pose if it developed nuclear weapons. It remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that or whether it had actually had been planning a strike. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel targeted both nuclear and military sites. 'It could be a year. It could be within a few months," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said as he vowed to pursue the attack for as long as necessary to 'remove this threat.' "This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival,' he said. The strike on Iran pushed the Israeli military to its limits, requiring the use of aging air-to-air refuelers to get its fighter jets close enough to attack. It wasn't immediately clear if Israeli jets entered Iranian airspace or just fired so-called 'standoff missiles' over another country. Fighter jets were reportedly heard flying overhead in Iraq at the time of the attack. The attack comes as tensions have reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme. The Board of Governors at the IAEA for the first time in 20 years on Thursday censured Iran over it not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more-advanced ones. Israel for years has warned it will not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon, something Tehran insists it doesn't want — though official there have repeatedly warned it could. Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz announced a 'emergency situation' in the country following the attacks. He said schools would be closed nationwide on Friday, adding that an Iranian retaliation of missiles and drones are to be expected in the 'immediate future'. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took 'unilateral action against Iran' and that Israel advised Washington that it believed the strikes were necessary for its self-defence. 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Rubio said in a statement released by the White House. Rubio said the Trump administration took steps to protects its forces and remained in contact with its partners in the region. He also issued a warning to Iran that it should not target US interests or personnel. A US media outlet says President Donald Trump has reportedly convened his cabinet for an emergency meeting following the Israeli attack. In the days leading up to the attacks, Washington has made clear that it will not participate in any Israeli attacks on Iran. Trump had urged Israel to refrain from striking Tehran, and to seek diplomatic solutions, but acknowledged that an Israeli strike could very well happen. Trump earlier said he urged Netanyahu to hold off on any action while the administration negotiated with Iran. 'As long as I think there is a (chance for an) agreement, I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it,' Trump told reporters. The US has been preparing for something to happen, already pulling some diplomats from Iraq's capital, Baghdad, and offering voluntary evacuations for the families of US troops in the wider Middle East region. Iran halted flights Friday at Imam Khomeini International Airport outside of Tehran, the country's main airport, according to state-run media. Iran has closed its airspace in the past when launching retaliatory attacks against Israel. Egypt blocked activists planning to take part in a march to Gaza on Thursday, halting their attempt to reach the border and challenge Israel's blockade of humanitarian aid to the enclave before the march could begin. Egyptian authorities and activists both said that dozens of people planning to march across the Sinai Peninsula were deported, but organisers said they had no plans to cancel the event. To draw attention to the humanitarian crisis afflicting people in Gaza, marchers have for months planned to trek about 50 kilometres from the city of Arish to Egypt's border with Gaza on Sunday to "create international moral and media pressure" to open the crossing at Rafah and lift a blockade that has prevented aid from entering. They said they had tried to coordinate with Egyptian embassies in the various countries from which the participants came, but authorities said they had not obtained authorisation for the march. Authorities deported more than three dozen activists, mostly carrying European passports, upon their arrival at Cairo International Airport in the past two days, an Egyptian official said on Thursday. The official said the activists aimed to travel to Northern Sinai "without obtaining required authorisations." The standoff has put pressure on the activists' home countries, which are wary of seeing their citizens detained. A French diplomatic official said France is in "close contact" with Egyptian authorities about French nationals who were refused entry in Egypt or detained to ensure "consular protection." The participants risked arrest for unauthorised demonstrations in sensitive areas like the Sinai Peninsula, the official added. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly on the sensitive diplomatic matter. Egypt has publicly denounced the restrictions on aid entering Gaza and repeatedly called for an end to the war. It has said that the Egyptian side of the Rafah crossing remains open, but access to the Strip has been blocked since Israel seized the Palestinian side of the border as part of its war with Hamas that began in October 2023. However, authorities have for years clamped down on dissidents and activists when their criticism touches on Cairo's political and economic ties with Israel, a sensitive issue in neighbouring countries where governments maintain diplomatic relations with Israel despite broad public sympathy for Palestinians. Egypt had earlier warned that only those who received authorisation would be allowed to travel the planned march route, acknowledging it had received "numerous requests and inquiries." "Egypt holds the right to take all necessary measures to preserve its national security, including the regulation of the entry and movement of individuals within its territory, especially in sensitive border areas," its foreign ministry said in a statement on Wednesday. Israel Katz, the Israeli defence minister, yesterday referred to the protestors as "jihadists" and called on Egypt to prevent them from reaching the border with Gaza. He said they "endanger the Egyptian regime and constitute a threat to all moderate Arab regimes in the region." The march was set to begin just days after a large convoy, which organisers said included thousands of activists, travelled overland across North Africa to Egypt. Activists and attorneys said airport detentions and deportations began on Wednesday with no explicit reason given by Egyptian authorities to detainees. Algerian attorney Fatima Rouibi wrote on Facebook that Algerians, including three lawyers, were detained at the airport on Wednesday before being released and ultimately deported back to Algiers on Thursday. Bilal Nieh, a Tunisian activist who lives in Germany, said he was deported along with seven others from northern Africa who also hold European passports. Organisers said in a statement that they had received reports that at least 170 participants had been delayed or detained in Cairo. They said they had followed the protocols laid out by Egyptian authorities, met with them and urged them to let march participants into the country. "We look forward to providing any additional information the Egyptian authorities require to ensure the march continues peacefully as planned to the Rafah border," they said in a statement. The Global March to Gaza is the latest civil society effort pressing for the entry of food, fuel, medical supplies and other aid into Gaza. Israel imposed a total blockade in March in an attempt to pressure Hamas to disarm and to release hostages taken in the 7 October 2023 attack that sparked the current war in Gaza. It slightly eased restrictions last month, allowing limited aid in, but experts warn the measures fall far short. Food security experts warn the Gaza Strip will likely fall into famine if Israel doesn't lift its blockade and stop its military campaign. Nearly half a million Palestinians are facing possible starvation and 1 million others can barely get enough food, according to findings by the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a leading international authority. Israel has rejected the findings, saying the IPC's previous forecasts had proven unfounded.


Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
Middle East power balance has tilted dramatically to Israel
Iran suffered huge military losses during the Israeli strikes and has limited capacities to hit back, according to an independent security expert Claude Moniquet. Moniquet served as an intelligence officer in the French services and has written several books about the region. He told Euronews that Israel committed an act of war on Iran. "I will not call an operation that involved more than 200 planes, missiles, 300 strikes, 100 sites hit, and at least a dozen or fifteen Iranian leaders eliminated a limited operation. It is an act of war that has been expected for 25 years. For 25 years, the Israelis have been saying that they will not tolerate Iran having an atomic bomb. Iran has been warned multiple times." Moniquet said that Iran now has four options by way of response, of which the first - sending drones towards Israel - has already begun. "They have already started trying to use drones to deliver direct strikes on Israel. The second possibility is a joint operation with proxies like Yemen's Huthis," he said. The third possibility, according to Moniquet, that they will deploy "one way or another" in the long or medium term, is "the use of terrorism". "Iran is a terrorist state that has attacked, including Europe and France, multiple times over the past 40 years," he said. "And the last possibility, if there were an escalation, would be the blocking of the Strait of Hormuz, which would be a disaster for Europe." He added that the chance of a full-scale war in the region is not out of the question, but added that Iran has limited capacities for that. "The extent of their responses will determine what happens next, and we can effectively fall into an all-out war. Now, quite clearly, I don't think the Iranians have the capacity to wage an all-out war against Israel, which has air supremacy in the region. We have seen that Iran's military-security system is totally disorganised." According to Moniquet, Israel systematically weakened Iranian proxies in the region with the war against Hezbollah and Hamas in the past few years, and now delivered a blow that will change the balance of power. "Iran today has undergone, whatever they say, a very, very heavy military failure, and it is not over. However, behind Hezbollah, behind Hamas, behind the Houthis in Yemen, what do we find? We find the Iranians. So what is happening, if the Israelis go far enough, is likely to change the whole geopolitical map in the Middle East." The expert added that this could also offer a chance for the Iranian population to revolt against the its leadership. Claude Moniquet said the conflict puts Europe on a high security risk footing. "They may well ask a Hezbollah cell or an Iranian cell like the one that was dismantled in London a few weeks ago to strike somewhere in Europe. This is an important possibility, and it means that Jewish communities, Israeli diplomatic and commercial interests, Israeli boats, Israeli planes, but probably also American interests, are now in a position of risk in Europe and could be hit." Moniquet said that the European Union has lost influence in the region and has no say in diplomacy over the future of the Middle East. "For Europe, but everyone sees that the European, as they say in soccer, is sitting on the sidelines. Negotiations were taking place between the Americans and the Iranians, the Europeans were excluded. Europeans have been pretty much excluded from all major diplomatic manouevres around the war in Gaza or the war in Lebanon." The main reason behind this loss of influence, Moniquet believes, is to be found in Europe's dwindling military power. The severity of the European Union's housing crisis has made it harder for citizens to find a home, as a combination of housing supply shortages and high rents continues to be a major issue. According to Eurostat, house prices went up by 48% and rents went up by 22% in 2023. Meanwhile, inflation drove overall prices up by 36%. And the burden has largely affected younger people the most. On average in 2023, EU households spent 19.7% of their disposable income on housing. In the same year, Eurostat data shows that young people make up a significant portion of the population that spend at least 40% of their income on housing. Furthermore, 26% of young people in the EU live in overcrowded housing, 9.2% more than the overall population. Speaking to Euronews, Housing Europe secretary general Sorcha Eduards said "We are compromising the capacity of youth to become independent, start their own lives, start their families. So again, in countries where we have a critical mass of limited-profit housing, we've seen that the age for becoming independent is indeed higher than countries that don't have that." "So, I think this already signals that increasing the amount of limited-profit housing and improving access criteria helps young people actually access that (housing)." The crux of solving this issue can be identified with a change in mentality. "We've relied too much on market forces, and then of course since 2008 we've had, with the great financial crisis, a huge impact on the capacity of the construction sector, so there was a big reduction in the number of companies delivering but also an increase in difficulty of households in actually paying their bills," says Eduards. "And I think when you look at that, we wouldn't be here, we wouldn't be talking about the housing crisis if rents and house prices had stayed aligned with income. But we've had a huge, let's say, differentiation now," she notes. When it comes to short-term rentals, Eduards explained that it "is another example where public policy has not kept up with societal needs. So, we are not making sure that our cities can house our students, that they can house our low and middle-income groups and that they can adequately house the elderly. We are allowing short-term lets to erode long-term lets." "We end up in a situation where we have empty apartments that are merely an investment. We are pushing students out of school, and families to the outskirts. We are pushing workers that are needed in the city centre to the outskirts, causing them a huge amount of stress." Some countries have already identified what the problem is. In the EU, some countries have already set up sustainable housing models. In Germany, 3.2 million people live in cooperatives, a not-for-profit model which is entirely democratic. In Belgium's Flanders region, poverty was reduced by 40% amongst people who have access to social housing. Denmark has launched programmes to ensure that young people can have access to scholarships, and that they can avoid slipping into a long-term "couch-surfing" situation, putting them at risk of becoming homeless. In the Netherlands, over 20–30% of residents live in limited-profit housing. The ideas are there, says Eduards, but we need to rely a lot less on market forces and go back to viewing housing as a fundamental right. "I think it's a time for a change in the paradigm. It's a time to build up a critical mass of housing that is responsible, that caters to our societal needs, and is not only about maximising short-term profit month-to-month", she argues.


Euronews
12 hours ago
- Euronews
Israel's strike on Iran's nuclear facilities is a win for global security
The world stands at a perilous crossroads. The Islamic Republic of Iran, the globe's foremost state sponsor of terrorism, is on the brink of acquiring nuclear weapons. This is not a distant threat; it is a clear and immediate danger, particularly to the national homeland of the Jewish people, the State of Israel. Faced with escalating aggression and years of openly declared genocidal intent from Tehran, Israel has begun to act decisively to ensure that the regime will not have the means to carry out its deadly and destructive ambitions. For too long, Iran has operated with near impunity as the engine of global terror. It has built and sustained a vast web of proxy militias and terrorist organisations, including Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, and Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria. With funding, weapons, and strategic direction from Tehran, these groups have sown chaos across the Middle East and beyond, including into Europe. Their targets have included civilians, embassies, oil infrastructure, commercial shipping, and international peacekeeping forces. The regime's violence is not random. It is part of a coherent, ideologically driven campaign to reshape the region, and ultimately the world, through intimidation, instability, and the export of their radical revolutionist ideology which openly calls for the downfall of the West. The Islamic Republic's leaders have declared, time and again, their desire to wipe Israel off the map. They do not hide their intentions; they amplify them, chanting 'Death to Israel', 'Death to America' and 'Death to Britain' in official gatherings, school curricula, and state-run media. Now, imagine that such a regime, with its genocidal rhetoric and extremist ideology were to possess nuclear weapons. This is not simply an Israeli concern. It is a global one. A nuclear-armed Iran would spark a regional arms race, embolden terrorist organisations with a powerful state sponsor behind them and a nuclear umbrella above them, and radically destabilise international security. Israel, more than any other country, understands the cost of inaction in the face of existential threats. It is a nation born from the ashes of genocide, with a solemn obligation to ensure that such horror is never repeated. When Iran races toward the bomb while calling for Israel's destruction, the danger is not theoretical. It is a potential second Holocaust. This is why Israel is taking action. Not out of recklessness, but out of responsibility. Not to escalate conflict, but to prevent catastrophe and massive bloodshed and destruction. Israel's response to Iranian aggression is rooted in the most fundamental principle of all sovereign states: the right, and the duty, to self-defence. Some in the international community may urge restraint or neutrality, but this is not a time for moral equivalence or diplomatic hesitation. This is a time for clarity. When a regime declares its intention to commit genocide, the world must believe it and act accordingly. Those who remain silent in the face of Iran's threats are not neutral; they are complicit. Those who condemn Israel for defending itself while ignoring Iran's decades of provocation have abandoned any sense of moral coherence, and those who call for restraint without addressing the root cause, Tehran's ideology of hate and its relentless march toward nuclear capability, are merely delaying the inevitable, not preventing it. To those who value freedom, democracy, and the sanctity of human life, the choice should be clear. Stand with Israel because it is on the front lines of a global battle between civilisation and barbarism, between the rule of law and the rule of terror. It is not only Israel's future at stake. A nuclear Iran threatens Arab neighbours, western interests in the region, European cities within missile range, and the global economy. The battle being fought now is not confined to the Middle East. Its outcome will shape the future security of the entire international community. Israel does not seek war. But it will not, and must not, wait for another 7 October, or something far worse, to justify its defence. It acts because it must, because history demands it, and because the consequences of inaction are too grave to ignore. Let us be clear, stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions is not a gift to Israel. It is a service to humanity. Every nation that values peace, justice, and the safety of future generations has a stake in this effort. We call on responsible governments, human rights defenders, and ordinary citizens everywhere to support Israel's right to defend itself against a regime that openly seeks its annihilation and has the capability to launch nuclear-armed missiles into European capitals. Condemning terrorism, halting nuclear proliferation, and defending innocent lives must not be controversial positions, they must be moral imperatives. In the face of evil, neutrality is not virtue. It is betrayal. This is not the time for silence. This is the time to stand with Israel, as it fights for us all. Sacha Roytman Dratwa is CEO of the Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM), a global coalition of 900 partner organisations committed to fighting the world's oldest hatred. In a dramatic escalation of Middle Eastern tensions, Israel launched last night a sweeping military operation targeting key Iranian infrastructure. Codenamed Operation Rising Lion, the offensive struck more than 100 locations across Iran, focusing on nuclear facilities, military leadership compounds, and air defence systems. The scale and precision of the strikes mark one of the most extensive aerial campaigns in the region in recent years. The confrontation places two of the Middle East's most powerful militaries on a direct collision course. As the world watches anxiously, the fear is no longer about whether hostilities will escalate but how far they might go. A full-scale conflict between Israel and Iran would be profoundly destabilising, not only for the region but for the world due to the military power involved. While Iran boasts numerical superiority in troops, tanks, and artillery, Israel maintains a technological edge, superior air power, and some of the world's most advanced missile defence systems. Furthermore, both countries have demonstrated strength in drone and missile warfare and possess decades of experience in modern, high-intensity combat. The Israeli offensive itself from last night was a display of military might. Over 200 aircraft dropped more than 330 precision munitions, with coordinated strikes on Iran's most sensitive sites. Among the targets were missile manufacturing facilities, residences and offices of nuclear scientists, and command centres of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). The Natanz Enrichment Complex in Esfahan Province, central to Iran's uranium enrichment program, was damaged, alongside numerous locations across Tehran. Initial reports from Iran suggest significant losses, too. Among those killed were major general Mohammad Bagheri, chief of the armed forces general staff, and Fereydoon Abbasi, former head of the Atomic Energy Organisation. Ali Shamkhani, a senior adviser to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was reportedly critically injured. The Israeli Air Force (IAF) said it carried out a "large-scale strike" targeting Iran's air defence systems, destroying "dozens" of radar installations and surface-to-air missile launchers. This suggests Israel is clearing Iran's deterrent capabilities in anticipation of further attacks. Iran responded swiftly, launching over 100 drones toward Israeli territory – most were intercepted by Israel's air defence systems, limiting the impact. Despite the immediate but limited retaliation, Iran's full military potential remains a looming threat for Israel. The country has invested heavily in a vast and sophisticated missile arsenal, including ballistic missiles with ranges exceeding 3,000 kilometres and even hypersonic weapons. These capabilities allow Iran to threaten regional adversaries as well as US bases in the region, and this, so far, has served as a powerful deterrent. Iran is also a regional leader in drone warfare, fielding a diverse fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) used for surveillance and strikes. The Islamic Republic has even exported this technology to allies and has begun establishing drone production facilities abroad to support partners such as Russia. Iran can also count on a large standing army, vast reserves, as well as asymmetric warfare through proxies, cyberattacks, and unconventional tactics. Israel, on the other hand, has long been recognised as one of the most technologically advanced militaries in the world. Its missile defence systems – including Iron Dome, David's Sling, and Arrow – are among the most sophisticated in the world. It also boasts a powerful cyber arsenal and highly trained intelligence services like the renowned Mossad and Shin Bet, which play a critical role in identifying and neutralising threats before they materialise. The Israeli Air Force is widely regarded as one of the best in the world, equipped with advanced aircraft and precision weapons. Israel possesses 340 combat-capable aircraft, many of them state-of-the-art American models such as the F-35 stealth fighter. Iran, while not far behind in numbers — with 312 aircraft, plus an additional 23 operated by the IRGC — largely relies on ageing Russian-made Sukhoi and MiG jets, many of which are considered outdated by modern standards. In the land forces category, according to Global Firepower Index Israel has 1,370 tanks and 43,407 armoured vehicles, in addition to 650 self-propelled artillery units and 150 rocket artillery systems. Iran surpasses Israel in tank numbers, operating 1,996 tanks and a larger fleet of 65,765 armoured vehicles. However Israel operates its own Merkava series tanks, of which almost half are the most modern Merkava IV series, whereas Iran's are mainly more dated Soviet and updated Karrer models. Israel, meanwhile, has an edge in self-propelled artillery, with 580 units over Iran's 775 rocket artillery systems. Israel's military doctrine emphasises rapid mobilisation, resilience, and technological superiority, all traits that have been shaped by decades of continuous conflict. A full-scale war between Israel and Iran risks igniting a wider regional conflict. Hezbollah, Iran's proxy in Lebanon, might be drawn in. Israel invaded southern Lebanon in October and has largely neutered the capability of Hezbollah, with a temporary ceasefire taking effect in late November. The fighting could easily spill into Syria, Iraq, and the Gulf, with US assets in the region at risk – American personnel were reportedly evacuated from Baghdad just two days ago. Iran's so-called 'axis of resistance' an informal coalition which includes Hezbollah, Shi'ite militias in Iraq, the Houthis in Yemen, and the overthrown Assad regime in Syria, still provides it with some ability to project force beyond its borders. The potential fallout extends beyond the battlefield. US involvement, whether deliberate or as a result of attacks on its assets, could spiral into a broader international conflict. Europe too may be impacted, whether through direct attacks, cyberattacks, a disruption in global oil flows or as a result of the knock-on effects of threats to the major shipping artery passing along the Gulf of Aden. Refugee crises, economic instability, and rising energy prices are all conceivable outcomes that could impact European countries if the conflict spreads.