California governor urges cities to 'take back the streets' from homeless
(Reuters) - California Governor Gavin Newsom on Monday urged localities to "take back the streets" from homeless encampments, proposing language for every city and county to use in a local ban on camping in public.
Newsom, a Democrat often mentioned as a potential presidential candidate for 2028, has taken a harder line on homelessness as California's unhoused population has grown to 180,000. His stance has alienated some liberal allies who advocate affordable housing over crackdowns.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled a year ago it was legal to ban camping in public even when there is no shelter space available, 42 of California's 482 cities and two of its 58 counties have passed some form of a camping ban, according to the National Homelessness Law Center.
Nationwide, some 160 cities and counties have passed similar bans in response to increasingly visible homelessness, with people pitching tents on sidewalks and public spaces.
"It is time to take back the streets. It's time to take back the sidewalks. It's time to take these encampments and provide alternatives," Newsom, who filed a brief before the Supreme Court last year supporting camping bans, told a press conference.
While urging compassion and dignity, Newsom's model ordinance would ban camping or semi-permanent structures on public land and allow city officials to remove them provided they notify the unhoused at least 48 hours in advance.
The proposal requires city officials to "make every reasonable effort" to provide shelter for those affected. An introduction to the proposal states, "No person should face criminal punishment for sleeping outside when they have nowhere else to go."
The announcement drew criticism from homeless advocates who said it fails to address the root cause of housing shortages and soaring housing costs.
"This is a problem that built up through years and years of under investment, and it's going to take some level of consistency and commitment to the problem to actually make headway," said Alex Visotzky, a fellow at the National Alliance to End Homelessness.
The Cicero Institute, a conservative think tank, urged California to follow the example of Republican-led states that have passed laws allowing them to sue cities that fail to clear encampments.
"This approach is far more effective in ensuring that cities are not derelict in their duties to protect the homeless and the public alike," said Devon Kurtz, public safety policy director for the Cicero Institute.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrat Sherrod Brown says he will try to return to US Senate in 2026
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Democrat Sherrod Brown of Ohio said on Monday he would try to return to the U.S. Senate seat in next year's midterm elections, a development that could bolster his party's chances of winning back control of the chamber. Brown, 72, said U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and health-care cuts prompted him to return to politics. "I didn't plan to run for office again. But when I see what's going on, I know I can do something about it for Ohio," Brown said in a video posted to social media. Brown served for 18 years in the Senate before he lost 50.1%-46.5% to Republican Bernie Moreno last November. He built a reputation as a champion for blue-collar workers in Ohio, an industrial state that has lost jobs to globalization. The state, once a political battleground, has trended increasingly Republican over the past decade. Brown will likely face Republican Senator John Husted, who was appointed in January to temporarily fill the seat vacated by JD Vance when he became vice president. Husted previously served as Ohio's lieutenant governor. The winner of the November 2026 special election would serve the remainder of Vance's Senate term, ending in January 2029. Analysts say it will be difficult for Democrats to pick up the four seats they will need to win back control of the Senate, which now has a 53-47 Republican majority. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report said Brown, the only Democrat to win statewide office in the past two decades, will make the race competitive and moved its rating from "likely Republican" to "lean Republican."
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pa. Treasurer Stacy Garrity just entered the governor race. Here's what to know about her.
Pennsylvania Treasurer Stacy Garrity has jumped into the Keystone State's gubernatorial race, announcing on Aug. 18 that she's seeking to win the Republican nomination for the role and block Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro from a second term. Many GOP activists in Pennsylvania have been hoping for Garrity's candidacy, arguing that she has the statewide popularity to face off against Shapiro. In her 2024 victory as treasurer, Garrity set a state record for number of votes won by a row office candidate. The Bradford County native is a decorated former Army Reserve soldier and worked as a business executive before launching her political career. Here's more background on the Republican contender. Garrity touts her nickname as 'Angel of the Desert' for her service in Iraq Garrity spent three decades in the U.S. Army Reserve, retiring in 2016 at the rank of colonel. During her military career, she was deployed to Iraq three times and twice received the Bronze Star, according to her campaign website. She earned the nickname 'angel of the desert' during one posting for her service at Camp Bucca, a U.S. detention center in Iraq, according to a NPR report from 2004. At the time, news outlets were calling attention to the torture at Abu Ghraib, another American prison in Iraq. NPR credited Garrity with fostering a different environment at Camp Bucca, where she provided soccer balls and board games to detainees and helped set up a post office system. Garrity has embraced the 'angel of the desert' moniker on her campaign webpage and official bios. She holds the record for most votes earned by a Pa. row office candidate The northeastern Pennsylvanian is a relative political newcomer, winning her first election in 2020 against then-incumbent Treasurer Joe Torsella. The Democrat had far outspent her, but she achieved victory after running on a platform of fiscal transparency and more restraint in government spending. At the time, she'd been working as a vice president of a metal powder manufacturer based in Towanda. More: Stacy Garrity wins second term as Pennsylvania treasurer She glided to reelection as the commonwealth's treasurer in 2024, capturing the most votes of any candidate ever for a statewide office in Pennsylvania. In doing so, she broke the record set by Shapiro in his 2020 win for attorney general. Her strong performance in that race stoked speculation about a potential showdown between Garrity and Shapiro in 2026. She's a staunch Trump ally but has made bipartisan overtures Garrity has been a firm supporter of President Donald Trump and proudly identifies with the MAGA movement. She's been criticized for speaking at a Harrisburg rally on Jan. 5, 2021, that contested former President Joe Biden's election victory over Trump in the commonwealth. (Her campaign in 2024 said she accepted Trump's loss.) But Garrity has also struck a bipartisan tone at times. She invited Torsella, the Democrat she defeated in 2020, to share some comments during her first inauguration ceremony as Pennsylvania treasurer. And though she could end up battling Shapiro in a general election race, she's had some kind words for him, praising aspects of his past budget proposals. She's also thanked him for signing bills to streamline the state's tax appeals process and offer property tax rebates. She came under fire for supporting the 'big, beautiful' bill Garrity has drawn criticism for speaking up in favor of Trump's marquee legislation, the 'big, beautiful' bill passed by Congress in July. In a May social media thread, she applauded the bill's permanent extension of 2017 tax cuts and the infusion of funds it provides for border security efforts. Congressional representatives who opposed the bill, she wrote, 'are risking higher taxes, weaker borders, and billions wasted on woke policies.' Democratic activists condemned her support for the legislation, noting that the bill also reduces federal support for social safety net programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Shapiro has estimated that 310,000 Pennsylvanians could lose Medicaid coverage and 144,000 could get pushed out of food assistance programs because of the bill's provisions. As treasurer, she has returned millions to Pa. residents One of the most public-facing responsibilities of state treasurer is to restore unclaimed property to rightful owners, and Garrity has stressed her efforts to return money, items and military medals during her tenure. Her office returned a record $272 million in unclaimed property to commonwealth residents in 2024. She also supported the passage of a new law letting her office return unclaimed property valued at up to $500 to residents without requiring them to file a claim first. In addition, during her tenure, she has updated the transparency website that allows Pennsylvanians to delve into government spending and has supported creating tax-deductible savings accounts where people can set aside retirement money if their employers don't offer pension plans. So far, that proposal has passed the Pennsylvania House and has moved to the Senate for consideration. Bethany Rodgers is a USA TODAY Network Pennsylvania investigative journalist. This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: Who is Stacy Garrity, the new Republican hopeful for PA governor?
Los Angeles Times
6 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom's redistricting plan is a power grab. But the GOP objections are rubbish
SACRAMENTO — One accusation hurled at Gov. Gavin Newsom for his retaliatory redistricting move against President Trump and Texas Republicans is that he's overriding the will of California voters. Rubbish. The flawed argument goes like this: Californians — once upon a time — voted overwhelmingly to ban partisan gerrymandering and strip the task of drawing congressional seats from self-interested legislators. In a historic political reform, redistricting was turned over to an independent citizens' commission. Now, Newsom is trying to subvert the voters' edict. 'It is really a calculated power grab that dismantles the very safeguards voters put in place,' California Republican Party Chairwoman Corrin Rankin said in a statement last week, echoing other party members. 'This is Gavin the Gaslighter overturning the will of the voters and telling you it's for your own good.' Again, baloney. Power grab? Sure. Overturning the voters' will? Hardly. Newsom is asking voters to express a new will–seeking permission to fight back against Trump's underhanded attempt to redraw congressional districts in Texas and other red states so Republicans can retain control of the U.S. House of Representatives after next year's midterm elections. First of all, that anti-gerrymandering vote creating the citizens' commission was 15 years ago. It was a wise decision and badly needed, and still a wonderful concept in the abstract. But that was then, this is now. Just because a ballot measure was passed one or two decades ago doesn't mean it has been cast in stone. Would Californians still vote to ban same-sex marriage or deny public schooling to undocumented children? Doubtful. Circumstances and views change. Second, that 2010 electorate no longer exists. Today's electorate is substantially different. And it shouldn't necessarily be tied to the past. Consider: PPIC researchers recently reported that 'partisanship now shapes the state's migration — with those moving out of the state more likely to be Republican and those moving in more likely to be Democrat. … This process makes California more Democratic than it would otherwise be.' So, Newsom and Democratic legislators are not thumbing their noses at the voters' will. They're asking today's voters to suspend the ban on gerrymandering and adopt a partisan redistricting plan at a Nov. 4 special election. The good government process of map drawing by the citizen's commission would return after the 2030 decennial census. The heavily Democratic Legislature will pass a state constitutional amendment containing Newsom's plan and put it on the ballot, probably this week. It would take effect only if Texas or other red states bow to Trump's demand to gerrymander their congressional districts to rig them for Republicans. Trump is seeking five more GOP seats from Texas and Gov. Greg Abbott is trying to oblige. Republicans already hold 25 of the 38 seats. Newsom's plan, released Friday, counters Texas' scheme with a blatant gerrymander of his own. It would gain five Democratic seats. Democrats already outnumber Republicans on the California House delegation 43 to 9. Neither the governor nor any Democrats are defending gerrymandering. They agree it's evil politics. They support redistricting by the citizens' commission and believe this high-road process should be required in every state. But that's not about to happen. And to stand by meekly without matching the red states' election rigging would amount to unilateral disarmament, they contend correctly. 'It's not good enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil and talk about the way the world should be,' Newsom declared at a campaign kickoff last week. 'We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt. And we have got to meet fire with fire.' But polling indicates it could be a tough sell to voters. A large majority believe the bipartisan citizens commission should draw congressional districts, not the politicians who they don't particularly trust. 'It'll be complicated to explain to voters why two wrongs make a right,' says Republican strategist Rob Stutzman, a GOP never-Trumper. Former GOP redistricting consultant Tony Quinn says: 'There is no way to 'educate' voters on district line drawing. And Californians vote 'no' on ballot measures they do not understand. … It's sort of like trying to explain the basketball playoffs to me.' But veteran Democratic strategist Garry South doesn't see a problem. 'The messaging here is clear: 'Screw Trump',' South says. 'If the object is to stick it to Trump, [voter] turnout won't be a problem.' Gerrymandering may not be the voters' will in California. But they may well jump at the chance to thwart Trump. The must-read: Newsom's decision to fight fire with fire could have profound political consequences The TK: Trial in National Guard lawsuit tests whether Trump will let courts limit authority The L.A. Times Special: Hundreds of Californians have been paid $10,000 to relocate to Oklahoma. Did they find paradise? Until next week,George Skelton —Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
