Russian Missile and Drone Attack Pummels Kyiv, Killing at Least 6
Rescuers raced to more than two dozen locations around the capital, Kyiv, to put out fires and search for survivors in the rubble of blasted apartment buildings.
'We have 52 injured, nearly 30 hospitalized,' Tymur Tkachenko, the head of the city's military administration, said in a statement at 7 a.m. local time. 'Among them, nine children were injured.' One child was among the deceased.
The number of dead and wounded was likely to grow, Mr. Tkachenko warned.
The assault came shortly after President Trump threatened new sanctions on Moscow if President Vladimir V. Putin did not put a halt to the bloodshed in 10 days. Russian officials dismissed the warning, and many in Kyiv saw the bombardment as Mr. Putin's way of thumbing his nose at the United States.
The bombardment began around midnight with swarms of drones packed with explosives descending on the city from multiple directions.
Tracer fire from heavy machine guns lit up the sky as air defense crews struggled to keep up with the barrage. Drones exploded over city streets as residents raced to find shelter wherever they could.
At 3:20 a.m., the Air Force issued an all-clear signal, but the threat quickly resumed at approximately 4:30 a.m.
This time, the threat came from ballistic missiles. The sky lit up as they slammed into the city center, with one striking a nine-story apartment building.
At least 27 locations around Kyiv were hit in either direct strikes or by falling debris, mainly in the city's Solomianskyi district, the authorities said.
President Volodymyr Zelensky shared video footage of one residential building reduced to ruins. 'People are under the rubble,' he wrote. 'All services are on site. Russian terrorists.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
16 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Tells European Leaders He Intends to Meet With Putin and Zelensky
President Trump intends to meet in person with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia as soon as next week, and he plans to follow up shortly afterward with a meeting between himself, Mr. Putin and President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, according to two people familiar with the plan. Mr. Trump disclosed his plans in a call with European leaders on Wednesday, the people said. The meetings would include only those three men, and would not include any European counterparts. The European leaders, who have tried to play a coordinating role on meetings to end the violence between Russia and Ukraine while supporting their European neighbor, appeared to accept what Mr. Trump said, one of the people familiar with the call said. It was not immediately clear if Mr. Putin or Mr. Zelensky have agreed to the plan Mr. Trump described. But Mr. Zelensky was on Mr. Trump's call with European leaders, saying in a statement afterward that he had a 'conversation with President Trump' and that his and European leaders' position was that 'the war must end,' but 'an honest end.' The call also included the leader of the United Kingdom, the German chancellor and the NATO secretary general, along with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Mr. Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff. Mr. Trump gave some details of the call in a post on his social media site, saying Mr. Witkoff had met for several hours in Russia with Mr. Putin. He did not mention his plans for his own summits. 'Afterwards, I updated some of our European Allies,' Mr. Trump wrote on his social media site, Truth Social. 'Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
16 minutes ago
- New York Times
What Trump's Immigration Crackdown Means for the 2028 Olympics
President Trump is making plans to celebrate the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles, an event that will draw many thousands of people from around the world, even as he makes it harder than ever for foreign visitors to come to the United States. Mr. Trump has imposed a travel ban and visa restrictions on 19 countries, and the State Department has announced a pilot program that would require some foreign visitors to pay bonds of up to $15,000 to secure a visa. Here's a look at what Mr. Trump's immigration crackdown means for the Olympic Games: Will there be exceptions for athletes? Yes. Athletes competing in the Olympic Games and World Cup (which the United States will host in 2026) are exempt from the travel ban. The White House has said it will allow into the country 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics.' Olympians typically use visas reserved for high-level athletes. Mr. Trump announced a task force on Tuesday to make sure there is a streamlined visa processing and credentialing process for foreign athletes, coaches, officials and members of the news media. Will there be exceptions for fans? No. Fans from the affected countries will have to abide by the restrictions. The State Department said people who want to come and watch the Olympic Games should apply for visas as soon as possible. 'We encourage prospective foreign travelers who will need U.S. visas to travel to the 2028 Olympics to apply early,' the statement said. The State Department noted that the travel and tourism sector contributes nearly 10 million jobs to the U.S. economy. What are the latest restrictions? Beginning on Aug. 20, the United States will begin a one-year pilot program in which travelers from Malawi or Zambia must post a bond ranging from $5,000 to $15,000, determined at the person's visa interview. The bond requirement applies to travelers eligible for a business or tourism visa, known as a B1 or B2 visa. As a condition of the bond, all visa holders from these two countries must arrive at and depart from the United States via Boston Logan International Airport, John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York or Washington Dulles International Airport. The State Department says the bond will help ensure the travelers do not overstay their visas. The countries were chosen based on their high visa overstay rates, according to data compiled by the Homeland Security Department. Who is affected by the travel ban? In June, Mr. Trump barred travel to the United States by citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Mr. Trump also imposed restrictions, but stopped short of a full ban, on travel from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela.
The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
New plan to limit Russian energy, protect US trade
President Trump has become increasingly angry with Russian President Vladimir Putin. For about two months he has been threatening the Kremlin with 'secondary' sanctions, which would impose high duties on imports from the nations which continue to purchase Russian energy resources. The Russians seem unfazed by Trump's warnings (as well as by Sen. Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) recent remarks), citing their resilience to sanctions. Several authoritative sources argue that the U.S. simply cannot afford to impose even 100 percent duties on China, India or Turkey. If all of Russia's energy trading partners were subjected to new tariffs, the U.S. would hijack a significant part of its foreign trade and ruin its trade relationships with at least 26 countries. I agree with those who believe the new tariffs cannot be put in place by Trump's updated deadline for Russia. We have seen that 125 percent duties on China lasted less than a month, and in recent days, President Trump has announced 50 percent tariffs against Brazil, 25 percent tariffs against India and 15 percent tariffs on the European Union. One hundred percent duties don't seem plausible. I would urge changing the overall approach to make the tariffs more affordable. The goal appears to be to cut Russia's energy supply to the world. Trump's plan should make Russian oil more expensive to the buyers (by the way, the European 'oil price cap' approach has failed. It resulted in discounts for the Russian oil, thus encouraging its smuggling and creation of Russia's 'shadow tanker fleet'). In this sense, Trump's position looks more effective — but the major problem lies in the numbers. The predecessor of Trump's strategy — the bill proposed by Sens. Graham and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) — calls for the duty to be applied to all imports coming to the U.S. from Russia's energy trading partners. I believe it is too radical and, frankly speaking, not very justified because of the lack of differentiation. A much better option would be to relate the tariffs to the actual amount of money countries pay to Moscow. For example, India sent $115 billion in its goods and services to the U.S. in 2024 and paid $49 billion for Russian oil that year. China exported $513 billion in goods to the U.S. in 2024 while it bought Russian oil, gas, and coal for up to $76 billion. The EU's figures stood at $939 billion and $34 billion, correspondingly. If the U.S. applies 100 percent tariffs linked to the Russian energy resources imported, it would fix additional duties for India this year at 42.6 percent of its exports to U.S., China's at 14.8 percent and Europe's at a mere 3.6 percent. These figures are not so astonishing. On the one hand, they seem manageable, and on the other hand, they still double the price of Russian oil for importing nations. If this strategy is taken as the principal one, the overall additional duties would equal the entire volume of Russia's energy exports, $261.9 billion for 2024. As the U.S. combined imports of goods and services amount to $4.11 trillion, the figure makes less than 6.5 percent in additional tariffs. It looks like a fair price for knocking Russia out as self-proclaimed 'energy superpower.' The measure would make Russia's 'shadow fleet' useless, since it doubles the price for Russia's energy for any country except those with zero exports to the U.S.. But these, if they exist, aren't significant oil importers that might be helpful to Moscow in substituting the vanishing demand for its oil and gas. I suggest amending Graham and Blumental's bill to impose the duty for goods or services imported into the U.S. to an amount that corresponds to each country's imports of Russian energy resources for the previous year. It would be a right recipe to destroy the Russian energy exports in two to three years and put Putin's economy on the brink of collapse without ruining America's trade ties to its major commercial partners. Should Trump adopt such a plan on Aug. 11, the chances of stopping Russia's aggression against Ukraine could rise significantly. Vladislav Inozemtsev is special adviser to the Middle East Media Research Institute's Russian Media Studies Project and is co-founder and senior fellow at the Center for Analysis and Strategies in Europe.
