CRPF jawan sacked for hiding marriage to Pakistani woman, aiding visa overstay
A Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) jawan has been dismissed from service with immediate effect for concealing his marriage to a Pakistani national and knowingly helping her stay in India beyond the validity of her visa.The dismissal of the soldier, Munir Ahmed, was ordered after the relevant authorities concluded that his actions violated service conduct rules and posed a threat to national security. This decision also follows India's heightened punitive measures against Pakistan in the wake of the Pahalgam attacks.advertisementAhmed, a CRPF jawan stationed in Jammu and Kashmir, married Minal Khan from Pakistan's Punjab in May 2024 after they developed a close relationship online. Their marriage was formalised through an online nikah.
The woman arrived in India in March 2025 after a long wait for a visa. However, her short-term visa expired on March 22, and she remained in India. Her lawyer asserted that she had applied for a long-term visa.Days ago the dismissal of Ahmed, Minal Khan had received a notice to leave India after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. However, at the last minute, just as she had left Jammu and reached the Attari-Wagah border to cross into Pakistan, she was granted court relief, allowing her to remain in India.According to the CRPF, which conducted an investigation into the jawan, he failed to disclose his marriage and his wife's overstay, leading to an immediate dismissal, highlighting the severity of the breach.advertisementOfficials believe that the incident raises concerns about potential security risks and the need for increased vigilance within security forces.Tensions are running high between India and Pakistan after Pak-based terrorists killed 26 civilians, mostly tourists, in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22. In response, India has announced a series of punitive measures against Pakistan, including visa cancellations, downsizing of diplomatic missions, closure of borders and airspace, suspension of trade, and the freezing of the Indus Waters Treaty, among other steps.Tune InMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Pakistan
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Foreign minister Jaishankar asked if India can trust US President Donald Trump. His reply: ‘Meaning what?'
External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar weighed in on India's foreign policy priorities and ties with major global players — including the United States under Donald Trump during his visit to Brussels this week. In a conversation with European media network Euractiv, he was asked whether India could trust Trump. Jaishankar replied: 'Meaning what?'. The interviewer then expanded on the question, asking, 'Is he (Trump) as good as his word? Is he a partner India is willing to deepen ties with?' 'I take the world as I find it,' was Jaishankar's reply. 'Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests — and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y.' Jaishankar's frank comments come as New Delhi and Washington have differed over US role in the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. The US President has often reiterated his claim of mediating peace between New Delhi and Islamabad, while India has asserted that the decision was made strictly bilaterally. Speaking at a campaign event on May 31, Trump once again said he 'got India and Pakistan to stop fighting' by linking trade talks to de-escalation. 'We talk trade, and we say we can't trade with people who are shooting at each other and potentially using nuclear weapons… They understood and they agreed, and that all stopped,' he said. Earlier, on May 10, when the two nuclear-armed countries agreed to stop firing and military action, the United States claimed credit for brokering the ceasefire with Trump saying the two countries agreed on a full and immediate ceasefire 'after a long night of talks mediated by the United States'. New Delhi has dismissed such remarks in the past and maintains that the ceasefire following Operation Sindoor was the outcome of direct bilateral engagement with Pakistan. Indian officials have underlined that no foreign government, including the United States, was involved — and that trade negotiations with Washington were unrelated to any security decisions made in the region. Jaishankar, who is in Brussels to meet European Union (EU) leaders, also spoke about India's foreign policy priorities from counterterrorism and trade to multipolarity and global trust. On the recent clash with Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror attack, Jaishankar urged the West to see India's response under Operation Sindoor as an anti-terror operation—not a border spat. 'This isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism,' he said, adding: 'Let me remind you—Osama bin Laden lived in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point. That very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you.' He also criticised the international media coverage for reducing the situation to 'tit-for-tat between two nuclear-armed neighbours.' Noting Europe's search for 'strategic autonomy,' Jaishankar said multipolarity is already here. 'Europe must now make decisions based on its own capabilities and interests… I hear terms like 'strategic autonomy' being used—these were once part of our vocabulary,' he remarked. Calling the EU a 'major pole' in the global order, Jaishankar said: 'That is precisely why I'm here: to deepen our relationship in this multipolar world.'
New Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump says US gets rare earth minerals from China in trade deal, tariffs on Chinese goods go to 55 per cent
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that the United States will get magnets and rare earth minerals from China under a new trade deal and that tariffs on Chinese goods will go to 55%.In return, Trump said the U.S. will provide China 'what was agreed to,' including allowing Chinese students to attend American colleges and global brands are among dozens of companies at risk of using forced labor through their Chinese supply chains because they use critical minerals or buy minerals-based products sourced from the far-western Xinjiang region of China, an international rights group said report by the Netherlands-based Global Rights Compliance says companies including Avon, Walmart, Nescafe, Coca-Cola and paint supplier Sherwin-Williams may be linked to titanium sourced from Xinjiang, where rights groups allege the Chinese government runs coercive labor practices targeting predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and other Turkic appeals court allows Trump tariffs to stay for nowThe report found 77 Chinese suppliers in the titanium, lithium, beryllium and magnesium industries operating in Xinjiang. It said the suppliers are at risk of participating in the Chinese government's 'labor transfer programs," in which Uyghurs are forced to work in factories as part of a long-standing campaign of assimilation and mass paints, thermos cups and components for the aerospace, auto and defense industries are among products sold internationally that can trace their supply chains to minerals from Xinjiang, the report said. It said that companies must review their supply chains.'Mineral mining and processing in (Xinjiang) rely in part on the state's forced labor programs for Uyghurs and other Turkic people in the region,' the report report came as China and the United States, the world's two largest economies, said that they have agreed on a framework to get their trade negotiations back on track after a series of disputes that threatened to derail them. The two sides on Tuesday wrapped up two days of talks in London that appeared to focus on finding a way to resolve disputes over mineral and technology exports that had shaken a fragile truce on trade reached in Geneva last about the report, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that 'no one has ever been forcibly transferred in China's Xinjiang under work programs.''The so-called allegation of forced labor in China's Xinjiang region is nothing but a lie concocted by certain anti-China forces. We urge the relevant organization to stop interfering in China's internal affairs and undermining Xinjiang's prosperity and stability under the guise of human rights,' ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said named companies didn't immediately comment on the report.A U.N. report from 2022 found China may have committed crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, where more than 1 million Uyghurs are estimated to have been arbitrarily detained as part of measures that the Chinese government said were intended to target terrorism and Chinese government has rejected the U.N. claims and defended its actions in Xinjiang as fighting terror and ensuring 2021, then U.S. President Joe Biden signed a law to block imports from the Xinjiang region unless businesses can prove the items were made without forced labor. The law initially targeted solar products, tomatoes, cotton and apparel, but the U.S. government recently added new sectors for enforcement, including aluminum and of China's major minerals corporations have invested in the exploration and mining of lithium, a key component for electric vehicle batteries, in Xinjiang, Global Rights Compliance said. Xinjiang is also China's top source of beryllium, a mineral used for aerospace, defense and telecommunications, its report said.A recent report by the International Energy Agency said that the world's sources of critical minerals are increasingly concentrated in a few countries, notably China, which is also a leading refining and processing base for lithium, cobalt, graphite and other minerals.
India Gazette
18 minutes ago
- India Gazette
India shocked at Pakistan's new UN counter-terrorism role
Rajnath Singh has questioned the Security Council's decision to appoint Islamabad as vice-chair of its anti-terror panel Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh has expressed shock and disappointment over the United Nations Security Council's (UNSC) decision to appoint Pakistan as the vice-chair of its counter-terrorism committee. In a public address on Tuesday, Singh questioned the intentions and policies of international organizations in light of the move. Last week, the UNSC appointed Pakistan as vice-chair of the Counter-Terrorism Committee consisting of 15 nations. "Its land has been used as a refuge by global terrorist organizations. There, terrorists like Hafiz Saeed and Masood Azhar roam around openly, and senior officers of Pakistan Army attend the funerals of terrorists," Singh said. "Now, the same country is expected to lead the global community against terrorism. This raises serious questions on the intentions and policies of the international system." India and Pakistan have fought four wars since the countries gained independence from British rule in 1947. Their most recent military standoff began on May 7, when India launched strikes against suspected terror targets in Pakistan-controlled territory. New Delhi said the strikes were conducted in response to a terrorist attack in Pahalgam in India's union territory of Jammu and Kashmir in late April that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The Resistance Front, believed to be linked to the Pakistani-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, initially claimed responsibility for the attack, but later denied it. Islamabad also denied having any involvement in the Kashmir attack. Pakistan retaliated to India's May 7 strikes, and after intense fighting over the next few days, the two nuclear-armed nations announced a ceasefire on May 10. On Tuesday, India's defense minister also called on the international community to cease funding Pakistan, claiming that the money ultimately supported the infrastructure of terrorism. He advocated for the international community to exert strategic, diplomatic, and economic pressure on Pakistan to compel it to address terrorism. Singh suggested that if Pakistan was unable to take action against terrorism within its own territory, it should consider seeking assistance from India. He said the Indian armed forces possessed the capability to conduct counter-terror operations on both sides of the border.
