St. Francis Area Schools sued by parents, ACLU over book ban controversy
The lawsuit in Anoka County District Court filed on behalf of the parents of eight district students was followed up by the ACLU's lawsuit on Monday.
Students at St. Francis High School have also protested the book bans, staging a walkout from classes on Monday, with an estimated 100 students participating.
The union lawsuit filed by parents and Education Minnesota claims the 'District's policy is antithetical to the values of public education and encouraging discourse. Perhaps more importantly, the policy violates the Minnesota Constitution and state law."
It also requests for the judge to declare the policy illegal and reverse the ban on more than 40 books that have been removed or will be soon. Among those publishings include:
"The Bluest Eye" by Toni Morrison
"Beloved" by Toni Morrison
"The Kite Runner" by Khaled Hosseini
"Slaughterhouse-Five" by Kurt Vonnegut
"Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley
"The Handmaid's Tale" by Margaret Atwood
A complaint has also been filed against the Holocaust memoir "Night" by Eli Wiesel, a Nobel Peace Prize winner. Per district policy, it will be removed from the shelves.
The book bans come in the wake of the school district adopting last fall to use ratings from the anonymous review site BookLooks in its library. BookLooks has generated headlines for its past links with conservative group Moms for Liberty.
The lawsuit alleges the BookLooks rating system discriminates "extensively based on viewpoint, particularly with regard to topics of gender, race, and religion.'
The BookLooks states on its website that it is not affiliated for Moms for Liberty, but that it communicates "with other individuals and groups with whom there is an intersection of mission and values."
The website is now shut down as of Sunday, with a post on the site saying it will be "ceasing operation and taking down all of our reports from the site." No book reviews are visible as of Tuesday.
"It has been quite the ride with many ups and downs since God called us to this work in 2022, but after much prayer and reflection it has become apparent that His work for us here is complete and that He has other callings for us," its statement reads.
It's unclear why the book review website is shutting down operations.
The lawsuit filed by the ACLU is on behalf of two other students in the district and says at least 46 books have been removed or are in the process of removal.
St. Francis Area Schools provided the following statement to Bring Me The News on Tuesday:
"St. Francis Area Schools can confirm the receipt of lawsuits from Education Minnesota and the American Civil Liberties Union-Minnesota in regards to our District Policy 606.5. The legal team is reviewing the documents from both lawsuits and working with the district on determining next steps. The district is committed to addressing the claims identified in the lawsuits thoroughly and appropriately."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
ACLU of Delaware asks Ocean View to repeal new legislation regulating public assemblies
The ACLU of Delaware is asking Ocean View Town Council to repeal a recently passed ordinance regulating certain gatherings, claiming the new law violates the First Amendment, which protects the right to assemble. The ordinance, which passed on July 8, establishes guidelines and a permitting process for First Amendment assemblies in town parks and town-owned property. Ocean View Town Manager Carol Houck said they appreciate the information provided in the ACLU's letter and intend to quickly review the points raised with the town's solicitor. The new law "recognizes and respects the rights of individuals to engage in peaceful First Amendment activities," according to the town's website. More: Fully treated wastewater is leaking continuously near Ocean View. Find out where The town, however, seeks to "ensure that such activities are conducted in a manner that protects public safety, minimizes disruptions to the community and preserves the rights and freedoms of all citizens." The new legislation also said the town has a "compelling interest in regulating the time, place and manner of First Amendment assemblies" to ensure public safety, protect public and private property and maintain public order. "This ordinance is an obvious and unconstitutional attempt to silence protesters by creating burdensome restrictions on their speech and assembly," ACLU-DE legal fellow Jared Silberglied said in a statement. "Introducing administrative hoops for people to jump through, on top of financial obligations with vague fees, is not honoring the First Amendment rights of the people of Ocean View. People should be able to express themselves publicly without this kind of interference." According to the ACLU, whose letter requesting the ordinance's repeal was dated Aug. 20, the new regulations require organizers to: Apply for a permit no less than 36 hours before any event with more than 10 people. Pay up to $150 in fees. Be subject to unspecified restrictions determined by the town manager. "First Amendment assemblies" must be between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. and participants are prohibited from wearing masks. The ACLU went on to explain how the new regulations violate free speech, including providing the example of how a 36-hour notice – with no exception – limits the public's ability to respond to fast-breaking news and current events. There is also long-standing U.S. Supreme Court precedent protecting the right of protesters to maintain their privacy and anonymity by wearing face coverings or masks, the ACLU said in its statement. Send tips or story ideas to Esteban Parra at (302) 324-2299 or eparra@ This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: ACLU asks Ocean View to repeal legislation regulating assemblies Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Stanislaus County could be affected by California's redistricting standoff
How Stanislaus County could be affected by California's redistricting standoff Stanislaus County is among the areas affected by the potential California redistricting – moving places that were 'toss-ups' in the last election into solidly blue territory. Gov. Gavin Newsom has called for a special election to authorize mid-decade congressional redistricting in direct retaliation to Texas doing the same. 'We're doing it in reaction to a president of the United States that called a sitting governor and said, 'Find me five seats,' Newsom said in an Aug. 14 news conference. Under normal circumstances, California redistricts once every 10 years through an independent commission based on the most recent census. 'The only reason Texas is changing the rules now is because President Trump believes that his party can't win under our current system,' Rep. Adam Gray, D-Merced, told The Modesto Bee. 'It's difficult to take my colleagues across the aisle seriously when they crow about election rigging and deep state plots and then turn around and do things like what we're seeing in Texas. It's unserious and it's damaging to our democracy.' Drawing maps to favor one party over another is 'gerrymandering.' Both Texas and California at this point are being transparent about the intent to redistrict to concentrate the power of one party over another. In California, unlike in Texas, the departure from the decade-by-decade system would require a special election to authorize the action Nov. 4. The proposed remapping would benefit some Democrats, such as Gray, who won the District 13 seat last year with just 187 votes. He would gain a larger section of central Stockton – part of Josh Harder's District 9 – and would add Salida and a portion of central Modesto. Harder would lose those sections of Stockton but gain the community of Antioch closer to the Bay Area. Republican Rep. Tom McClintock's District 5 would remain a heavily red area and expand to the east. Locally, he would lose a section of central Modesto and gain Escalon and the northern section of the town of Empire. Both Harder and McClintock did not respond to a request for comment. Newsom said the decision to redistrict would be temporary and limited. 'We will affirm our commitment to the state's redistricting committee for the 2030 census, but we're asking the voters to consent to do midterm redistricting in 2026, 2028 and 2030 for congressional maps to respond to what's happening in Texas, to respond to what Trump is trying to incite,' the governor said. The ACLU previously has argued that gerrymandering hinders the ability of voters to choose their politicians and instead allows politicians to choose their voters. Arguments to that effect were made as dozens of Democrats in the Texas Legislature walked out to prevent a House quorum from forming for a period of two weeks. They've since returned to Texas, some under duress. Redistricting is described in Article 1 Section 2 of the Constitution. Each state handles its redistricting efforts differently. In Texas, for example, redistricting is run by the state Legislature. But the general basis of each state having at least one representative and apportioning the regions by population is the same. California's Citizen Redistricting Commission independent committee was given the task of drawing congressional maps in 2010. It is composed of active voters whose party affiliation has not changed in five years. At least one state office-holder who represents Stanislaus County residents, District 22 Assemblymember Juan Alanis, is against the push for redistricting. The Republican said in part in a statement: 'My colleagues in the majority are undermining the principles of representative democracy and the clear will of California voters, who do not want elected politicians to draw the lines in this state. I will not be supporting any of these shameful retaliatory mid-decade redistricting bills, and I urge both California and Texas to stop playing gerrymandering games and start putting the people first.' On Aug. 19, the California Republican Party petitioned the state Supreme Court to issue an emergency stay on the call for a special election. Stanislaus County Registrar of Voters Donna Linder said that if the plan moves ahead, voters would have a one-item ballot, which they could cast beginning Oct. 25. The deadline for the Legislature to decide if California will move forward with the planned redistricting is Aug. 22. There is a public comment period open for voters to share their thoughts on the proposition. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Adams joins legal fight over ICE courthouse arrests
(The Center Square) — New York City Mayor Eric Adams has joined a legal challenge against the Trump administration's policy of arresting undocumented immigrants at city courthouses. The city's Legal Department has filed a legal brief in support of a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups that asks a federal judge to block Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials from detaining immigrants who show up for scheduled hearings at a Lower Manhattan federal immigration building. Adams, a Democrat who has been criticized for backing Trump administration immigration policies, called the arrests "illegal" and said they have driven many "law-abiding" immigrants to avoid courts, the police and other basic city services for fear of detention. "From my first days as a rookie cop to my current role as mayor of New York City, my job is, and has always been, to keep law-abiding New Yorkers safe," Adams said in a statement. "We should allow New Yorkers to feel secure to attend legal proceedings in their pursuit to obtain legal status." Immigration enforcement actions in courthouses have been a flashpoint in pushback by Democrats and civil liberty groups to Trump's administration's immigration enforcement. To enter America from another country, if not a U.S. citizen, a visa or some other travel authorization is required to be presented at a port of entry. Advocates, court officials and even some judges have been accused of resisting attempts by ICE to apprehend suspects who show up for court hearings. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, a Democrat who was then seeking the Democratic nomination to run for mayor, was arrested in June for allegedly assaulting a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who was attempting to take an undocumented immigrant in a New York City courthouse into custody. He was let go when Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul showed up at the ICE detention facility to demand his release. The Justice Department sued New York state in February over a state law that limits state cooperation with federal immigration authorities and again in June over the Protect Our Courts Act, which the DOJ said "shields dangerous aliens from being lawfully detained" and violates the Constitution by obstructing federal immigration operations. Those cases are still pending. In another lawsuit, the DOJ took New York City to federal court in July over its "sanctuary" policies that restrict cooperation with federal immigration crackdowns, accusing the city of shielding wanted criminals from deportation.
