Trump Aide Reveals Staff's Withering Verdict on Tariffs Guru
A former staffer to President Donald Trump Monday claimed that Peter Navarro—the man behind the tariff rollout—was intentionally left out of White House meetings because of his incompetence.
'What I'm stunned by, I worked with Peter Navarro. I liked Peter Navarro,' said Alyssa Farah Griffin, who served as Trump's director of strategic communications and assistant in 2020. 'But Peter Navarro was actively kept out of key economic meetings in the Oval Office by people like Steve Mnuchin, Larry Kudlow, and members of the NEC, because he often didn't have all the facts and all the details, and gave half-baked ideas to President Trump.'
Griffin's description of the aide on CNN's 'Anderson Cooper 360″ came just before Trump's billionaire adviser Elon Musk called Navarro 'dumber than a sack of bricks, 'a 'moron,' and suggested he be called by the slur 'Peter Retarddo.'
Navarro, who led the charge on Trump's tariff plan, has promised the American public that the country will not sink into recession despite the fact that markets plunged early this week and only slightly bounced back Tuesday.
'I'm not surprised to know he is a chief architect of what was a disastrous rollout of tariffs,' admitted Griffin.
Trump's sweeping taxes have been met with extreme backlash from both parties who claim that the math was faulty and the exaggerated percentages will wreck the economy. Navarro tried to assure the public during a Monday interview on on Fox News's 'The Ingraham Angle.'
He said the market is 'finding a bottom now, but it … look, here's the thing … it's going to shift over, and it's going to be companies in the S&P 500 who are the first to produce here. Those are the ones are going to lead the recovery.'
The taxes include a 10 percent base tariff on nearly all foreign trading partners and additional higher tariffs on several U.S. allies.
Griffin slammed the mixed signals coming out of the White House, saying 'they do have a messaging problem. Everyone's saying different things about the end game.'
Trump defends the policy, which was calculated based on an economist who has publicly rebuked the math and claimed that it is 'very wrong.'
'We're going to get fair deals and good deals with everybody,' Trump said Monday. 'And if we don't, we're going to have nothing to do with them. They're not going to be allowed to participate in the United States.'
Griffin referenced Navarro's Monday Financial Times op-ed, titled 'Donald Trump's tariffs will fix a broken system.' While his essay claimed there's 'no concessions' or 'deal to be made,' said Griffin, 'you have others saying we're open to negotiations.'
'But messaging is secondary to the policy issue here,' she added. 'These tariffs are devastating. And every traditional economist, every Republican economist, for decades would have said that this is something that would hurt wealth in this country, that would have the impact it did on the markets.'
The tariff fallout has divided even the most devoted MAGA members, including conservative podcaster Ben Shapiro, who called the agenda 'pretty crazy' and 'probably unconstitutional.' Several major bankers and financial leaders, including BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, have also denounced the policy, which he said was 'destabilizing the economy.'
Even DOGE leader Musk seems to distrust Navarro and has recently questioned his credentials and even broken rank with the president to stand in opposition to tariffs.
The White House declined to comment on Griffin's statements but pointed the Daily Beast to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's recent response to Musk's criticism: 'Whatever. We are the most transparent administration in history, expressing our disagreements in public."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
15 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Defying Trump, National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet is still at work
President Donald Trump's latest attempt to assert control over an elite American cultural institution has turned into a high-stakes Washington stand-off. In defiance of Trump's announcement last Friday that he was firing her, Kim Sajet — the director of the Smithsonian Institution's National Portrait Gallery — has continued to report for work, conducting meetings and handling other museum business as she did before, according to several people familiar with her activities who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter. Writing on Truth Social, Trump had declared he is firing Sajet because she 'is a highly partisan person' and because she is a 'strong supporter of DEI,' a reference to diversity, equity and inclusion. He said her replacement would be named shortly. Trump has not provided a legal reasoning to support his authority to fire Sajet. Two top congressional Democrats have asserted the president does not have legal authority for the firing. In a joint statement, House Administration Committee ranking Democrat Joe Morelle of New York and House Appropriations Committee ranking Democrat Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut said: 'President Trump has no authority to fire employees of the Smithsonian Institution — including the Director of the National Portrait Gallery. The dismissal of Director Sajet is unacceptable and has the same legal weight as the President's prior attempts to undermine the Smithsonian's independence: absolutely none. Should the White House require a copy of the Constitution, we would be more than happy to provide one.' Sajet's refusal to abide by Trump's decision sets up a test of the bounds of presidential authority over the Smithsonian, a sprawling complex of 21 museums, 14 education and research centers and the National Zoo. It is not a traditional government agency nor part of the executive branch, and hiring and firing decisions have historically been handled by the Smithsonian's secretary, rather than its Board of Regents. The Smithsonian's current secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch III, is widely expected to discuss the president's attempt to oust Sajet when regents meet next Monday. In an only-in-Washington twist, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. — who has been presented with major questions at the Supreme Court regarding the limits of presidential authority since Trump took office — is the chancellor of the Smithsonian and a member of its board. A Trump White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A Smithsonian spokesperson declined to comment. In February, Trump made another foray into American arts when he took over control of the Kennedy Center, dismissing his predecessor's appointees to its board, who then installed him as chairman and replaced the institution's director with a political ally with scant experience in the arts. The Smithsonian differs from the Kennedy Center because presidents don't appoint members to its board, which is composed of a mix of officials from all three branches of government and members of the public. But Trump is not without allies on the Smithsonian board, including Vice President JD Vance who, like Roberts, is an ex-officio member. Trump's move against Sajet follows an executive order he issued on March 27 titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' which aims to 'restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.' A 35-year-old special assistant and senior associate staff secretary, Lindsey Halligan, was among the order's architects — instigated, in part, by her early-2025 visit to the show 'The Shape of Power: Stories of Race and American Sculpture,' an exhibition at the Smithsonian American Art Museum, which shares a building with the Portrait Gallery. The order calls for Halligan and Vice President JD Vance to 'remove improper ideology' from the Smithsonian and 'prohibit expenditure on exhibits or programs that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race.' 'President Trump's attempt to fire the National Portrait Gallery Director is outrageous and represents yet another disturbing example of his relentless effort to control American art and culture,' said Rep. Chellie Pingree (Maine), ranking Democrat of the House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee, which oversees the Smithsonian, in a statement. 'Despite what the President may think, America's cultural institutions are not run by dictatorial impulses.' On Tuesday a White House official provided The Post a list of 17 instances in which, the White House argued, Sajet was critical of Trump or outspoken about her support for diversity, equity and inclusion. The list included her donations to Democratic politicians and advocacy groups; a social media post praising Anthony Fauci; the caption for the museum's presidential portrait of Trump mentioning his two impeachments and 'incitement of insurrection' for the events of Jan. 6, 2021; and numerous quotes from interviews in a variety of publications about her efforts to represent a broad swath of Americans within the gallery's walls. One item on the list was a quote in a 2019 USA Today story about Black artists demanding representation in American artistic institutions: 'We owe it to Americans to reflect them because we owe it to accurate history,' Sajet says. 'I'm not interested in only having a museum for some people.' The list additionally took issue with remarks Sajet has made in support of the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements, and criticism of Columbus Day and her rejection of one artist's 2016 portrait of Trump as 'too political.' It notes that Sajet has commissioned artworks about Mexican immigration and 'the complications of ancestral and racial history.' It was critical of her 2013 decision to use '50 percent of all money spent on art' to 'support diverse artists and portrait subjects.' Since its founding 179 years ago, the Smithsonian, which receives about 60 percent of its budget from federal appropriations and grants, has generally operated independently, although there have been several controversies in which museums have altered exhibitions in response to outside criticisms, including from politicians. Museum directors, such as Sajet — holders of some of the most prestigious positions in American arts — are not paid with federal funds, instead drawing their salaries from the Smithsonian's trust fund. Hours after Trump's post, Bunch told Smithsonian staff in an email obtained by The Washington Post that the White House also sent new details of proposed cuts to the institution's budget, slashing it by 12 percent and excluding funding for its Anacostia Community Museum and its forthcoming National Museum of the American Latino, Bunch said. On Saturday, at the Portrait Gallery and SAAM's joint family Pride celebration, a trio of visitors strolled the central courtyard in neon vests emblazoned with 'Hands off the arts' on the back — closely watched by a Smithsonian staff member, who hovered nearby. 'I'm outraged' by Sajet's firing, said Karen Nussbaum, 75, of Washington. 'There's a place for a political expression in art, but not political control of art.' 'I think the next step is controlling what artists think and do,' said Cynthia Cain, 60, of Washington, 'and that's not acceptable.' Sophia Nguyen and Janay Kingsberry contributed to this report.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
James Altucher: 'America Just Hit the AI Reset Button'
New briefing reveals how Trump and Musk are quietly building the most powerful artificial intelligence system in U.S. history — and why July 1 could mark a major turning point BALTIMORE, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- In a new briefing, tech entrepreneur and bestselling author James Altucher reveals a development he says will 'change America forever.' At the center of it is Project Colossus — a classified supercomputer initiative led by Elon Musk's xAI — and backed by sweeping support from President Donald Trump. A Presidential Reversal with Massive Implications Altucher says the shift began with one of Trump's first presidential actions in 2025. 'In one of his FIRST acts as President… Donald Trump overturned Executive Order #14110.' This decision reversed Biden-era restrictions on AI research, which Altucher claims had 'prevented us from unleashing its true power.' 'Trump also announced the LARGEST AI investment in history… Stargate… a massive, AI data center and infrastructure project.' Hidden Inside a Warehouse in Memphis Altucher's report reveals a facility in Tennessee that, until now, has gone largely unnoticed. 'Right here, inside this warehouse in Memphis, Tennessee… lies a massive supercomputer Musk calls 'Project Colossus.'' 'It contains not just one or two… but 200,000 units of Nvidia's all-powerful AI chips… making it the most advanced AI facility known to man.' 'The fastest supercomputer on the planet.' — Jensen Huang, Nvidia CEO July 1: 'When It All Changes' According to Altucher, time is short. A critical update to Colossus is imminent. 'That's when I predict Elon could announce a major update to this new AI project. One that some say will essentially 10X its power – overnight.' Altucher refers to this moment as a 'second wave' of AI — what he calls: 'Artificial Superintelligence.' 'This second wave… will rival all of the great innovations of the past. Electricity… the wheel… even the discovery of fire.' A Warning… and a Milestone Altucher closes his briefing with a quote from Vladimir Putin to stress the stakes: 'Whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world.' — Vladimir Putin He believes Project Colossus may determine whether America leads — or falls behind — in the AI race. About James Altucher James Altucher is a computer scientist, entrepreneur, and bestselling author. A pioneer in AI since the 1980s, he previously worked on IBM's Deep Blue supercomputer and developed early AI trading systems on Wall Street. His latest research uncovers critical breakthroughs in AI infrastructure and the political forces accelerating its rise. Media Contact:Derek WarrenPublic Relations ManagerParadigm Press GroupEmail: dwarren@
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
St. Louis waits for aid as FEMA response to Missouri disasters is slowest in 15 years
Residents at Clearence and Labadie Avenues assess the damage to their home after the May 16 tornado rolled through the Ville neighborhood of north St. Louis. (Wiley Price/ St. Louis American) When a tornado struck Joplin on May 22, 2011, killing 161 people and causing about $2 billion in damage, President Barack Obama issued a major disaster declaration the next day. That action immediately made help available through the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, for people to pay for temporary housing and begin repairs. The declaration also made state and local governments, as well as some not-for-profit aid agencies, eligible for reimbursement of 75% of the cost of recovery and rebuilding. By the time the books were closed, FEMA had distributed $37.1 million to individuals for recovery needs and provided $161.6 million for public recovery and rebuilding costs. In St. Louis, a May 16 tornado cut a 22-mile path across the region, damaging or destroying 16,000 structures and killing five people. Damage is estimated at $1.6 billion, making it the biggest weather disaster for Missouri since the Joplin tornado. Gov. Mike Kehoe made a formal request on May 26 for President Donald Trump to extend similar help. Nine days later, that request is still pending as Trump waits for the results of a formal assessment of damages. It is part of a pattern in Trump's second term of longer waits and, oftentimes, denials of state requests for disaster declarations. Kehoe on April 2 requested a declaration for help following severe storms and flooding in southeast Missouri. Trump issued the declaration May 21, 49 days later. A May 1 request, for storms and flooding from March 30 to April 8, was also approved May 21. Another disaster declaration request from Missouri, submitted May 19, is also awaiting action by the president. Both of the approved requests took longer than all but six of the 20 federal disaster requests submitted by Missouri governors from the start of 2010 through the end of 2024. The average wait during that period, from a governor's request to a presidential declaration, was 16 days. St. Louis area state lawmakers, called to Jefferson City for a special session, said the delay is adding to the hardship thousands face, with some people camping outside destroyed homes because they have no money for shelter. 'Some people are staying in homes that are completely unsafe to stay in after the storm has wiped out their entire neighborhood,' state Sen. Brian Williams, a Democrat from University City, said in an interview with The Independent. 'It's saddening, it's disheartening, and I'm not interested in any conversation outside of ensuring that storm victims are taken care of.' A federal disaster declaration can make help available for individuals and public needs, or it can be limited to assisting with public recovery costs. Nationally, over the last four years, FEMA has provided more than $12 billion to individuals and $133 billion to state and local governments, tribal nations, territories and some nonprofits to help in recovery efforts, Stateline reported in February. When individual assistance is provided, victims can receive up to $770 for immediate emergency needs, plus up to $43,600 to assist with home repair costs and $43,600 for other recovery costs. A federal disaster declaration also provides emergency SNAP and unemployment benefits. The main purpose of the special session is to consider legislation offering tax incentives for the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals to remain in Missouri. The bill providing stadium aid also includes a tax credit of up to $5,000 for payments against an insurance deductible in a disaster area. A spending bill requested by Kehoe includes $25 million, to be spent by the Missouri Housing Development Commission to assist in repairs. But with 37 Missouri counties covered by disaster requests submitted this year, lawmakers from both St. Louis and rural areas say the money is inadequate. State Sen. Jason Bean, a Republican from Holcomb, said the $25 million is 'a drop in the bucket' for disaster needs. Bean represents 10 southeast Missouri counties that include the three with the highest poverty rates in the state. Eight of the 10 counties in Bean's district were included in Trump's disaster declaration for storms and flooding on March 14 and 15. All 10 were included in the disaster declaration for the March 31 to April 8 storms and flooding. The delay in receiving help is frustrating, Bean said during a hearing on the spending bill. 'We need to realize that people have been living in shelters,' Bean said. 'They've been living in other homes for some time. So once again, the speed of our response, I think, is something we've just got to address.' Massive, obvious disasters like Joplin no longer get quick responses from FEMA. Since taking office, Trump has tried to push more costs to state and local agencies, even suggesting that FEMA be abolished. Now, every disaster must go through the formal assessment process to determine if it meets the standards for federal assistance. FEMA uses cost per capita to gauge whether local and state governments can handle recovery themselves, or if they'll need federal help. Those thresholds currently stand at $4.72 per capita for counties and $1.89 per capita for states. But just meeting those thresholds isn't enough. Trump can accept or deny applications at his discretion. 'After a thorough assessment, FEMA will approve a disaster declaration request if the assessment shows the event's damage exceeds the state, local governments, and voluntary organizations' capacity to respond,' a FEMA spokesperson wrote in an email to The Independent. 'Just like all declaration requests, this decision is based on policy, not politics.' During testimony on the special session legislation, Casey Milburg, policy director for St. Louis Mayor Cara Spencer, said Kehoe and the state's congressional delegation have all been pushing for action on the disaster request. 'There's certainly a tremendous amount of uncertainty in our minds,' she said. 'We are certainly hopeful.' The congressional delegation push began the day after Kehoe requested aid for tornado response. 'Missourians are still recovering from the recent tornado, and our communities are in desperate need of federal assistance,' U.S. Rep. Ann Wagner, a Republican from St. Louis County, said in a news release May 27, the day after Kehoe made his request. Wagner, five of Missouri's eight U.S. House members and both U.S. Senators signed a letter to Trump on May 27 urging swift action. 'These resources are essential to stabilizing affected communities and safeguarding public health and safety,' the letter stated. 'Given the scale of devastation and the urgent need for federal assistance, we respectfully request swift approval of Missouri's disaster declaration. We appreciate your attention to this matter and stand ready to support efforts to ensure resources reach those who need them most.' During a hearing on the special session legislation, state Sen. Barbara Washington, a Democrat from Kansas City, asked budget director Dan Haug whether FEMA would approve the request to help St. Louis. 'Have we received notice that FEMA is going to help?' she said. 'Because there are other states that have been denied assistance from FEMA, and so have we received any guarantee that we're actually going to receive funding from FEMA to help?' Haug said no assurances have been received. 'I think the governor's office, in communication with our federal officials, feel confident in the result,' Haug said. Williams, however, said the state shouldn't count on it. 'I am not optimistic,' he said, 'that FEMA is going to step in and do anything.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
