Australian lawyer apologizes for AI-generated errors in murder case
The blunder in the Supreme Court of Victoria state is another in a litany of mishaps AI has caused in justice systems around the world.
Defense lawyer Rishi Nathwani, who holds the prestigious legal title of King's Counsel, took 'full responsibility' for filing incorrect information in submissions in the case of a teenager charged with murder, according to court documents seen by The Associated Press on Friday.
'We are deeply sorry and embarrassed for what occurred,' Nathwani told Justice James Elliott on Wednesday, on behalf of the defense team.
The AI-generated errors caused a 24-hour delay in resolving a case that Elliott had hoped to conclude on Wednesday. Elliott ruled on Thursday that Nathwani's client, who cannot be identified because he is a minor, was not guilty of murder because of mental impairment.
'At the risk of understatement, the manner in which these events have unfolded is unsatisfactory,' Elliott told lawyers on Thursday.
'The ability of the court to rely upon the accuracy of submissions made by counsel is fundamental to the due administration of justice,' Elliott added.
The fake submissions included fabricated quotes from a speech to the state legislature and non-existent case citations purportedly from the Supreme Court.
The errors were discovered by Elliott's associates, who couldn't find the cases and requested that defense lawyers provide copies.
The lawyers admitted the citations 'do not exist' and that the submission contained 'fictitious quotes,' court documents say.
The lawyers explained they checked that the initial citations were accurate and wrongly assumed the others would also be correct.
The submissions were also sent to prosecutor Daniel Porceddu, who didn't check their accuracy.
The judge noted that the Supreme Court released guidelines last year for how lawyers use AI.
'It is not acceptable for artificial intelligence to be used unless the product of that use is independently and thoroughly verified,' Elliott said.
The court documents do not identify the generative artificial intelligence system used by the lawyers.
In a comparable case in the United States in 2023, a federal judge imposed $5,000 fines on two lawyers and a law firm after ChatGPT was blamed for their submission of fictitious legal research in an aviation injury claim.
Judge P. Kevin Castel said they acted in bad faith. But he credited their apologies and remedial steps taken in explaining why harsher sanctions were not necessary to ensure they or others won't again let artificial intelligence tools prompt them to produce fake legal history in their arguments.
Later that year, more fictitious court rulings invented by AI were cited in legal papers filed by lawyers for Michael Cohen, a former personal lawyer for US President Donald Trump. Cohen took the blame, saying he didn't realize that the Google tool he was using for legal research was also capable of so-called AI hallucinations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
a day ago
- Arab News
Saudi ambassador meets Tajik investment chief
Saudi Ambassador to Tajikistan Waleed bin Abdulrahman Alreshaidan recently met with Sulton Rahimzoda, the chairman of the Tajik State Committee on investment and state property management. During the meeting, the two sides 'reviewed bilateral relations and discussed various topics of common interest,' the Saudi Press Agency reported on Saturday. Meanwhile, Saudi Minister of Health Fahd AlJalajel met with a group of Saudi students from Monash University in Melbourne as part of his official visit to Australia. The minister stressed the students' role as 'ambassadors of Saudi Arabia within the framework of Vision 2030.'
Al Arabiya
2 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Australia grants asylum to former Hong Kong lawmaker and pro-democracy activist
Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Ted Hui has been granted asylum in Australia, the former lawmaker said in a Facebook post on Saturday, more than four years after he left Hong Kong where he faces criminal charges over the 2019 pro-democracy protests. Hui said he received written notice from the Australian Department of Home Affairs on Friday approving his claim and that his wife, children and parents were also granted visas. 'When people around me say 'congratulations' to me, although I politely thank them, I can't help but feel sad in my heart. How to congratulate a political refugee who misses his hometown?' he said in the Facebook post. 'If it weren't for political persecution, I would never have thought of living in a foreign land. Immigrants can always return to their hometowns to visit relatives at any time; Exiles have no home.' The Home Affairs Department did not immediately respond to emailed questions sent after business hours. The Hong Kong government and China's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to questions about the decision. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visited Beijing last month as part of his administration's years-long push to improve ties with China. A former Democratic Party lawmaker, Hui left Hong Kong late 2020 after facing criminal charges over the 2019 pro-democracy protests. In 2023 Hong Kong accused him and seven others of national security offences, including incitement to secession, and put HK$1 million ($127,782) bounties on their heads. Australia said it was disappointed by the decision at the time and concerned about the law. Pro-democracy businessman Jimmy Lai is currently on trial in Hong Kong on charges related to a national security law imposed by Beijing and alleged sedition.
Al Arabiya
2 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Meta probed over AI chatbot exchanges with children
A US senator announced Friday that he is investigating whether Meta's AI chatbots were allowed to engage in potentially harmful online conversations with children. Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, posted a letter to Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg demanding all documents and communications related to reports that the company's AI chatbots engaged in 'romantic' and 'sensual' exchanges with minors. 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors,' a Meta spokesperson told AFP in response to an inquiry. Hawley said the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, which he chairs, will investigate whether Meta's generative AI tools 'enable exploitation, deception, or other criminal harms to children.' Meta has been instructed to preserve all relevant records and provide them to Congress by September 19. Hawley cited one reported example in which a Meta AI chatbot allegedly described an eight-year-old child's body as 'a work of art' and 'a treasure I cherish deeply.'
