Kashmiri women's struggle highlighted in UK
The term "half widow" refers to thousands of Kashmiri women whose husbands have been forcibly disappeared by Indian forces, leaving them in a state of legal, economic, and emotional uncertainty. These women struggle to provide for their families while being denied closure or justice.
The webinar was chaired by Fahim Kayani, President of Tehreek-e-Kashmir UK, and moderated by Rehana Ali, Information Secretary of TeK UK. Human rights activists, political leaders, and international advocates came together to highlight the urgent need for global intervention in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IOJK), where women continue to bear the brunt of the decades-long conflict.
In his opening remarks, Fahim Kayani praised the resilience of Kashmiri women, stating, "Kashmiri women have shown great courage in the face of Indian military occupation. Despite being subjected to sexual violence, enforced disappearances of their loved ones, and extreme human rights violations, they remain steadfast in their fight for self-determination. The international community must acknowledge and take action against these atrocities."
Rehana Ali, Information Secretary of TeK UK, said that Asiya Andrabi, Naheed Nasreen, Fehmeeda Sofi, and many other Kashmiri women activists have been arrested under draconian laws like the Public Safety Act (PSA) and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). These laws are often used to silence political dissent in Kashmir, targeting not just male activists but also women who play a role in the resistance.
Former Cllr Summara Khurshid praised the resilience of Kashmiri women, calling them "silent warriors" who continue to advocate for their people's rights despite immense challenges.
Cllr Majid Hussain delivered a powerful speech, emphasizing that the world has turned a blind eye to the suffering of Kashmiri women:
"On this International Women's Day, we honor the strength of women worldwide. But today, I want to focus on the unheard cries of Kashmiri womenthe silent victims of one of the world's longest-standing conflicts. For decades, they have faced violence, displacement, and the pain of losing their loved ones. Their sons and husbands have disappeared, their dignity has been violated, yet their struggle remains overlooked by the global community."
Hussain urged the international community to take concrete action, stating that "justice delayed is justice denied."
Turkish human rights activist Sheri Hamid said the militarization of Kashmir has disproportionately affected women. From mass rapes like Kunan-Poshpora (1991) to enforced disappearances of their husbands, Kashmiri women have suffered immensely. However, they have also organized resistance in powerful ways.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistanis under rubble: here and there
Pakistan, born against many odds, has survived despite incomprehensible antagonisms over seventy-eight years of independence — no trifling triumph. Those who enabled this survival were mostly gumnam sipahi (unsung soldiers) or people who faced frightful fates. Although the country has changed, with East Pakistan no longer hers and Karachi no longer her capital, Pakistan continues to make strides in many fields, from fashion and entertainment to nuclear capability. Marka-e-Haq (battle of truth) heightens the joy of this year's 14th August. Pakistanis' ability to create memes in the middle of a war is admirable, but as a medical doctor I get concerned too. TV channels have convinced us that all of us are equal, and even the masses who continue to suffer (perhaps without realisation) from the impact of social injustices, erased histories and moral bankruptcy, celebrate jashn. Sadly, Nature has its own laws. The criminal silence of the elite segment of civil society, who cannot go beyond fancy titles and slogans and apple-polishing those in power to secure a slot in foreign trips, and the criminal negligence of successive governments in responding to the impact of climate change, are taking their toll. While I write these lines, Buner is facing catastrophe, and so are many other areas of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, while the flood affectees of Sindh have been reduced to passive recipients of a housing scheme that should have been their right in the first place. I am deliberately avoiding statistics related to the human face of such crises, because apparently millions of out-of-school children, people living below the poverty line, and the scale of bureaucratic complacency have rarely made anybody feel guilty. The nation is being fed with certain narratives and good ones are rewarded accordingly. From the Nobel Peace Prize to civil awards in our country, there are rarely any undisputed recipients — and this piece is not about the latest ironic awards. I am infuriated that mainstream media largely continues business as usual. There is no emergency telethon, no dashboards, and no actions required in emergencies of this extent. While a large population lies under the real rubble in present-day Pakistan, another group is buried under the rubble of erased history. If anyone is in reflective mode yet once again, they must notice the omission of those 250,000-300,000 shunned Pakistanis still stranded in Bangladesh from any official statement or ceremony. There are inequalities everywhere in Pakistan — from Gilgit-Baltistan to Islamabad Capital Territory, from Turbat to Thar, from Bajaur to Burewala — and no human misery must be trivialised. Yet with a heavy heart I am mentioning this particular issue, as it is the most despised and deserted one. Others at least make it into headlines, hashtags, or academic arguments. The stranded Pakistanis? They are excluded and erased. And here I stand, a lone advocate, raising what no media giant, no human rights darling, no "hero/shero" journalist dares to raise. Nobody is interested in the fate of the inhabitants of "Geneva Camp" in Dhaka, who are facing another calamity created by land mafias and will eventually be evicted. They were never counted, so nobody will notice their disappearance. My claim can be dismissed. But contemplate who gets attention, and what content gets published — certainly not the one I have been conveying for the last 15 years or so. The dominant narrative in our media and academia has been consistent: talk of 1971 is permitted and endorsed only as a one-sided "Bengali genocide" story — a story that too often becomes a suitable style to slander Pakistan. Sympathy flows only in one direction. But where is the truth and reconciliation? Where is the recognition of the Biharis and other non-Bengalis who stood by Pakistan, only to have their lives, properties and heritage destroyed in the liberation war of anti-Pakistan Bengali Mukti Bahnis? A new political bloc, China-Pakistan-Bangladesh, is in the making. Sustainable friendship between Pakistan and Bangladesh is not possible without reconciliation, and the latter means admitting inconvenient truths and taking actions. The reconciliation measures involve both governments, as I have written many times before. Bangladesh must show remorse for the genocide of pro-Pakistanis and for rendering them stateless. Pakistan must complete the unfinished repatriation of those still stranded, as it did for about 170,000 people between 1974 and 1982. And yes, their return can and must be carried out without threatening Sindh's demography through a fair, federated resettlement approach. But here is where my helpless anger sharpens: MQM. Every version of this party has been part of governments in Sindh or at the Federal level. And yet they never made the repatriation of these Pakistanis a priority. They never sought a grand dialogue with Sindhi nationalists for harmony. They never pressured other provincial governments to share resettlement responsibility. Empty slogans, no action. And then the duplicity of our celebrated media and human rights champions! They boost their voices for Balochistan (and yes, Balochistan deserves justice) but why? Because it gives them international appreciation, invitation to global conferences, foreign fellowships. Yet for the stranded Pakistanis, they remain muted. Not one prime-time debate, not one award-winning documentary. Hush. Hush. Hush. So here I am, in monologue. A lone rebel, perhaps, shouting into the void. With no audience, no trending hashtag, no solidarity march. I thank The Express Tribune for occasionally publishing my agony but I know I am looking for justice in an unfair world. After all, even the live-streamed genocide in Gaza has refused to move the hearts and heads of those who matter. And yet, I remind myself: this is my role. As a peace activist. As an advocate for the forgotten. To speak, even when no one listens. To demand, even when no one cares. Remember, even if the nation forgets. Because silence is support. And I will not be complicit.
Express Tribune
5 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US and India — strategic autonomy or alliance partnership
The writer is a retired major general and has an interest in International Relations and Political Sociology. He can be reached at tayyarinam@ and tweets @20_Inam This piece attempts to deconstruct the imperatives of Sino-India bilateralism in the backdrop of US-China competition. In my piece, "War of Humiliation" in the South Asia magazine (November 2020), discussing the Sino-Indian escalation in Ladakh, I had concluded that expecting India to stand up to China as a bulwark, that the US continues to prop it, is too far-fetched. That China and India would never — willingly or unwillingly — walk into a full-blown war, that is in nobody's interest. If anyone expects India to stand upto to China — doing the US bidding — in a resurrected Great Game 2.0; then it is not knowing India of Chanakya Kautilya (375-283 BC). The wizard, also called Vishnugupta or the Indian Machiavelli, said: "Do not reveal what you have thought of doing... keep it secret being determined to carry it into execution." Fast forward to 2025, there is a lot of debate nudging India to be in a 'partnership alliance' with the US to counter China; as most analysts in the US/European camp, think India cannot do it alone. Some emphasise that 'strengthening Quad' (Quadrilateral Security Dialogue comprising Australia, India, Japan and America) would be a good starting point for New Delhi. Realising that India is a 'hedging' middle power, eager to play both if not all sides, the US think-tanks deduce that transfer of more sophisticated and advanced technology to India would depend upon India's overt anti-Beijing credentials. The basic premise of such thinking is that a shooting Sino-Indian war is inevitable, and that militarily embroiling China through India is cost effective and makes strategic sense. This is a faulty presumption, just like encouraging Ukraine, a militarily weaker side, to go on the offensive against a militarily stronger Russia that was on the defensive, in the much-touted Ukrainian counter offensive in 2023, that failed. The recent chasm in the US-India relations emanate from India profiting from the Russian oil imports, debunking sanctions; Indian protectionism in trade against US agricultural products; Modi's refusal to acknowledge President Trump's role in the May 2025 Pakistan-India ceasefire; and the less than expected tenacity by India in the cited conflict. However, these are transient factors originating from the 'Trump Factor', who is in his last presidential term. There are compelling reasons for Washington to keep India in its orbit and repair the damaged relations, even if New Delhi is not very forthcoming. First, in the US strategic construct China, Iran, North Korea and Russia make a substantial 'authoritative scale (mass of alliance power)' presenting a unified challenge, needing a unified response. Moreover, China under President Xi has moved away from its confrontational 'wolf warrior' diplomacy, with emerging profile in the Global South, Africa in particular. Its BRI networks 126 countries through highways, railways, pipelines, power plants, grids, IT, social welfare and poverty-alleviation projects. BRI's staggering investment of over $1.3 trillion will ultimately cover 60% of the world population and 40% of its GDP, providing a viable economic alternative, catapulting the present US-led predatory economic system. Second, America's inability to compete with both China and Russia, requires 'strategic diplomacy', some US analysts emphasise. Its core purpose being 'cultivating favourable balances of power in critical regions' to project power far beyond material means. Strategic diplomacy aims to limit rival's options, without seeking to remove the sources of conflict. The US is moving past the age of 'globalized utopia', of being the single-most powerful hegemon, enjoying comprehensive security enabled by techno-military capabilities. It gravitates towards alliance partnerships and strategic diplomacy. And under its 'pivot to Asia' strategy, building the largest anti-China coalition, India stands out to bridge the gap between Washington's rhetoric and capabilities. US analysts feel Biden Administration was unable to properly cultivate New Delhi against Beijing. They feel Trump should nudge India closer 'as an ally on the level of Japan or NATO partners'. Will India do the US bidding willingly, under coercion or under inducements? The straight answer is no, under any conditions. Way back in a meeting with the US officials, when asked to analyse the US-India potential relationship, my answer was to 'go ahead and find out'. However, much that India will drag its feet on becoming involved in bloc politics, alliance partnership with the US, and ignore its 'strategic autonomy', Washington will persistently deploy the pressure-inducement combo to rope in New Delhi against China. Even if that means making India, as some suggest, a regional policeman and hegemon in South Asia, deferring to its advice and actions concerning other countries like Pakistan. The other touted US 'deputy sheriffs' to include Australia in Pacific Islands, Vietnam in continental Southeast Asia and Nigeria in Africa. Expecting India to go against one of its largest trading partners (despite an otherwise obscure border conflict), is not understanding geo-economics and history. First, Sino-India annual trade is over $100 for the third consecutive year. It was $124 billion for FY2024. Second, India has historically conceded against formidable adversaries, from Afghans to Moghuls to Portuguese to the British. That historic constant has not changed, Modi or no Modi. Third, militarily, Indian discussions concede China's conventional and nuclear advantage. India responds to this "conventional asymmetry" through infrastructural build-up, force modernisation and new raisings, compared to Beijing's better military infrastructure, capabilities, and logistics. The Indian security establishment remains concerned about greater survivability of Indian forces on the battlefield, in an environment of uncontrolled escalation, instead of investing in new weapon platforms especially the nuclear ones. However, paradoxically, the cited asymmetry also serves as a strong catalyst for peaceful co-existence. It is, therefore, no surprise that India gravitates towards better relations with Beijing under its 'Look East Policy', burnished by the recent chasm with Washington. When China's Foreign Minister, Wang Yi on August 18, 2025, during his two-day visit to New Delhi emphasised both nations to view each other as 'partners' and not 'adversaries or threats'; his Indian counterpart Jaishankar acknowledged the Chinese overtures, saying both countries were seeking to 'move ahead from a difficult period in our relations'. Wang met Premier Modi on Tuesday, reaffirming 'positive trend' in the bilateral ties. In sum, India it too smart to fall for the US trap.
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Netanyahu says Israel has ‘work' to do to win over Gen Z
LONDON: Israel has 'work' to do in winning over young people in the West as polls show collapsing support, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted to a UK-based podcast in an interview aired Wednesday. Protests against Israel's actions in Gaza have become increasingly common in capitals across the West, attracting large numbers of young people. A recent Gallup poll also showed only six percent of 18 to 34-year-olds in the United States had a favourable opinion of Netanyahu and just nine percent approved of Israel's military action in Gaza. On the 'Triggernometry' podcast, Netanyahu was asked whether Israel could lose the backing of Western governments once 'Gen Z' – those born between around 1997 and 2012 – assumes power. 'If you're telling me that there's work to be done on Gen Z and across the West, yes,' he responded. But he said opposition to Israel among Gen Z stemmed from a wider campaign against the West and repeated his unproven claim of an orchestrated plot against Israel and the West, without saying who was behind it. Netanyahu announces plan to allow foreign reporters into Gaza Israel's defence minister approved a plan on Wednesday for the conquest of Gaza City and authorised the call-up of around 60,000 reservists, piling pressure on the Palestinian group Hamas as mediators push for a ceasefire. Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's offensive has killed at least 62,122 Palestinians, most of them civilians, the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza said, in figures the United Nations deem reliable. Since returning to the White House in January, US President Donald Trump has offered Israel ironclad support. Netanyahu told the podcast, which bills itself as promoting free speech with 'open, fact-based discussion of important and controversial issues', that Trump 'has proven an exceptional, exceptional friend of Israel, an exceptional leader.' 'I think we've been very fortunate to have a leader in the United States who doesn't act like the European leaders, who doesn't succumb to this stuff,' he added, referring to countries including France and the UK that have vowed to recognise a Palestinian state.
