logo
Colorado Announces Historic Team GPA Under Deion Sanders Ahead of 2025 Season

Colorado Announces Historic Team GPA Under Deion Sanders Ahead of 2025 Season

Yahooa day ago

Colorado Announces Historic Team GPA Under Deion Sanders Ahead of 2025 Season originally appeared on Athlon Sports.
Deion Sanders is heading into his third season as head coach of the Colorado Buffaloes. When he accepted the job in Boulder, taking over a program that had won just one game the previous year and was at the bottom of its conference, it was a major leap of faith.
Advertisement
Yet, he has remarkably shifted the culture and elevated the program to unprecedented heights—both on and off the field.
Sanders has made it clear what kind of culture he wants to build long-term in Boulder, and his players are buying into that vision. This was especially evident on Friday when the program announced its team GPA for the spring semester under Sanders' leadership.
While the team already saw academic success last year, this spring was particularly historic. As a collective, Colorado football maintained a 2.957 GPA—the highest spring semester GPA in program history and the second-highest overall, just behind last fall's 3.011 GPA.
"The standard is the standard," Colorado's socials posted. "SMART, TOUGH, FAST, DISCIPLINED, "WITH CHARACTER."
They continued, "The Herd made history this spring, earning a 2.957 GPA — the highest ever for Colorado Football in a spring semester."
This success is a testament to what Sanders has emphasized to his team and staff since taking the job. He's been adamant about the importance of performing in the classroom before focusing on what happens on the field—and so far, that approach has paid off.
Colorado head coach Deion Sanders.© Michael Ciaglo-Imagn Images
"I don't get involved in what you make," Sanders told his players back in October 2024. "But when you stop going to class, now you're affecting me. So we're going to affect your check. When I see a multitude of Fs and Ds, we're going to affect your check. Do we understand that?"
Advertisement
He added, "When you stop doing certain things that you're supposed to do, that you signed up to do, then you're going to be affected."
Related: Marcus Freeman Reveals the One Team He Wants Notre Dame to Play Every Year
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on May 31, 2025, where it first appeared.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Best American Whiskeys From The NY International Spirits Competition
Best American Whiskeys From The NY International Spirits Competition

Forbes

time17 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Best American Whiskeys From The NY International Spirits Competition

Some of the Double Gold medalists from the 2025 NYISC The New York International Spirits Competition is one of the most respected spirits competitions in the world, known for its distinctive approach of having trade-only judges, including buyers, sommeliers, bartenders, and importers, evaluate entries. Below are the Double Gold American whiskey winners from the 2025 competition. Founded in 2010, the NYISC takes place annually in New York City and is part of the larger International Beverage Competitions group. What sets the NYISC apart is its focus on real-world market relevance: spirits are judged not just on quality but also on price and packaging, reflecting how actual buyers and consumers assess products. The competition accepts entries from over 40 countries and across a broad range of spirit categories, including whiskey, tequila, rum, gin, vodka, and liqueurs. Awards include Double Gold, Gold, Silver, and Bronze medals, as well as honors like Distillery of the Year and Importer of the Year. Winning a medal at the NYISC carries strong industry credibility, as it signifies not only excellence in production but also commercial appeal and category competitiveness in the global market. A unique blend of straight bourbon, rye, and wheat whiskeys aged 15 and 11 years. A blend of Kentucky straight bourbons aged 16 and 8 years, finished in Cognac, Port, and Rum casks. Crafted from yellow corn, red winter wheat, and malted barley and aged a minimum of 3 years. A Kentucky straight bourbon whiskey, single barrel, unfiltered, and cask strength. Distilled in Bardstown, Kentucky. Finished in port wine barrels, this bourbon is distilled in Louisville, Kentucky. A four-grain, high-rye straight bourbon whiskey with a mash bill of 65% corn, 22% rye, and 13% wheat and barley. Aged a minimum of 4 years. It's distilled in Indiana and bottled in Columbia, Tennessee. An 18-year-old bourbon offering a rich and complex flavor profile. A small batch bourbon aged for 6 years, known for its smoothness and character. Barrels of bourbon aging in a Kentucky rick house A Tennessee bourbon known for its smooth and mellow flavor, produced in Tullahoma, Tennessee. A cask strength Texas straight bourbon whiskey, known for its bold flavor. A Texas straight bourbon whiskey finished in port casks, offering a unique flavor profile. A revival of a historic brand, this bourbon is known for its rich heritage and flavor. A bottled-in-bond bourbon offering a balance of flavor and strength. A 13-year-old bourbon known for its depth and complexity. A limited release bourbon aged in unique casks, offering a distinctive flavor. A premium bourbon expression finished in a Mizunara cask, known for its smoothness and character. A masterfully blended bourbon offering a harmonious flavor profile. A wheated bourbon known for its smooth and mellow character. Toasting with a glass of American whiskey A barrel proof bourbon offering a robust and full-bodied flavor. A flagship bourbon known for its balance and depth. A traditional wheated bourbon offering a smooth and rich flavor profile. A Kentucky bourbon known for its unique blend of ten distinct recipes, offering a complex flavor profile. A Tennessee bourbon known for its smoky character, produced in Nashville, Tennessee. A bourbon aged at sea, offering a unique flavor influenced by oceanic conditions. 15-year-old bourbon, known for its depth and complexity. A classic Kentucky bourbon known for its smooth and approachable flavor. Glass of whisky with ice, sitting on the American Flag. An American single malt whiskey known for its bold and robust flavor, produced in Waco, Texas. An American single malt whiskey crafted from heritage barley varieties, offering a rich and nuanced flavor profile. An American single malt whiskey known for its smooth and complex character. An American single malt whiskey offering a unique and refined flavor profile. An American single malt whiskey finished in Cabernet wine casks, offering a distinctive aroma and taste profile. Glass of whiskey surrounded by rye grain A single-barrel rye whiskey known for its spicy and robust flavor. A rye whiskey finished in port casks, offering a unique and complex flavor profile. A cask strength rye whiskey known for its bold and spicy character. A double rye whiskey offering a rich and spicy flavor profile. A Tennessee whiskey honoring the legacy of Nearest Green, known for its smooth and rich flavor. An American blended whiskey, a collaboration between Moët Hennessy and Beyoncé, offering a smooth and balanced flavor profile. These whiskeys are the pinnacle of American whiskey craftsmanship, chosen not only for their aroma and taste profiles but also for their value and packaging. Relatively easy to find, any one of them would be an excellent addition to your home bar. One of these whiskeys will go on to claim the crown of America's Best Whiskey. Can you guess which one?

Bears' Kevin Byard sounds off on NFL players playing in Olympics
Bears' Kevin Byard sounds off on NFL players playing in Olympics

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bears' Kevin Byard sounds off on NFL players playing in Olympics

For the first time in history, NFL players will be allowed to compete in the 2028 Olympic Games for flag football. While much of the conversation will be revolved around the potential risks vs. rewards in the decision to the let NFL players compete in the Olympics, there's been a widespread response around the league, and veterans on the Chicago Bears are also weighing in on the decision. Advertisement Safety Kevin Byard recently stared his thoughts about the ruling. While he understands the allure of playing for his country in the Olympics, he's not necessarily looking to participate. "I think for any athlete to be able to have the opportunity to go and get a gold medal for our country, I think that's an enormous opportunity and it's a blessing," Byard said. "Would I want to play? Probably not, if you asked me probably five some years ago, I probably would be one of the guys in the front of the line. I did hear something about it, I think it'll be during training camp. I don't want to speak too soon, but I just don't know how that would work." Byard believes Bears quarterback Caleb Williams would be a good fit for flag football, but with teams preparing in training camp, he doesn't see how the timing would make sense for anyone who is involved. "I think we got a lot of guys on our team that probably can do it," Byard said. "I'm not sure he's going to want to do it, but I think Caleb would be an excellent flag football team quarterback. Especially with the broken plays and being able to scramble around, do those type of things. I think it is a blessing for sure." Advertisement It's going to be interesting to see how the NFL and their top players come together to decide on how they'll play in the 2028 Olympics. While it would be beneficial for the worldwide reach of the league and sport, it also comes with risk of top players being banged up before the regular season. Follow Bears Wire on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram This article originally appeared on Bears Wire: Bears' Kevin Byard sounds off on NFL players playing in Olympics

Indy 500 runner up among 3 IndyCar penalizes for failed tech: Penalties and why
Indy 500 runner up among 3 IndyCar penalizes for failed tech: Penalties and why

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Indy 500 runner up among 3 IndyCar penalizes for failed tech: Penalties and why

INDIANAPOLIS — Three top-12 finishers from Sunday's Indianapolis 500 have been moved to the back of the field for a series of post-race penalties including failed tech inspection and team member improper conduct. Despite finishing runner-up in the Indy 500 for the second time in three years, Andretti Global's Marcus Ericsson has been bumped back to 31st in the final standings. Along with his teammate Kyle Kirkwood, both the Nos. 27 and 28 Andretti Global cars were discovered in post-race tech inspection to have modified their Dallara-supplied Energy Management System covers and cover-to-A-arm mounting points with unapproved spacers and parts. According to an IndyCar release, EMS covers "must be used as supplied," with the series stating "these modifications provided the capability of enhanced aerodynamic efficiency to both cars." Why were Marcus Ericsson, Kyle Kirkwood penalized after Indy 500? The two cars were in violation of the following rules: Advertisement Rule 9.3.1. Improper Conduct – Any member attempting to or engaging in unsportsmanlike conduct, unsafe conduct, or conduct detrimental to racing; INDYCAR; and/or to the NTT INDYCAR SERIES, whether during an Event or on/off the Track, may be subject to any or all penalties. Rule 14.1.2. Questions to be submitted and will be answered via IRIS. Modifications must be approved seven (7) days prior to the date of intended use. Rule 14.1.3. All parts provided by an Approved Supplier must be used as supplied without modification unless otherwise approved by INDYCAR and stated in these Rules or in update bulletins. Ericsson will now be credited with a 31st-place finish, with Kirkwood sliding back to 32nd. "We are in receipt of the Indianapolis 500 'post-race penalty notice' as provided by IndyCar," Andretti Global wrote in a statement posted to social media. "We are taking the necessary time to assess the information, and we will be requesting a full review with IndyCar." Can Andretti Global, Prema appeal IndyCar's penalties? According to IndyCar's rulebook, Andretti Global may request a review in writing, providing a list of errors they believe were made, along with accompanying facts, before designating a single point of contact for the review process. A request for review must be submitted to IndyCar within two business days. If IndyCar determines the request adheres to its rules, the series will name a review administrator who will help all sides with administrative aspects of the review. Within three business days of receiving Andretti Global's review request, IndyCar will be required to provide three potential review facilitators from a previously distributed list of possible caretakers. Advertisement Andretti Global will then have one business day to to name its choice for a facilitator, and IndyCar will have an additional business day to confirm the chosen facilitator's status. Provided the facilitator deems the review to adhere to the rules, a review meeting will be conducted within 10 business days of the penalty being issued. The meeting will take place at IndyCar's offices and be a single-day event of no more than four hours, unless the parties agree to a mutual change. Both sides are permitted three attendees each, and both must have one member deemed to be able to have full authority to reach a resolution of the penalty. At the end of the meeting, the facilitator will provide their thoughts concerning the penalty and whether it should be upheld, overturned or modified, but the recommendation of the facilitator is not binding. An additional appeals process exists for Andretti Global to pursue, should team officials continue to disagree with the results of the review process. Why was Callum Ilott penalized after Indy 500? Additionally, Prema Racing's No. 90 of Callum Ilott was found to have a front wing assembly that failed to meet the minimum endplate height and location specifications during routine inspection of that part. The entry was found to have violated: Advertisement Rule 9.3.1. Improper Conduct – Any member attempting to or engaging in unsportsmanlike conduct, unsafe conduct, or conduct detrimental to racing; INDYCAR; and/or to the NTT INDYCAR SERIES, whether during an Event or on/off the Track, may be subject to any or all penalties. Rule 14.7.6.8. Front wing must adhere to the following Technical Inspection dimensions: Failure of the left side minimum endplate height Rule 14.7.6.4., which requires endplates, wing flaps and mainplanes remain in the designed location. Ilott will be credited with a 33rd-place finish. In a social media post on the team's X account, Prema Racing explained that the wing was "completely original, successfully passed tech multiple times throughout the month and didn't lead to any performance gain," the car's left-side front wing endplate became non-compliant within the rules by the end of the race. "The team accepts full responsibility," Prema Racing wrote. "The team is currently investigating the root of the problem, which can involve incidents and fitment or production issues. We look forward to implementing the needed procedures to ensure improved control and avoid these kinds of issues in the future." The field will receive the appropriate prize money and championship points according to the official standings after the penalties. All three cars will each receive a $100,000 fine, and the team/competition managers for all three cars have been suspended for this weekend's Detroit Grand Prix. Advertisement Editor's note: This story was updated with team statements and information about IndyCar's appeals process. This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indy 500 penalties: Marcus Ericsson, Kyle Kirkwood, Callum Ilott points, fines

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store