
Mahadev, Malegaon, And India's Final War Against Terror
The last week of July 2025 has seen three significant developments in the world of counterterrorism. In Kashmir, the Indian army neutralised three Pakistani terrorists, including Suleiman Hashim Musa, the mastermind behind the Pahalgam attack. In a parallel development, a UNSC report explicitly stated that the TRF could not have executed the Pahalgam terror attack without support from LeT. The third and most sensitive development was the NIA court's acquittal of Col Purohit, Sadhvi Pragya, and Kulkarni in the Malegaon blast case, following years of torture, harassment, and humiliation in a fabricated, politically motivated, and botched-up investigation.
In the past four decades, cross-border terrorism has been at the core of India's security challenges. It began with Khalistan and Kashmir terrorism in the late 70s. At that time, India, complacent about its superiority over Pakistan in conventional warfare, confronted terrorism in Punjab, Kashmir, and the North East. Over these four decades, India has faced the worst and most brutal forms of terrorism, including abductions, hijackings, massacres, minority killings, murders, IED attacks, suicide bombings, and fidayeen attacks. The horrors of Chattisinghpora, Nandimarg, the Parliament attack, bomb blasts in Mumbai, Jaipur, Delhi, Bangalore, and Coimbatore, the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, the Pulwama Fidayeen attack, and the recent Pahalgam attack have bruised India's morale, communal harmony, and stability multiple times. However, India never succumbed to terrorists. It always demonstrated a firm resolve in its fight against terror, even when the West, preoccupied with the spectre of communism, ignored the expansion of Jihadism globally.
Left without allies in 1990 after the Soviet Union's disintegration and a collapsing economy, India faced deadly terrorist movements in Kashmir, Punjab, and the North-East. Pakistan, the primary supporter of cross-border terrorism in India, was favoured by the West. In the 1980s, GHQ Rawalpindi carried out covert operations for the CIA. ISI veterans like Col Imam and Gen Hamid Gul trained Deobandi jihadists from Afghanistan and Pakistan for a prolonged proxy war in Afghanistan. In return, Washington provided Pakistan with billions of dollars in aid and military support, which Pakistan diverted to finance terrorist activities in J&K.
Fueled by drug money and US backing, Pakistan pursued nuclear ambitions. By the early 1990s, Pakistan was fast closing the nuclear gap with India. India was in a difficult position. With the rise of the Taliban, India lost Afghanistan, another key neighbour and ally. Strategically, Afghanistan's loss was a major setback to India's national security. Under the overarching Pakistani umbrella, the jihadist takeover of Pakistan led to the emergence of numerous terrorist groups, terror training camps, drug smuggling networks, infiltration routes, crime syndicates, and illegal weapons markets. Consequently, an array of transnational Deobandi and Wahhabi terror groups like Harkat-ul-Mujahiddin, Harkat-ul-Ansar, Harkat-ul-Jihad-ul-Islami (HuGI), Lashkar-e-Toiba, Al Badr, and Hizbul Mujahiddin made Kashmir the epicentre of terrorist activities. After Pakistan's successful nuclear tests in 1998, its audacity knew no bounds, unleashing more lethal groups like Jaish-e-Mohammad.
India's cautious, measured, moderate, and proportionate military response, combined with diplomatic efforts aimed at peaceful resolution, demonstrated patience and strategic restraint. India's restraint and patience stemmed from practical geopolitical considerations and moral and civilisational values, as reflected in the Ramayana and Mahabharata, where Lord Rama and Krishna sought peace until the very end, even at personal sacrifice. However, India faced the embarrassment of releasing Masood Azhar in exchange for freeing 150 passengers of IC-814.
After a series of ISI-orchestrated bomb blasts in Mumbai, Jaipur, Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Coimbatore, Hyderabad, and other cities, India was helpless. ISI's covert capabilities emboldened indigenous jihadist groups like SIMI and IM, who developed close ties with them. Following the 26/11 Mumbai attacks, the then government chose not to retaliate, leaving the average Indian feeling humiliated and betrayed.
However, after Modi's rise to power, India broke the shackles and began regaining lost ground on national security. Modi started with a bang. India's surgical strike after the Uri fidayeen attack was the first signal of change, calling out Pakistan's nuclear bluff. But Pakistan refused to accept the change. After Burhan Wani's encounter-death in 2016, ISI masterminds orchestrated widespread violent civil unrest in the Kashmir Valley, followed by a long spell of homegrown insurgency. In some areas of South Kashmir, the state's writ ceased to exist. However, India's massive crackdown soon forced the rioters and stone-pelters to retreat. Following that, the Central government's All-Out operation against terrorists signalled Delhi's force posture with an unprecedented clarity.
Modi's message was clear – guns, bombs, and bullets will be met with force, but those who wish to talk are welcome. NIA's massive crackdown on terror funding and the separatist ecosystem dealt a deathblow to separatism and jihadism. For the first time, the Indian government responded with a holistic, bold, and courageous approach, not only against gun-toting terrorists but also against internal subversionists who weakened India's foundations from within as journalists, academics, administrators, engineers, etc.
Once again, Pakistan responded with the deadly fidayeen attack in Pulwama, killing 40 Indian soldiers. For the first time, Indian fighter jets flew deep inside Pakistani territory and retaliated with air strikes on Balakot, neutralising 300 Jaish terrorists. The message was clear – India will not succumb to nuclear blackmail and will hit hard inside enemy territory.
Continuing its fight against terror, India abrogated Article 370 in 2019, a historic move that still amazes us – ordinary citizens had lost faith in the Indian state's ability to carry out such a measure until Modi removed it. After the Kashmir move, New Delhi invested heavily in development and tourism in Kashmir. Although grievances and grudges about abrogating Article 370 persisted and intensified due to bureaucratic apathy, Kashmir began to change. The youth had new expectations. However, Pakistan refused to relent and changed its strategy. It created an array of proxy terror groups with secular-sounding names like TRF, PAFF, and Kashmir Tigers, so that India would not have a legitimate reason to blame Pakistan after future terror attacks, as its conventional groups like LeT and Jaish were overexposed. Meanwhile, the NIA continued its drive against terror financing, recruitment, and internal subversion.
Allegedly, Indian agencies neutralised many terrorist commanders wanted for attacks in India through 'unknown gunmen' in Pakistan. Simultaneously, the Pakistan Army suffered reverses from Baloch separatists and the Islamist TTP. Pakistan made a terror comeback in 2025 with the brutal Pahalgam attack, killing 26 tourists for their religious identity. This time, India launched Operation Sindoor at a scale much higher than the Balakot air strikes and Uri surgical strikes. India destroyed nine terror camps in Pakistan, rained Brahmos missiles, destroyed Pakistan's air-defences, and rendered it vulnerable to full-scale invasion with ground troops. In a daring and unconventional move, India attacked the Nur Khan air base, reportedly a storehouse of Pakistani nuclear assets. An Indian missile attack on its entrance killed 300 people, including soldiers and scientists, inside the underground silo.
Initially, India responded moderately, destroying only terror camps. However, Pakistan opened the front along the entire western border with India. Turkish drones, Chinese missiles, and air defences proved ineffective against Indian might. Momentarily, it seemed India was on its way to conquer PoK and move ground forces. However, the attack on the Nur Khan base alarmed Pakistan and its allies in Washington, DC, leading to an unexpected ceasefire.
Today, India's official policy states that an act of terror will be regarded as an act of war. Gone are the days when India quietly tolerated cross-border terrorism. This is the era of 'ghar me ghus ke marenge." Reflecting on India's counter-terrorism journey, detailed above, evokes an emotional response among nationalist Indians. With Operation Mahadev, the killers face justice, and the victims receive their due. India emerges strong, confident, and capable of protecting its citizens and inflicting severe punishment on terror sponsors.
There was a time when Israel set the benchmarks in counterterrorism. Today, when unknown gunmen kill jihadist commanders in Pakistan and Khalistani extremists in Canada, it instills a sense of pride – doing better than the role model. Furthermore, the UNSC monitoring committee's mention of TRF and its relationship with LeT is a significant diplomatic victory for India. Post-2014, India leads the world in counterterrorism, whether through diplomacy, kinetic operations, or propaganda. After 2019, India's diplomatic heft enabled it to silence many countries, rendering Pakistan's propaganda war ineffective. Today, when the UNSC mentions the unholy nexus between Pakistan's LeT and TRF, it brings shame to Pakistan. Compare this to the days when India's complaints in global multilateral bodies fell on deaf ears.
Finally, the acquittal of falsely accused individuals in the Malegaon blast case delivers a crushing blow to internal subversives. It is hard to believe there was a time when the state targeted innocent Hindus, tortured distinguished soldiers, humiliated holy monks, and falsely accused them of terrorism. The state machinery was infiltrated by Islamists and pro-Pakistan elements, with Bollywood working for the underworld mafia in Pakistan, aiding jihadists. Politicians contested elections with fake currency printed in Pakistan, and liberal intellectuals and academics attended conferences and parties of jihadi extremists and ISI spies like Fai in the US. Over the last 14 years, the state has changed dramatically. Today, anyone defending Rohingya settlers and Jihadists in the name of human rights finds little support across the ideological spectrum. Even opposition parties must think twice before undertaking such a suicidal venture.
top videos
View all
As we move forward, it is clear that any future Pahalgam-like terror attack will likely lead to significant cartographic changes in South Asia. However, beyond Kashmir, India faces a major war against Jihadism in its hinterland. Due to polarised social and political discourse, bitter communal tensions, widespread jihadist activities, and Muslim radicalisation, every city sits on a ticking time bomb. Any spark could ignite major civil unrest and communal rioting. India's intelligence and kinetic capabilities require a massive overhaul and upgrade. Sooner or later, we must confront the jihadist juggernaut, which is comprehensive and multifaceted. Additionally, the state must consider its covert links with Pakistan and Bangladesh-based jihadist entities and global jihadist organisations. Before the jihadist machinery makes a final effort to transform India into an Islamist nation by 2047, as the PFI document stated, the state must act systematically, long-term, and determinedly.
The author is a policy analyst specialising in counterterrorism, Indian foreign policy and Afghanistan-Pakistan geopolitics. He has done his PhD on Jaish-e-Mohammad. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
tags :
Malegaon blast Pahalgam attack TRF UNSC
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 07, 2025, 15:40 IST
News opinion Opinion | Mahadev, Malegaon, And India's Final War Against Terror
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
India faces tough choices amid US tariff pressure. What's ahead for New Delhi?
NEW DELHI: India faces an ultimatum from the United States with major political and economic ramifications both at home and abroad: end purchases of Russian oil or face painful tariffs. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, leader of the world's most populous nation and its fifth-biggest economy, must make some difficult decisions. US President Donald Trump has given longstanding ally India, one of the world's largest crude oil importers, three weeks to find alternative suppliers. Levies of 25 percent already in place will double to 50 percent if India doesn't strike a deal. For Trump, the August 27 deadline is a bid to strip Moscow of a key source of revenue for its military offensive in Ukraine. "It is a geopolitical ambush with a 21-day fuse", said Syed Akbaruddin, a former Indian diplomat to the United Nations, writing in the Times of India newspaper. How has India responded? New Delhi called Washington's move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable", while Modi has appeared defiant. He has not spoken directly about Trump but said on Thursday "India will never compromise" on the interests of its farmers. Agriculture employs vast numbers of people in India and has been a key sticking point in trade negotiations. It all seems a far cry from India's early hopes for special tariff treatment after Trump said in February he had found a "special bond" with Modi. "The resilience of US-India relations... is now being tested more than at any other time over the last 20 years," said Michael Kugelman, from the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada.


Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Meghalaya CM seeks citizenship or long-term visa for Catholic priest serving in state
Shillong, Meghalaya Chief Minister Conrad K Sangma has urged Union Home Minister Amit Shah to consider granting Indian citizenship or a 10-year visa to an elderly Catholic priest serving in Nongstoin town of West Khasi Hills district, citing humanitarian grounds and the clergyman's long-standing service in the state. Meghalaya CM seeks citizenship or long-term visa for Catholic priest serving in state The chief minister, who recently met Shah in Delhi, said the request was made to ease the difficulties faced by the 80-year-old foreign national, who currently requires annual visa renewals while his citizenship application remains pending. Describing the Union Home Minister's response as "positive", Sangma told PTI, "He assured me that a 10-year visa will be granted to the Father , so that he will no longer need to go through the hassle of yearly renewals." The CM added that the development was well received by church leaders, including the Archbishop and the priest himself, who expressed their gratitude. "This is a welcome step. Extending visas to 5 or 10 years for genuine religious and humanitarian workers will significantly ease bureaucratic burdens, both for them and the authorities," Sangma said. The Catholic priest in question has been serving in the Nongstoin area for several decades and is known for his contributions to community welfare and spiritual life in the region. His application for Indian citizenship is under consideration, officials said. Sangma also said that he had raised the issue of facilitating smooth entry for the upcoming visit of Rector Major, the global head of the Salesians of Don Bosco, to Meghalaya. According to him, the Salesian Sisters had requested state assistance in coordinating with the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of External Affairs . "They are coming solely for their religious missions. I have ensured that both ministries have been informed so that there are no hurdles during their visit," Sangma added. The Salesians of Don Bosco and other religious orders have played a significant role in Meghalaya's education and social service sectors for decades. The state government's intervention, observers say, reflects a broader effort to support religious and charitable institutions that have contributed to the development of remote and rural communities in Meghalaya. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Hindustan Times
13 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
IMEC offers hope as Trump tariffs threaten Indian markets
Two distinctly different yet related events took place on August 5-6, 2025, with regards to India. On the one hand, US President Donald Trump initially announced a tariff of 25% on Indian goods being exported to the US and then added another 25% the next day as a 'punishment' to India for supporting Russia in its war against Ukraine by buying cheap crude oil. Concurrently, the first official meeting of the eight signatory countries of the India-Middle East-Europe-Economic Corridor (IMEC) was held in Delhi, hosted by the National Security Council Secretariat. Along with the other country representatives, the US was represented by Ricky Gill, who is the special assistant to the US President for national security affairs and the US National Security Council's senior director for South and Central Asia. The aim of the meeting was to find a way to kickstart the long delayed economic corridor, the IMEC. Donald Trump (Bloomberg File Photo) What does IMEC aim to achieve—for a start, closer integration of the three regions (India, West Asia and Europe) through trade and better connectivity. With Trump hitting India hard with tariffs, there were some speculation that the American delegation may not travel to India, but that did not happen and the delegation participated in the talks, the first of its kind since the announcement of IMEC on the sidelines of India's G20 Summit in Delhi in September 2023. IMEC is one of the most transformative and ambitious projects announced with regards to economic integration and trade connectivity. In its concept, it is a bold vision to connect India with Europe across the deserts of the Arabian Peninsula. It envisions a multi-modal economic corridor involving multiple businesses, integrating railways, ports, highways, energy networks, and digital infrastructure to enhance trade, investment, and connectivity across the continents. The Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on the project was signed by India, the US, Saudi Arabia, UAE, France, Germany, Italy, and the European Union (EU). The proposed structure of the IMEC has three distinct sections. The eastern section links India with West Asia via sea links, the central section is the overland route across the West Asian region, culminating at the port of Haifa on the Mediterranean coast in Israel. The western leg of the corridor is sea-bound, where the containers have to be put back on ships in Haifa, to be transported to various ports in Europe. The success of IMEC depends upon developing a seamless connectivity network of ports, ships and rails. A digitally connected, uniform and fully integrated customs and regulatory framework is the backbone for success of such a project. In addition to transporting containers, IMEC also plans to include infrastructure for electricity transmission, digital connectivity, as well as pipelines for clean hydrogen export. When implemented in full, it promises to unlock new opportunities of multi-dimensional trade through multi-modal transport linkages across regions that have traditionally been close trade partners. It has the potential to facilitate faster and more efficient movement of goods, bypassing existing bottlenecks, reducing shipping delays, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and cutting costs. There is even talk of developing a southern leg in the IMEC later, which would then link up with key connectivity corridors in Africa to facilitate two-way trade with Africa too For India, in particular, IMEC represents a strategic vision beyond physical infrastructure and is an instrument for building a more connected, resilient, and inclusive global order. For India, it aligns with its Act East and Link West policies and reinforces its role as a bridge between regions, enhancing both economic engagement and geopolitical influence. As India charts its course towards becoming a developed nation and a $30 trillion economy by 2047, infrastructure corridors such as IMEC are vital drivers. Considering China's current dominance in global manufacturing, which is at 30% versus India's 3% share, India has a lot of ground to cover. For India to become the 'factory of the world,' industrial corridors would need to be scaled up, manufacturing capacity boosted, and these hubs must be linked through strategic infrastructure like IMEC. In terms of trade between the Europe and India, IMEC can be an economic game changer and an opportunity to strengthen strategic partnerships. The president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, during her visit to India in March 2025, had pitched for the IMEC as an important cornerstone for enhancing India-EU trade. Earlier, the French President had described IMEC as a 'fabulous catalyst' for concrete projects and investments while pitching Marseille port as one of the entry points for IMEC during PM Modi's visit to France in February 2025 for the Global AI Summit. The enthusiasm comes from the fact that the EU is India's largest trading partner, accounting for €124 billion worth of trade in goods in 2023 or 12.2% of total Indian trade, surpassing the US (10.8%) and China (10.5%). The EU is also the second-largest destination for Indian exports (17.5% of the total) after the US (17.6%). On the other hand, however, India is the EU's 9th largest trading partner, accounting for 2.2% of the EU's total trade in goods in 2023, well behind the US (16.7%), China (14.6%), or the UK (10.1%). Within this overall trade figures, trade in goods between the EU and India has increased by almost 90% in the last decade, whereas the trade in services between the EU and India reached €50.8 billion in 2023, up from €30.4 billion in 2020. With this considerable volume of trade, the EU and India are looking for ways to enhance the trade potential further. Both sides are also negotiating an ambitious FTA (free trade agreement) which promises to increase trade beyond € 200 billion. One key issue that could help reach the agreement on FTA is a faster, more secure, and cheaper transit route, which the IMEC promises. One of IMEC's most unique dimensions is its integration of green hydrogen into the corridor's architecture. The ability to transport green hydrogen across borders offers a major breakthrough for the global clean energy transition. India's twin objectives—energy independence by 2047 and net-zero emissions by 2070—are closely tied to the successful deployment of renewable energy technologies. Green hydrogen emerges as a transformative energy carrier within this shift, offering long-duration energy storage, a replacement for fossil fuels in hard-to-abate industrial sectors, and clean mobility solutions. Indian companies have taken huge strides in developing infrastructure for producing green hydrogen. Europe is looking at reliable markets to offer green fuel as they strive to achieve net zero emissions. IMEC offers India a unique opportunity to position itself as a global hub for green hydrogen. India has committed $2.5 billion toward building a robust green hydrogen ecosystem, with companies like Adani Group, Larsen & Toubro, and ReNew Energy Global leading infrastructure and technology deployment. India has also emerged as the leader in producing and promoting solar energy. It is closely linked to India's call for establishing One Sun, One World, One Grid (OSOWOG) initiative which envisions a globally interconnected solar grid, enabling real-time cross-border energy sharing. This model benefits India by reducing dependence on costly storage systems while maximising the efficiency of renewable generation. This too presents a unique opportunity for India to deepen its economic integration with the region as also deepen climate preservation, promote energy interdependence, and generate industrial and financial synergies. Also, the combination of a faster route using IMEC for perishable, fast moving and costly goods while keeping the option of Suez Route running for bulk products like crude oil can become a win-win strategy for all stakeholders. When overlapped with the economic benefits of transporting green hydrogen, solar energy, high speed internet etc, IMEC can be a game changer in years to come. Trump tariffs may have presented a challenge for India but it is also an opportunity to seek diversified and reliable partnerships. Europe too, which is reeling from tariff threats from the US and had to submit to its tariff demands, is looking at India as a reliable partner. Other signatories of IMEC, along with some potential additions like Egypt, Oman, Israel, Jordan, Cyprus and Greece already have close strategic ties with India. IMEC offers the perfect link for a faster, secure and more efficient between India and these countries. The fact that the project brings together economically strong, politically influential, and ideologically compatible countries, offering India a vital opportunity to cement its presence and deepen its influence in the region, is an added advantage. The lessons from recent global shocks—including the Covid pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war, Gaza War and the tariff war under the Trump administration highlight the urgent need for and secure connectivity options and resilient supply chains. IMEC offers a critical response to these disruptions by providing an alternative and reliable trade route. With the right mix of infrastructure investment, diplomatic engagement, and institutional coordination, IMEC can become a cornerstone of 21st-century connectivity, linking continents and creating new avenues for shared prosperity. For India specifically, IMEC offers the perfect opportunity to look beyond the US tariff war, to explore all necessary steps to safeguard its national interests and economic security. This article is authored by Rajeev Agarwal (retd), senior research consultant, CRF, Chintan Research Foundation, New Delhi.