Up to Iranians to decide future, says dissident leader
PARIS: The leader of a Paris-based Iranian opposition group said after the announcement of a ceasefire in the Iran-Israel air war on Tuesday that the Iranian people should now bring down Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's system.
Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, spoke a day after the last heir to the Iranian monarchy urged Western states to accept that "regime change" is needed to bring lasting peace and regional stability.
She made her comments before Defence Minister Israel Katz said he had ordered the Israeli military to strike Tehran after Iran fired missiles in violation of the ceasefire.
"The proposal for a ceasefire and ending the war is a step forward for the third option: neither war nor appeasement," Rajavi said in a statement after US President Donald Trump said a ceasefire between Israel and Iran was now in place in the aerial war that began on June 13.
"Let the people of Iran themselves, in the battle of destiny, bring down Khamenei and the dictatorship."
She added: "We seek a democratic, non-nuclear republic, with the separation of religion and state, gender equality and also autonomy for Iran's nationalities."
After the United States bombed Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday, Trump raised the possibility of Iran's hardline clerical rulers being toppled but his administration said the aim was solely to destroy Iran's nuclear programme.
The Iranian authorities did not immediately comment on Rajavi's remarks. Teheran says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes and denies seeking a nuclear weapon.
The Paris-based NCRI, which is banned in Iran, is also known by its Persian name Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK).
It was listed as a terrorist organisation by the US and the European Union until 2012. Critics question its support inside Iran and how it operates, but it remains one of the few opposition groups widely considered able to rally supporters.
"The people of Iran, in their century-long struggle, at tremendous and bloody cost, have repeatedly rejected the dictatorships of the Shah and Sheikh through successive uprisings," Rajavi said.
Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of the toppled Shah, on Monday urged the police, military and security apparatus to abandon Iran's leadership.
But opposition to Iran's clerical government is fragmented, with no clear recognised leader and a multitude of ethnic groups.
Any direct challenge to the Islamic Republic would be likely to require some form of popular uprising. Political analysts familiar with the situation have said that whether such an uprising is likely - or imminent - is a matter of debate.
The NCRI had remained in the background during the air war, communicating little as it sought to avoid publicly supporting a foreign war led by Israel, sources aware of its actions said.
The Mujahideen joined the 1979 Islamic Revolution but later broke from the ruling clerics and fought against them during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s.
During earlier mass demonstrations against the Iranian authorities, the NCRI was active on social media, documenting as much as it could from sources in Iran.
Iran regularly accuses the group of fermenting trouble and several of its activists have been executed over the last year.
In 2002, the group was the first to publicly reveal that Iran had a uranium enrichment programme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
China helpless as Middle East war craters regional leverage: analysts
BEIJING: China has been able to do little more than stand back and watch as war between its key partner Iran and Israel harms its hard-fought leverage in the Middle East, analysts say. Beijing has sought to frame itself as a mediator in the region, facilitating a 2023 rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Iran and portraying itself as a more neutral actor in the Israel-Palestinian conflict than its rival the United States. And its position as the largest purchaser of Iranian oil has served as a crucial lifeline for Tehran as its economy is battered by crippling international sanctions. But as Israel and Iran engaged in an unprecedented exchange of attacks and the United States struck key targets on Iranian soil in the past week, Beijing has offered little beyond calls for de-escalation. "Beijing has offered Tehran no real help -- just rhetoric that paints China as the principled alternative while it stays safely on the sidelines," Craig Singleton, senior China fellow at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies think tank, told AFP. China, he said, "sticks to rhetoric -- condemnations, UN statements, talk of 'dialogue' -- because over-promising and under-delivering would spotlight its power-projection limits". "The result is a conspicuously thin response that underscores how little real heft China brings to Iran when the shooting starts." - 'Strategic' friendship - China -- alongside its "no limits" partner Russia -- has long been a key backer of Iran, deepening ties in the wake of the United States' withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action nuclear deal in 2018. President Xi Jinping described relations as "strategic" in a 2023 meeting with Iran's then-president Ebrahim Raisi, and backed Tehran in its fight against "bullying". Liu Qiang, a retired Chinese Senior Colonel, was even more explicit in an article on the academic website Aisixiang this month. "Iran's survival is a matter of China's national security," said the director of the Academic Committee of the Shanghai International Center for Strategic Studies. Beijing, he insisted, must take "proactive measures" in light of the recent war to ensure that Tehran "will not be broken by the military conflict" or "jointly strangled by the US and Israel". Analysts say Beijing's ties with Tehran are central to its efforts to ensure a regional counterbalance against both the United States and Israel as well as the Gulf States. "Iran fits into Beijing's broader campaign to counterbalance US-led hegemony and to a lesser extent NATO encroachment," Tuvia Gering, non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global China Hub, told AFP. Those efforts have gone into overdrive following blows to other "Axis of resistance" players since the start of the Gaza war -- the collapse of Bashar Al-Assad's rule in Syria and the degradation of Hamas and Hezbollah in fighting with Israel. "Beijing has sought to prevent a total unravelling of Iran's regional role," Gering said, pointing to Chinese efforts to resurrect the nuclear deal. - 'Little leverage' China has condemned recent US strikes on Iran and called for parties in the region, "especially Israel", to de-escalate. And it has called for a political solution to help a declared ceasefire hold. Fighting last month between India and Pakistan saw Beijing furnish its long-time allies in Islamabad with state-of-the-art military gear. Analysts don't expect China to extend the same courtesy to its comrades in Tehran, given the risk of direct confrontation with the United States. "Iran needs more than statements at the UN or missile components," Andrea Ghiselli, a lecturer at the University of Exeter, told AFP. "It needs air defences and fighter jets, which are things that China could provide but would require much time to be put into use -- not to mention the likely extremely negative reaction by Israel and, especially now that is directly involved, the US," he added. The United States has urged China to use its influence on Iran to help deter its leaders from shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for oil and gas. But Ahmed Aboudouh, an associate fellow with the Chatham House Middle East and North Africa Programme, was sceptical that Beijing has the leverage. "China's position in the Middle East after this conflict" has been badly affected, he told AFP. "Everybody in the Middle East understands that China has little leverage, if any, to play any role in de-escalation." - AFP
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Malaysia at crossroads of deep ties with China and reliance on Western systems: Tunku Naquiyuddin
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia is at a crossroads, balancing its deep economic ties with China while relying on US security guarantees and Western investment flows. While Chinese companies increasingly shape the country's digital infrastructure, Malaysia's financial markets remain closely linked to Western systems. Tunku Laksamana of Negeri Sembilan Tunku Datuk Seri Utama Naquiyuddin ibni Almarhum Tuanku Ja'afar said this growing split in strategic alliances is making it increasingly challenging for the nation to maintain a steady course. 'We are witnessing the end of what many considered a stable global order. For three decades, markets operated on the assumption that goods would move freely, capital would flow without interference, and geopolitical tensions would be contained. 'That assumption is now dead. 'The post-Cold War consensus, where economics and security were treated as separate spheres, has collapsed. Trade, technology and finance have become instruments of power,' he said in his special address at the Malaysia Economic Forum 2025 today. Tunku Naquiyuddin said the US is decoupling from China, but only selectively. In turn, China is building parallel systems of commerce, finance, and diplomacy that bypass Western institutions. The European Union is pursuing a new model of economic nationalism, dressed in green industrial policy. 'Even in Southeast Asia, hedging has its limits. Asean's traditional strategy of avoiding alignment is under pressure. Supply chains are being redrawn around political lines. Multinationals are shifting production, not purely for cost reasons, but because governments are directing them to do so. 'Malaysia is caught in this cross-current.' Tunku Naquiyuddin said that for businesses, this means the world is no longer global in the old sense. 'Markets are fragmenting. Standards are diverging. Sanctions, export controls and national security reviews are no longer exceptions. They are policy tools used routinely. 'If Malaysian firms continue to plan based on pre-2016 assumptions, they will find themselves vulnerable. Old models based on cost arbitrage and passive market access are becoming obsolete. 'It is not enough to think in terms of growth. We must now think in terms of exposure, resilience and strategic alignment,' he told delegates at the forum attended by economists, market analysts and experts, corporate business leaders and various government agencies. This is not a passing phase, Tunku Naquiyuddin said, adding that the global economy is being permanently restructured by competition between major powers. 'Trade is now a strategy, politics shapes investment decisions and supply chains are being redesigned for control, not just efficiency.' However, Tunku Naquiyuddin said Malaysia still has an edge. The nation's connectivity, capital markets, and institutional depth are advantages that cannot be replicated overnight. 'But advantages fade if they are not renewed. The gap between planning and delivery needs to be closed. The distance between government policy and private action must shrink. If we fail to act decisively now, we risk falling into managed decline, where we do just enough to stay afloat, but never enough to move ahead.' While the government must prioritise disciplined execution, businesses need to embrace risk, invest for the long term, and align with national goals. Tunku Naquiyuddin said Malaysian companies must urgently analyse their geopolitical risks, looking beyond market diversification to address supply chain, funding, and technology vulnerabilities. He said building resilience is now as crucial as growth, and ignoring geopolitics in business strategy invites unnecessary danger. Further, Malaysian businesses must move beyond simply following rules and start aligning their strategies with global expectations. Issues such as environmental, social and governance, data governance, carbon disclosure and technology localisation are now fundamental, not optional. Treating these as side concerns risks exclusion from higher-value supply chains and global opportunities. 'At the same time, regional integration – especially within Asean – offers significant potential. While progress may seem slow, Asean remains open and dynamic. 'Malaysian firms are well-positioned to lead cross-border partnerships and leverage investment incentives across the region, yet too many still underutilise these opportunities,' Tunku Naquiyuddin said. He added that technology must be seen as a core business driver, not just a trendy topic. Industry 4.0, artificial intelligence, blockchain, cloud computing and digital platforms have been reshaping industries for years. Ignoring these is no longer cautious – it is risky and threatens relevance, he stressed. Companies, Tunku Naquiyuddin said, must actively assess and adopt the right technologies tailored to their specific needs. Lastly, the private sector must recognise its central role in Malaysia's development. Tunku Naquiyuddin said businesses are not bystanders. They must take initiative, shape policy, and drive progress with the urgency they expect from government. 'The government must focus on disciplined execution. Business leaders must take responsibility for innovation, investment and competitiveness. 'The world ahead will remain volatile. Markets will be shaped by power as much as price. But we are not without agency. 'Malaysia has the experience, the talent and the institutional depth to compete – if we are willing to act with focus and urgency,' he said.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump claims Iran-Israel truce holding after berating both countries
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that a ceasefire between Iran and Israel was holding, shortly after he lashed out at both countries and cursed as he accused them of violating the truce. In a fast-moving series of declarations, the 79-year-old Republican, who was on his way to attend a Nato summit in The Hague, posted on his Truth Social app that "the Ceasefire is in effect!" "ISRAEL is not going to attack Iran. All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly 'Plane Wave' to Iran. Nobody will be hurt," Trump wrote. Minutes earlier, he had castigated Iran and also close US ally Israel for violating a ceasefire he had originally announced late Monday. The two countries have been "fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing, do you understand that?" the president told reporters at the White House. Iran violated the ceasefire, "but Israel violated it too," Trump told reporters on the White House's South Lawn as he departed for the Nato summit. "So I'm not happy with them. I'm not happy with Iran either. But I'm really unhappy if Israel is going out this morning." "I've got to get Israel to calm down," he said. "Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and dropped a load of bombs the likes of which I've never seen before." Trump's unusually public display of anger at Israel saw the US leader apparently trying to cajole his ally to call off warplanes in real time. Earlier the same morning, he had posted on Truth Social: "ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS" -- without it being clear which bombs he was referring to. "IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION. BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!" If it holds, the truce would be a big political win for Trump in the wake of his risky decision to send US bombers over the weekend to attack three nuclear facilities in Iran that Israel and the United States say were being used to build an atomic bomb in secret. The US leader had said the truce would be a phased 24-hour process beginning at around 0400 GMT Tuesday, with Iran unilaterally halting all operations first. He said Israel would follow suit 12 hours later. Israel has been bombing Iran in an offensive that began June 13. The United States joined the attack with a mission starting overnight Friday to Saturday against the deeply buried Fordow complex and two other sites. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump insisted that the US bombing mission was a success. "I think it's been completely demolished," he said, savaging US journalists for "fake news" and calling two networks "scum" for reporting that it remains unclear whether the Iranian nuclear infrastructure was truly dismantled.
