When Politics Get in the Way of the Students: Charter Educators Challenge Sacramento Priorities
'California youth deserve an education system that prioritizes flexibility and innovation, not excessive policies that limit opportunity.'
Share
Learn4Life Superintendent Shellie Hanes points out that Learn4Life assesses each student's learning style, strengths and weaknesses, and develops a personalized learning plan. Free tutoring, life skills and job training help prepare them for adulthood. This model works well with teens who need extra attention, and is successful with students who were lost in traditional high schools, including:
Students with disabilities who require special education (SPED)
Those with mental health needs
Students in foster care
Teens who have already dropped out
Pregnant and parenting teens
Students experiencing homelessness
18- to 20-year-olds who have aged out of traditional school
The model isn't just innovative; it's effective. A 2023 report by the California Department of Education found that students in personalized learning charter schools had graduation rates up to 15% higher than their peers in traditional schools, particularly among historically underserved groups.
Yet California legislators would have the public believe that charter schools are taking money away from district schools and stealing all the good kids. That's untrue. And once again, they're proposing a new law that claims to add more oversight to charter schools but instead will divert student funding to government bureaucracy.
Now in the State Senate, the bill is based on the erroneous belief that learning can only happen when a student sits in a classroom all day. California families disagree. Almost three-quarters support a flexible education model and 89 percent say it is important to structure school to serve individual students, rather than forcing a 'one-size-fits-all' approach. 1
'There is a double standard that exists for charter schools and ignores equal accountability for traditional school districts,' said Hanes. 'Unlike traditional public schools, charter schools must prove their very existence every five years to continue operating.'
There have been numerous instances of fraud, misuse of funds and conflicts of interest by California school districts – yet those never prompted legislators to respond with bills that cut funding and increase oversight. Hanes questions if California charter schools need to divert more funds from serving student outcomes to bureaucracy when sufficient oversight already exists.
'California youth deserve an education system that prioritizes flexibility and innovation, not excessive policies that limit opportunity,' said Hanes. 'We call on our elected leaders to join in our dedication to provide all students options and flexibility to succeed.'
For more information, visit Learn4Life.org.
About Learn4Life
Learn4Life is a network of nonprofit public high schools that provide students personalized learning, career training and life skills. Each school is locally controlled, tuition free and gives students the flexibility and one-on-one attention they need to succeed. Serving more than 64,000 students through a year-round program, we help them prepare for a future beyond high school. For more information, please visit www.learn4life.org.
______________________
1 From Friday, March 19 through Wednesday, March 31, 2021, J. Wallin Opinion Research conducted a telephone survey of voters who are parents of one or more high-school-aged youths throughout the state of California. Eight hundred interviews were completed (plus an oversample of 71 additional African American respondents to equal 100 total of that demographic). A survey of this size yields a margin of error of +/-3.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval).
Expand
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
31 minutes ago
- Business Wire
CUPE: Liberals reward Air Canada's refusal to bargain fairly by crushing flight attendants' Charter rights
TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Air Canada asked the government to crush underpaid flight attendants' Charter rights, and Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu only waited a few hours to deliver. The Liberal government has invoked Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code to end a strike by Air Canada flight attendants fighting to end unpaid work and poverty wages. "The Liberals have talked out of both sides of their mouths. They said the best place for this is at the bargaining table. They refused to correct this historic injustice through legislation," said Wesley Lesosky, President of the Air Canada Component of CUPE. "Now, when we're at the bargaining table with an obstinate employer, the Liberals are violating our Charter rights to take job action and give Air Canada exactly what they want — hours and hours of unpaid labour from underpaid flight attendants, while the company pulls in sky-high profits and extraordinary executive compensation." CUPE came to the table with data-driven and reasonable proposals for a fair cost-of-living wage increase and an end to forced unpaid labour. Air Canada responded by sandbagging the negotiations. The Liberal government is rewarding Air Canada's refusal to negotiate fairly by giving them exactly what they wanted. This sets a terrible precedent. Contrary to the Minister's remarks, this will not ensure labour peace at Air Canada. This will only ensure that the unresolved issues will continue to worsen by kicking them down the road. Nor will it ensure labour peace in this industry — because unpaid work is an unfair practice that pervades nearly the entire airline sector, and will continue to arise in negotiations between flight attendants and other carriers.
Business Wire
31 minutes ago
- Business Wire
'This government is anti-union and anti-worker': CUPE NS Denounces Use of Bill 107
HALIFAX, Nova Scotia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--CUPE Nova Scotia strongly condemns the federal government's decision to interfere in workers' right to collective bargaining and job action by invoking Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code. 'Clearly, this government is anti-union and anti-worker,' said Alan Linkletter, CUPE Nova Scotia President. 'Forcing workers back on the job instead of supporting free and fair collective negotiations directly contradictions workers' rights that are guaranteed under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.' Air Canada has asked the government to crush striking workers' Charter rights, and Federal Labour minister Patty Hajdu is ready to deliver. Hajdu announced that the federal government will be invoking Section 107 at a press conference this afternoon, citing the financial welfare of Canadians and the economy at large as a deciding factor for this decision. 'She says this move is for the financial security of Canadians—are these workers not Canadians? Does their welfare not matter? How can you be financially secure when you don't even get paid for all of the hours you work?' Contrary to the Minister's remarks, this will not ensure labour peace in Canada. This will only push this fight onto the next group of workers in negotiations, while Air Canda's flight attendants continue to work for a billion-dollar company for free. Flight attendants are only paid when the plane is moving, and work as many as 35 unpaid hours a month performing vital duties that ensure the safe and smooth operation of each flight. Now, instead of paying flight attendants for all the hours they work, Air Canada has clearly sought help from the federal government to continue exploiting their employees. 'Minister Hajdu's comments indicate a clear lack of respect for workers' rights,' said Sherry Hillier, President of CUPE Newfoundland and Labrador and National General Vice President for Atlantic Canada. 'By using Section 107 to force workers back on the job yet again, they're setting a pattern. And that pattern is that Liberals don't care about Canadians.' Recent polling data indicates that 9 out of 10 Canadians support Air Canada flight attendants' fight for fair pay. 88% per cent of Canadians believe flight attendants should be paid for all work-related duties including boarding, delays, and safety checks. 76% support raising their pay to reflect the important safety role they play. 59% believe the federal government should respect flight attendants' right to take job action–even if it causes travel disruptions. CUPE represents over 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants across the country, and workers have been demonstrating at Halifax Stanfield International Airport since 6AM. 'Messages of support have been pouring in for these workers from across the country,' continued Linkletter. 'Canadians stand with us. Our elected representatives should, too.'
Business Wire
a day ago
- Business Wire
Statement from CUPE on Air Canada's Request for Binding Arbitration
TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Air Canada Component of CUPE has respectfully urged Employment Minister Patty Hajdu not to intervene pursuant to section 107 of the Canada Labour Code thereby permitting collective bargaining to continue and allowing the parties to negotiate a resolution. The integrity of the collective bargaining process depends on allowing the parties to reach a resolution through free and fair negotiations, without undue interference. Rather than continuing to negotiate in good faith, Air Canada appears to have anticipated government intervention and has opted to suspend meaningful discussions, contrary to its legal obligation to bargain in good faith. On August 11, 2025, the Union submitted a revised wage proposal, which included the withdrawal of its long-standing position seeking the same wage adjustment previously provided by Air Canada to its pilots. Despite this significant concession, Air Canada declined to meaningfully engage with the proposal and did not present a counter-proposal. On August 12, 2025, the Union made additional and substantial modifications to its wage position. The Union did not receive a response to its proposals, instead, it learned for the first time, when meeting with Minister Hajdu on August 12, 2025, that it had been rejected. On August 12, 2025, Air Canada unilaterally declared an impasse and withdrew from the bargaining table. It has not returned. On August 12, 2025, unbeknownst to the Union, the Company made an extraordinary and premature request to the Minister seeking the application of section 107 to prevent a strike or lockout. It is clear from Air Canada's submissions to the Minister that it had planned to withdraw from bargaining and ask the Minister to interfere with the bargaining process. Early on August 13, 2025, given Air Canada's refusal to bargain, the Union issued notice of its intent to commence a legal strike beginning Saturday, August 16, 2025. Within minutes, Air Canada served a lockout notice. The Union submits that the appropriate course of action is for Air Canada to return to the table and resume good faith bargaining. Accordingly, Air Canada's request for ministerial intervention under section 107 should be firmly rejected. The mere prospect of ministerial intervention has had a chilling effect on Air Canada's obligation to bargain in good faith. Air Canada's request for intervention should be denied. Such a decision would reaffirm the principles of free collective bargaining and compel Air Canada to return to the bargaining table – where it ought to be – and engage meaningfully in negotiations, where it is likely that the Parties may be able to reach an agreement.
