2 cold cases solved by Fulton County unit that specializes in testing old sexual assault kits
An executive district attorney says the system failed the two victims for years, but a unit that specializes in using DNA technology on old sexual assault kits has done its best to rectify that.
Channel 2 investigative reporter Mark Winne spoke to one of the victims who finally got justice.
'Those years that nothing was done, it had a mental effect, emotional effect and it ended up in some physical effects,' she said.
'It was some sense of justice because you don't get to do it again. You don't give to hurt anyone else,' she said about the man who was convicted.
'We need people to know that no matter how long ago you were victimized,' Fulton DA Fani Willis said. 'We intend to fight for you.'
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
Jai Scott Williams and Leonard Cross were convicted for rape and other charges in separate cases, but with some common factors.
The brutal rapes occurred in abandoned dwellings. Both guilty verdicts happened the same week on consecutive days. Both were solved years after the crimes by the Fulton County DA's federally-funded Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (SAKI) unit.
Rape kits in old cases, most of which had been lost in the system for years, are tested again by a DNA database containing the DNA of convicted felons and others.
The SAKI unit focuses on the victims who were for a time abandoned by the system.
'Absolutely, they were abandoned, they were failed, and they were not believed,' Executive District Attorney Julianna Peterson Eley told Winne. 'They were actually fought for finally after so many years.'
Peterson Eley says in the Williams case, the victim was 19 when the attack happened in 2014.
'Did you believe you would ever get justice?' Winne asked the victim.
'No, it had been so long,' she said.
'I think the testimony of our victim, it was very powerful. She was very brave. She was able to get on the stand and tell strangers what he did to her,' Senior Assistant DA Katherine Reimer said.
Chief Senior Assistant DA Christina Robinson, who tried the case with Reimer, said Williams abducted his victim at knife point as she walked down Cleveland Ave.
'He eventually said, 'You think you're too good for me. I'm gonna show you and I'm going to take you and you're going to become a woman tonight.''
Robinson said Williams had been charged with raping another woman in 2006, but it was dismissed when the victim couldn't be located.
But that victim testified in Williams trial this time to establish a pattern. Judge Robert McBurney gave Williams two consecutive life without parole sentences.
TRENDING STORIES:
Father, son killed after tree falls and crushes them at Georgia golf course
Man killed, another airlifted after tree falls on campsite in remote part of Fannin County
Mother, four young children killed in early morning wreck along Georgia coast
In the Leonard Cross case, Peterson Eley says the victim was just 14 years old when he raped her in 2007.
'She walked from that apartment complex and walked to her school and reported it there immediately,' she said.
'In 2021, when our investigators did an amazing job of finding the victim. They spoke with her and she remembered an exact person and those exact lips. So I think that was something that she never forgot as it was something it continuously bothered her,' Assistant DA Marquez Jones said.
Cross is scheduled for sentencing on April 14 and the state will ask for the maximum sentence: life plus 20 years. Defense attorneys released the following statement.
'The Fulton Public Defender's Office represented Mr. Cross and Mr. Williams in their separate cases and will continue to fight for them as they navigate the post-trial legal process. We must decline further comment at this time.'
In Williams' case, a motion for a new trial has been filed, suggesting grounds including the verdict is contrary to the evidence.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
‘Worst' Amazon driver angers shoppers — after shockingly careless home delivery is caught on camera
What a tosser. A North Carolina family was shocked when footage from their home security system captured what's being dubbed one of the worst Amazon delivery performances in recent memory. The now-viral doorbell camera video, filmed in Cabarrus County, shows the driver delivering packages with an alarming lack of care. 3 A now-viral doorbell camera video captured what's being dubbed one of the worst Amazon delivery performances in recent memory. Queen City News Instead of walking up to the porch and placing the items neatly by the door, the unidentified driver casually drops multiple boxes from a distance, letting them crash onto the steps and scatter across the entryway. One of the packages appears unstable, prompting the driver to roughly shove it back up the steps instead of placing it with care. He then lingers briefly at the porch, scanning a smaller package in his hand before walking away —seemingly unfazed by the mess he just made. The commotion startled the family, who were home at the time and heard a loud bang outside. When they stepped out to investigate, they discovered their packages strewn across the porch, some left precariously perched on the edge of the stairs. 3 Instead of walking up to the porch and placing the items by the door, the unidentified driver casually drops multiple boxes from a distance, letting them crash onto the steps and scatter across the entryway. Queen City News Disturbed by the incident, the family — who have chosen to remain anonymous — decided to release the footage to raise awareness about what they consider unacceptable delivery behavior. The video has since sparked outrage online, with many viewers calling it one of the worst displays of delivery etiquette they've ever seen. Yet, this isn't the worst-behaved Amazon delivery driver the world has seen. A mischievous employee was axed earlier this year after she was caught on home surveillance video relieving herself on two front porches while dropping off packages in Los Angeles. The gross stunt took place in the city's Woodland Hills area, with the unnamed driver caught literally with her pants down, according to KTLA-TV News. 'We're deeply disturbed by the unacceptable behavior of this delivery driver and apologize to the customers involved,' Amazon officials said in a statement to the outlet. 'We immediately identified the driver and they are no longer delivering on behalf of Amazon.' While that Amazon driver left an unwanted package, others have been caught taking them. 3 One of the packages appears unstable, prompting the driver to roughly shove it back up the steps instead of placing it with care. Queen City News A man captured the moment an Amazon delivery driver appeared to steal the package he'd just delivered. Matthew Perry, 29, ordered a Bluetooth device for his car and a workout bench from Amazon, which cost $15 in total. In the video, the delivery driver puts the package down and walks around the corner. But 30 seconds later, he returns to retrieve the items before running down the garden path. Perry was at work while his package was delivered and said he was shocked that someone would jeopardize their job for a $15 package.
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Judge temporarily suspends ‘Alligator Alcatraz' construction
A federal judge on Thursday suspended construction at the 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center in Florida for two weeks as groups pursue claims it doesn't comply with a bedrock federal environmental law. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued the temporary order after a two-day hearing in her Miami courtroom, the plaintiffs said. It prevents filling, paving, lighting and installation of additional infrastructure. Immigration authorities can still detain migrants at the facility. The temporary measure comes as the judge weighs whether to grant an indefinite pause. Williams is an appointee of former President Obama. Surrounded by the Florida Everglades, Alligator Alcatraz opened in early July and has the capacity to house thousands of migrants. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has cast it as a model for state-run immigrant detention facilities elsewhere in the country. The Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of the Everglades sued in late June to stop the construction, claiming the project runs afoul of the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). The statute requires the federal government to consider environmental consequences before approving major infrastructure projects. 'We're pleased that the judge saw the urgent need to put a pause on additional construction, and we look forward to advancing our ultimate goal of protecting the unique and imperiled Everglades ecosystem from further damage caused by this mass detention facility,' Eve Samples, executive director at Friends of the Everglades, said in a statement. The federal government has cast Alligator Alcatraz as a state operation where NEPA doesn't apply. The Justice Department also asserts that Williams' court is the wrong venue, because Alligator Alcatraz is located elsewhere in Florida. Immigration organizations and a group of detainees are meanwhile suing over allegations that the administration is not providing migrants with attorney access at the facility. That case is set to head to a hearing on Aug. 18 before a different federal judge.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge orders two-week construction pause at ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
MIAMI — A federal judge Thursday ruled construction must temporarily stop at 'Alligator Alcatraz' as hearings challenging the Everglades-based detention center's environmental impact continue. District Judge Kathleen Williams ordered the state to, at the very least, stop installing additional lighting, infrastructure, pavement, filling or fencing and to halt excavation for 14 days. She called the request for the temporary restraining order from the plaintiffs, which represent environmental groups, 'pretty reasonable' to prevent further interruption to the ecosystem. The judge, an Obama-era appointee, said the plaintiffs had introduced evidence of 'ongoing environmental harms.' 'I think that evidence is sufficient to support the plaintiffs' claims,' she said, pointing to how many elected officials, including presidents, had lauded the Everglades over the years and wanted it to remain 'pristine.' The decision came after Williams heard arguments from expert witnesses theorizing that newly created pavement in the area would have consequences on America's largest wetlands. The airstrip housing the detention center is surrounded by the federally protected Big Cypress National Preserve, a fragile ecosystem home to endangered species like the Florida bonneted bat and the Florida panther. Thursday marked the second day in a row that Williams heard arguments regarding environmental harms that might come from the detention center. Questioning is scheduled to continue Tuesday, and the defense hasn't yet brought up its witnesses. The judge offered to continue the hearing into Thursday afternoon to avoid the temporary restraining order, but the defense team representing the state had already released its witnesses to return to Tallahassee. During Wednesday's hearing, each side had agreed to end Thursday's proceedings by noon and meet again Tuesday, given conflicting schedules. The plaintiffs then raised the need for a temporary restraining order Thursday, and Williams reprimanded both sides for failing to predict that the hearing would need to take place over multiple days. The state pushed back on the temporary restraining order, noting that a detention center requires a good amount of activity to care for detainees. 'Can I stand here and say not one feature of this site will change in any iota? How could I even say that?' asked Jesse Panuccio, the lawyer representing Florida Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie. The Emergency Management Division is leading the construction and management of the facility for the state. Williams shot back that "construction" was the key word for the state to consider and said it was meant to apply to 'erecting, building, amplifying the facility footprint.' She allowed the various sides to take a lunch break and make their arguments when they returned, issuing her decision within minutes after they finished. The hearing involves just one of several lawsuits that have been filed against 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Friends of the Everglades, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida argue that the state and federal government failed to follow federal environmental law when it quickly built a tented detention facility at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport. They specifically allege that officials should have asked the public to weigh in, looked for alternative sites and sought ways to minimize effects to the wetlands. Paul Joseph Schwiep, who is representing the plaintiffs, described the law as a 'look before you leap' requirement. On Thursday morning, two experts testified using aerial photos and videos that the newly paved area would cause harm to the environment through runoff. They also said temporary silt fencing in the area wouldn't help reduce stormwater runoff. Christopher McVoy, a wetlands ecologist, testified that he received a tour of the area June 28 from the incident commander and said it was clear new pavement had been put down. Because the wetlands are flat, he explained, runoff or other contamination from the pavement can easily travel like a sheet through other parts of the Everglades during rain or storms and disturb the sensitive ecosystem. The water can rise up to 2 feet, depending on the season, then drag debris from the road into the wetlands, he explained. McVoy said he 'definitely' would have expected the detention facility to have agencies study the area before adding the pavement, which he described as not being porous. 'It's like pouring water on glass,' McVoy said of water landing on the new pavement. 'It doesn't go in; it runs off. And wherever it runs into is potentially a concern. That's why urban areas [near the Everglades] have strict requirements about how to have a plan to treat water.' Geologist Dillon Reio testified that he estimated 20 or more acres of new pavement had been added to the site. He said pollution chemicals would form as a result, damaging aquatic and terrestrial life. One of the defense's main arguments is that the environmental law in question, the National Environmental Policy Act, doesn't apply given that the facility was 'planned, executed, managed and funded' by the state and not the federal government, as Panuccio described it to the judge. Schwiep countered that all the plaintiffs had to show was that a 'federal actor is involved,' and Williams concluded it was a 'joint partnership.' Panuccio had asked the judge to consider factoring in that illegal immigration posed a harm to society and noted that detention centers had been overcrowded, necessitating temporary detainment facilities. Much of the state's pushback additionally rests on an argument that the airstrip was being used more frequently than the plaintiffs realize before the detention center was built. They leaned into assertions that the plaintiffs failed to show any new significant impact to the environment from the way the airstrip operated previously. They pointed to data showing an estimated 150 flights used the airstrip every day for flight training, as well as training for military aircraft, and argued through questioning that Reio's testimony wasn't specific enough because he used engineering drawings rather than accessing the site directly to study it. They also said he failed to use the initial flight data as a baseline for comparing the impact to the area and didn't personally assess the drainage setup. The state hasn't specified what types of aircraft were using the airstrip before, but one aerial photo showed what appeared to be a large commercial-style plane. The state's Emergency Management Division didn't respond to questions about how many flights are coming in and out of the airstrip now and whether the area is still being used as a training facility. Solve the daily Crossword
