Emerging OMCs demandfair, equal treatment
Listen to article
Pakistan's emerging oil marketing companies (OMCs) have voiced serious concerns about what they describe as unfair regulatory practices and unequal treatment compared to larger, established players in the petroleum industry.
The Oil Marketing Association of Pakistan (OMAP) has written a letter to Petroleum Minister Ali Pervaiz Malik to highlight the challenges they are facing despite making huge investments and significant contributions to the country's petroleum sector.
According to the letter, new OMCs have invested a total of Rs150 billion in petroleum infrastructure, of which Rs81 billion has been spent on building storage terminals, which now make up nearly 50% of the national storage capacity. Another Rs75 billion has been invested in developing retail outlets and other facilities and a further Rs70 billion is being injected into ongoing projects.
These companies have also played an important role in ensuring fuel supply to remote and troubled areas, contributed large amounts in taxes and created thousands of jobs across the country.
However, despite such large investments and efforts, emerging OMCs currently hold only 5% share of Pakistan's oil market. "OMAP believes this is unfair because these companies have more than 3,200 retail outlets and storage capacity equal to that of major players," the letter said.
They argued that market rules and policies, although designed to encourage competition and investment, were not being applied equally. One of the main issues highlighted was the strict enforcement of the rule that required all OMCs to maintain a minimum 20-day stock cover. OMAP argued that the rule should be applied flexibly, considering each company's size and financial strength.
However, they claimed, that the regulator – Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra) – has not provided this flexibility.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
19 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan's poverty is political
The writer is a Lecturer in English at the Higher Education Department, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Email him at namdar057@ Listen to article By any decent standard, Pakistan is broke: not in fiscal lingo or glossy budgetary graphs but broke in a way that gnaws at the stomach. World Bank numbers show a shocking 44.7% of Pakistanis stay below the global poverty line. That works out to more than 107 million people scraping by on less than $4.20 a day (under Rs1,200 for the full twenty-four hours). That's not even the worst of it. Upwards of 39 million — 16.5% of the country - live in what the world euphemistically calls 'extreme poverty'. That's not living, that's barely hanging on, that's economic abandonment. These numbers are long past their expiry. They're based on a 2018-19 survey, like diagnosing a patient today using a six-year-old X-ray. They don't reflect the 2022 floods that drowned homes and livelihoods alike. They don't account for the punishing inflation of the past few years, turning grocery, gas and electricity bills into waking nightmares. Imagine the horror the real numbers would reveal if they reflected today's reality. We're flying blind or pretending the plane is fine while it plummets. World Bank says this surge in poverty isn't from worsening conditions per se but from a shift in how poverty is now measured globally. In other words, people didn't suddenly get poorer, the goalposts just moved. About 82% of that spike is due to the new poverty line; the rest — 18% — is thanks to Pakistan's own price surges from 2017 to 2021. We'll get the full picture in September. Maybe then we'll finally see the truth for what it is. Maybe it'll stir someone awake in Islamabad. Maybe that'd serve as a reality check for those still playing policy ping-pong in air-conditioned offices. Meanwhile, the HRCP is done mincing words. It has called for a living wage - not just a minimum wage. That's not semantics. There's a world of difference. A minimum wage keeps you just above the grave. A living wage lets you breathe with dignity. The HRCP says a family of six needs at least Rs75,000 a month to live with basic dignity while the government pegs it at Rs37,000. Never mind that the government leaves it to rot on paper. It's policy on paper and paper doesn't quiet hunger or pay the rent when the month is up. What's the value of a policy if it never touches the ground? I know teachers in private schools pulling in Rs9,000 a month. A woman in my neighborhood teaches at a government primary school for Rs3,000 a month. That's not a wage. That's an insult! A middle-aged bakery salesman I know was earning Rs7,500 until recently. Yes, he finally got a raise, but you can guess how far that crumb really goes. Maybe enough for an extra packet of tea. These aren't rare outliers. This is business as usual. Employers operate with impunity because labour laws exist like paper tigers; because they (employers) exploit loopholes and underpay at will; because there are always others desperate enough to take the same job for even less. And then we wonder why our young people drown off Greek shores, fleeing a country that gave them nothing but unpaid internships, underpaid jobs and broken promises. They know the risks. They know they might not make it. They still go. Because hope — even a sliver — feels worth dying for when home offers only hunger, humiliation and hopelessness. We're not just poor in numbers; we lack the will, the compassion and the basic belief that a citizen deserves more than just survival. We're not poor because poverty sneaked up on us. We are poor because we've been kept poor by policies that drone on about 'reforms' while people can't afford 'daal', by leaders who hold pressers on economic growth while schoolteachers earn less than what a politician's tie costs, by a system that only works for those already at the top. This country is starving. Not just for food but for fairness.
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Domestic consumers: Pakistan govt hikes gas fixed charges
ISLAMABAD: Federal government has approved increase in the fixed charges for domestic gas consumers of both gas companies (SNGPL/ SSGC) by Rs150 (protected) and Rs400 (non-protected) effective from July 1, 2025. With an average 10 percent tariff hike will applicable to the power sector, bulk consumers, and general industry (process). The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC), on Friday, approved the summary submitted by the Petroleum Division, seeking approval for a revised natural gas pricing structure for the fiscal year 2025–26. The ECC considered the proposed adjustments in energy sector tariffs and decided to maintain gas prices to protect household consumers with only fixed charges re-adjusted in domestic sector to recover the asset costs. It also allowed price of gas for bulk consumers, power plants operating on natural gas and industry to be increased by an average value of around 10 percent. SNGPL, SSGC: Weighted average price of imported RLNG cut slightly The committee approved a raise in gas tariff to bulk consumers from Rs2,900 per mmbtu to Rs3,075 per mmbtu. For power sector tariff has revised from Rs1,050 per mmbtu to Rs1,313 per mmbtu. For general industry (process) tariff was revised from Rs2,150 to Rs2,350 per mmbtu. The minimum bill for protected and non-protected consumer will be calculated at the first tariff slab of each category. Power tariff would also be stand revised for PPL's gas supply to Guddu, and Mari Energies' gas supply to Foundation Power. According to the summary submitted for consideration of ECC, it argues that only room to revise prices is available in the domestic sector slabs, wherein, a huge cross-subsidy is involved which is estimated at Rs168 billion per annum at current prices. Government is already engaged with IMF under the resilience sustainability facility to replace cross-subsidies with direct or budgeted subsides in commensuration with income levels of the domestic consumers under the BISP. As per the reform measure, the framework for replacing the cross-subsidy would be developed by June 2026 following the model being pursued by Power Division which is expected to be rolled out in 2027. Petroleum Division worked out option whereby revision in the gas tariff, as well as, fixed charge has been proposed; however, in order to lower the impact of price revision in domestic sector, the revision in bulk domestic, industry (process) and power sector, which is unchanged since February 2023, has also been approved. The revisions in gas tariff are estimated to meet Rs41 billion revenue deficit of SNGPL and it would also generate Rs31 billion surplus for SSGC which would be utilised to meet prior revenue shortfall of SSGC which are around Rs565 billion. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Emerging OMCs demandfair, equal treatment
Listen to article Pakistan's emerging oil marketing companies (OMCs) have voiced serious concerns about what they describe as unfair regulatory practices and unequal treatment compared to larger, established players in the petroleum industry. The Oil Marketing Association of Pakistan (OMAP) has written a letter to Petroleum Minister Ali Pervaiz Malik to highlight the challenges they are facing despite making huge investments and significant contributions to the country's petroleum sector. According to the letter, new OMCs have invested a total of Rs150 billion in petroleum infrastructure, of which Rs81 billion has been spent on building storage terminals, which now make up nearly 50% of the national storage capacity. Another Rs75 billion has been invested in developing retail outlets and other facilities and a further Rs70 billion is being injected into ongoing projects. These companies have also played an important role in ensuring fuel supply to remote and troubled areas, contributed large amounts in taxes and created thousands of jobs across the country. However, despite such large investments and efforts, emerging OMCs currently hold only 5% share of Pakistan's oil market. "OMAP believes this is unfair because these companies have more than 3,200 retail outlets and storage capacity equal to that of major players," the letter said. They argued that market rules and policies, although designed to encourage competition and investment, were not being applied equally. One of the main issues highlighted was the strict enforcement of the rule that required all OMCs to maintain a minimum 20-day stock cover. OMAP argued that the rule should be applied flexibly, considering each company's size and financial strength. However, they claimed, that the regulator – Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra) – has not provided this flexibility.
