logo
Recognizing a Palestinian State Is a Rebuke to Hamas

Recognizing a Palestinian State Is a Rebuke to Hamas

Hindustan Times5 days ago
The decision by France, the U.K., Canada and Australia to recognize a Palestinian state in September is morally right and reflects a global consensus. More than 140 countries agree that the Palestinian people are entitled to self-determination alongside a secure Israel.
Yet with the Gaza crisis still unfolding, this focus on recognition seems totally beside the more pressing realities. Amid the suffering of Palestinian civilians and Israeli hostages—and Israel's announced plan to occupy all or part of the enclave—averting famine, recovering the hostages and ending the conflict in Gaza are the priorities. Talk of two states can wait.
Recognizing a Palestinian state at the appropriate time and in the appropriate way, however, could help enable Israel's departure from Gaza and accelerate the normalization of relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia, which many Israelis desire.
Israel long ago achieved two of its three stated objectives in Gaza: destroying Hamas as a military organization and killing the leaders responsible for the massacre of Oct. 7, 2023. The third goal—freeing the hostages—is unlikely to be met by fully occupying Gaza. Israel has failed to develop a plan to withdraw from Gaza and prevent Hamas from taking over again. Hamas has continued to recruit significant numbers of new militants. Israeli occupation would perpetuate the misery of innocent Palestinians and be a recipe for an enduring insurgency that bleeds Israel militarily and morally.
This is where a plan to recognize Palestine becomes necessary. Key Arab states have rightly if belatedly condemned Hamas and called on it to disarm and release hostages. These countries are also open to providing security forces and aid to help Palestinians govern, secure and rebuild Gaza while sidelining Hamas. But they'll do so only if there's a credible political path toward Palestinian self-determination. Their people will accept nothing less, and they're convinced that without Palestinian self-determination, Hamas will retain political legitimacy.
Ending the conflict in Gaza and opening a credible pathway to a Palestinian state is also required for Saudi Arabia to normalize relations with Israel. Polls suggest that a majority of Israelis could unite around such a plan. In turn, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could ditch his poisonous coalition to achieve it.
But unconditionally recognizing Palestine won't produce a Palestinian state or end suffering in Gaza. Failing to require that Palestinians commit to steps to ensure Israel's security in return for recognition would fortify proponents of terror on the Palestinian side and rejectionists of Palestinian statehood on the Israeli side.
There's a better way forward. France, the U.K., Canada and Australia should adopt, and the U.S. should embrace, a time-bound, conditions-based path toward recognizing a Palestinian state. Start and end points are a must, because no one will accept an endless process. Palestinians need a clear and near horizon for political self-determination.
Recognition should also be conditions-based. While Palestinians have a right to self-determination, with that right comes responsibility. No one should expect Israel to accept a Palestinian state that is led by Hamas or other terrorists, that is militarized or has independent armed militias, that aligns with Iran or others that reject Israel's right to exist, that educates and preaches hatred of Jews or Israel, or that, unreformed, becomes a failed state.
For Israelis, past peace efforts have been met with rejection, violent resistance and greater insecurity. The failed 2000 Camp David summit led to the Second Intifada, and Israel's unilateral withdrawals from Lebanon and Gaza emboldened Hezbollah and Hamas. Convincing Israelis otherwise after Oct. 7 will be difficult.
Addressing these conditions over the next three years—a reasonable time frame—can show Israel and the world that an independent Palestine will be focused on building a state, not destroying Israel.
The United Nations Security Council is the appropriate organization to judge whether the Palestinians meet the conditions, and America's veto would reassure Israelis. Palestinians and Israelis would negotiate directly on issues such as borders, security arrangements, Jerusalem and the right of return. That process could go on for some time, but it wouldn't stop recognition—which in turn could speed up the resolution of these issues.
In the meantime, Israel must urgently address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and implement a withdrawal plan. It must cease expanding settlements, legalizing outposts and demolishing Palestinian homes in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It must hold accountable extremist settlers who commit acts of violence and intimidation against Palestinians. It must respect the status quo arrangements for holy sites such as the Temple Mount. Finally, it must support the reform of the Palestinian Authority instead of trying to undermine it, which lets Israel claim it has no negotiating partner.
On its current course, Israel faces the prospect of perpetual conflict in Gaza, dangerous division at home, and diminished standing in the world. Israelis and Palestinians must decide what their relationship will look like moving forward. Israelis can't operate under the illusion that Palestinians will accept being a non-people without national rights. Palestinians, meanwhile, can't hold on to their vision of a Palestine that runs 'from the river to the sea.' Seven million Israeli Jews, two million Israeli Arabs and some five million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza are rooted in the same region. No one is going anywhere, whatever the delusions of extremists on both sides.
Hamas has hoped for decades to kill the idea of two states. It tried to destroy the 1993 Oslo Accords with suicide bombs. It sought to strangle the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative by launching the horrific Passover attacks. It unleashed the depravity of Oct. 7 in part to derail the Biden administration's efforts to normalize relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia, which required Israel to accept a credible pathway toward a Palestinian state.
Far from rewarding Hamas, as some Israelis contend, embracing a time-bound, conditions-based recognition of Palestine would be the ultimate rebuke to its agenda of death and destruction. And it would finally put Israelis and Palestinians on the path to enduring, peaceful and secure coexistence.
Mr. Blinken served as U.S. secretary of state, 2021-25.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Beyond recognition: The challenges of creating a new Palestinian state are so formidable, is it even possible?
Beyond recognition: The challenges of creating a new Palestinian state are so formidable, is it even possible?

New Indian Express

time27 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Beyond recognition: The challenges of creating a new Palestinian state are so formidable, is it even possible?

Geographical complexities of a future state Second is the issue of a future border between a Palestinian state and Israel. The demarcations of the Gaza Strip, West Bank and East Jerusalem are not internationally recognised borders. Rather, they are the ceasefire lines, known as the 'Green Line', from the 1948 War that saw the creation of Israel. However, in the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel captured and occupied the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem, Egypt's Sinai Peninsula (since returned), and Syria's Golan Heights. And successive Israeli governments have used the construction of settlements in the occupied territories, alongside expansive infrastructure, to create new 'facts on the ground'. Israel solidifies its hold on this territory by designating it as 'state land', meaning it no longer recognises Palestinian ownership, further inhibiting the possibility of a future Palestinian state. For example, according to research by Israeli professor Neve Gordon, Jerusalem's municipal boundaries covered approximately seven square kilometres before 1967. Since then, Israeli settlement construction has expanded its eastern boundaries, so it now now covers about 70 square km. Israel also uses its Separation Wall or Barrier, which runs for around 700km through the West Bank and East Jerusalem, to further expropriate Palestinian territory. According to a 2013 book by researchers Ariella Azoulay and Adi Ophir, the wall is part of the Israeli government's policy of cleansing Israeli space of any Palestinian presence. It breaks up contiguous Palestinian urban and rural spaces, cutting off some 150 Palestinian communities from their farmland and pastureland. The barrier is reinforced by other methods of separation, such as checkpoints, earth mounds, roadblocks, trenches, road gates and barriers, and earth walls. Then there is the complex geography of Israel's occupation in the West Bank. Under the Oslo Accords of the 1990s, the West Bank was divided into three areas, labelled Area A, Area B and Area C. In Area A, which consists of 18% of the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority exercises majority control. Area B is under joint Israeli-Palestinian authority. Area C, which comprises 60% of the West Bank, is under full Israeli control. Administrative control was meant to be gradually transferred to Palestinian control under the Oslo Accords, but this never happened. Areas A and B are today separated into many small divisions that remain isolated from one another due to Israeli control over Area C. This deliberate ghettoisation creates separate rules, laws and norms in the West Bank that are intended to prevent freedom of movement between the Palestinian zones and inhibit the realisation of a Palestinian state.

Syrian President says unifying country 'should not be with blood'
Syrian President says unifying country 'should not be with blood'

The Hindu

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Syrian President says unifying country 'should not be with blood'

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa [Muhammad al-Jolani] has said the battle to unify his country after years of civil war "should not be with blood", rejecting any partition and accusing Israel of meddling in the south. His remarks, released by state TV on Sunday (August 17, 2025), came as hundreds demonstrated in south Syria's Sweida province, denouncing sectarian violence last month and calling for the right to self-determination for the Druze-majority province. "We still have another battle ahead of us to unify Syria, and it should not be with blood and military force... it should be through some kind of understanding because Syria is tired of war," Mr. Sharaa said during a dialogue session involving notables from the northwest province of Idlib and other senior officials. "I do not see Syria as at risk of division. Some people desire a process of dividing Syria and trying to establish cantons... this matter is impossible," he said according to a recording of the meeting, distributed overnight by state media. "Some parties seek to gain power through regional power, Israel or others. This is also extremely difficult and cannot be implemented," he said. At the protest in Sweida, some demonstrators waved the Israeli flag and called for self-determination for the region. A week of bloodshed in Sweida began on July 13 with clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouin, but rapidly escalated, drawing in government forces, with Israel also carrying out strikes. Syrian authorities have said their forces intervened to stop the clashes, but witnesses, Druze factions and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights have accused them of siding with the Bedouin and committing abuses against the Druze, including summary executions. Mr. Sharaa said that Sweida "witnessed many violations from all sides... some members of the security forces and army in Syria also carried out some violations". The state is required "to hold all perpetrators of violations to account", whatever their affiliation, he added. "Israel is intervening directly in Sweida, seeking to implement policies aimed at weakening the state in general or finding excuses to interfere in ongoing policies in the southern region," Mr. Sharaa said. Israel, which has its own Druze community, has said it has acted to defend the minority group as well as enforce its demands for the demilitarisation of southern Syria. Syria's new authorities are also in talks with a semi-autonomous Kurdish administration that runs swathes of the country's north and northeast and has called for decentralisation, which Damascus has rejected. Implementation of a March 10 deal on integrating the Kurds' semi-autonomous civil and military institutions into the state has been held up by differences between the parties. "We are now discussing the mechanisms for implementation" of the deal, Mr. Sharaa said.

'Second Battle...': Syria Warns Israel Against Meddling In Southern Sweida Amid Druze Unrest
'Second Battle...': Syria Warns Israel Against Meddling In Southern Sweida Amid Druze Unrest

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'Second Battle...': Syria Warns Israel Against Meddling In Southern Sweida Amid Druze Unrest

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa says the battle to unify his country after years of civil war 'should not be with blood,' rejecting any partition and accusing Israel of meddling in the south. His remarks come as hundreds demonstrated in south Syria's Sweida province on Saturday, denouncing sectarian violence last month that drew in Israeli airstrikes and calling for the right to self-determination for the Druze-majority province. At the protest, some demonstrators waved the Israeli flag and called for self-determination for the region. Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store