Australia joins France, Britain and Canada to recognise a Palestinian state
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's remarks on Monday followed weeks of internal pressure from within his Cabinet and widespread calls across Australia to recognise a Palestinian state, and amid growing criticism from officials in his government over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Australia's government has also criticised plans announced in recent days by Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu for a sweeping new military offensive in Gaza.
Albanese told reporters after a Cabinet meeting on Monday that Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state will be formalised at the United Nations General Assembly in September. The acknowledgement was 'predicated on commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority,' Albanese said.
Those commitments included no role for Hamas in a Palestinian government, demilitarisation of Gaza and the holding of elections, he said.
'A two-state solution is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza,' Albanese said.
Ahead of Albanese's announcement, Netanyahu on Sunday criticised Australia and other European countries that have moved to recognise a Palestinian state.
'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole ... this canard is disappointing and I think it's actually shameful,' the Israeli leader said.
Nearly 150 of the 193 members of the United Nations have already recognised Palestinian statehood, most of them decades ago. The United States and other Western powers have held off, saying Palestinian statehood should be part of a final agreement resolving the decades-old Middle East conflict.
Recognition announcements are largely symbolic and are rejected by Israel.
A two-state solution would see a state of Palestine created alongside Israel in most or all of the occupied West Bank, the war-ravaged Gaza Strip and annexed east Jerusalem, territories Israel seized in the 1967 Mideast war that the Palestinians want for their state.
Albanese dismissed suggestions Monday that the move was solely symbolic.
'This is a practical contribution towards building momentum,' he said. 'This is not Australia acting alone.'
In neighbouring New Zealand, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said Monday that his government 'will carefully weigh up its position' on recognising a Palestinian state before making a formal decision in September.
'New Zealand has been clear for some time that our recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of when, not if,' Peters said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Israel plans to widen coming offensive beyond Gaza City into last areas not under its control
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel plans to widen its coming offensive beyond Gaza City to the last areas not yet under Israeli control, and where most of Gaza's 2 million residents have sought shelter as the territory slides toward famine. The mobilization of forces is expected to take weeks, and Israel may be using the threat of a wider offensive to try to pressure Hamas into releasing more hostages or surrendering after 22 months of war sparked by its Oct. 7, 2023, attack into Israel. Any expansion of Israeli operations is likely to bring even more death and destruction to the war-ravaged territory, around 75% of which is already largely destroyed and controlled by Israel. A wider offensive would also force more people to flee and further disrupt the delivery of humanitarian aid during a severe hunger crisis. The plans have also sparked controversy in Israel. Families of the remaining hostages fear another military escalation could doom their loved ones, while former senior security officials have said there is little to be gained militarily. Netanyahu says Israel will go into the central camps Israel announced last week its plans to take over Gaza City, where it has already carried out major raids and heavy bombardment throughout the war. On Sunday, Netanyahu told a news conference that operations would be expanded into the 'central camps" and beyond. He appeared to be referring to the built-up Nuseirat and Bureij camps in central Gaza that date back to the 1948 war surrounding Israel's creation. Israel has carried out near-daily airstrikes in the camps since the start of the war but no major ground operations. Netanyahu referred to Gaza City, the central camps and Muwasi — a vast cluster of displacement camps along the coast — as Hamas strongholds. These areas, along with the central city of Deir al-Balah, are the only parts of Gaza that have not been almost completely destroyed in previous Israeli operations. They are also areas where Hamas may be holding hostages in tunnels or other secret locations. An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss aspects of the plans that have not been made public, said the operation will not begin immediately and will take a significant amount of time to scale up. One indication will be the potential mobilization of thousands of reservists. The official said the announced plans were partly aimed at putting pressure on various parties. Few places left to flee Netanyahu said Israel will allow civilians to flee to 'designated safe zones,' where 'they will be given ample food, water and medical care, as we have done before.' He did not say where they would go. Israel designated Muwasi as a humanitarian zone earlier in the war. The barren stretch of sandy coastline was soon filled with tents housing hundreds of thousands of people with little in the way of food, running water, toilets or trash collection. Israel has regularly carried out airstrikes against what it said were militants hiding out there, often killing women and children. Last month, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz reportedly floated the idea of transferring Gaza's population to a so-called 'humanitarian city' that the military would build on the ruins of the southernmost city of Rafah — now a largely uninhabited Israeli military zone — on the border with Egypt. Netanyahu has vowed to eventually relocate much of Gaza's population to other countries through what he refers to as voluntary emigration. The Palestinians and much of the international community see it as forcible expulsion because Israel's offensive has made much of Gaza uninhabitable. They fear that concentrating people in the south would be a step toward implementing such plans. A possible negotiating tactic Netanyahu has said he will end the war if Hamas gives up power, lays down its arms and releases the remaining 50 hostages — around 20 of whom are believed by Israel to be alive. Israel would still maintain open-ended security control over Gaza and facilitate the departure of those who wish to leave, according to Netanyahu. He has said Arab forces friendly to Israel would administer the territory, but none are known to have volunteered, aside from an Israeli-backed armed group known for looting aid. Hamas has said, in line with international demands, that it would release the remaining hostages in return for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. The militant group says it is willing to hand over power to other Palestinians but will not give up its weapons as long as Israel occupies lands the Palestinians want for a future state. Israel may hope that ratcheting up pressure will yield further concessions from Hamas in U.S.- and Arab-mediated talks that appear to have broken down last month. But the hostages are Hamas' only remaining bargaining chip, and it is unlikely to give them up if it believes that Israel will then resume the war, attempt to eradicate the group and carry out plans to depopulate Gaza. Israel ended a previous ceasefire in March that had facilitated the release of 25 hostages and the remains of eight others. Since then, it has imposed a 2 1/2 month blockade that pushed the territory toward famine, launched daily airstrikes across Gaza, expanded its buffer zone and ordered mass evacuations. Hamas has only released one hostage during that time, as a gesture to the United States. Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251 others in the 2023 attack. More than half of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israel's offensive has killed around 61,500 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. The ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government and run by medical professionals, does not say how many of those killed were civilians or combatants, but it says women and children make up around half of the fatalities. The agency's numbers are considered a reliable estimate by the U.N. and independent experts. Israel disputes them but has not offered its own figures. ___ Associated Press Writer Melanie Lidman in Tel Aviv, Israel, contributed to this report. ___
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Minister vows to fix broken nuclear regulation
Ministers have vowed to speed up crucial nuclear projects as part of a plan to transform Britain into a green energy superpower. A new independent taskforce commissioned by the Government called for a 'radical reset' of nuclear regulations this week, taking aim at the current system which it said was 'unnecessarily slow, inefficient and costly'. In its first report, the taskforce said overly complex and expensive red tape was holding up crucial infrastructure projects and increasing the cost of the UK's nuclear deterrent. John Fingleton, the former head of the Office of Fair Trading who is leading the taskforce, said: 'Nuclear energy is safe and reliable and can contribute to net zero goals. It is also vital to the UK's strategic deterrent. 'However, over recent decades, nuclear regulation has become more complex and costly without always delivering commensurate safety and environmental benefits.' He said the current system was 'not fit for purpose'. Miatta Fahnbulleh, the minister for energy consumers, said: 'For too long, big British infrastructure projects have been held back by needless bureaucracy. 'It's time for a new approach to getting nuclear projects off the ground more quickly, and at a lower cost. 'We look forward to working with the expert taskforce to modernise outdated regulations so we can unlock growth, jobs and energy security for the British people.' It comes after ministers were forced to admit that the Sizewell C nuclear power plant could end up costing £48bn to build – £10bn more than they estimated when final approval was given last month. The cost of the new plant in Suffolk had already more than doubled from about £16bn in 2016. Meanwhile, a sister project at Hinkley Point C in Somerset is six years late and £28bn over budget. Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, recently heralded a new 'golden age' of nuclear amid concerns that the rapid shift to wind and solar has left Britain exposed to blackouts. However, the ballooning cost of nuclear projects has fuelled concerns about rising energy bills for consumers. A new levy to help fund Sizewell C is due to kick in this autumn, adding an average of £12 per year to household bills. In its report, the taskforce attacked 'risk-averse cultures that prioritise bureaucracy over proportionate safety measures', which it said led to higher costs and delayed projects. It also criticised complex and inconsistent rules, with processes often duplicated across overlapping regulators, as well as outdated planning rules. The Government said it would work with the taskforce to develop a new strategic direction for the nuclear industry to ensure projects are completed quickly and safely. A final report and recommendation will be published in the autumn. Mike Finnerty, the chief executive of the Office for Nuclear Regulation, said: 'Our discussions with the taskforce have been extremely productive. We will continue to work with the team, providing further requested regulatory expertise, to help inform the final report in a way that supports innovation.'
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Government admits prison expansion plan is ‘unachievable'
The Government has admitted its plans to expand Britain's prisons are 'unachievable'. Two of the Ministry of Justice's infrastructure projects have 'major issues', according to the National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority (Nista). The Government previously promised to increase capacity in Britain's category B and C male prisons, and provide additional permanent places in the open prison estate. Both projects, which the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said 'supports' Labour's commitment to 20,000 additional prison places, have been derailed by the supplier going into administration. Nista, a unit that reports to the Treasury and the Cabinet Office, uses a traffic light system to indicate progress on large infrastructure projects. According to its rating system, red means 'successful delivery of the project appears to be unachievable'. Both projects were given a 'red' rating. A third project, the New Build project, was rated 'amber'. Nista said that although one of the four new prisons promised, HMP Millsike, was on schedule, 'timeline risks remain' for the other three. The prisons system in Britain was brought ' dangerously close to collapse ' by previous government policies, according to the sentencing review by David Gauke, the former justice secretary, in February. Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, who released criminals early to avert overcrowding, has described the consequences of prisons running out of space as ' terrifying '. The first project, the houseblocks and refurbishments programme, was designed to deliver about 2,000 additional places 'primarily in the closed male category B and C estate'. Category B prisons are the second-highest security category, and are either for prisoners taken directly from local courts, or training prisons for long-term and high-security inmates. The description of the project said this would include 'modern, purpose-built houseblocks which will provide improved living space for prisoners and a safer working environment for staff'. The second, the category D programme, would 'provide additional permanent places across the category D open prison estate', according to the Government. ISG, a construction giant that held £1bn in government contracts including with the MoJ for prison-building, fell into administration in September last year. The company was carrying out building and repair work on 2,000 out-of-commission cells before it collapsed. The Labour manifesto had promised to fulfil a previous Conservative Party commitment to creating 20,000 new spaces. Ministers have said that the Government is on track to deliver 14,000 places by 2031, having bolstered the number of spaces by 2,500 since the election. Nista said that its delivery confidence assessments were not a 'comprehensive reflection of project performance, but reflect a project's likelihood of success at a specific snapshot in time if issues and risks are left unaddressed'. Data from the Commons public accounts committee in March found that the prison population was increasing by 4,500 a year, nearly 100 a week. This will mean that jails in England and Wales will be full by early 2026 and short of 5,400 spaces by November 2027.
