Some NIOSH employees reinstated, permanence not guaranteed
CLARKSBURG, W.Va. (WBOY) — A few NIOSH employees were back in their offices on Wednesday as administrative leave had been withdrawn for certain positions, though it may only be temporary.
Around a dozen people within NIOSH's division of Safety Research Firefighter Initiative were called back into their offices and all 58 people within the respiratory health division, which the Coal Workers Health Surveillance Program is a part of, were also reinstated earlier this week.
NIOSH employees who received Reduction in Force (RIF) letters on May 1 or 2 were told to ignore those letters, though their termination dates were estimated for June 30.
12 News spoke with the retired coordinator of the Coal Workers Health Surveillance program about how advocates were speaking out in attempts to save NIOSH jobs.
Due to dozens of former employees and advocates speaking out over the layoffs, Senator Shelley Moore-Capito and the chief of staff for Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. have spoken with advocates like Anita Wolfe to help better understand the importance of these programs.
'The cuts to NIOSH, they're in direct opposition to President Trump's executive orders that he signed, saying 'dig baby dig.' I'm not going to say we don't need more coal; we do need more coal, but the easy seams of coal to get to have all been mined out,' Wolfe said.
'Unforgiving cuts in Washington' could force Clarksburg History Museum to close
Though there has been no official confirmation that the reinstated jobs will be permanent, Anita stated that there has been talk of the Coal Workers Health Surveillance Program to be placed under Secretary Kennedy's Administration for Healthy America, or AHA.
Without a solid understanding of whether or not these NIOSH employees still have their jobs, many people have already started looking for employment elsewhere.
'If my program that I oversaw goes away, if the firefighters program goes away, if a lot of the other research that's being done…there's nobody to pick that up. And that's one thing that's so upsetting, which was in the RIF letters, they were told that this was to get rid of research that could be done elsewhere, and NIOSH just doesn't fall into that. I mean, there is no other agency or even private industry in the nation that does what we do, and what we do even reaches internationally,' Wolfe said.
She continued with 12 News on her beliefs behind the cuts.
'I'm not at all against government cuts in some programs, but I think they need to weigh the value of the program against the money, and I have said many, many times, you know, what is a life worth? And then, even better than that, what is an Appalachian life worth because we have so much more disease here in Appalachia than anywhere else in the nation,' Wolfe said.
Advocates like Anita still plan to push for permanent change by continuing conversations with government officials and various media outlets to help spread awareness on the importance of these programs.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
‘She always said, 'I'm going to be famous, dad'': Teen dies after viral TikTok ‘dusting' challenge
The parents of a 19-year-old who dreamed of fame and died after trying the TikTok 'dusting' trend are warning others about its deadly risks. Renna O'Rourke and her boyfriend DoorDashed aerosol keyboard cleaner to her parents' Tempe, Arizona, home without her mother's knowledge, Dana O'Rourke told 12 News. The dusting trend, also known as chroming or huffing, involves inhaling common household cleaners to get high for views online. The sensation causes brief euphoria but can cause instant, fatal damage, often due to heart failure, according to the Cleveland Clinic. After inhaling the keyboard cleaner, Renna went into cardiac arrest, spent a week unconscious in the intensive care unit, and then was declared brain-dead. Renna's parents described their late daughter as 'vivacious and caring and loyal.' Her father, Aaron O'Rourke, told 12 News that Renna loved to sing and lit up every room with her smile and laughter. 'She always said, 'I'm going to be famous, dad. Just you watch. I'm going to be famous,' and unfortunately, this is not under the most optimal of circumstances,' Aaron O'Rourke, told the outlet.. Despite the less-than-ideal circumstances, the O'Rourke family is now working to honor Renna by spreading the word about the dangers of huffing for teens and parents. 'There's no ID required. It's odorless. It's everything kids look for. They can afford it, they can get it, and it doesn't show in mom and dad's drug test,' Dana O'Rourke told AZ Family about access to the trendy chemicals. She added, 'Don't take your kid's word for it. Dig deep. Search their rooms. Don't trust — and that sounds horrible, but it could save their life.' A GoFundMe started to help the O'Rourke family with hospital bills, burial and therapy costs, and to spread awareness about huffing has surpassed its $5,000 goal and sits at over $9,000 at the time of publication.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Special air quality statement for Windsor-Essex, Chatham-Kent, Sarnia
Environment and Climate Change Canada has issued special air quality statements covering Windsor-Essex, Chatham-Kent and Sarnia as a result of smoke from wildfires burning across western Canada. Smoke is either causing or is expected to cause poor air quality and reduced visibility, the weather office said. High risk air quality is expected to persist into Friday evening, at which point northerly winds should improve conditions. The weather office is urging people to consider reducing or rescheduling outdoor sports, activities and events and to wear a well-fitting respirator-type mask, such as a NIOSH-certified N95, if it's necessary to spend time outdoors. Mild and common symptoms of smoke exposure include eye, nose and throat irritation, headaches and mild coughs. More serious but less common symptoms include wheezing, chest pains or severe coughs. People who think they are experiencing a medical emergency should seek seek immediate medical assistance, Environment and Climate Change Canada said. Those most likely to be impacted by outdoor air pollution include people aged 65 and older, pregnant people, infants and young children, people with an existing illness or chronic health condition, and people who work outdoors. The weather office asked people to check on people in their care or who live nearby who might be more likely to be affected by the pollution. It also encouraged people to protect their indoor air from wildfire smoke by using a clean, good-quality air filter with their ventilation system and/or a certified portable air cleaner that can filter fine particles. More than 200 wildfires are currently burning across Canada, according to data from provincial government information portals. In Alberta, nearly half of the community of Chipewyan Lake has been destroyed, by fire. More than 30,000 people in Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan have been ordered to evacuate. Evacuation orders are also in effect for parts of northwestern Ontario.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
HHS staffers sue over ‘hopelessly error-ridden' layoffs
This story was originally published on Healthcare Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Healthcare Dive newsletter. Fired HHS employees are suing the Trump administration for illegally terminating thousands of employees in the federal health department's spring restructuring based on incorrect records. Seven affected staffers filed the lawsuit, which seeks class-action status, Tuesday in a D.C. district court against the HHS, the Department of Government Efficiency and other agencies and top leaders in the Trump administration. The lawsuit seeks monetary damages for HHS employees who were let go with termination notices that contained errors. Lawyers estimate that most of the roughly 10,000 employees who were fired during the April reduction-in-force, or RIF, would be members of the class. The HHS began notifying employees that they would be laid off on April 1 as part of a departmental restructuring, amid the Trump administration's larger push to drastically reduce the federal workforce. The process was quickly dogged with questions about its legitimacy, with many affected staffers noting that termination notices included incorrect performance scores, office names and other information. Healthcare Dive has reported extensively on the potential illegality of the RIF, including paperwork issues, the closure of congressionally mandated offices and inconsistencies with how the Trump administration decided which employees to terminate. Now, a group of terminated HHS staffers are suing over the 'hopelessly error-ridden' personnel records that were used to underpin the cuts. Performance ratings, which range from 1 to 5 and are assigned to federal staff to appraise their performance, were frequently wrong on RIF notices, the workers allege in their suit. In addition, employees' paperwork had seemingly random codes determining their eligibility for the RIF, and informed them that their entire division was being terminated when it wasn't. Such errors are a major point of concern, given that data affects whether a specific employee should have been caught up in a RIF, their severance pay and the availability of stopgap healthcare coverage — and can affect future career prospects. HHS' actions violated the Privacy Act, which gives individuals recourse if an agency acts on the basis of inaccurate personnel records, according to the suit. An HHS spokesperson declined to comment, citing the ongoing litigation. However, the agency in the past has blamed siloed and disorganized recordkeeping for discrepancies in RIF paperwork. 'It is, of course, little solace to these Plaintiffs that they were fired because of 'siloed' recordkeeping. Nor is it any comfort to know that many of them had been fired by 'mistake,'' the lawsuit reads. 'For these Plaintiffs, HHS's intentional failure to maintain complete and accurate records before making life-changing employment decisions was a clear violation of the law.' HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has publicly acknowledged that mistakes were made during the restructuring due to the agency's desire to move quickly, and pledged to reinstate staff who were improperly let go. The HHS has since rescinded RIF notices for hundreds of employees. However, the secretary has brushed off ongoing concerns about the cuts and failed to provide a comprehensive accounting of the layoffs. 'Because the decisionmakers at these agencies were working with such flawed data, they barely knew who they were cutting,' Clayton Bailey, a lawyer at the Civil Service Law Center, which is bringing the suit, said in a statement. 'These employees suffered the consequences.' The RIF was supposed to go into effect early June. However, the firings were paused after a California federal judge issued an injunction in a separate lawsuit over the administration slashing the federal workforce without Congress' say-so. A group of states are also suing the Trump administration seeking to undo the HHS cuts, arguing the department's critical health work has been stymied as a result of the restructuring. Many affected workers remain on administrative leave. Recommended Reading HHS layoffs may be illegal, legal experts say
