Woman files for divorce after ChatGPT reveals husband's alleged affair through coffee cup reading, ending 12-year marriage
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT are becoming common in everyday life, helping not only with work and school but in unusual ways too.A woman in Greece reportedly put too much faith in ChatGPT's abilities when she asked it to interpret the leftover coffee grounds in her husband's cup—a practice known as tasseography or tasseomancy, which is traditionally a form of fortune-telling done by humans, not AI This digital 'reading' allegedly led to a serious marital crisis after ChatGPT suggested the husband was having an affair. The woman uploaded photos of the coffee cup residues to the chatbot, which supposedly indicated her husband was thinking of starting an extramarital relationship with a woman whose name began with the letter E and that the affair was already underway, threatening their marriage.The husband appeared on a Greek TV morning show, To Proino, explaining that this wasn't the first time his wife had been influenced by supernatural beliefs. He recalled that she had previously consulted an astrologer and only accepted it was nonsense after a year. However, this time the AI reading seemed to convince her completely.Following the chatbot's interpretation, she asked him to leave, told their children they were divorcing, and soon after served him divorce papers. He contested the divorce, with his lawyer emphasising that ChatGPT's claims have no legal validity and that he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.The story sparked reactions online, with some joking that AI might be taking over psychic jobs. Others pointed out the flaws in AI, sharing examples of ChatGPT giving clearly incorrect answers. More seriously, some expressed concern that vulnerable people might struggle to distinguish between reality and fiction due to AI tools, suggesting safeguards are needed, though it may be too late for that.The practice of reading coffee grounds has historical roots in Turkey dating back to the 16th century, where patterns in coffee residues were believed to reveal fortunes. Similar traditions include reading tea leaves, which became popular in Europe after tea was introduced from China in the 17th century. Both involve interpreting shapes and symbols formed by leftover leaves or grounds to predict the future.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Apple iPhone 17 leaks: Slimmer design, new AI, and launch just weeks away — is this the moment Apple fans dreamed of?
When is the iPhone 17 release date in the U.S.? Live Events What's changing in the iPhone 17 design? iPhone 17 Air : The new mid-tier model, replacing the Plus, is rumored to be Apple's thinnest ever at just 5.5mm , with a lightweight body and minimalist single-camera setup. : The new mid-tier model, replacing the Plus, is rumored to be Apple's thinnest ever at just , with a lightweight body and minimalist single-camera setup. iPhone 17 Pro and Pro Max : Expect a stronger titanium frame , a micro-lens OLED display for brighter visuals, and a redesigned pill-shaped horizontal camera bump . : Expect a stronger , a for brighter visuals, and a redesigned . All models: Reports point to ProMotion displays (120Hz) becoming standard, alongside a smaller Dynamic Island and improved durability. How will AI and performance shape the new iPhone? Google's Pixel 10 is already making waves with real-time voice translation and AI-driven camera editing. is already making waves with real-time voice translation and AI-driven camera editing. Apple's focus, according to analysts, appears to be less about flashy demos and more about integrated, privacy-centric AI that runs on-device rather than in the cloud. How much will the iPhone 17 cost in the U.S.? iPhone 17 : Starting around $899 : Starting around iPhone 17 Air : Likely $999 : Likely iPhone 17 Pro : Around $1,099 : Around iPhone 17 Pro Max: Topping $1,249 or higher Why the iPhone 17 matters more than usual Design identity reset: Slimmer, lighter, more futuristic—cementing Apple's stance against foldable trends. AI positioning: Apple entering the intelligence race on its own terms, emphasizing trust and integration over hype. Pricing reality: Testing how far U.S. consumers are willing to stretch for incremental but polished innovation. FAQs: (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The wait for Apple's most anticipated product of 2025 is almost over. With the iPhone 17 series expected to launch in early September, leaks and insider reports have already sent shockwaves across the U.S. has kept its September rhythm for more than a decade, and all signs suggest this year will follow the same a radically thinner body to deeper AI integration and possible price hikes, this iPhone cycle isn't just another upgrade—it could redefine Apple's strategy in a tightening smartphone insiders and multiple reports align on a likely, followed byandFor U.S. buyers weighing an upgrade, the timeline matters: early pre-orders often determine delivery windows, especially for Pro and Pro Max models that typically sell out isn't just slimming the bezels this year—it's reimagining the form shift isn't cosmetic alone—it's Apple doubling down on premium feel at a time when rivals like Samsung and Google are experimenting with foldables.A slimmer body and cleaner design keep Apple's identity intact, but they also set the stage for the biggest physical overhaul since the iPhone paired with up to, is designed to run Apple's newseamlessly. That includes smarter call handling, real-time translation, enhanced photo editing, and new ways of streamlining daily the bigger question U.S. buyers are asking: is Apple's AI truly competitive?The implication: Apple may not lead in gimmicky AI features, but it's betting consumers value reliability and data protection over experimental leaks point to a bump across the reports cite component costs and U.S. trade tariffs as reasons for the increase. For many shoppers, this could push the Pro Max beyond the comfort zone, especially with high-end Android flagships undercutting Apple's Apple has historically been able to justify higher prices through resale value, ecosystem lock-in, and financing programs that spread the cost over 24 months. For U.S. buyers, the question isn't just 'how much?' but whether thejustifies an upgrade from iPhone 15 or 16 year's iPhone isn't simply another iteration. It signals three big shifts:For Apple, it's not just about selling units—it's about proving that the iPhone can still dominate in an era where smartphone excitement is you're waiting for the, expect bold design changes, meaningful AI features, and higher prices. The upgrade path may feel less urgent if you own a recent Pro model, but for anyone on older devices, this launch could offer the biggest leap forward in is betting that consumers will see more than just a phone—it wants you to see a glimpse of the future of mobile computing. The coming weeks will reveal if that bet pays iPhone 17 is expected to come with a slimmer design, upgraded AI features, and potential price is set to unveil the iPhone 17 within the next few weeks. Industry insiders and multiple reports align on a likely September 9, 2025 launch event, followed by pre-orders on September 12 and in-store availability by September 19.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
AI may not be the job killer many feared: Signs of a balanced future with automation
Early Fears of Job Losses More Nuanced Outlook from Industry Leaders You Might Also Like: AI is choosing AI over humans: New study sounds alarm on what this bias means for human intelligence and creativity Gradual Shifts Instead of Dramatic Losses The rise of artificial intelligence has sparked intense debate about its impact on employment . While early predictions focused on mass layoffs and large-scale worker displacement, recent research and labor data suggest a more measured reality. Instead of wiping out entire professions, AI may be gradually reshaping roles, creating demand for new skills, and driving efficiency in ways that could benefit both workers and businesses over AI tools such as ChatGPT entered the mainstream in 2022, business leaders quickly warned of potential disruption. Executives from Amazon, Anthropic, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicted that automation could displace large numbers of workers, particularly in white-collar and administrative CEO Andy Jassy indicated that AI could reduce the company's corporate workforce, while Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei went further, suggesting that half of entry-level office jobs might disappear. The IMF similarly cautioned that AI adoption could result in a 'painful transition' for many all leaders share this bleak outlook. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has noted that while some jobs—especially in customer service—are highly vulnerable, society rarely experiences job losses at the scale predicted. Altman has offered one of the starkest assessments of AI's potential disruption. Speaking at a Federal Reserve conference, he said generative AI is not just transforming the workplace but could transform significant parts of it. He singled out customer support as the sector most vulnerable, noting that AI systems are already capable of handling everything from basic queries to complex problem-solving without human acknowledging the potential for AI to support diagnostics and patient care, he made clear that he would not want medical treatment without human oversight. His remarks highlight the limits of automation in areas requiring empathy, judgment, and ethical decision-making. In this sense, AI may serve as a co-pilot for professionals rather than a full replacement, particularly in high-stakes suggested that many of the new roles created may prove more rewarding than those CEO Jensen Huang has argued that AI will affect every role but does not necessarily spell mass job loss. Instead, he emphasized that workers risk being left behind only if they fail to adopt AI widespread concern, the numbers do not currently show mass job losses. Research from the Economic Innovation Group found no evidence of large-scale labor disruption tied to AI adoption. Unemployment among AI-exposed occupations has not spiked, and firms with AI-related roles are still maintaining strong employment levels. Martha Gimbel of Yale University's Budget Lab underscored this, noting that the impact of AI has not yet registered in labor market from MIT's GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025 also point to a more selective impact. Workforce reductions have been limited to customer support and administrative processing—areas that were already at risk before AI's rise. In contrast, industries such as healthcare, energy, and advanced manufacturing have reported no significant cutbacks. The report concluded that generative AI's influence on employment remains gradual and than eliminating jobs outright, AI is transforming what employers value in candidates. Companies are now prioritizing AI literacy, with some reporting that new graduates often outperform experienced professionals in this area. Experts believe AI will increasingly handle repetitive tasks, allowing workers to focus on problem-solving, creativity, and higher-value to Daniel Zhao, chief economist at Glassdoor, the long-term outcome is still uncertain. The rapid pace of AI development means its full effect on the labor market may only be felt in the coming years. Columbia Business School professor Stephan Meier expects that AI will transform tasks within jobs rather than eliminate entire positions, but the pace of this change will depend on how quickly businesses integrate the fears of widespread AI-driven unemployment remain strong, current evidence suggests a more balanced picture. The technology is beginning to alter tasks and hiring priorities, but its broader disruption has yet to materialize.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
How US built new tool to stop AI from making nuclear weapons
Anthropic, an Artificial Intelligence (AI) start-up backed by Amazon and Google, has developed a new tool to stop its chatbot from being used for the nefarious purposes of building a nuclear bomb or a reactor Anthropic, whose AI bot Claude is a direct competitor to OpenAI's ChatGPT, said it has been working with the US government for over a year to build in the safeguard. Today, everyone is obsessed with Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI is said to have the potential to change society forever, in good ways and bad. Many hope it will cure humans of disease, extend our lifespans solve climate change, and unlock the secrets of the universe. Others fear it will cause some jobs to go away forever, leaving millions out of work and society on the brink. Others imagine a dark, dystopian future with AI ruling over humanity – perhaps in the aftermath of it ordering nuclear strikes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Now, some are taking steps to at least safeguard its AI models from being used as tools to build nuclear weapons. But what happened? What do we know? Let's take a closer look What happened? Anthropic, an AI start-up backed by Amazon and Google, has developed a new tool to stop its AI from being used for the nefarious means of building a nuclear bomb. Anthropic's Claude is a direct competitor to OpenAI's ChatGPT. Anthropic said it has been working with the US government for over a year to build in the safeguard. The company said it has coordinated with the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) to figure out a 'classifier' that can halt 'concerning' conversations — for example, how to build a nuclear reactor or bomb – on its AI system. Anthropics said the program sprung out of its 2024 exercises with the US Department of Energy. The NNSA falls under the US Energy Department. It is tasked with making sure the United States 'maintains a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear stockpile through the application of unparalleled science, technology, engineering, and manufacturing.' The NNSA's Office of Defence Programs is in charge of maintaining and modernising the country's nuclear stockpile. How did it do it? The company said it was able to put together a list of gauges that can help Claude identify 'potentially concerning conversations about nuclear weapons development'. The classifier acts like a spam filter in the email and identifies real-time threats. The company has claimed that the classifier can determine with almost 95 per cent accuracy if the person carrying on the conversation with the AI bot is intending to cause harm. The company said the classifier identified 94.8 per cent of nuclear weapons queries. However, it inaccurately classified 5.2 per cent of the queries as dangerous. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The company said it was able to put together a list of gauges that can help Claude identify 'potentially concerning conversations about nuclear weapons development'. Anthropic has said that it has already employed the classifier in some of its Claude models. 'As AI models become more capable, we need to keep a close eye on whether they can provide users with dangerous technical knowledge in ways that could threaten national security,' Anthropic has said. The company has vowed to share what it has learnt with the Frontier Model Forum, an AI industry body it has co-founded alongside Amazon, Meta, OpenAI, Microsoft and Google, in order to help other companies build similar programmes. Anthropic earlier in August said it would offer its Claude AI model to the US government for $1 (Rs 87), joining the ranks of AI start-ups proposing lucrative deals to win federal contracts. This came days after OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude were added to the US government's list of approved AI vendors. 'America's AI leadership requires that our government institutions have access to the most capable, secure AI tools available,' CEO Dario Amodei said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rival OpenAI had also announced a similar offer in August, wherein ChatGPT Enterprise was made available to participating US federal agencies for $1 per agency for the next year. With inputs from agencies
