New BLUETTI Apex 300 Modular Energy Storage Solution Launches on Indiegogo
Imagine this: a sudden power outage leaves your home in darkness, your devices uncharged, and your plans disrupted. Or perhaps you're dreaming of an off-grid adventure, but the thought of unreliable energy keeps holding you back. These scenarios are all too familiar in today's world, where energy demands are rising, and power stability is far from guaranteed.
Whether you're navigating the unpredictability of outages or seeking sustainable energy independence, the need for a reliable, efficient, and adaptable power solution has never been more pressing. That's where BLUETTI's latest innovation, the Apex 300, steps in to redefine how we think about energy storage and management. Launched on Indiegogo this week the project has raised over $1 million already thanks to over 740 backers with still 44 days left to run. BLUETTI Apex 300 Overview
The Apex 300 isn't just another power station—it's a game-changer for anyone looking to take control of their energy needs. With its modular design, impressive storage capacity, and cutting-edge features like true 0ms UPS and ultra-fast solar charging, this system is built to handle everything from home backups to off-grid living. But what truly sets it apart is its ability to scale and adapt, making it as versatile as the challenges it's designed to solve. Whether you're a homeowner preparing for the unexpected, an adventurer craving freedom from the grid, or someone simply looking to lower energy costs, the Apex 300 is a great affordable solution.
The Apex 300 stands out for its modular design and impressive technical specifications, making it adaptable to a wide range of energy requirements.
– Energy Storage Capacity: 2,764.8Wh per unit, expandable up to 58,000Wh with additional modules.
– Power Output: 3,840W per unit, scalable to 11,520W with three units in parallel.
– Voltage Support: Dual voltage capability for 120V and 240V applications.
– Expansion Options: Compatible with up to 18 B300K expansion batteries for enhanced capacity.
This modularity allows the Apex 300 to cater to diverse scenarios, from small-scale home backup systems to powering entire households during extended outages. Innovative Features
The Apex 300 introduces several advanced features that distinguish it from traditional energy storage systems:
– True 0ms UPS: Provides uninterrupted power for critical devices during outages, making sure seamless operation.
– 50A/12,000W Bypass Capability: Integrates smoothly with existing electrical systems for enhanced functionality.
– Ultra-Low AC Idle Drain: Consumes only 20W in idle mode, reducing energy waste and improving efficiency.
These features reflect BLUETTI's commitment to delivering reliable and efficient energy solutions tailored to modern needs. Watch this video on YouTube. Advanced Charging and Solar Integration
The Apex 300 excels in charging versatility, particularly for users prioritizing renewable energy sources.
– Solar Input: Supports up to 30,720W solar input when three units are connected in parallel, allowing rapid solar charging.
– Fast Charging: Reaches 80% charge in just 40 minutes via solar power and achieves full charge in 65 minutes through AC input.
– Dual MPPT Controllers: Enhances solar charging efficiency and ensures compatibility with a wide range of solar panels and rooftop systems.
This robust solar integration makes the Apex 300 an attractive option for eco-conscious users seeking to maximize their reliance on renewable energy. Smart Energy Management
The BLUETTI App enhances the usability of the Apex 300 by offering real-time energy management and optimization. Key features include:
– Time-of-Use Utility Plans: Helps users reduce energy costs by optimizing consumption during off-peak hours.
– Peak Load Shifting: Minimizes reliance on grid power during high-demand periods, reducing overall energy expenses.
– Extreme Weather Alerts: Provides timely notifications to prepare for adverse weather conditions.
– Black Start Functionality: Automatically recharges the system during outages, making sure uninterrupted energy availability.
These intelligent features empower users to take control of their energy usage, improving efficiency and cost savings. Durability and Sustainability
The Apex 300 is designed with longevity and environmental responsibility in mind.
– Battery Technology: Uses automotive-grade LiFePO₄ cells, offering 6,000 charge cycles with 80% capacity retention, equating to a lifespan of up to 17 years.
– Eco-Friendly Materials: Incorporates sustainable materials to minimize environmental impact.
This focus on durability and sustainability aligns with BLUETTI's broader commitment to creating energy solutions that are both reliable and environmentally responsible. Versatile Port Options
The Apex 300 is equipped with a wide range of ports to accommodate diverse energy needs:
– Six AC Outlets: Suitable for household appliances and electronics.
– NEMA TT-30R and NEMA 14-50R Ports: Designed for RVs and heavy-duty equipment.
– 12V/50A Anderson Port: Supports custom setups and DIY configurations.
– Alternator Charger: Enables energy capture from vehicles for added convenience.
This versatility ensures the Apex 300 can adapt to various scenarios, from home backup systems to off-grid adventures.
Watch this video on YouTube. Practical Applications
The Apex 300 is designed to meet a variety of energy needs, making it a versatile solution for different use cases:
– Home Backup: Keeps essential devices running during power outages.
– Off-Grid Living: Supports sustainable energy independence in remote locations.
– RV and Travel: Powers recreational vehicles and outdoor activities.
– Whole-Home Backup: Integrates with the AT1 Smart Distribution Box for comprehensive energy management.
Its adaptability makes it a valuable asset for individuals and families seeking reliable and efficient energy solutions. Pricing and Availability
The BLUETTI Apex 300 is now available for pre-order, exclusively on Indiegogo. The campaign will run until July 19, 2025, offering early supporters discounted pricing:
– Apex 300: $1,199 (equivalent to $0.43 per kWh).
– Apex 300 + B300K Bundle: $1,999 (equivalent to $0.36 per kWh).
Shipping for early backers is expected to begin in mid-June 2025, with retail availability planned after the campaign concludes. BLUETTI also offers 0% interest installment plans, making the system more accessible to a broader audience.
The BLUETTI Apex 300 combines high-capacity storage, advanced solar integration, and intelligent energy management into a modular system designed to meet the demands of modern energy challenges. Whether for home backup, off-grid living, or portable power, the Apex 300 offers a scalable and sustainable solution for a wide range of applications. Here are more guides from our previous articles and guides related to power solutions that you may find helpful. Filed Under: Gadgets News, Hardware
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
39 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. S25 Edge: The ULTIMATE Speed Battle!
When comparing flagship smartphones, the iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge emerge as two of the most advanced options available. Each device caters to distinct user preferences, offering unique strengths in design, performance, and usability. The Galaxy S25 Edge emphasizes speed and innovation, while the iPhone 16 Pro Max focuses on delivering a refined and consistent user experience. Below is a detailed breakdown of how these two devices stack up across key features in a new video from Nick Ackerman. Watch this video on YouTube. Design and Build The Galaxy S25 Edge stands out with its ultra-thin and lightweight design, redefining portability in the smartphone market. Despite its slim profile, it incorporates effective heat management, making sure the device remains comfortable to use even during extended sessions. This makes it an excellent choice for users who prioritize sleekness and mobility. In contrast, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a more substantial build, emphasizing durability and robustness. Its slightly bulkier design accommodates a larger battery, which translates to longer usage times. For users who value sturdiness and extended battery life, the iPhone's design is a clear winner. Both devices showcase premium craftsmanship, but their appeal depends on whether you prioritize portability or endurance. Performance Performance is a critical factor for any flagship device, and here the Galaxy S25 Edge takes the lead with its faster app launch speeds and superior multitasking capabilities. The device's snappy interface and responsiveness are particularly noticeable during demanding tasks, making it a favorite among power users. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a different kind of performance advantage. Its smooth animations and optimized app performance create a polished and seamless user experience. While the Galaxy S25 Edge excels in raw speed, the iPhone prioritizes fluidity and consistency, which many users find more intuitive for everyday use. Both devices deliver exceptional performance, but their strengths cater to different user needs. Display and Software The iPhone 16 Pro Max features a ProMotion display with adaptive refresh rates, offering a visually smooth experience during scrolling, video playback, and gaming. This technology enhances usability and provides a refined visual experience, making it ideal for users who value visual precision and fluidity. In comparison, the Galaxy S25 Edge delivers a faster and more responsive user interface, appealing to those who prioritize speed and efficiency. However, its rapid transitions and animations may feel overwhelming to users accustomed to a more measured pace. Both devices feature high-quality displays, but the choice between them depends on whether you prioritize visual refinement or interface responsiveness. Unlocking and Biometrics Biometric security is another area where these devices differ significantly. The iPhone 16 Pro Max relies on Face ID, a secure and seamlessly integrated system that works intuitively with its swipe-to-unlock functionality. This system is reliable and easy to use for most users. The Galaxy S25 Edge, however, offers greater versatility with both in-display fingerprint scanning and face unlock. These options provide faster access and cater to users who prefer having multiple unlocking methods. While both systems are effective, the Galaxy S25 Edge's variety may appeal to those who value flexibility and convenience. Gaming and Graphics For gaming enthusiasts, the Galaxy S25 Edge is a standout performer. Its multi-core processing power and advanced 3D graphics capabilities make it ideal for resource-intensive games. The device handles demanding titles with ease, delivering a smooth and immersive gaming experience. The iPhone 16 Pro Max, while slightly behind in multi-core performance, excels in single-core tasks and game launch speeds. Both devices maintain similar temperatures during extended gaming sessions, making sure comfort for users. Ultimately, the Galaxy S25 Edge is better suited for hardcore gamers, while the iPhone offers reliable performance for casual gaming. Camera Performance The iPhone 16 Pro Max excels in everyday photography, offering fast camera launch speeds and a responsive shutter. Its camera system is optimized for social media, making sure consistent results across platforms. This makes it a dependable choice for users who frequently capture spontaneous moments. The Galaxy S25 Edge, equipped with a 200MP main sensor, shines in capturing fine details and high-resolution images. However, its zoom capabilities fall short compared to Samsung's Ultra models. While both devices deliver impressive results, the iPhone's consistency and ease of use give it a slight edge for most users. Battery Life Battery life is a crucial consideration, and the iPhone 16 Pro Max outperforms the Galaxy S25 Edge in this area. Its larger battery capacity ensures longer usage times, making it a reliable choice for users with demanding schedules. The Galaxy S25 Edge, while capable of lasting a full day with moderate use, sacrifices battery capacity for its thin and lightweight design. This trade-off may appeal to users who prioritize portability, but those seeking endurance and reliability will find the iPhone more dependable. Future Implications The Galaxy S25 Edge's innovative design sets a new benchmark for smartphone portability. Its ultra-thin profile has sparked speculation about future trends, including the possibility of an 'iPhone Air' model. As manufacturers continue to push the boundaries of design and performance, devices like the Galaxy S25 Edge pave the way for thinner and more efficient smartphones. Meanwhile, the iPhone 16 Pro Max reinforces Apple's commitment to delivering a polished and consistent user experience, emphasizing durability, battery life, and ecosystem integration. These qualities ensure its relevance in a market increasingly focused on balancing innovation with practicality. Final Thoughts The iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge represent two distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. The Galaxy S25 Edge impresses with its ultra-thin design, faster app launches, and superior gaming performance, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize speed and portability. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max delivers a refined and consistent experience, excelling in battery life, camera functionality, and ecosystem integration. Ultimately, the choice between these devices depends on your priorities. Whether you value innovative design or reliability and durability, both smartphones offer compelling features tailored to different user needs. Here are more detailed guides and articles that you may find helpful on iPhone 16 Pro Max. Source & Image Credit: Nick Ackerman Filed Under: Android News, Apple iPhone, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Should workers who don't come into the office have their pay cut?
The UK was named the working-from-home capital of Europe last week, with university graduates revealed to work 1.8 days a week from home on average. We're nearly world-beaters too, with only employees in Canada found in the office less, averaging 1.9 days at home. Worldwide, the average is 1.3 days, according to the Global Survey of Working Arrangements, a poll of 16,000 full-time university-educated workers across 40 countries. However, the winds could be changing, with companies such as HSBC threatening to cut pay packages if workers don't come into the office more. But are they right to do this? Oliver Chapman, the chief executive of OCI, a supply chain company As a company, we pride ourselves on transparency, performance and long-term value. That's why I believe it's time we address the widening gap between in-office and remote work and change the pay structures that have failed to adapt. I'm not here to say remote work doesn't have its place. It does. During the pandemic, it kept businesses alive and people safe. But we are no longer in crisis mode. What we face now is a choice between what's convenient and what drives collaboration, innovation and growth. When employees choose to work remotely full-time, often from locations with a significantly lower cost of living, they are making a lifestyle decision. That decision has real economic implications. Yet in many cases, their salaries remain tied to cities they've left behind, often London, where pay reflects not just talent but living expenses, access and availability. If you're living in Cornwall instead of Canary Wharf, but drawing the same salary, we have to ask: is that fair to the company or to colleagues showing up in person every day? In-office work brings tangible benefits. It facilitates mentorship, spontaneous problem-solving and stronger team dynamics. It builds culture. These aren't just perks — they drive productivity. The people commuting daily, navigating the rising costs of transport, lunch and childcare, are investing in the business in ways remote workers simply are not. Compensation must reflect contribution — real, measurable, and holistic. If a role no longer requires city-based presence, great, we're flexible. But flexibility works both ways. Geographic-based pay is not about punishment. It's about equity. If you choose not to be where the work most needs you, that should be factored into how you're compensated. Some will call this regressive. I call it responsible. Businesses need to adapt to a post-pandemic reality, yes, that's true, but that means balancing flexibility with fairness, and performance with presence. Remote work isn't going away, nor should it. But it should evolve. And part of that evolution includes acknowledging that when you change where and how you work, it might also change what you're paid. That's not exploitation. That's economics. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts Gemma Dale, a former HR director and senior lecturer at Liverpool John Moores University No, workers who don't return to the office shouldn't have their pay cut. Firstly, there are the legal issues. Any unilateral pay cut to a contractual salary is likely to result in a wave of claims from workers for unlawful deductions from wages, or breach of potential legal issues aside, it is still a very bad idea. Organisations need productive, engaged, healthy employees. Remote and hybrid work can help to deliver this. We learnt during the pandemic that a great deal of work can be successfully undertaken remotely. Employees want to retain that flexibility — and who can blame them? Remote work is good for wellbeing, work-life balance and inclusion, helps people manage caring and domestic responsibilities, provides them with time for family, friends and exercise, and saves money. In contrast, commuting can be expensive, stressful and, if you add in public transport, unreliable. When you get there, many offices aren't conducive to deep work, and, spoiler alert, watercooler conversations don't magically spark innovation. There is a growing body of evidence, which the debate too often ignores, that shows that workers are just as productive working at home than they are in the office. In fact, it has been found that people work harder and longer from home. • Bosses shouldn't discipline staff for working from home, judge rules Forcing people back to the office unnecessarily, even without a pay cut, runs the risks of talent attrition, disengagement and difficulties attracting the best people. Cutting workers' pay if they don't fulfil an attendance requirement, especially if they are performing well, is the very opposite of trust and motivation. It's also poor people management. Good managers focus on outputs and outcomes, not performative presence. People are paid a salary to undertake a role; what should matter most is how they do it and what they contribute. Cutting pay for employees working remotely conflates presence with performance. It's about lack of trust. Underneath lies an assumption that if people work from home they might skive or spend all day watching Homes Under the Hammer. There is no need to penalise people for wanting to work in a way that is practical, suits their family and supports their wellbeing. Flexible work is now an employee expectation, not a nice to have. The office still has a place, but when we empower people to choose how they work, everyone wins.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Trump cornered as China weaponises its rare-earths dominance
When or if Donald Trump gets on the phone with Xi Jinping, the tone between the two men is likely to be frosty. The US and China have in recent days both accused each other of violating their fragile, three-week-old trade truce. The two presidents are expected to speak this week in an effort to rescue the deal. But Trump has a tough pill to swallow: it is his arch-rival who looks to have the better negotiating hand. China's near-total dominance of the world's supply of rare-earth metals – which are used in the manufacture of everything from cars and computer chips to F-35 fighter jets and nuclear-powered submarines – means Xi can squeeze the US where it hurts. 'Critical minerals are one of the most important bargaining chips for China in its negotiations with Washington. China will really hold on to this, as a significant point of leverage,' says Matilda Buchan, a senior analyst at Asia House, a London think tank. Beijing's willingness to weaponise the rare-earths supply chain is so potent a threat to the US economy and military that it has already pushed the White House into de-escalating its planned trade war with China. After Trump's April 2 'liberation day' announcement raised tariffs on US imports from China to an eventual peak of 145pc, Beijing's retaliation included a ban on exports to the US of magnet alloys containing key rare-earth materials. The impact was quickly felt. On May 9, some of the biggest carmakers in the US – including General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen and Hyundai – wrote to the White House warning that unless China's export ban was lifted, they would soon have to start cutting back production. That same day, Trump told his Truth Social followers that he was ready to make big concessions to get a deal with China. Negotiations in Geneva took place over the ensuing weekend, and the tariffs came tumbling down. It emerged, more quietly, in subsequent days that China would allow rare-earths exports to the US to resume. 'Major disruption' Last Friday, though, Trump was back on Truth Social claiming that China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US'. Jamieson Greer, the president's trade envoy, told CNBC that Beijing was 'slow-rolling' its issuance of licences to export products containing rare earths. 'We haven't seen the flow of some of those critical minerals as they were supposed to be doing,' he said. The question is whether China is actively frustrating the deal, as some White House officials reportedly suspect, or whether the explanation is more mundane: not a grand conspiracy but simply a system coming to grips with new red tape. Back in April, Beijing did not just slap a ban on exports, it built a new bureaucratic structure to underpin future rare-earths trade. China-based companies wanting to export metal alloys containing more than a trace of seven key rare earths – samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, yttrium and scandium – now need to apply for a licence from the commerce ministry. It was not initially clear which shipments would be caught by the new rules, and there was plenty of precautionary laboratory testing, even of exports that were below the rare-earth content threshold. 'What initially looked like an almost total freezing of exports from China was really just a response to this need for testing of all the material, and of any material which contained more than 0.1pc of any of these elements,' says David Merriman, the research director at Project Blue, a critical minerals analysis and advisory firm. Project Blue's analysis suggests the application process is taking about 45 days, which may explain why exports to the US have been slower than expected. By mid-May, six large companies had received export licences, and at least another three were in the process of doing so. 'We are seeing some approvals come through, certainly slower than industry would like,' Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, told Bloomberg this week. 'Some of the delay is related to China working through their new system to approve exports, not that they are not allowing exports.' As part of the Geneva trade deal between the US and China, the commerce ministry has taken 28 US businesses off its export-control blacklist. But exports will still have to be approved on a shipment-by-shipment basis, and none is so far bound for the US. Volkswagen's European operations appear to have been an early beneficiary of an export licence, but not in sufficient quantities to ease supply concerns. 'There are a few approvals coming through, but they are far from being sufficient to prevent imminent production halts,' Jens Eskelund, the president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, told the New York Times. 'We are still facing a major disruption of supply chains.' Trump cornered The threat of factory production lines grinding to a halt highlights the immense power of China in this crucial market, and the power of its hand in negotiations. China's mines churn out about 61pc of the world's rare earths, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Chinese refiners and manufacturers also hoover up most of the rare earths from elsewhere, processing 92pc of the world's supply. It is refining that is key, as this is the process that turns the material into a usable product. The country has a particular stranglehold on the manufacture of magnet alloys containing rare earths, which have near-ubiquitous application in computing, vehicular and electrical systems. 'Particularly as you move further down the supply chain, from mined products towards downstream highly engineered products, China's market share only grows,' Merriman says. 'Its grip only gets tighter.' Rare earths are used in very small quantities, which means it has long been uneconomic for most countries to mine or refine them – most, that is, except China, where the industry is under state control. The US has been spearheading sporadic efforts to restart rare-earths production and magnet manufacture either at home or in friendlier countries. But these efforts are yet to bear real fruit. The IEA estimates that a decade from now, China will still account for 85pc of refined rare-earths output. This leaves Trump cornered. He has been talking up the prospects of Ukraine and Greenland as alternatives, but his presidency will be long gone before either of those becomes a realistic option. Tariffs are no use here either. His only weapon is semiconductors. Over the past month, the US has been gradually tightening controls over China-bound exports of chips and associated software, particularly those used in artificial intelligence. The chips squeeze is partly motivated by the White House's long-term strategic desire to retain technological supremacy over China. But it also has some immediate tactical trade leverage – as Howard Lutnick, the US commerce secretary, admitted on Sunday. '[We are] taking certain actions to show them [the Chinese] what it feels like on the other side of that [export ban] equation,' he told Fox News. This has riled Beijing. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the Chinese commerce industry said in a statement on Monday. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus.' Despite the war of words, Lutnick claimed he was confident that Trump would 'work it out' with Xi. Perhaps his confidence is well-founded. With the US and Chinese tech and manufacturing industries hanging in the balance, a deal looks essential for both sides.
