Woman wins £30,000 compensation for being compared to Darth Vader
Comparing someone at work to the Star Wars villain Darth Vader is 'insulting' and 'upsetting', an employment tribunal has ruled.
A judge concluded that being told you have the same personality type as the infamous sci-fi baddie is a workplace 'detriment' – a legal term meaning harm or negative impact experienced by a person.
'Darth Vader is a legendary villain of the Star Wars series, and being aligned with his personality is insulting,' the employment judge Kathryn Ramsden said.
The tribunal's ruling came in the case of an NHS blood donation worker Lorna Rooke, who has won almost £30,000 after her co-worker took a Star Wars-themed psychological test on her behalf and told colleagues Rooke fell into the Sith Lord's category.
The tribunal found that the outcome of the online quiz reflected the colleague's perception of Rooke and it was 'little wonder' the NHS employee was upset by the result.
The tribunal, held in Croydon, south London, heard that in 2003 Rooke began working for the NHS Blood and Transplant service as a training and practice supervisor.
In August 2021, members of Rooke's team took a Star Wars themed Myers-Briggs questionnaire as a team-building exercise.
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator sorts people into 16 categories based on how introverted they are, level of intuition, if they are led by thoughts or feelings and how they judge or perceive the world around them.
In the movie franchise, Vader is half human, half machine, and uses the 'dark side of the force' in his pursuit of his son Luke Skywalker and the Rebel Alliance – also featuring Han Solo, Princess Leia, Chewbacca and the droids C-3P0 and R2-D2.
Read More Listed financial adviser in £6.1m law firm deal
But in the personality test, the Darth Vader category was described as a 'very focused individual' who could bring teams together.
Rooke did not participate as she had to take a personal phone call but when she returned a colleague, Amanda Harber, had filled it out on her behalf and announced that she had the same personality type as Vader – real name Anakin Skywalker.
The supervisor told the tribunal this outcome made her feel unpopular and was one of the reasons for her resignation the following month.
Although the tribunal rejected her claim that the 'Darth Vader incident' had prompted her to leave it did find it counted as a 'detriment'.
Rooke won her case for detriment after a protected disclosure but lost claims for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and failure to make reasonable adjustments. She was awarded £28,989.61 in compensation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The cost of caring for a loved one
It's Carers' Week, when we're encouraged to recognise the effort put in by unpaid carers looking after their loved ones. As more people live longer and need more care, it should also be a chance to consider what we'd do if we found ourselves in this position, and someone we love needed care. You might want to step in and help, so it's worth understanding the potential costs — from the extras you'd need at home to the cost of any lost income. In many cases, the whole family will need to have a frank conversation about how to support the person offering care, as well as the person needing it. If your family member needs professional care, the question of costs becomes even more pressing. On average, you'll pay about £50,000 a year for residential care and £66,000 for a nursing home, but the averages hide some big costs, and plenty of people pay well over £100,000 a year. You may be able to get some help from the state, but there's a process you need to go through first. It starts with a "needs assessment", done by your local authority, who will work out what care the person needs. Read more: How much does it cost to become a driver in the UK? Next you go through a financial assessment, which looks at the assets of the person needing care. If they're getting care at home, or they're in a care home temporarily, this assessment won't include the value of their own home. If they're going into a care home permanently, it may include their home, unless someone from specific groups also lives there. This includes a partner, any of their children under the age of 18, or a relative who is disabled or over the age of 60. In England, if they have assets of less than £14,250, the council may pay for care — although it will also take their income into account. If they have between £14,250 and £23,250, they will have to contribute to the cost of care, but if they have assets over £23,250, they'll need to foot the entire bill. If your loved one has complex medical needs, they should be assessed for NHS Continuing Healthcare. This can pay for all their care in some cases, but don't assume they'll qualify. It's not enough to have caring needs around the clock, they'll have to have very high medical needs too, requiring regular intervention from medical experts and professionals. If you end up needing to pay for care for someone, there are a few benefits that will help. If they are over state pension age, they could get the attendance allowance — or pension age disability in Scotland. However, this will barely scratch the surface of costs. It means you may need to speak to anyone in your life who might need care, to see what preparations they've put in place. A piece of research we did a while ago found that fewer than half of people thought their loved ones could pay for care from their savings. It means you should consider their pension too. A guaranteed monthly pension income will go towards the cost of care. If they're using pension drawdown, they may have money in their pension pot that can be used too. For younger people, this often makes sense as a way to save for your own care needs, especially if you're saving into a workplace pension and your employer is helping to build the pot. Read more: What is the Pension Investment Review? However, the value of the property will often need to be used. Some people will rent the family home out to cover fees, although this is risky because rental income isn't guaranteed, and will be depleted by maintenance and repairs. You can consider equity release to free up some of the value in the property, but this is expensive. There will be a set up cost, and usually any interest on the loan will roll up, and needs to repaid when the property is sold. There's also the option of a deferred payment arrangement with the local council, which is a bit like equity release, but run by the council and slightly less expensive. But for many people, the most sensible option ends up being selling up. You might pay fees from the lump sum as you go along, but it's worth considering an immediate needs care annuity instead. These pay a fixed amount to the care home every month for the rest of their life, and tend to cover the gap between pension income and the cost of care. Talking to your loved ones about care, and how they'd pay for it, is difficult, but it's a far easier conversation well in advance, when they have time to make a plan. It's much more stressful to try to discuss this at the point they already need care and are starting to panic about how they're going to pay for more: How to tell if you're rich Should people keep working until later in life? How to get your children to move outSign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The NHS and Royal Mail are a match made in hell
Your bank doesn't send letters ticking you off about your overdraft anymore. Neither does your lawyer, or your accountant, or anyone else for that matter. Even your birthday or Christmas cards typically arrive via your phone's inbox instead of the front door. There is, however, one organisation that still finds a piece of paper delivered by hand to be the most efficient way to communicate: the NHS. Its spending on the Royal Mail is still soaring – with taxpayers footing the bill. The Health Secretary Wes Streeting may still trot out his standard speech about how the NHS is a global leader in new technologies and how Artificial Intelligence will drive a new era of productivity. The reality, as so often, turns out to be very different. We learned this week that the technology that the health service relies on is one from the 1840s: the letter with a stamp on it. Despite pledging to switch to a completely digital way of communicating with patients, according to research from the Taxpayer's Alliance the amount the health service spent on mail punched through £100 million this year, up by 12.5 per cent over the last twelve months. Even though up to a quarter of the estimated eight million missed appointments a year were the fault of delays in the post, hospital managers persist in using letters as their main form of managing the system. The last quarter of a century of technological progress has completely passed it by. Indeed, at the current rate of growth the NHS will be spending £180 million a year by the end of the decade on the postal service, and more than £500 million by the 2040s. Perhaps the takeover of the mail system by the Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky makes sense after all. While most of us may have imagined the postal business was in terminal decline, perhaps there is a fortune to be made as the booking system of the NHS. The trouble is that it should hardly come as a surprise to anyone. In reality, the NHS and Royal Mail are perfect partners for each other. They are both relics of a different era, created at a time when we still believed that government-owned monopolies were the most effective way to deliver a product or a service. They are both hopelessly inefficient and riddled with restrictive practices. They are both dominated by trade unions that are resistant to change; that protect their privileges with a single-minded determination; and bask in a sense of entitlement that justifies everything they do. And they are both completely resistant to new technology, even if it could transform both the quality and the efficiency of the service they are meant to be delivering. They could both move with the times if they wanted to. But it would cause too much inconvenience for the staff. Instead, they are perfectly happy to prop each other up – with the long-suffering taxpayer left to foot the bill for both of them. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who can and can't give blood, as NHS calls for donations
The NHS is calling for 200,000 new donors to come forward as it warns of a "challenging" blood supply shortage. Currently only 2% of the population – just under 800,000 people – supports the entire UK blood supply. Since last year, the health service has been on "amber alert" – meaning supplies have dwindled to the point that it may impact patient treatment. Now, experts are warning that things have turned "critical" and are nearing "red alert" status. Here, we take a look at the criteria for donating blood – as well as the most common blood types and how to sign up. According to Give Blood, the general criteria for donating is: That you are aged 17-65 You're generally fit and healthy You weigh between 7 stone 12 lbs and 25 stone You have suitable veins You meet all donor eligibility You cannot donate blood if: You've got some heart conditions, such as heart palpitations, abnormal heartbeat – or if you've had a heart attack, stroke, a heart bypass or you were born with a congenital heart defect You have tested positive for HIV You've had an organ transplant You have had most types of cancer You have received blood, platelets, plasma or any other blood products after 1 January 1980 You carry hepatitis B or C You've injected non-prescription drugs – including body-building and injectable tanning agents You may be asked to wait to donate blood if: You've given blood too recently – Providing you're otherwise eligible, men can give blood every 12 weeks and women can give blood every 16 weeks. You are pregnant or you've had a baby in the past six months – You will not be permitted to give blood while pregnant. Nor can you donate blood if you had a blood transfusion during your pregnancy or delivery. If you are trying to conceive it is not recommended, as you'll require all iron stores if/when you do fall pregnant. Once you have passed the six-month post-delivery mark, you may be able to donate blood. You've recently got a tattoo or a piercing – Although most tattoo and piercing parlours offer safe services, the introduction of a foreign object to the body still carries risk, and so to protect the recipient of the blood, donors must wait for four months after having a tattoo of piercing before they can give blood. This includes microblading or semi-permanent make-up, as well as acupuncture. You feel ill at the time of donation – It's common for donors to feel faint or anxious before, during and after the procedure, but if you are feeling unwell you must flag ahead of time, as it is important that you do not carry any infection at the time of donating. In order to donate, you must be healed and recovered from an infection for at least 14 days prior. You're undergoing medical assessment – Similarly, if you are undergoing medical tests and assessments, you may have to wait before you donate blood. You travel to and from certain countries outside of the UK – You can check whether your travels impact your eligibility to give blood here. You've had a new sexual partner in the past three months – Regardless of gender, if you've had anal sex with a new partner in the past three months, you might not be able to give blood. Similarly, if you finished taking Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) or Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) in the last three months, you'll have to wait. You've had sexual contact with a partner who is – HIV positive, HTLV positive, carries hepatitis B or C, syphilis positive, has injected non-prescribed drugs, has received money or drugs for sex. You will need to wait at least three months. If you have any health conditions or you're on medication, you can check your eligibility at the NHS Give Blood website here. O positive is the most common blood type, accounting for roughly 35% of donors. It's followed by blood type A positive, with around 30% of donors falling into this category. The rarest, meanwhile, is AB negative, with just 1% of donors falling into this category. If you would like to sign up to donate blood or plasma, you can do so at the Give Blood website here. You can also call them on 0300 123 23 23. The NHS site also outlines which donor centres have availability today – you can check here. Some sites also welcome walk-ins. You can find your nearest centre here. Read more about health 10 foods that may reduce your risk of developing dementia (Yahoo Life UK 7-min read) 7 myths and truths about inducing labour, from dancing to spicy food (Yahoo Life UK 6-min read) Are nicotine pouches as bad as vaping and smoking? (Yahoo life UK. 6-min read)
