The Road To War: Family feud that sparked Sydney's gang wars
The most recent was a triple shooting in the heart of Sydney's west, which critically injured a female kebab shop worker who was caught in the crossfire.
Alleged underworld figure and the man at the 'epicentre' of a simmering underworld feud, Samimjan Azari, 26, was targeted for the fourth time last Monday when two masked men stormed a Turkish food outlet at Auburn and opened fire on him and another man acting as his bodyguard.
The underworld war that has been ongoing since late-2020 has escalated to a new level, something many who have followed closely in recent years would have thought was impossible.
But gang wars are not a new thing for the suburbs of the Harbour City, in fact, they have been raging - with highs and lows - for the best part of the last 20 years.
A new doco-series from The Daily Telegraph delves into Sydney's first gangland war between the Razzaks and the Darwiches.
The conflict between the two began in the wake of the Sydney Olympics as the two families went toe-to-toe, gunning each other down in public and spraying the opponents' homes with more bullets than police could count.
At one point, the Darwiches even considered using a rocket launcher to annihilate their rivals.
The Road to War is the latest docu miniseries from The Daily Telegraph, taking you inside the biggest gang conflicts this city has seen.
Episode one 'Til Death Do Us Part - which was released today - looks at how a drug dealer being robbed in 2001 sparked the city's first gangland war.
It started when Bilal Razzak robbed a drug dealer who worked for a rival crime family, the Darwhiches in early 2001. Tensions simmered for two years before an all out war broke out the likes which Sydney had never seen.
How to watch The Road To War
After Bilal Razzak robbed the drug dealer he was confronted by Adnan Darwiche and his enforcer, Khaled Taleb and bashed at a Bankstown shopping centre.
Tit-for-tat drive-by shootings followed before Ali Abdul-Razzak, who was married to the sister of Adnan Darwiche, arranged a sit-down of the two factions. It failed and violence reigned on Sydney's streets for the next eight years.
In 2009, the final chapter played out when Abdul Darwiche was shot in front of his family as he walked out of a restaurant in Bass Hill.
'It was unprecedented. There had been nothing like this before. The underworld killers like Neddy Smith and the like did their business quietly. They more often than not disposed of the bodies in shallow graves,'' says retired Detective Superintendent Stuart Wilkins.
'This was in your face, confronting intimidation and violence against police and the public. They would shoot and leave bodies in car parks, outside restaurants and service stations. Wherever, wherever they decided to attack somebody, they were shot and killed.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
5 minutes ago
- ABC News
Spit hoods return to the NT as chief minister sprays critics as 'offender apologists'
The Royal Darwin Show usually makes headlines for its prize-winning pumpkins and scones, not setting the political agenda in the Top End of Australia. But when the show became a crime scene on Saturday night, that's exactly what transpired, after a 15-year-old boy was allegedly stabbed by another 15-year-old boy and left in a serious condition. Cue the Northern Territory government's political rhetoric on social media: It would make "no apologies" for toughening up a "broken system" by changing the Youth Justice Act. Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro led the charge by saying she expected the "usual offender apologists to criticise our efforts". "They should look Territorians in the eye and say that kids witnessing senseless violence at a family show is okay," she wrote on social media. The statement laid out the blueprint for the week ahead — you're with us, or you're against us. By the end of the week, the government had rolled out its planned changes, including bringing back spit hoods in youth detention settings and removing the principle of detention as a last resort. Both are measures the royal commission into youth detention in the Northern Territory, sparked by a 2016 Four Corners investigation, explicitly recommended against. On social media and radio text lines, voters commended the government's tough stance. On the other side of the debate, there were condemnations of the changes — from health and justice advocacy groups, not-for-profit organisations and Aboriginal peak bodies — as a "catastrophic step backwards" for young First Nations people. The new chief executive of the North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency, Ben Grimes, warned of a flood of youths into detention before the system was properly bolstered to deal with the influx. "It's sort of like saying you're going to increase a school population by a thousand children, but not hiring any more teachers, building any more rooms or providing any more resources," he said. So-called "offender apologists" were offered limited airtime within parliament house. Ms Finocchiaro told a group of NT paediatricians who had written to her expressing "deep concern" over this week's changes that they were wasting their time. "I will do my job, which is to run the NT, and they can do their job, which is to look after sick children," she said. The chief also sledged Opposition Leader Selena Uibo in parliament, saying while her party did not win the election, "she wins the award for being the biggest gutter trash politician in the chamber". And an all-out "personal" attack on NT Coroner Elisabeth Armitage by Prevention of Domestic Violence Minister Robyn Cahill drew the ire of the sector. Eight months after a landmark inquiry into four murdered women, the minister's official response accused the coroner of lacking humility and delivering "uninspiring" recommendations. Alarmed lawyers and advocates returned serve, accusing the minister of "undermining" Judge Armitage's judicial role. Deputy Opposition Leader Chansey Paech also weighed in, saying Territorians expected accountability and action from the Country Liberal Party (CLP) government. "What they're getting from the CLP is blame-shifting, bullying and finger-pointing," he said. "The CLP government has no credible plan to make our communities safer, no strategy to improve the justice system and no willingness to accept responsibility — so instead, they attack the coroner." The NT government won last year's territory election with a massive landslide, and it is continuing to deliver on the tough-on-crime law changes it promised, no matter the concern or criticism. "This Youth Justice Legislation Amendment Bill … is part of our election commitments," Ms Finocchiaro said this week. "It is a part of our plan to continue to reduce crime across the Northern Territory." And, according to Ms Finocchiaro, the changes are something that have won the applause of "tens of thousands of Territorians who agree with us". She may well be right. But ignoring or undermining experts and judicial officials may also come with great risk. Earlier this week, the ABC revealed more than 400 youths had been taken into custody at police watch houses during the first six months of the government's time in power. The laws passed this week will likely see that number climb even higher — but anyone who raises that point is likely to be shot down as an "apologist" by a government hell-bent on pursuing its agenda.
ABC News
35 minutes ago
- ABC News
Man sentenced for lighting own unit on fire out of frustration at noisy neighbours
A Canberra man who tried to claim he was acting in self-defence when he set his own unit on fire, because he was frustrated after years of loud music from his neighbour, has been sentenced for arson in the ACT Supreme Court. Steven Kazmar-Hall, 39, was found guilty of arson after he set the fire in April last year. The court heard he had run up the street afterwards to escape the fire. The court rejected his self-defence argument that he had set the fire out of frustration because of mental health effects from noise he had endured for three years. Acting Justice Rebecca Christensen said in her judgement, the fire left the home uninhabitable, although it did not spread beyond his unit. The evidence presented in the trial included photographs of the "sizeable sound system" that was used by the neighbour in his unit. Acting Justice Christensen said it was a serious offence that put other vulnerable residents at risk. "Not only was their safety, and their lives, put at risk, but a number of tenants seemingly experienced significant distress from the fire," Acting Justice Christensen said. "The offender himself at the trial described that there were people 'screaming' after his conduct." But Acting Justice Christensen said Kazmar-Hall's culpability was reduced. "This would lead to significant distress and frustration for anyone, let alone a person suffering the mental health challenges of the offender." But Acting Justice Christensen said it was still serious offending. Kazmar-Hall has been in custody since the fire. He was sentenced to eight months in jail, but was freed after the sentencing because he had already served his time.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Before the Falconio trial, Bradley John Murdoch was accused and acquitted of rape and abduction
Before Bradley John Murdoch was arrested for English backpacker Peter Falconio's disappearance and the attempted kidnapping of Joanne Lees, the killer faced charges of raping a woman and her 12-year-old daughter. WARNING: This story contains content that some readers may find upsetting. He was eventually acquitted of all charges relating to the case, but the events of the alleged 20-hour kidnapping ordeal that were relayed in the South Australian District Court have some similarities to the Falconio and Lees case. In 2003, more than two years after Murdoch had killed Mr Falconio at Barrow Creek in the Northern Territory, a court heard the mother and daughter, who were allegedly abducted from their Riverland home, were also bound, gagged and sexually assaulted during the 20-hour ordeal. The mother, who cannot be named, told the court that as the alleged incident came to an end, she did not know if she and her daughter would survive. "After the trailer was packed up, he sat near the trailer staring at us … and I didn't know if he was going to let us go or not," she said in 2003. "Are you going to kill us?" she asked. In the South Australian case, Murdoch was charged with two counts of rape, two counts of abduction, assault and two counts of indecent assault, but he was later acquitted. According to the court transcripts, Murdoch, who died on July 15, had been a regular guest at the Riverland home the mother and daughter shared with the mother's de facto partner, who was away receiving cancer treatment in Adelaide. They had known each other for 18 months. It was alleged that when he stayed, Murdoch used a small guest house at the back of the property as an occasional base for his drug-running operation between the Riverland and Broome, in Western Australia. On his last visit to the property in August 2002, Murdoch, who the court heard was using amphetamines and cannabis daily, put black plastic on the windows of the small flat. The court heard on the pretence of helping him unpack maps, Murdoch asked the 12-year-old daughter to come out to the guest house before he allegedly raped her. "I think he said: 'If you move, I'll give you brain damage'," she told the court. She said Murdoch carried her out to his LandCruiser and chained her up before going inside to the main house to abduct her mother. Prosecutor Liesl Chapman, now District Court Judge Liesl Kudelka, said in her opening statement to the jury that Murdoch told the mother: "Shut up and put some warm clothes on" before he took her outside. "The accused was wearing a gun in his shoulder holster," Ms Chapman said. "She saw the LandCruiser and [her daughter] in the back. "The accused said to [her], 'I need some insurance to get away from this place, get in the back or I'll shoot you'." The prosecution said that Murdoch had spoken about the disappearance of Peter Falconio several times before and during the abduction. "[The mother] asked the accused, 'Why are you doing this?'" Ms Chapman said. "He said words to the effect, 'you were in the wrong place at the wrong time'. "He said that the cops had framed him for the Falconio murder and that's why he was on the run. "He kept saying that he was being framed." Ms Chapman said he told the mother he was going to Western Australia to kill a fellow drug associate and planned to turn the gun on himself. "The Crown case is that his state of mind about being framed for a very high-profile murder explains his extreme criminal behaviour in South Australia," Ms Chapman said. "He was paranoid that he was being set up. "He was using amphetamines, commonly known as speed, which … can increase paranoia. "At that stage he didn't care anymore, he raped a 12-year-old girl and then took her and her mother as insurance in order to get out of there." Bradley John Murdoch's defence team argued in court that the case against him was a "made-up story". The court heard that there was a "conspiracy against" Murdoch created by his enemies, to frame him for the murder of Peter Falconio and that the claims of rape, abduction, assault and sexual assault were part of a "set-up". Just three days before he arrived in the Riverland, Murdoch's brother had given DNA evidence to Northern Territory police and the Falconio investigation team had Bradley Murdoch in its sights. The court heard in the early hours of Thursday, August 22, 2002, Murdoch drove away from the Riverland property with the mother and daughter shackled in the back. "I did what I was told because he had a gun," the mother said in court. "I was so scared I didn't know if he was going to shoot me and [my daughter]. "She [the daughter] was white as a ghost and she was terrified." The mother said they were initially handcuffed, and Murdoch stopped the LandCruiser three times over the next 20 hours, during which he was also alleged to have raped the mother. He also bound them with cable ties, similar to the ones used when Murdoch abducted Joanne Lees. She described him at one point as like "a raging bull". "He was verging on psychotic, like really angry and terrifying," the mother said. Eventually, she demanded Murdoch cut the cable ties off as they were hurting their wrists and cutting her daughter's circulation. The court heard the mother told the accused he was "pathetic for tying up a 12-year-old child". Then the court heard his mood changed, he brought clothes out for the pair and became "more sympathetic". "To me it seemed like he thought that he had done nothing wrong and he was just talking to us normally like he used to when we used to be friends," the mother said. The court heard he eventually dropped the pair at a Port Augusta service station and gave them $1,000 to get home, before allegedly making a final threat to kill them if they went to police. The mother and daughter said even after being released they remained fearful that he was still in the area watching them. They caught a cab to the Royal Adelaide Hospital, where the mother's partner was, but a report wasn't made to police for another five days. Murdoch was arrested by heavily-armed police outside a Port Augusta supermarket, and was remanded in custody to face court in South Australia. Inside the LandCruiser after Murdoch's arrest police alleged they found chains, clothes, cannabis, methamphetamine and $5,000. But, during a two-week trial, the prosecution failed to make its case and Murdoch was acquitted. Seconds later, as he walked out of the court, he was arrested inside Adelaide's Samuel Way building for Peter Falconio's murder and the abduction of Joanne Lees and escorted through a media scrum outside. He was then taken to Darwin where he was found guilty in 2005. Central Queensland University criminologist, Associate Professor Xanthe Mallett, said while there were obviously similarities between the Falconio and Lees case and the Riverland allegations, ultimately the South Australian jury could not be convinced of Murdoch's guilt. "It is a big deal to come forward, it turns your life upside down, it re-traumatises the victim-survivors and so to go through all of that and then for the perpetrator to be found not guilty is heartbreaking," Dr Mallett said. "We are talking 20 years ago, if there was gap between the alleged crime and somebody reporting then that certainly made it harder to prove … and sex crimes are very hard to prove anyway. Dr Mallett said it could be very hard to prove criminal cases beyond what a jury considered reasonable doubt. "Even if, on the balance of all the evidence, they think they probably are [guilty], that doubt is what makes the difference and that can be a very difficult level to achieve," Dr Mallett said. South Australia's Commissioner for Victim's Rights Sarah Quick said sexual assaults remained difficult to successfully prosecute, in part, because victims' evidence was often "fragmented, confused, and non-linear recollections are common". "The cumulative effect of giving evidence, being cross-examined, and then not being believed is deeply distressing," Commissioner Quick said. "Research demonstrates that harmful misconceptions and stereotypes about sexual assault remain widespread."
