
The Motley Fool's Market Volatility Toolkit
Foreword: Paying the Cost of Admission
By Morgan Housel
The stock market is the greatest wealth-generating machine history has ever known. Every dollar invested in the S&P 500 at the start of 1925 is today worth $1,285 -- and that's adjusted for inflation.
The fact that this money machine is available to ordinary people would have seemed preposterous to someone even two generations ago. In 1929, 5% of Americans owned stocks. Today, more than 60% do. Many of them will get rich by owning a slice of American businesses.
If the story ended there, this would sound like a fairytale.
But let me introduce you to the first law of economics: Everything worthwhile has a price. And now, the first law of personal finance: Find the price, and be willing to pay it.
Successful investing demands a price. But its currency is not dollars and cents. It's volatility, fear, doubt, uncertainty, and regret -- all of which are easy to overlook until you're dealing with them in real time.
Say you want to earn an 11% annual return over the next 30 years so you can retire in peace. Does this reward come free? Of course not. The world is never that nice. There's a price tag -- a bill that must be paid.
Remember that period I told you about when the stock market increased 1,200-fold? Here's what happened during those beautiful years:
Stocks fell at least 10% more than 100 times. That's an average of once every 11 months.
It fell 15% more than 40 times. Or about once every two years.
It fell more than 20% at least 23 times. Call it once every four years.
On 10 separate occasions, it fell more than 30%.
Three times, it has lost more than half its value.
During a sensational period of wealth creation, the market served up a constant parade of volatility, fear, doubt, and confusion.
Here's the kicker: Not only is stock market volatility normal, but it is also the cost of admission.
The entire reason the stock market can produce great long-term returns is that its short-term returns are volatile and unpredictable. If you want tranquility, cash and bonds can provide it -- for a far lower return.
The cause of most investing problems -- most, that is not an exaggeration -- is viewing market volatility not as the cost of admission, but as an indication of error.
An analogy might help.
If I get pulled over for speeding and am issued a $100 ticket, that is a fine. I did something wrong. I am in trouble. I should not do it again.
If I take my kids out to dinner and the bill is $100, that is a fee. It's the cost of receiving something in return. No one did anything wrong. I will gladly pay it again.
In the vast majority of cases, market volatility is a fee, not a fine.
Volatility is rarely a sign that you screwed up. Dealing with it is the cost of admission that the market makes you pay to receive excellent long-term returns.
And if you want to sum up the skill of the best investors of all time, it's this: They identified the cost of admission, and they became willing to pay it.
Introduction
The Nasdaq has tumbled more than 10% from its December high, officially entering a correction, while the S&P 500 isn't far behind, down over 9%. But this isn't just a tech-driven sell-off -- pressure is mounting across the entire market.
And the fear is only growing. Investment bank Citi (NYSE: C) recently downgraded U.S. stocks to neutral, warning that "U.S. exceptionalism is at least pausing." Adding to the uncertainty, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell signaled that rate cuts the market had been counting on may not be coming anytime soon.
With policy uncertainty rising and economic optimism fading, volatility is surging. The VIX, Wall Street's so-called "fear gauge," has spiked 60% this year -- a clear signal that investors are growing uneasy as the safety net of government support looks increasingly out of reach.
It's with this backdrop that we're bringing investors a comprehensive toolkit about the current environment and the steps to take to ready their portfolios. In it, we'll cover:
The biggest risks threatening the market right now -- and what's driving them.
Actions The Motley Fool is taking today to navigate uncertainty within its products.
A five-part checklist with practical moves long-term investors can make now to prepare for a downturn.
Stay Foolish out there, and remember we're always here to help.
Economic Shifts, Tariffs Breed Uncertainty
A major driver of the market's recent downturn is mounting concern about the impact of the Trump administration's economic policies, from its trade stance and shifting tariffs to widespread job losses and public comments acknowledging turmoil could be ahead. Investors and businesses alike are weighing the fallout -- evidenced by the fact that 383 S&P 500 companies referenced tariffs in their latest earnings calls.
Tariffs function as an import tax, raising costs for companies that rely on foreign goods. This leaves businesses with two options: absorb the added expense or pass it on to consumers.
The pressure is already showing. Best Buy (NYSE: BBY) and Target (NYSE: TGT) have cut sales forecasts, warning that price hikes on essentials like groceries and electronics are inevitable. Delta (NYSE: DAL) and American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL) have also slashed their profit outlooks, citing concerns that economic uncertainty will weaken travel demand.
Critics argue that escalating tariffs are inherently inflationary. Warren Buffett recently likened them to "an act of war, to some degree," while Carlyle CEO Harvey Schwartz warned that trade wars have "sustainably inflationary" effects.
The concerns are reflected in economic data:
Consumer prices rose 2.8% on an annual basis in February, remaining well above the Federal Reserve's 2% target.
Economists estimate the administration's trade policies amount to a $130 billion annual tax increase on Americans, roughly $1,000 in extra costs per household.
The pessimism isn't isolated to boardrooms and trading floors -- it's reaching everyday Americans, too.
Consumer confidence in February posted its sharpest monthly drop since August 2021, and a survey showed they expect inflation to rise by 6% over the next year. That's a troubling signal in an economy where nearly 70% of gross domestic product (GDP) comes from consumer spending. If households start pulling back, growth could stall, increasing the risk of stagflation -- slowing economic activity paired with persistent inflation.
With markets slipping and pessimism rising, it might seem like the worst has passed. But before reaching that conclusion, it's worth considering just how stretched valuations were at the start of 2025.
Fools don't invest alone!
Join the conversation on our Fool24 YouTube stream, live every Monday through Friday from noon to 4 p.m. Eastern. Engage with fellow investors, ask questions, and get insights from our team.
Investors Used to Feel Differently
Investor sentiment was near euphoric at the end of last year. The S&P 500 Shiller CAPE Ratio, a cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings (P/E) metric, stood at 37.1 in December 2024 -- its third-highest level ever, trailing only the dot-com bubble (44.2) and the post-pandemic stimulus surge (38.6).
The enthusiasm spilled into 2025. The Buffett Indicator, which compares total U.S. stock market capitalization to GDP, hit a record 207% in February, surpassing the 195.6% peak from November 2021. Historically, when this ratio exceeds 150%, future stock market returns weaken. Buffett took note -- Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.B) stockpiled over $330 billion in cash and Treasuries rather than buying more equities.
Traditional valuation metrics also flashed warning signs. At its peak in February, the S&P 500 traded at 25 to 26 trailing operating earnings, while its GAAP price-to-earnings ratio topped 29 -- eerily similar to levels seen before the dot-com crash.
History doesn't repeat, but it often rhymes. Extended bull markets with soaring valuations frequently set the stage for turbulence.
Things Could Get Worse
The Atlanta Federal Reserve's GDPNow prediction tool projects a contraction by about 2% in the first quarter of 2025, a sharp reversal from 2.3% growth in the fourth quarter of 2024. Meanwhile, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) economists recently bumped up the risk of a recession in 2025 to 40%. If a slowdown materializes, recession odds rise, and further stock market declines could follow.
The economy and stock market don't always move in lockstep, but history suggests that when growth slows, stocks struggle -- especially when optimism has already been baked into valuations.
Over the last three recessions, the S&P 500 dropped an average of 38.7%. A similar decline remains a real possibility if economic conditions deteriorate.
Returns as of March 11, 2025
Risks in a Top-Heavy Market
Market downturns don't impact all stocks equally. The 2022 pullback saw the S&P 500 Growth Index fall 30.1%, while the Value Index dropped just 7.4%. If history repeats, high-growth names could face steeper losses.
Today's market is more concentrated than ever. The top 10 stocks now make up nearly 40% of the S&P 500's total value -- far exceeding the 27% concentration seen before the dot-com crash or the 23% before the Great Financial Crisis. If these mega-cap stocks stumble, they could take the broader market down with them.
Much of this concentration stems from sky-high valuations. The table below highlights why the "Magnificent 7" stocks may be at risk:
Company Forward P/E Ratio Expected EPS Growth PEG Ratio
Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL) 19.4 11.8% 1.6
Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) 31.5 14.5% 2.2
Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) 31.7 8.7% 3.6
Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) 24.8 5.8% 4.3
Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) 28.5 11.7% 2.4
Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) 25.1 52.7% 0.5
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) 92.2 16% 5.8
average 36.2 17.3% 2.1
Data as of March 11, 2025
Peter Lynch famously wrote, "The P/E ratio of any company that's fairly priced will equal its growth rate." That means a P/E-to-growth (PEG) ratio of 1. High-quality growth companies can still justify ratios up to 1.5, but some of these numbers look stretched -- especially if earnings growth slows in a recession. If the economy slumps due to a trade war, the Magnificent 7 could fall over 20%.
Navigating volatility is never easy for any investor. But it's important to remember that over the last 75 years, the S&P 500 has fallen roughly 10% from highs every year or so. Yet, each time, it has recovered to go onto higher highs. Every. Single. Time.
It often takes a few months, maybe a couple of years. But a diversified basket of U.S. stocks has shown remarkable resiliency since the end of World War II.
And that has created exceptional wealth for investors willing to sit through and invest in down markets. As Morgan Housel has previously written: "Most of the money you make in a bull market actually comes from what you did in the bear market."
There's a big caveat though: The stock market resiliency pertains to a nicely diversified basket of stocks like the S&P 500. The same is not true for any one stock.
Studies show that around 40% of all companies over the last 45 years have fallen more than 70% from their all-time highs and never come back.
Those of us who invested during the COVID-19 boom have likely felt this pain. Stocks ballooned post-pandemic but then deflated during the 2022 interest rate and banking bear market. Many high-flying stocks from four years ago have lagged from their previous highs, while the market as a whole, like historical clockwork, rallied back to all-time highs through last month.
We Live in Interesting Times
While no one can control or predict the broader market, investors can control how they respond and prepare. Understanding the risks, adjusting expectations, and staying focused on long-term fundamentals will be critical in navigating what comes next.
Over three decades at The Motley Fool, we've honed core principles that are our North Star toward long-term investing success. There are no guarantees in investing, but we recommend these tenets in bull and bear markets alike:
Invest in the market only capital you don't need for the next 3 to 5 years.
Own a diversified basket of 25 or more Fool recommendations.
Hold stocks on average for at least 5 years (be an owner not a trader).
Invest regularly through all market conditions.
Hold through market volatility.
Know that your stocks will routinely rise or fall 20% to 50% or more.
Expect 80% of your gains to come from 20% of your stocks.
Let your portfolio's winners continue winning.
Target long-term returns.
Utilize cash positions for ballast and opportunities.
What The Motley Fool Is Doing
With history notes in hand and leading principles in mind, here are some actions our investors are taking as they guide our scorecards.
Stay Invested and Continue Investing
We are not all-in or all-out. We want to keep investing and stay the course in good and bad times. The Fool's analysts are still making recommendations, and we're still buying stocks in our real-money portfolios.
We might make some sells within individual scorecards or portfolios, but we keep our money in the market -- because time in the market is our greatest asset, and no one can time the market. While short-term volatility is painful, there's no way to know when the market will rebound. If you fight the temptation to sell, you can see how staying invested smooths out year-to-year volatility into long-term positive returns:
Add Diversification
Consider diversifying portfolios that lean heavily on volatile growth companies with stable, financially robust, lower-volatility companies and stocks.
For example, over in Stock Advisor, our last two recommendations, healthcare leaders GE HealthCare (NASDAQ: GEHC) and Novo Nordisk (NYSE: NVO), are categorized by our Quant analyst team as "Cautious." We love great growth companies, but it's nice to have some steadier ballast during tumultuous market times.
Watch Large Positions
Be mindful of very large positions. If a stock, even of a great company, has grown to be more than 15% of a portfolio, we'll want to make sure we're very comfortable with the long-term prospects. Run a thought exercise: How would we feel if that stock fell 25% from today?
For example, in the Everlasting Portfolio, we trimmed our position in Arista Networks (NYSE: ANET) from 17% of the portfolio to a more manageable 10%. We remain committed holders of Arista, but its valuation became a little exuberant for that large of a position. Trimming it back helped us manage the risk profile of that $21 million Fool real-money portfolio.
Consider Cash
Do we have some set aside to give our portfolio more optionality during volatile times? Consider a baseline of 5% to 10% and tweak based on risk appetite and portfolio holdings.
The more high-growth and volatile a portfolio is, the more cash we want to have handy. Going back to the Everlasting Portfolio as an example, we carry around 12% cash there, up from 10% a few months ago.
Drawdowns. Corrections. Bear markets. Black Mondays. We can't avoid them. In fact, they're a natural part of the capitalist system.
But we can learn how to manage through them. And even use them to our advantage.
Check out our printable PDF checklist for 5 steps we recommend you take to prepare for market volatility.
Where to invest $1,000 right now
When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is 822% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 162% for the S&P 500.*
They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor.
*Stock Advisor returns as of March 10, 2025
Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Citigroup is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Andy Cross has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Arista Networks, Berkshire Hathaway, Best Buy, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Target, and Tesla. David Meier has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Premium Team has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Arista Networks, Berkshire Hathaway, Best Buy, GE HealthCare Technologies, JPMorgan Chase, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, Target, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Delta Air Lines and Novo Nordisk and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Invest in Quantum Computing Stocks During the TACO Trade?
It's been a hard year for investors so far. As of market close on June 5, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite indexes each have breakeven returns on the year. While this makes it incredibly difficult to make money in the stock market, there have been some pockets during which investors made out well if they chose to engage with higher-than-usual volatility. By now, you may have come across a new acronym floating around financial circles called the "TACO" trade. Below, I'll detail what this means and why it's important. From there, I'll dig into one of the new, hot areas fueling the artificial intelligence (AI) narrative: quantum computing. Could quantum computing stocks be a good way to play the TACO trade? Read on to find out. What is the TACO trade? Even though the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are both flat on the year, the image below illustrates that there have been some pronounced dips and sharp rises across both indexes throughout 2025. The catch is that these volatile movements have been incredibly fleeting. ^SPX data by YCharts The term "TACO trade" is a cheeky acronym that stands for "Trump always chickens out." Basically, whenever the President voiced some tough rhetoric on his new tariff policies, the markets plummeted. However, when he subsequently eases some of the pressure on the tariff talking points, the markets roar again. In summary, the TACO trade is simply a new version of buying the dip when stock prices become abnormally depressed. Are quantum computing stocks a good buy right now? Two of the most popular quantum computing stocks in the market right now are IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) and Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI). During 2024, shares of IonQ soared by 237% while Rigetti stock climbed by a jaw-dropping 1,450% -- both of which completely dominated the broader market. This year has been a different story, though. As of closing bell on June 5, shares of IonQ and Rigetti Computing have plummeted by 12% and 28%, respectively. Given these declines, is now a good opportunity to buy quantum computing stocks? To answer that question, smart investors understand that valuation needs to be a consideration. Per the chart below, Rigetti Computing and IonQ boast price-to-sales (P/S) ratios that seem incongruent with the company's underlying fundamentals. RGTI PS Ratio data by YCharts Looked at another way, IonQ and Rigetti Computing have generated a combined revenue of roughly $50 million over the last 12 months -- all while posting a net loss of $460 million between the two businesses. Given the nominal sales figures and hemorrhaging losses, it's hard to justify the valuation multiples pictured above. While Rigetti and IonQ have each been on a monster run from a share price perspective, both of these companies appear to be riding high on a bullish quantum computing narrative. In other words, their trading levels are not rooted in the actual performance of the business but rather in a broader macro viewpoint that quantum computing could be a good opportunity in the long run. Keep the big picture in focus The big takeaway here is that even though shares of IonQ and Rigetti are down on the year, their respective valuations make it clear that neither of these companies is a good "buy the dip" candidate. Rather, even with their underperformance throughout the year, each stock remains overvalued. For these reasons, I would not chase any sell-offs in these quantum computing stocks as the TACO trade continues to evolve. My suspicion is that both IonQ and Rigetti will experience some continued valuation compression, and their share prices could very well keep spiraling downward. Should you invest $1,000 in IonQ right now? Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025


Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Mike Johnson downplays Musk's influence and says Republicans will pass Trump's tax and budget bill
Published Jun 08, 2025 • 3 minute read Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., wraps up a news conference on President Donald Trump's bill of tax breaks and spending cuts, at the Capitol in Washington, Wednesday, June 4, 2025. Photo by J. Scott Applewhite / AP With an uncharacteristically feistiness, Speaker Mike Johnson took clear sides Sunday in President Donald Trump's breakup with mega-billionaire Elon Musk. The Republican House leader and staunch Trump ally said Musk's criticism of the GOP's massive tax and budget policy bill will not derail the measure, and he downplayed Musk's influence over the GOP-controlled Congress. 'I didn't go out to craft a piece of legislation to please the richest man in the world,' Johnson said on ABC's 'This Week.' 'What we're trying to do is help hardworking Americans who are trying to provide for their families and make ends meet,' Johnson insisted. Johnson said he has exchanged text messages with Musk since the former chief of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency came out against the GOP bill. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Speaker Mike Johnson on the Trump-Musk feud: 'Hopefully these two titans can reconcile. I think the president's head is in the right place … There's a lot of emotion involved in it, but it's in the interest of the country for everybody to work together.' — This Week (@ThisWeekABC) June 8, 2025 Musk called it an 'abomination' that would add to U.S. debts and threaten economic stability. He urged voters to flood Capitol Hill with calls to vote against the measure, which is pending in the Senate after clearing the House. His criticism sparked an angry social media back-and-forth with Trump, who told reporters over the weekend that he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk. The speaker was dismissive of Musk's threats to finance opponents — even Democrats — of Republican members who back Trump's bill. 'We've got almost no calls to the offices, any Republican member of Congress,' Johnson said. 'And I think that indicates that people are taking a wait and see attitude. Some who may be convinced by some of his arguments, but the rest understand: this is a very exciting piece of legislation.' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Johnson argued that Musk still believes 'that our policies are better for human flourishing. They're better for the US economy. They're better for everything that he's involved in with his innovation and job creation and entrepreneurship.' RECOMMENDED VIDEO The speaker and other Republicans, including Trump's White House budget chief, continued their push back Sunday against forecasts that their tax and budget plans will add to annual deficits and thus balloon a national debt already climbing toward $40 trillion. Johnson insisted that Musk has bad information, and the speaker disputed the forecasts of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office that scores budget legislation. The bill would extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts, cut spending and reduce some other levies but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over the decade, according to the CBO's analysis. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The speaker countered with arguments Republicans have made for decades: That lower taxes and spending cuts would spur economic growth that ensure deficits fall. Annual deficits and the overall debt actually climbed during the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, and during Trump's first presidency, even after sweeping tax cuts. Russell Vought, who leads the White House Office of Budget and Management, said on Fox News Sunday that CBO analysts base their models of 'artificial baselines.' Because the 2017 tax law set the lower rates to expire, CBO's cost estimates, Vought argued, presuming a return to the higher rates before that law went into effect. Vought acknowledged CBO's charge from Congress is to analyze legislation and current law as it is written. But he said the office could issue additional analyses, implying it would be friendlier to GOP goals. Asked whether the White House would ask for alternative estimates, Vought again put the burden on CBO, repeating that congressional rules allow the office to publish more analysis. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More Other Republicans, meanwhile, approached the Trump-Musk battle cautiously. 'As a former professional fighter, I learned a long time ago, don't get between two fighters,' said Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin on CNN's 'State of the Union.' He even compared the two billionaire businessmen to a married couple. 'President Trump is a friend of mine but I don't need to get, I can have friends that have disagreements,' Mullin said. 'My wife and I dearly love each other and every now and then, well actually quite often, sometimes she disagrees with me, but that doesn't mean that we can't stay focused on what's best for our family. Right now, there may be a disagreement but we're laser focused on what is best for the American people.' — Associated Press journalist Gary Fields contributed from Washington. Sports Canada Sunshine Girls World Crime


Edmonton Journal
3 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Trump's tax and budget bill was written for 'hardworking Americans, not 'to please' Musk: Mike Johnson
Article content 'I didn't go out to craft a piece of legislation to please the richest man in the world,' Johnson said on ABC's 'This Week.' 'What we're trying to do is help hardworking Americans who are trying to provide for their families and make ends meet,' Johnson insisted. Johnson said he has exchanged text messages with Musk since the former chief of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency came out against the GOP bill. Raymond J. de Souza: This Trump-Musk cage match could be seen coming Musk called it an 'abomination' that would add to U.S. debts and threaten economic stability. He urged voters to flood Capitol Hill with calls to vote against the measure, which is pending in the Senate after clearing the House. His criticism sparked an angry social media back-and-forth with Trump, who told reporters over the weekend that he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk.