Thomasville hospital receives an A in national health care report
THOMASVILLE — A semiannual national health care report gave one Davidson County-based hospital an A grade and the another a B.
Novant Health Thomasville Medical Center received an A in the nonprofit watchdog The Leapfrog Group's spring 2025 report, while Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Lexington Medical Center in Lexington received a B.
Novant Health has received the most A hospital safety grades in North Carolina for the fourth consecutive grading period. The nine recognized N.C. Novant Health hospitals, including Thomasville Medical, outperformed nearly 70% of hospitals nationwide for safety and quality with A grades.
'Our team members' faithful commitment to providing safe, high-quality care for each patient shines through in this recognition,' said Dr. David Priest, senior vice president and chief safety and quality officer for Novant Health. 'We are proud of our collective efforts to keep safety and quality at the center of everything we do. While these scores reflect a certain timeframe and set of criteria, they allow our teams to continually monitor benchmarks and set even higher goals to ensure we are constantly improving to create a healthier future for every patient and community we serve.'
A spokesperson for Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist said, 'We are committed to always providing the highest levels of safe, high-quality care to our patients and the communities we serve, and we remain dedicated to constant improvement.'
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist also received a B in 2024.
The Leapfrog Group reviews hospital and patient outcomes across the United States based on more than 30 performance measures focused on safety, quality and patient experience. Each assessment results in a letter grade ranging from A to F. Scores are released twice a year, in the spring and fall.
Leapfrog researchers said they have determined that when compared with a hospital rated an A, patients face on average a 35% greater risk of avoidable death at a B hospital, an 88% greater risk at a C hospital and a 92% greater risk at a D or F hospital.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Boil in the bag' funerals could be introduced in UK after European roll-out in Ireland
"Boil in a bag" funerals - already used widely in America - could soon be made available across the UK. This environmentally friendly, yet controversial, way to say your final goodbyes to a loved one has already been rolled out in Ireland back in 2023 and could come to the UK next. This unusual method, officially known as water cremation or alkaline hydrolysis, is currently effectively banned in the UK, but could well get the legal go-ahead following the independent Law Commission's new consultation into funerary methods. READ MORE: Dad, 32, who flew to Turkey for family holiday dies hours after being escorted off plane READ MORE: Met Office verdict on UK heatwave this WEEK as temperatures to climb to 29C Already available across 30 US states, as well as Canada and South Africa, the first European water cremation facility, or resomation, opened its doors in early 2023 in Navan, Co Meath, Ireland. Traditional burials can lead to embalming fluid seeping into the grave soil, while each gas-powered fire cremation releases around 245kg of CO2 into the atmosphere, according to UK-based cemetery and crematorium development the CDS Group. By comparison, figures from Resomation Ltd, the founding body for alkaline hydrolysis, show just 28kg of CO2 is released into the atmosphere per water cremation. Unlike conventional cremations, these eco-friendly farewells, which take between three to four hours, also don't release harmful mercury emissions into the atmosphere. But you might be wondering how the process actually works. Well, first the body is loaded into the alkaline hydrolysis machine, which calculates the amount of water and potassium hydroxide required. The machine locks and an alkaline solution fills the pressurised tank, which is gently heated to 152C. The remains get broken into their chemical components - amino acids, peptides, sugars and salt - leaving behind a liquid that is then cooled in another tank until sterile and free from any remaining tissue or DNA. Around 330 gallons of brown-coloured liquid will be washed down the drain, while the softened bones are ground to powder in a reducer, and presented in an urn to the grieving family. In 2017, Wired journalist Hayley Campbell described the process in colourful detail after seeing a resomator in action at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Hayley wrote: "Over the course of up to four hours, the strong alkaline base causes everything but the skeleton to break down to the original components that built it: sugar, salt, peptides and amino acids; DNA unzips into its nucleobases, cytosine, guanine, adenine, thymine. "The body becomes fertiliser and soap, a sterile watery liquid that looks like weak tea. The liquid shoots through a pipe into a holding tank in the opposite corner of the room, where it will cool down, be brought down to an acceptable pH for the water treatment plant, and be released down the drain." Noting that "it's not actually that terrible", Hayley revealed: "The human body, liquefied, smells like steamed clams." Highlighting why this process is still a bit of a taboo in an interview with The Telegraph, Dr Lian Lundy, a wastewater specialist from Middlesex University, explained: "Some people view it as basically mixing up my loved one with poo in the sewer and they don't like that. "But there's a lot that goes into the sewer that we don't really think about – waste from mortuaries and hospitals and all sorts of things that we don't know about – so from that perspective, it's not really any different."
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Honey Recall Map Shows Warnings Issued to Customers in 7 States
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced its classification of a recall of certain Comvita honey products, affecting seven states. Comvita, a California-based company, recalled three of its manuka honey products last month as the induction seal was not properly fitted, meaning the product was leaking on the packaging. Newsweek has contacted Comvita outside of regular working hours via email for comment. File photo: a teaspoon with a jar full of honey. File photo: a teaspoon with a jar full of honey. Oliver Berg/dpa via AP Why It Matters Maintaining packaging standards is important as it can make consumers feel more assured that companies have followed regulatory guidance more closely, and ensured their products are properly manufactured and controlled. Given that many Americans are concerned about food safety and food recalls, maintaining standards and regulations are even more important if brands want to establish consumer trust. What To Know The affected products include: Comvita's Manuka Honey + Lion's Mane for Focus (355g), with lot codes 34828522 and 34835584, and expiration dates of January 21, 2026 and February 21, 2026 respectively Comvita's Manuka Honey + Cordyceps for Energy (355g) with lot codes 34828523 and 34835585, and expiration dates of January 22, 2026 and February 25, 2026 respectively Comvita's Manuka Honey + Reishi (355g) with lot codes 34828521 and 34835574, and expiration dates of January 21, 2026 and February 24, 2026 respectively There were 2,730 units sold of each product, to various states including Colorado, Arizona, Texas, Maryland, Florida, California, and Georgia. Comvita initiated the recall on May 23, and the FDA announced its classification of the recall on June 9. The FDA classification of the recall was a Class II, meaning it is a situation "in which use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote." What People Are Saying Professor Byron Chaves, a professor and food safety extension specialist in the department of Food Science and Technology at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, told Newsweek: "An induction seal is a protective seal commonly found on food containers, like jars or bottles, just under the cap. It's created using heat to attach a foil liner to the container's opening, forming a tight, tamper-evident seal. This helps prevent leaks, keeps the product fresh, and shows if the package has been opened." He added: "If an induction seal isn't properly applied, it can lead to leaks, contamination, and reduced shelf life. It also means the package may not show evident signs of tampering, which can raise safety concerns. In some cases, it could lead to regulatory issues or loss of consumer trust if the product appears unsafe or poorly sealed." What Happens Next Consumers are advised not to consume the affected products and return them to the place of purchase for a refund. As of June 9, the recall remains ongoing. The FDA did not specify if any illnesses had been reported in relation to the recall.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Woman Visits Gym Every Week, but There's a Twist: 'Need This'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A savvy woman has shared the only reason she goes to the gym once a week—and it isn't to work out. The TikTok clip, shared by @almillishit, has gathered 4.6 million views and 316,400 likes. It shows a spray tan machine, and the text overlaid explains that she pays $25 a month for a fitness membership "just to get a weekly spray and never actually work out." The Delaware-based woman told another user: "I'm genuinely so lucky [and] grateful." Some users expressed their envy, and said: "So jealous. Mine only has tanning booths!!!" Many users are impressed with the woman's money-saving hack, as the average cost of a spray tan is generally between $25 and $60, according to The Knot. "That's cheaper than the tanning bed I pay for at the salon each month," said one user, and another wrote: "Damn. I just paid $40 for one level 1 spray tan." "This should be it instead of the tanning beds," suggested a third user. In the comments, the woman tells another user that she is "scared" of sunbeds, most likely because sunlamps and sunbeds—including tanning beds and booths—are classified as known human carcinogens. A stock image of women using her phone in a gym. A stock image of women using her phone in a gym. Oscar Gutierrez Zozulia/iStock / Getty Images Plus Are Spray Tans Safe? According to the American Cancer Society, the amount and type of ultraviolet (UV) radiation a person receives from tanning beds depend on several factors: the type of lamps used, the duration of exposure, and the frequency of use. Most tanning beds primarily emit UVA rays, with a smaller proportion being UVB, which is a risk factor for all types of skin cancer. As a safer alternative, many people opt for sunless tanning methods such as fake tan products or sprays. These products work by interacting with proteins on the surface of the skin to create a temporary darkening effect, mimicking a natural tan. Like a real tan, the color gradually fades over several days. Most sunless tanning products contain an FDA-approved ingredient called dihydroxyacetone (DHA), a color additive used specifically for external application. When used correctly, these products are generally considered safe. However, the American Cancer Society cautions that DHA should only be used on the skin's surface and not: Inhaled through the nose or mouth. Ingested. Applied to areas with mucous membranes (such as the eyes, nose, or lips). If you're considering using a sunless tanning product, consult your doctor—especially if you have sensitive skin or health concerns. It's also important to note that most of these products do not provide sun protection. Even if a product contains sunscreen, its effectiveness typically lasts only a few hours. To reduce the risk of skin damage and skin cancer, continue using broad-spectrum sunscreen and wearing protective clothing when spending time outdoors. Newsweek has reached out to @almillishit for comment via email. We could not verify the details of the case. Do you have any clever hacks you use to make life easier (or cheaper) that you want to share? Send them to life@ with some details and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.
